Thanks for remind me CBT.
It slip off my mind.
Arye.
On 30 January 2010 19:24, Bob Shannon bshan...@rocketsoftware.com wrote:
If the dynamic steplib that stopped working was STEPLIB, an updated version
that works with 1.11 (and earlier) is available on the CBT Tape.
Bob Shannon
Rocket
Unfortunately I don't have the data available anymore from last week. For
another PMR at IBM I had to change the RMF intervall from 1h to 15min and
the higher amount of data shortens the available period in RMF3. It's time
to adjust the dataset sizes.. But this week is expected to get again
Jim,
we don't have DB2 in SYSSTC, just the IRLMs. Application Server run in an
own SC with a high goal, but still lower than SYSSTC.
Werner Kuehnel
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu schrieb am 29.01.2010
16:18:18:
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Werner Kuehnel
We running on z10 with 16 processors (1264 MSUs), however our LPAR just
has 2 logical processors with 40 MSUs.
Werner Kuehnel
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu schrieb am 29.01.2010
17:02:32:
Werner,
I'm curious, how many CPU's?
--- On Fri, 1/29/10, Werner Kuehnel
We running on z10 with 16 processors (1264 MSUs), however our LPAR just
has 2 logical processors with 40 MSUs.
Tried already to shift TCPIP into SYSTEM, but is not allowed. WLM can not
starve STCs defined in SYSSTC. Why does WLM not cut the processor
for the batch jobs which are defined
Lizette,
This STC is not shared by other LPARS. Thanks for your help.
--- On Mon, 2/1/10, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com wrote:
From: Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com
Subject: Re: DFHSM QUESTION - ARC1151I :RECALL PROBLEM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Received: Monday, February 1,
David,
I checked. The RECYCLE started at 07:30. However, this job started at 06:00
and finally abended at 06:56. I will keep on digging because the user wants an
answer.
--- On Mon, 2/1/10, O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C] obrie...@mail.nih.gov
wrote:
From: O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT)
If I understand you have only one LPAR running DFHSM? You have no other
LPARs that can use this DFHSM environment? Do they share DASD or TAPE that
might have been needed by this request?
The MCDS, OCDS, CDS are all used by one LPAR and one DFHSM? I am just
trying to understand your
Cannot find anything.
Are they simply parallel values for APF authorized routines?
--
Binyamin Dissen bdis...@dissensoftware.com
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar Grill - Israel
Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should
1. Check all things TCP for where they run.
There is also a subsystem type TCP, do you have this defined? Or is
there
anything in service class SYSOTHER?
All TCP related STCs are running with SYSSTC, no address spaces in
SYSOTHER.
I don't have any subsystem type TCP defined in WLM, do I
snip
I don't have any subsystem type TCP defined in WLM, do I really need
that?
/snip
There is no such thing by default. It could be created with a fair
amount of work.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
On Mon, 1 Feb 2010 07:47:34 -0600, Staller, Allan allan.stal...@kbm1.com
wrote:
snip
I don't have any subsystem type TCP defined in WLM, do I really need
that?
/snip
There is no such thing by default. It could be created with a fair
amount of work.
A fair amount of work?? Under subsystem
Eureka. I found it. It was an ABARS job which was holding the dsns. The user
had submitted the ABARS job about 10 minutes before the batch job which was
trying to recall the same dsns.
Thanks to all who responded.
--- On Mon, 2/1/10, O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C] obrie...@mail.nih.gov
Esmie,
Your recall should not have failed. Recall should have taken the tape away
from the abackup - then the abackup would try to backup any further datasets
later.
From the zOS 1.9 DFSMShsm Storage Administration Guide:
Function that has the tape - ABACKUP
Function that needs the tape -
I can't recall if we talked about this already, but does anyone know what
happened to the MVS Data Areas for z/OS 1.10 and z/OS 1.11 for downloading?
I can't find them with Softcopy Librarian on either the BookManager bookshelves
or the PDF extended bookshelves. However, I do see them in both
Never mind. It was in the manual.
--
Binyamin Dissen bdis...@dissensoftware.com
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar Grill - Israel
Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain.
I very
Hi,
I am getting messages while defining non-vsam datasets :
IEC331I 020-000(2908001C),H2FAIPA3,UTIL0003,IGG0CLEG
IEC331I CATALOG.TEST01.USER
IEC331I FCIS.ZZZ.ON.CCISCHZZ.P7.D100130
IEC332I PADD,NVSM,IDVR,CDVR,ACD1
IEC333I L028(041),08,CATALOG.TEST01.USER,FCIS.ZZZ.ON.CCISCHZZ.P7.D100130
I can't recall if we talked about this already, but does anyone know what
happened to the MVS Data Areas for z/OS 1.10 and z/OS 1.11 for downloading?
I can't find them with Softcopy Librarian on either the BookManager
bookshelves
or the PDF extended bookshelves. However, I do see them in
On Mon, 1 Feb 2010 07:40:17 -0800, George Fogg gf...@nwlink.com wrote:
I can't recall if we talked about this already, but does anyone know what
happened to the MVS Data Areas for z/OS 1.10 and z/OS 1.11 for downloading?
I can't find them with Softcopy Librarian on either the BookManager
I have a customer outside of Toledo, OH that is looking to migrate off the
MF but doesn't intend to do so for another 3-5 years (we've heard this
before). They have a contractor on-site that is looking to retire, and they
have a very old, unsupported environment. They are looking for someone who
Jacky Bright jacky.bri...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:b3d93f5f1002010742v333abc2ewf8fe732ba64e8...@mail.gmail.com...
Hi,
I am getting messages while defining non-vsam datasets :
IEC331I 020-000(2908001C),H2FAIPA3,UTIL0003,IGG0CLEG
IEC331I CATALOG.TEST01.USER
IEC331I
I think we could use the GPSAM routines from the CBT tape to create the
TEE function.
Both versions of this (CBT files 290 and 648) appear to have been written in
1982. I haven't tried using the code on our z/OS 1.9 system, but they use
some questionable means of locating and modifying control
Hi, All,
We currently license Rational Developer for System z (RDz) v7.5 and the
IBM PD Tools suite (includes IBM Debug Tool) v9.1. We're looking to
begin developing and running Java applications on z/OS, and will require
an interactive debugging tool for Java on z/OS. From the Announcement
Could you let us know which manual you found it in?
Lizette
Never mind. It was in the manual.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET
You shouldn't need __any__ add-ons. Eclipse (upon which RD/z is based) has that
built in. As does Java. See if this site is of any help:
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/rsdhelp/v7r0m0/index.jsp?topic=/org.eclipse.jdt.doc.isv/reference/api/org/eclipse/jdt/debug/core/package-summary.html
My bad. Perhaps?
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/library/os-eclipse-javadebug/index.html
--
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services Group
HealthMarkets(r)
9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010
(817) 255-3225 phone * (817)-961-6183 cell
Rick,
Thanks for the info. Just that I may not have painted a clear picture the
sequence is as follows. The ABARS backup started at 05:30. a.m. The batch job
was submitted after 06:00 a.m. The batch job failed at 06:55 after waiting for
the recall.
I will follow up with IBM. Thanks.
Lizette,
Yes, This LPAR is not shared. No dsns, dasd or catalogs are shared. As I had
mentioned earlier that the culprit was a ABARS backup. As per Rick's post he
mentioned that there is a known problem. I will open an ETR as well.
--- On Tue, 2/2/10, Lizette Koehler
I am trying to change the status of an online volume. It is mounted as PRIVATE
and I want to change it to PUBLIC. I issued the following mount command:
M A3FD,VOL=(SL,WRKC14),USE=PUBLIC
However, it failed due to a :
ACF9CCCD USERID INFSTC IS ASSIGNED TO THIS JOB - MOUNT
IEF403I MOUNT
On 02/01/10 13:04, John Dawes wrote:
I am trying to change the status of an online volume. It is mounted as PRIVATE
and I want to change it to PUBLIC. I issued the following mount command:
M A3FD,VOL=(SL,WRKC14),USE=PUBLIC
However, it failed due to a :
ACF9CCCD USERID INFSTC IS ASSIGNED
John,
I am trying to change the status of an online volume. It is mounted as
PRIVATE and I want to change it to PUBLIC. I issued the following mount
command:
M A3FD,VOL=(SL,WRKC14),USE=PUBLIC
I think you need to preceed a four digit (character) device address with a
slash.
M
John,
I've found it easier to do the mount like this:
MOUNT SYSDA,VOL=(SL,volser),USE=usage
You don't really need to specify the volume's address. This is much simplier!
--
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services Group
HealthMarkets®
9151 Boulevard 26 . N. Richland Hills
Thanks for all that information. If TEE was so difficult to implement, I
shudder to think about my UNIX SUBSYS= functionality! I wonder about doing
something hinkey in OPEN. OPEN can open multiple DCBs in a single SVC. So, I
wonder if it does it them sequentially. If so, I wonder if it would be
The z/OS Library Center is now working (it wasn't due to the new java on my
windows)
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Is this volume defined in a VATLSTxx member? Is it part of an SMS group?
Lizette
I am trying to change the status of an online volume. It is mounted as
PRIVATE and I want to change it to PUBLIC. I issued the following mount
command:
M A3FD,VOL=(SL,WRKC14),USE=PUBLIC
However, it failed
Hello,
I had the same problem installing z/OS 1.11 and setting up Indirect Cataloging.
I received message IGGN505A SPECIFY UNIT FOR SYS1.PARMLIB ON SYSR1
OR CANCEL, and a reply of the correct device would result in a repeat of
message IGGN505A. I know I was getting the correct LOADxx due to
I wonder about doing something hinkey in OPEN. OPEN can open multiple
DCBs in a single SVC. So, I wonder if it does it them sequentially. If so, I
wonder if it would be possible to dynamically add my DCBs onto the end of
the list. Probably not something that would be long term viable.
Since the
On Mon, 1 Feb 2010 10:04:00 -0800, John Dawes
jhn_da...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
I am trying to change the status of an online volume. It is mounted as
PRIVATE and I want to change it to PUBLIC. I issued the following mount
command:
M A3FD,VOL=(SL,WRKC14),USE=PUBLIC
However, it failed due to a
- Original Message -
From: Martin Kline martin.kl...@yrcw.com
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 9:09 AM
Subject: Re: Friday thought - a couple of SUBSYS= subsystems for discussion.
I think we could use the GPSAM routines from the CBT tape to create the
I was going through my SMFPRMxx for the first time in a very long time,
and found the following comment I'd left for myself:
/*
* SMF RECORDING DATASETS SHOULD RESIDE IN THE MASTER CATALOG.
* (THE DOCUMENTATION DOES NOT EXPLICITLY SAY THIS.) IT APPEARS
* TO BE POSSIBLE TO HAVE THEM IN A
I see no difficulties except the following:
If the usercat containing the SMF datasets needs maintenance, you will
need to create/format new MAN* datasets in another catalog, until the
repairs can be made. This is (IMO) a serious PITA.
IF no maintenance is ever needed on this ucat, you are safe.
Martin Kline provided a response that would probably work.
That being said, and having been there, done that, I wouldn't
go there. Other folks have other views.
These days, that subsystem code has a support status of:
If it breaks, you get to keep both pieces.
Looking back across four
You can interactively debug Java programs from Eclipse (free) using
its built-in support for JPDA.
We do it all the time...
Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Technologies
http://dovetail.com
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Chase, John jch...@ussco.com wrote:
Hi, All,
We currently license Rational
I'd be interested to know in your conversions from PDSEs to PDSs, how you
converted library objects to load modules?
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 8:02 AM, Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca wrote:
And I asked you to elaborate what you thought the problems were
related specifically to non-SMS PDSEs vs.
Good for IBM - goodbye Neon, sleep tight.
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 9:48 PM, Ed Gould ps2...@yahoo.com wrote:
http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2010/01/29/ibm_countersues_neon/
With mainframe revenues off sharply and likely to be so until the System
z11 mainframes ship much later this year, IBM
Dear IBM-Main members,
We just wanted to let you know about some recent activity on the
IBM-Main group on Academia.edu. In the IBM-Main group on
Academia.edu, there are now:
- 35 people (12 in the last month)
- 1 paper
- 7 photos
IBM-Main members’ pages have been viewed a total of 528
I'm working on setting up automount for ordinary users under /u
My ACS routines was coded to not allow the storage class specified under
the OMVSGRP. I changed and activated the ACS routine (and changed the
value of the exit code).
It appears that the new ACS routines are not taking effect
There MUST be a SYS1.IBM.PARMLIB in your master catalog, even if there is
nothing in it. This may be y our problem
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with
I was unaware that SMS could be used to control the actual USS
constructs in the file system. I use SMS to manage the actual filesystem
datasets, and use ACF2 to control access to the actual USS directory
structure.
Doug
Gibney, Dave wrote:
I'm working on setting up automount for
SMS controls the allocation of a new physical hfs/zfs container file.
See the automount command in Unix Systems Services Command Reference.
allocany allocation-spec Specifies the allocation parameters when using
automount to allocate HFS or zFS file systems, keeping in mind that zFS
is the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Gibney, Dave
Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 7:05 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: ACS routines and OMVS
I'm working on setting up automount for ordinary users under /u
My
No ICH, RACF isn't really involved.
My ACS STORCLAS routine contains:
filtlist AUTHCLAS include ('SCNONSMS','SCGSPACE', /* sc's */
/* mc's */'MCNOMIG','MCDISTR','SERVICE','ZCHFS')
filtlist AUTHGRP include ('DBA','SYSTEMS','SYSPROG','SYS1','STGADMIN',
(Would this be better on MVS-OE?)
This is utterly weird! On Solaris 10, I do mvslogin, then cd to
a PDS, then do wc * (count lines, words, and characters in all
the members). I see:
135$ ( cd /my/mvs/PDS amp; wc * )
0 0 0 a
0 0 0 b
0 0
That is what I was referring to. I have nothing in my ACS routines for
OMVS except to manage the actual HFS datasets to the OMVS storage group.
Access to the OMVS filesystem (/whatever) is controlled by rules in ACF2.
Doug
McKown, John wrote:
snip
What do you mean by the OMVS world? My
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 9:06 PM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
(Would this be better on MVS-OE?)
This is utterly weird! On Solaris 10, I do mvslogin, then cd to
a PDS, then do wc * (count lines, words, and characters in all
the members). I see:
135$ ( cd /my/mvs/PDS amp; wc *
I don't have any subsystem type TCP defined in WLM, do I really need
that?
Don't think so, given that you don't have anything in SYSOTHER.
A fair amount of work?? Under subsystem type just do create and
put in TCP.
My guess is that Allan meant a fair amount of work in *TCPIP*.
It's only used
I'd be interested to know in your conversions from PDSEs to PDSs, how you
converted library objects to load modules?
I thought I mentioned it in a previous post.
We converted what we could, and left the rest.
There were some that could NOT be converted, which displeased our MVS Team.
We also
While we're on the topic of WLM: Remember this topic back in 2007? And
specifically *this*:
Exactly my point: I think *someone* needs to take a real hard look at how
this product was ported to z/OS. (I didn't mention that it was ported from
the 'open world', did I?) I also think to 'play nice'
On Mon, 1 Feb 2010 23:18:52 -0500, P S wrote:
Surmise: when I attempt to read a member with Solaris 10, something
goes wrong; the member is reported as empty. But something caches
this information (who else but MVS.MVSNFS?)! So members read
incorrectly on Solaris 10 appear likewise
On Mon, 1 Feb 2010 23:18:52 -0500, P S wrote:
135$ ( cd /my/mvs/PDS amp;amp; wc * )
0 0 0 a
0 0 0 b
Haven't tried it, but ...statistics? Maybe the empty members are thus
because they have no stats?
Addendum: I tried this instead on a DSNTYPE=LIBRARY
I am out of the office until 17/02/2010.
A la vuelta trataré de responder.
Note: This is an automated response to your message IBM-MAIN Digest - 31
Jan 2010 to 1 Feb 2010 (#2010-32) sent on 2/2/10 2:00:01.
This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away.
The confident assertion of radically ignorant conjectures
is not so defensible. Do your homework before you post.
May I hope that you'd offer to act as censor so we can avoid
having to read radically ignorant conjectures in the futurre?
--
Peter Hunkeler
Credit Suisse
62 matches
Mail list logo
