Hi List,
I'm installing a product in a client and when I invoked the primary panel
of the installation, one of the selections don't do anything when I select
it with an 's'.
I have test it in my systems and functions, so, I think there is something
trhough their logon procedures that is causing
Hi
Try to search in the archive/and got server errors
for /http://bama.ua.edu//archives///ibm/-/main
/
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message:
There WAS a corner case and at least one customer I knew of had it: With
ICFs you could expand into shared engines - with the non expansion case
being all dedicated. That went away some time ago. I think what you said
about z10 corroborates my memory that Dynamic ICF Expansion was only
Hi
Wit the ISPF Dialog Test you can trace/debug the dialogs
On 2/16/2012 9:00 AM, Alvaro Guirao Lopez wrote:
Hi List,
I'm installing a product in a client and when I invoked the primary panel
of the installation, one of the selections don't do anything when I select
it with an 's'.
I have
My sadump program is coded with DDSPROMPT=NO (to enable sadump
autoipl) and a dump data set name that is NOT SYS1.SADMP (since
something needed to get done in SMS for dsntype=large, and sys1 is
not sms-managed - don't ask me about particulars).
When we migrated to 1.12, we were on old
Stefan,
This newsgroup is a mirror of a list-server and that is where the
majority of the IBM-MAIN people read the posts. To subscribe, see the
info attached below. This reply will send your answer to the group.
Kees.
stefan stefan.br...@gmail.com wrote in message
A simple beginning:
- Enter ISPF option 7, Dialog Test
- Select: 1 Functions
- Enter the actual name of the ISPF Primary Option menu panel at:
Invoke selection panel:
PANEL . . panelname
(If You don't know, enter PANELID ON at the primary menu which shows the
name near the left upper
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:14:03 +0200 Mark Jones markj...@za.ibm.com wrote:
:Hi
:I havent had a problem with this
:/* REXX */
:FREE F(INDD1)
:FREE F(OUTDD1)
:FREE F(SYSIN)
:ALLOC FI(INDD1) DSN('x..aaa') SHR
:ALLOC FI(OUTDD1) DSN('x..bbb') SHR
:ALLOC FI(SYSIN)
W dniu 2012-02-16 01:55, Dan pisze:
Thanks Radoslaw Bob.
I figured there must be some explanation for the additional byte other than
some new extended device ranges.
This is still a DOC problem as the manual simply states these are device
addresses.
Radoslaw, are you saying there is a way of
Cross Posting to IBM Main and TSO-REXX groups
Hi List,
I'm installing a product in a client and when I invoked the primary panel
of the
installation, one of the selections don't do anything when I select it
with an 's'.
I have test it in my systems and functions, so, I think there is
Cross Posting to IBM Main and TSO-REXX groups
Hi List,
I'm installing a product in a client and when I invoked the primary
panel
of the
installation, one of the selections don't do anything when I select it
with an 's'.
I have test it in my systems and functions, so, I think
With the current CICS and COBOL, you must compile your COBOL with NODYNAM, as
I'm sure you know. static CALLs in CICS are still not supported. However,
with LE, it is now supported to do dynamic CALLs in COBOL. The dynamically
CALLed subroutine still needs to be defined to CICS. The CICS
Vacation? Not likely. I just don't know all the answers off the top
of my head,
Impossible. :-) You're destroying the image I have of you!
Prior to DSNTYPE=LARGE in z/OS 1.7, the only way to use an
extent size larger than 64k tracks was to use an extended
format data set, and extended
Lizzette,
Thank you for the info, I have requested to join ISPF list, I didn't know
it.
And thanks for the presentation.
I have deleted in the past a few times ISPF profiles from the users avoding
some problems related with ISPF, in this case was the logon procedure of
the client.
I have
Thanks Barbera, that explains 'mixed' perfectly.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Hello,
Recently we have installed a IMS system. We have a requirement of changing
all the started task userid for which I was able to do it easily, but there
are some Jobs which generates automatically when the IMS region starts up
for which the OWNER for the JOB is IBMUSER.
Is it possible to
Hi Scott,
From experience I have found that BPXWDYN is not the easiest beast to
control. Whilst I do program in Assembler, it has to be acknowledged that
not everybody does and hence more prolific languages with calls to existing
functionality should be favoured.
I personally think that BPXWDYN
Paul,
IEBCOPY is documented (and functions) as generating a SYSIN if none exists, if
it's dummied, or if
it's an empty file. Not sure what category a 'bad' file fits into, but I would
guess it's
essentially 'omitted'.
If you feel strongly about it you could open a Share requirement.
From
Hello,
Recently we have installed a IMS system. We have a requirement of changing
all the
started task userid for which I was able to do it easily, but there are
some Jobs which
generates automatically when the IMS region starts up for which the OWNER
for the
JOB is IBMUSER.
Is it
Hello Lizette,
Z/OS : 1.13
IMS : 11.1
SECURITY product : RACF 1.13
IMS11M41 JOB07743 IBMUSER 9 EXECUTION A DEV1 =
Needs to be changed to other Owner
IMS11F41 JOB07744 IBMUSER 9 EXECUTION A DEV1 =
Needs to be changed to other Owner
IMS11CR4 STC07738
Cross Posting to JES2 RACF and IBM-Main
Jags,
If you look - you have a JOBCARD. You can put the assignment of the owner
in there
1 //IMS11M41 JOB ACCT#,
// 'SAGAR',
// CLASS=A,
// MSGCLASS=H,MSGLEVEL=(1,1),
// NOTIFY=IBMUSER,
// REGION=64M
Lizette
-Original Message-
Hi Jags,
snippet
Recently we have installed a IMS system. We have a requirement of changing
all the started task userid for which I was able to do it easily, but there
are some Jobs which generates automatically when the IMS region starts up
for which the OWNER for the JOB is IBMUSER.
Is it
Hello Mr. John.
Thanks again.
Best Regards, and have a Nice Day.
Sergio
-Mensagem original-
De: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] Em nome de
McKown, John
Enviada em: quarta-feira, 15 de fevereiro de 2012 16:59
Para: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Assunto: Re: Question
Frank,
From IMS/DC point of view, It works almost the same. CICS has DBCTL that
perform as a limited DBRC as well as IMS/DC has the DLI DBRC address
spaces. Same commands, traces etc. Is this what your question refer to ?
ITschak
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 2:04 AM, Frank Swarbrick
They haven't been device addresses since 1983 with the advent of MVS/XA, in
spite of the fact that people who had been calling them device addresses since
1964, for the most part, still call them device addresses. They have been
device numbers since XA's redesign of the I/O architecture. And
W dniu 2012-02-16 15:14, Bill Fairchild pisze:
They haven't been device addresses since 1983 with the advent of MVS/XA, in spite of the fact
that people who had been calling them device addresses since 1964, for the most part, still call them device
addresses. They have been device numbers
One of the first investigative tasks handed to me at my new job...
...and I don't know where to start.
Got a z-OS 1.9 system, that runs as a guest under z/VM. (It's a long time since
I last worked with such a combination. Last time it was VM/370(?) and MVS
1.3.0e, alongside a bunch of
John,
have a gander in the z/VM OPERATOR log at about the time the event happened.
Would not be the first time that someone logged off instead of
disconnecting a z/OS guest.
There again, if the z/OS guest was disconnected in an unclean way that
is a another thing altogether.
In the z/VM
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 11:15:55 -0800, Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com wrote:
Walt,
First , thanks for responding..
Let me explain:
The STC is in LE Cobol..4.2
I want to call IKJEFTSR ...to call a rexx clist that will perform authorized
functions , i.e.; alloc, free
Alloc and free are
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:11:14 -0600, McKown, John
john.mck...@healthmarkets.com wrote:
Is this even possible? here:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/ikj4b780/23.4.3.2
quote
Table 122 shows the reason codes that are found in parameter 5 if IKJEFTSR
completes with a
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:29:52 -0600, David Magee david.ma...@dillards.com
wrote:
I was wondering how some of you are handling the HOME field of the model
userid profile specified in the APPLDATA field of the BPX.UNIQUE.USER porfile.
The IBM examples I've seen all show /tmp for HOME. My
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 09:20:55 +0100, Miklos Szigetvari
miklos.szigetv...@isis-papyrus.com wrote:
Hi
Try to search in the archive/and got server errors
for //http://bama.ua.edu//archives///ibm/-/main
The proper address (as far as I know) is
http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
--
Walt
This behaviour gives a simple, and little known/used, method of running a
compress without control cards.
1. Allocate SYSUT1 to your PDS
2. SYSUT2 DSN=*.SYSUT1
3. Omit SYSIN
Runs a compress of SYSUT1
Regards,
Mike
Mike Wawiorko
Global z Connectivity and Automation Engineering
Global
Predictably--I am the pedant who insists on distinguishing KB and
KiB--Bill Fairchild's point seems to me to be important. Quaint,
long familiar terminology should be avoided where it is misleading.
The original System/360 scheme was simple and in its way elegant.
01F---decodable unambiguously
I'm glad the DYNAM/NODYNAM has been brought up. I have a question about a CICS
application. It contains sub modules using CALL.
PGM1 (CALL 'PGM2') -- PGM2 (CALL 'PGM3') -- PGM3
Each module is translated/pre-processed and then compiled with DYNAM.
If PGM3 is compiled/linked, then PGM1 and
The whole point of DYNAM is that you do NOT have to recompile calling programs
when a subroutine is recompiled UNLESS the interface changes (E.G. if the
arguments change format or order of position or new values are required, etc.).
The reason that CICS requires NODYNAM is that the CALL's that
I do think I need to be more specific, since the answers so far aren't quite
what I was looking for (though interesting). Probably because I am on the
applications side, rather than the systems side, I have different concerns than
most here. Anyway, here are some specific questions...
1) How
Walt:
Are we saying Cobol cant invoke TMP ?? If so, where do i find an example
Scott J Ford
Software Engineer
http://www.identityforge.com
From: Walt Farrell wfarr...@us.ibm.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 11:14 AM
Subject:
I agree i am an old VMer, especially is someone is running second level with
privileges
Scott J Ford
Software Engineer
http://www.identityforge.com
From: J. Cassidy s...@jdcassidy.net
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 10:28
johnwgilmore0...@gmail.com (John Gilmore) writes:
The original System/360 scheme was simple and in its way elegant.
01F---decodable unambiguously into (multiplexor) channel 0, control
unit 1, and that control unit's device F or 15---was, for example, the
usual device address of the card punch
Frank,
IMS DC does the same thing as CICS, but completely different.
An IMS control region with its message region function basically like CICSPlex
with AOR's and TOR's.
Transactions in IMS can be tied to specific message regions and you can have
several message regions tied to a control
I found the below information in the archives, but I did not see an answer,
where can i obtain the format of HSMLOGX/Y ?
using ARCPRLOG, the output shows a lot of ID=xx (where xx is numeric),
but nowhere can i find the complete list.
can i use my little utility (like SAS) to read HSMLOG directly
Can probably get a good answer from the IMS listserv that BMC Supports:
im...@imslistserv.bmc.com
-Original Message-
From: Frank Swarbrick [mailto:frank.swarbr...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 12:44 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: CICS vs IMS
I do think I need
In
77142d37c0c3c34da0d7b1da7d7ca346c...@nwt-s-mbx1.rocketsoftware.com,
on 02/16/2012
at 02:14 PM, Bill Fairchild bfairch...@rocketsoftware.com said:
They haven't been device addresses since 1983 with the advent of
MVS/XA, in spite of the fact that people who had been calling them
device
In 4f3d172f.9030...@bremultibank.com.pl, on 02/16/2012
at 03:48 PM, R.S. r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl said:
Yes, in z/OS (OS/390,...) there are device numbers, not adresses.
No.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see
In 0156585592475057.wa.mvsjes2sympatico...@bama.ua.edu, on
02/14/2012
at 07:06 AM, Dan D mvs-j...@sympatico.ca said:
Subject: 5 Byte Device Addresses?
ITYM 5-digit device addresses[1], unless you're talking about 4-bit
bytes. IAC, the subchannel-set identifier (SSID) is not formally part
of
In 132955.66876.yahoomail...@web164511.mail.gq1.yahoo.com, on
02/15/2012
at 11:15 AM, Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com said:
I want to call IKJEFTSR ...to call a rexx clist that will perform
authorized functions , i.e.; alloc, free
Those aren't authorized functions, unless you need to
In a6b9336cdb62bb46b9f8708e686a7ea00e924b3...@nrhmms8p02.uicnrh.dom,
on 02/15/2012
at 02:55 PM, McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.com said:
//STC EXEC PGM=IKJEFT01,
// REGION=0M,PARM='%REXXCMD'
//SYSTSPRT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSTSIN DD DUMMY
//SYSEXEC DD
In 9c2b672b-1bb5-4a16-a2ba-560eaf26c...@yahoo.com, on 02/15/2012
at 01:34 PM, Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com said:
long running STC program is linked ac(1)
It must come from an APF-authorized concatenation for that to take
effect.
Do i create an entry in ikjtso00
My suggestion is: Don't use DYNAM for compiling CICS COBOL programs. Change
your coding standards from:
CALL 'PGM1'.
to
MOVE 'PGM1' TO CALLED-PROGRAM.
CALL CALLED-PROGRAM.
With CALLED-PROGRAM being PIC X(8).
--
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services Group
That's not just a suggestion. It's a requirement. If you compile a CICS COBOL
program with DYNAM the compile and link (bind) may succeed, but the program
will not execute properly under CICS. (Not sure I've actually ever tried it,
but I can't imagine any other result based on the
I found the below information in the archives, but I did not see an
answer,
where can i obtain the format of HSMLOGX/Y ?
using ARCPRLOG, the output shows a lot of ID=xx (where xx is numeric), but
nowhere
can i find the complete list.
can i use my little utility (like SAS) to read HSMLOG
Thanks.
I have compared the two files SMF and HSMLOG, and if you line up the HSMLOG
with the SMF 241 record then the data is the same
.
If you start at byte 29 of the HSMLOG record then this matches up correctly
with the SMF TYPE 241 record.
Thanks for this
Seymour is right that we have had subchannel numbers since 1983 instead of
device addresses, but we have also had device numbers since 1983. And we still
have device addresses, but the device address is now only one byte long and the
subchannel and device numbers are two bytes long.
As John
I am trying to find out how much staff, numbers and titles, eg z/OS, z/VM,
VTAM/TCPIP, CICS, etc, are needed to run a large zSeries mainframe shop.
Would some of you be so kind as to share that information with me.
--
George Henke
(C) 845 401 5614
On 16 February 2012 13:31, Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com wrote:
Walt:
Are we saying Cobol cant invoke TMP ?? If so, where do i find an example
I'm not Walt, of course. But as far as I know, no one can invoke the
TMP. Well, not quite true, obviously, but no normal program, even if
APF
Tony,
I dont want to knock IBM but for us developers this is UGLY ...
Maybe the problem is they never intended for it to be called that way ...
FWIW,,
Regards,
Scott J Ford
Software Engineer
http://www.identityforge.com
From: Tony Harminc
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com wrote:
Tony,
I dont want to knock IBM but for us developers this is UGLY ...
Maybe the problem is they never intended for it to be called that way ...
Yes, exactly right on both counts. Don't forget that TSO is older than
On 2/16/2012 2:31 PM, Tony Harminc wrote:
On 16 February 2012 13:31, Scott Fordscott_j_f...@yahoo.com wrote:
Walt:
Are we saying Cobol cant invoke TMP ?? If so, where do i find an example
I'm not Walt, of course. But as far as I know, no one can invoke the
TMP. Well, not quite true,
Steve:
I have tried this and it works well enough to be part of our product...
Cobol - calls 'irxjcl' - linkmvs pgmname - performs authorized functions
( in this case RACF )
Works well and is fast...I was hoping to short my development time on another
product we support..
I will probably
Amen brother Chris, I am converted...lol...I am an ex-Vmer, CMS was so much
easier at times..
Scott J Ford
Software Engineer
http://www.identityforge.com
From: Chris Craddock crashlu...@gmail.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012
TSO is archaic and was, IMO, not well designed. Well, it possibly was back in
MVT days. But it has not advanced with the times along with the rest of z/OS.
And it depends on why you want to use TSO in a batch program. I would guess it
is just so that you don't have to re-invent the wheel.
Thats a great idea John ! I like it and will have to try it
Scott J Ford
Software Engineer
http://www.identityforge.com
From: McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 5:11 PM
Subject: Re:
CMS and XEDIT can easily bury TSO/ISPF. The only thing better is Linux/gvim
ducking.
--
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services Group
HealthMarkets®
9151 Boulevard 26 . N. Richland Hills . TX 76010
(817) 255-3225 phone .
john.mck...@healthmarkets.com .
John:
I loved VM/CMS and like Linux really well, close my eyes they are kissing
cousins
Scott J Ford
Software Engineer
http://www.identityforge.com
From: McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Thursday, February 16,
I am trying to find out how much staff, numbers and titles, eg z/OS, z/VM,
VTAM/TCPIP, CICS, etc, are needed to run a large zSeries mainframe shop.
Would some of you be so kind as to share that information with me.
--
George Henke
(C) 845 401 5614
George the only answer I can give
Sometimes I wonder if IBM took the 'blue pill or the red pill'...from the
Matrix...lol
Scott J Ford
Software Engineer
http://www.identityforge.com
From: McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012
I never saw any of those movies, so the meaning is unknown to me.
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services Group
HealthMarkets®
9151 Boulevard 26 . N. Richland Hills . TX 76010
(817) 255-3225 phone .
john.mck...@healthmarkets.com . www.HealthMarkets.com
John,
In a nutshell, the 'red pill' was a big change and the 'blue pill' back to the
mundane world..nothing changed
Scott J Ford
Software Engineer
http://www.identityforge.com
From: McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
ty Lizette,
I am just trying to get a general idea of how many people a typical large
zSeries shop needs running whatever on whatever as long as it is *big* and
*blue* and wears a *z*.
IOW if you think you are a large zSeries shop how many other people like
you are around and what do they do,
One of our Cyber Security folks is putting up a NOC (Network Operations
Center) and they purchased something called SolarWinds. Now they are on my
doorstep saying they want to scan my system along with DB2 and Oracle data
bases. This is COOL and then I asked how they intended to do this
Yep Lizette, and how much money is in the budget ...
Sent from my iPad
Scott Ford
Senior Systems Engineer
www.identityforge.com
On Feb 16, 2012, at 5:21 PM, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com wrote:
I am trying to find out how much staff, numbers and titles, eg z/OS, z/VM,
That is not my intent.
Please do not divulge anything with which you do not feel comfortable.
Where ignorance is bliss, 'tis folly to be wise. Thomas Gray
I am just trying to get a sense, a reasonability check, on how
labor-intensive a large zSeries shop is.
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 6:11 PM,
George,
I worked for a large American company aboard, one of the top 5 in the world, we
has a staff including mgmt around 200, that was MVS , VM , Communications, and
DR.
Sent from my iPad
Scott Ford
Senior Systems Engineer
www.identityforge.com
On Feb 16, 2012, at 6:19 PM, George Henke
ty, Scott, but 200 people must have supported many data centers.
The feedback I have gotten so far, based on a few private replies, is about
8 - 12 people per CEC.
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 6:29 PM, Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com wrote:
George,
I worked for a large American company aboard,
George,
I have worked for 20+ shops consulting and full time, this one I referred to
was European HQ.
Most of the other places systems staffs were 20+ , I worked most of those shops
in NYC, numbers are small also, because of this economy, cutbacks.
Sent from my iPad
Scott Ford
Senior Systems
Well, I can say that one is not really enough, but some of us try.
I think I could keep z/OS current, plus a few other ISV products, if there
wasn't day to day needs and the occasional urgent demand for special requests.
Dave Gibney
Information Technology Services
Washington State University
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Frank Swarbrick
frank.swarbr...@yahoo.com wrote:
deleted
1) How does BMS compare to MFS. Power, flexibility, ease of use.
Pretty similar. One run to create a binary map, one run to create the copybook.
2) Does IMS TM have an API for miscellaneous functions
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 10:31:50 -0800, Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com wrote:
Walt:
Are we saying Cobol cant invoke TMP ?? If so, where do i find an example
No, but nothing stops you from structuring your STC so it invokes the TMP, and
the TMP invokes your Cobol program. Then it can use
My experience as a SYSPROG was a while back at a smallish insurance company in
Vancouver. IIRC, this was a mid-size ES9000 running OS/390, CICS/ESA, and DB2.
I think we had TCP/IP networking via Token-Ring attachment to a 3174
controller. I know we all ran DOS PC's running some 3270 emulator.
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 14:42:01 -0700, Steve Comstock st...@trainersfriend.com
wrote:
OK, just being a little crazy, what about EXEC PGM=MYASMPGM
which does some stuff and then does XCTL to the TMP? Would
that work?
The last time I tried it (28+ years ago before I joined IBM) it was possible to
I'm not really an expert on this topic. We're an IMS shop, but all the
IMS topics
are hidden behind a site specific application framework, so that most of
IMS is
not visible to the applications. In my earlier life, I worked at a
company, which used
CICS on VSE. So my impression is:
- CICS is
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 15:40:40 -0600, Chris Craddock wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Scott Ford wrote:
I dont want to knock IBM but for us developers this is UGLY ...
Maybe the problem is they never intended for it to be called that way ...
Yes, exactly right on both counts. Don't
Thanks for the information!
It may be worth noting that the issue you bring up can happen as easily with
CICS. Or really any situation where more than one person can read/update the
same record.
Frank
From: Mike Schwab mike.a.sch...@gmail.com
To:
John,
I worked a twin 4381 VM and VM/VSE shop for awhile and we had about the same
amount of ppl
Sent from my iPad
Scott Ford
Senior Systems Engineer
www.identityforge.com
On Feb 16, 2012, at 7:29 PM, Roberts, John J jrobe...@dhs.state.ia.us wrote:
My experience as a SYSPROG was a while
Thank you all for the valuable information. John
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Frank Swarbrick
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 12:17 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: CICS vs IMS
That's not just a suggestion.
At 13:12 -0500 on 02/16/2012, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote about
Re: 5 Byte Device Addresses?:
In
77142d37c0c3c34da0d7b1da7d7ca346c...@nwt-s-mbx1.rocketsoftware.com,
on 02/16/2012
at 02:14 PM, Bill Fairchild bfairch...@rocketsoftware.com said:
But that's ok, since I still call z/OS
hal9...@panix.com (Robert A. Rosenberg) writes:
No Bill is right. OS/VS2 Release 2 WAS MVS like OS/VS2 Release 1 was
SVS. SVS was OS/360 MVT with Virtual Addresses (SVS was a single 16MB
Address Space with which was divided into smaller areas for the
programs to use, just like MVT). MVS made
In 1329350690.69346.yahoomail...@web122113.mail.ne1.yahoo.com, on
02/15/2012
at 04:04 PM, Frank Swarbrick frank.swarbr...@yahoo.com said:
We are a CICS shop with IMS DB (DBCTL), but I've been curious for a
while about the differences between how CICS works and how IMS TM
works.
CICS was
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:28:34 +0100, J. Cassidy s...@jdcassidy.net wrote:
Would not be the first time that someone logged off instead of
disconnecting a z/OS guest.
There again, if the z/OS guest was disconnected in an unclean way that
is a another thing altogether.
In the z/VM OPERATOR log, also
To stay young requires unceasing cultivation of the ability to unlearn old
falsehoods
(Robert A Heinlein)
Some-how seemed appropriate. Must be time I went back and re-read some of his
work.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN
George Henke observes:
The feedback I have gotten so far, based on a few private replies, is
about
8 - 12 people per CEC.
Maybe, but that doesn't mean when you double the number of CECs you would
double the number of people, or vice versa. That is, you can't extrapolate
linearly in either
On 2/13/2012 9:38 AM, Joel C. Ewing wrote:
Requiring application programmers to think in terms of tracks and cylinders
and to understand interaction between physical block size and track capacity
is indeed archaic, as are artificial restrictions on number of extents or
volumes.
TRKs and
93 matches
Mail list logo
