W dniu 2012-02-07 23:22, Bill Fairchild pisze:
You listed the only two things supported by IBM in its operating
system. There is also an unknown number of user applications with
files that have keys, which could be BSAM, BDAM, or BPAM (PDS with
keys in its members and not just in its
So that told you some of your batch WASN'T (in business terms) truly
discretionary. Glad you (by the sound of it) pulled the stuff that
mattered if it never ran out of SYSOTHER.
Martin
Martin Packer,
Mainframe Performance Consultant, zChampion
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
-- Forwarded message --
From: Shai Hess mfnetd...@mfnetdisk.com
Date: Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 11:20 AM
Subject: New documentation about MF emulation and MFNetDisk.
To: shai.h...@gmail.com
**
HI,
I add documentation about MF emulation and MFNetDisk.
Shai
*
MF emulation and
In
cajtoo5_tp0_vy4usbrajdxo9phjcvrtvevqpco+pq-spf_c...@mail.gmail.com,
on 02/07/2012
at 05:36 PM, Mike Schwab mike.a.sch...@gmail.com said:
Actually, VSAM basically formats its datasets like FBA disk, and PDSE
is a type of VSAM file.
No, VSAM has no way to format a disk as FBA; it has to
In nrh3j7pn7qerevfk7hovdjk61qc509h...@4ax.com, on 02/07/2012
at 09:03 PM, Clark Morris cfmpub...@ns.sympatico.ca said:
4. Restrict the FBA devices to FBA data architectures (VSAM, PDSE,
HFS, zFS, any other FBA architecture. Thus no QSAM, no BSAM, no PDS,
no BDAM, no traditional Spool.
How
Hi
On 2/7/2012 7:28 PM, Itschak Mugzach wrote:
Hi Avram,
The program does not operate in any way under IMS. The only reason I
mentioned IMS was that is is an alternative to LE...
If you can tell, in which environment this program works ?
How and who starts 10 times /second ?
ITschak
On
I was wondering if there was a way to identify what files/datasets are on a
back end tape in a VTS B20 3494? I think there might be a panel on the
specialist B20 but not sure. I am going through the manuals now but just
not seeing it. I am hoping to get a listing into a file on the mainframe
We are running z/OS v1r11. Using the RMF panels, option 1 for postprocessor I
get an IKJ56231I FILE ERBSUB2 Not ALLOCATED, SYSTEM OR INSTALLATION ERROR.
Checking the IBM web site I don't see any direct hits but it looks like this
appeared with other products.
Can someone running V1R11 try it
Brian:
I am trying to understand , why he would do this ? Bpxwdyn will do this without
a problem and can be called easily in COBOL or assembler. There is a outdes
descriptor ..you might run it by him
Sent from my iPad
Scott Ford
Senior Systems Engineer
www.identityforge.com
On Feb 8, 2012,
Can someone please help me determine what the 'acceptable paging' should be on
a system? We are having issues with MQ and broker. Thanks.
Sharon Lopez
z/OS Systems Programmer
State of North Carolina
Office of Information Technology Services
919-754-6432 (Work)
919-398-8638 (Cell)
Bulk Volume Information Retrieval BVIR)
http://www-03.ibm.com/support/techdocs/atsmastr.nsf/WebIndex/WP100430
You may need to have your IBM service representative enable BVIR on your
VTS.
Joe Testa
Innovation Data Processing
--
From: Lizette
Hi
Tested with 1.11 no problem like this .
Did you get ERBPPUT panel ?
Something with SUBMIT ?
You could see maybe with Edit generated JCL YES
On 2/8/2012 2:36 PM, Dansinthecarolinas wrote:
We are running z/OS v1r11. Using the RMF panels, option 1 for postprocessor I
get an IKJ56231I FILE
Can someone please help me determine what the 'acceptable paging' should
be on a
system? We are having issues with MQ and broker. Thanks.
Could you describe your environment a little?
CPU(s) (z10, z9 , etc)
Amount of dasd space allocated to Page Datasets? Number of Page Datasets
Real
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 10:18:27 +0800, Lim Ming Liang limm...@unifi.my wrote:
Hi Lizette,
Are you willing to share that with us ?
Regards Lim ML
On 08/02/12 7:42 AM, Lizette Koehler wrote:
Never Mind, I found Mark Zelden's code in my notes files.
It's freely available to anyone from CBT File 434
On 2/8/2012 7:38 AM, Brian Westerman wrote:
He wants to be able to access the OUTPUT statement fields from inside his
program. I think he wants to be able to pass information, or act on the
information contained there. He said he spent weeks trying on his own, and I
looked around, but
We have a z/10 and this test lpar had 11G of real memory. IBM is loaning us
16G of real memory so now we have 27G of real memory. We had 3 mod-9 page
datasets and after message broker started we had to add 4 additional mod-9 page
datasets. We do have IMS, CICS, and DB2 running on this
When did the manufacturing of real CKD devices end?
Bill Fairchild
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Anne Lynn Wheeler
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 6:20 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Why can't the track
IBM still supports the KEYLEN parameter in the DCB macro for new user-created
data sets in BSAM, BDAM, and BPAM. The VTOC and PDS directory are the only
system structures still using keys, but access methods are also part of the
operating system and are supported. IBM still supports having
What could cause delays in RMF? Trying to figure out why RMF would be stalled
- as though it stopped processing. Any ideas where to look - obviously this
well after the fact. Should I start with SMF data?
I know - not much to go on.
Best Regards,
DJ
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 14:01:48 +, Lopez, Sharon sharon.lo...@nc.gov wrote:
Can someone please help me determine what the 'acceptable paging' should be on
a system? We are having issues with MQ and broker. Thanks.
Any amount that still keeps your end user response time and job turnaround
Maybe you can explain what MQ and broker issues you have and why you
think this is related to paging and/or the page configuration.
I know the broker uses a lot of virtual storage, which indeed requires
additional paging space, so the first check you can do is check how full
your paging
I think when manufacturing real 3390 devices ended.
Kees.
Bill Fairchild bfairch...@rocketsoftware.com wrote in message
news:77142D37C0C3C34DA0D7B1DA7D7CA346AE5C@nwt-s-mbx1.rocketsoftware
.com...
When did the manufacturing of real CKD devices end?
Bill Fairchild
-Original
Correction: *local*.
Maybe you can explain what MQ and broker issues you have and why you
think this is related to paging and/or the page configuration.
I know the broker uses a lot of virtual storage, which indeed requires
additional paging space, so the first check you can do is check how full
Minimally, modus ponens yields the result that the production of real
CKD devices did not end before the production of real 3390s--which
were/are real CKD devices--ended.
On 2/8/12, Vernooij, CP - SPLXM kees.verno...@klm.com wrote:
I think when manufacturing real 3390 devices ended.
Kees.
Demand paging is anathema to multi-user address spaces (e.g. CICS/IMS).
It is somewhat less problematic for single user address spaces. (TSO,
BATCH) and in-between for DB2.
e.g. it may be perfectly acceptable to have a demand paging rate of 100
if CICS/IMS demand paging is zero.
Side trip to the
A couple questions. When did IBM actually stop manufacturing the 3390 device,
and was the 9345 an actual CKD device? The digging I did in IBM says it was.
If so, when did that device (with a different geometry than either the 3380 or
the 3390) stop manufacturing?
Rex
-Original
W dniu 2012-02-08 16:03, John Gilmore pisze:
Minimally, modus ponens yields the result that the production of real
CKD devices did not end before the production of real 3390s--which
were/are real CKD devices--ended.
Yes and no.
It depends on definition of real CKD device.
Actually 3390 and
One of the subtle misconceptions in the design of WLM was the implicit
assumption that you would always have enough hardware resources to do
the required workload with the required response time, and if not
would quickly remedy the situation. In the real world, this is not
always the case and
On Tue, 7 Feb 2012 22:41:34 -0500, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
In nrh3j7pn7qerevfk7hovdjk61qc509h...@4ax.com, on 02/07/2012
at 09:03 PM, Clark Morris said:
4. Restrict the FBA devices to FBA data architectures (VSAM, PDSE,
HFS, zFS, any other FBA architecture. Thus no QSAM, no BSAM, no
Hello all,
I have a customer who has a rather backlevel version of z/OS (1.5) and ACF2
(6.5) as the ESM.
He would like to authenticate from the outside (open) world against ACF2
using CA's ACF2-LDS (LDAP Directory Services).
Does anyone know if the LDS implementation of ACF2-LDS is enough in
Bonjour,
When I worked on z/VM I could print without carriage control using PRINT
member (NOCC.
On JES2 when I put stuff out to the spool it's inserting a x'40' as the
leading character. I tried XMIT and see the \INMR01, but again there is now
a leading x'40'.
How can I put
I know you can define processors as dedicated or shared. Is there any
advantages/disadvantages to dedicating some to specific LPARs and shared for
others?
TIA
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
Hi GSG,
Simply, if you dedicate some CP to a busy lpar, it can improve performance -
if that is what the lpar needs. If you dedicate all that a lpar is likely to
use at peak untilitzation, cp reaources are wasted when the lpar is not so
busy. Many shops use a mix of shared and dedicated
Using HiperDispatch on a z10 or z196 provides many of the benefits of
dedicated processors with the flexibility of shared processors.
Thanks, Sam
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of gsg
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 2:26
Lizette, You would need to look to your tape management system, hopefully rmm,
for that information.
For some real basic info you can use the SV subcommand and SD by volume. For
example
RMM SV VOLUME(*) LIMIT(*) STATUS(NOTSCRATCH,NOTRELEASE) LOCATION(vtslibname)
CLIST('RMM SD DSN(*)
In 239ab4569639f44abf2edc7f90f528b1f2b...@ncwwditmxmbx34.ad.ncmail,
on 02/08/2012
at 02:01 PM, Lopez, Sharon sharon.lo...@nc.gov said:
Can someone please help me determine what the 'acceptable paging'
should be on a system?
There is no one size fits all.
We are having issues with MQ and
In
CAPD5F5oYqr6=-+xzsa9hcvgafquskcg+vns7pdh+-kniuay...@mail.gmail.com,
on 02/08/2012
at 10:03 AM, John Gilmore johnwgilmore0...@gmail.com said:
Minimally, modus ponens yields the result that the production of real
CKD devices did not end before the production of real 3390s--which
were/are real
r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl (R.S.) writes:
Yes and no.
It depends on definition of real CKD device.
Actually 3390 and 3380 were FBA under the cover. The data cells (32
or 34 bytes) were the fixed size sectors. Indeed, the device was not
emulated - physical disc was presented as single I/O
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 13:25:06 -0600, Hansen, Dave L - Eagan, MN wrote:
Bonjour,
When I worked on z/VM I could print without carriage control using PRINT
member (NOCC.
On JES2 when I put stuff out to the spool it's inserting a x'40' as the
leading character. I tried XMIT and see the
How are you getting on, lucky stiff?
http://tcis.ir/youvernoo.php?ygudgoogleid=19
Wed, 8 Feb 2012 22:01:24
_
The fish were now averaging a foot in length and many a fine meal the boys and
the farmer had out of that pond.Now, fellows, Ill divide between
Hi Dave,
PRINT member (NOCC is a CMS command and it suppresses carriage control.
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/zvm/v5r4/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.zvm.v54.dmsb4/hcsd8b3078.htm
So, z/OS is not adding the carriage control, the command that you used to print
on VM was
Our workload is entirely for development. Since we can't predict where demand
will come from we share all of the CPs so that capacity will float to where
it's needed. One disadvantage is that this is bad for the cache(s). In our
environment the cost is acceptable. I wouldn't do this if we ran a
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 21:16:38 +, Linda Mooney wrote:
PRINT member (NOCC is a CMS command and it suppresses carriage control.
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/zvm/v5r4/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.zvm.v54.dmsb4/hcsd8b3078.htm
So, z/OS is not adding the carriage control, the command that
Hi Gil,
Yeah, it had been a long time since we even had a VM machine. That's why I
included the link. ;)
Linda
- Original Message -
From: Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2012 1:29:40 PM
Subject: Re: PRINT (NOCC for
Am 08.02.2012 06:00, schrieb IBM-MAIN automatic digest system:
Re: Simple iinventory control products?
We use XINFO from the German software manufacturer Horizont (based in Munich,
they are focussed on mf datacenter software).
Citation from their website:
XINFO is the information system for
Bob,
Why would this be bad for cache?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Why would this be bad for cache?
Since multiple LPAR are isong the CP, because multiple LPARs are causing cache
updates. If you have production LPARs it's best to limit cache updates to a
single LPAR so that your cache hit ratio will be better. Dedicating CPs will do
that.
Bob Shannon
Thanks Arthur, I will look into it.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Arthur Fichtl
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 5:06 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Simple iinventory control products
Am 08.02.2012
The number and size of paging volumes set an upper limit to the amount of
virtual storage that can be in use at any one time across all address spaces.
This alone does not impact paging rates. Only the amount of real storage
affects paging rates. (Note: this may not be 100% technically true,
I have no idea, but I'm going to guess the answer is: no.
Reason is that LDAP is a relitivaly new kid on the block, and I would not
expect meaningful support unless you were on the very latest versions of the
software. Indeed, many LDAP featres wen't offered in RACF until very recently.
But
In
1910aea19cd2554fb59403184ebe4381044b40a...@mmoexchmbs01.jhacorp.com,
on 02/08/2012
at 04:49 PM, Hal Merritt hmerr...@jackhenry.com said:
A demand page in event can cause a full stop in the requesting
address space
Address space or only task?
A page always consumes a slot,
No. An
In
493357941.926625.1328735798778.javamail.r...@sz0042a.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net,
on 02/08/2012
at 09:16 PM, Linda Mooney linda.lst...@comcast.net said:
PRINT member (NOCC is a CMS command and it suppresses carriage
control.
No.
I don't know why, but anyhow back in MVS internals. There's the PART, the
SART and the Frame Allocation Resource Table. What no FART? Not PC! Sorry...
In a message dated 2/8/2012 8:44:47 P.M. Central Standard Time,
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net writes:
No. An unreferenced page does not
I do not know if its changed but...
At one time I asked IBM to get me subscribed to the system journal.
They were sort of reticent but did so for one year I got it.
The next year they said no.
From then on they got no IBM recommendations from me. I also made it
plain that if and when they
Maybe you can explain what MQ and broker issues you have and why you
think this is related to paging and/or the page configuration.
I agree with Kees. What exactly is your 'issue' with 'the broker'? (Assuming
that MQS is just the innocent bystander here.)
I know the broker uses a lot of virtual
Our workload is entirely for development. Since we can't predict where demand
will come from we share all of the CPs so that capacity will float to where
it's
needed. One disadvantage is that this is bad for the cache(s). In our
environment
the cost is acceptable. I wouldn't do this if we ran a
So far, I did not see answers. So I try to add my 2 cents.
what are the systems that use XML? ... Well, I don't know for sure. But I
would say the common suspects: Windows, Linux, AIX as well as smart phones
and other manager tamagoccies. The one I know is z/OS. But not only since
V1R11: I was
Joel C. Ewing jcew...@acm.org wrote in message
news:4f32a2df.5030...@acm.org...
One of the subtle misconceptions in the design of WLM was the implicit
assumption that you would always have enough hardware resources to do
the required workload with the required response time, and if not
58 matches
Mail list logo
