o, given the situation at hand, is there a better place to look than
>IEFDB401?
>
Yes - covered early in the thread along with a pointer to the
manual. GRS exits.
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
mailto:mzel...@flash.net
On Wed, 7 Jul 2010 09:00:50 -0500, Arthur Gutowski wrote:
>On Tue, 6 Jul 2010 19:10:45 -0500, Mark Zelden
>wrote:
>
>>... Even with a single engine you can create more than one
>>CF LPAR and share that engine. As long as you weren't using it for true
>>data
"shamplex" that worked quite well with multiple CF LPARs sharing engines.
Of course the standard YMMV disclaimer applies.
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
mailto:mzel...@flash.net
Mark's MVS U
SET BOUNDARY (GLOBAL) .
RECEIVE
FROMNTS(
ORDER(ORD2)
)
/* DELETEPKG*/
.
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
te your "sysres" unix file systems.
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
mailto:mzel...@flash.net
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html
Systems Programming expert at
Enter CANCEL or EXIT to cancel the rename request.
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
mailto:mzel...@flash.net
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.
NEW,DELETE,DELETE).Thankfully if
someone forgets to code disp on an important data set (or even a
unimportant one) that is in use the job will wait until it is canceled or
fail due to duplicate data set if it is not in use.
Of course I've never done such a thing.
Mark
--
Mark Zeld
On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 09:24:41 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 07:38:49 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
>
>>It still works for certain things, but to be honest, I haven't needed to use
>>it since DFSMS and ISPF added the support for renaming an "in u
ix uses shared memory and mutex locks to ensure that files are locked
>between processes. How was that implemented on z/OS?
>...and I'd like to understand it more. Anyone have any pointers?
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semaphore_(programming)
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Con
It still works for certain things, but to be honest, I haven't needed to use
it since DFSMS and ISPF added the support for renaming an "in use" data set
in OS/390 R10.
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
mailto:mz
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 21:36:29 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
wrote:
>In , on 06/30/2010
> at 08:42 AM, Mark Zelden said:
>
>>[1] Many people don't realize that at the same time the started jobs
>>support came in, enhancements were made to the START command to
&g
stallation Exits documentation. Relying upon
SVCs for ENQs is not supported and would be exposed to this type of
internal change if and when it occurred."
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
mailto:mzel...@flas
Although Paul may be able to use more chicanery to add an SDSF REXX
batch step to look at the joblog of the running job, get the tape mount
message, and create the IDCAMS DEFINE NONVSAM input and then
run IDCAMS in a subsequent step.
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS
GCLASS
than the STC default: S CICSPROD,MSGCLASS=H
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
mailto:mzel...@flash.net
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html
Sy
hink the question was about using zFS in place of HFS. While your
points are valid, the same considerations exist regardless of the
file system format and presumably have been addressed already.
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
though the STC
default is for a different class.
For example:
//INIT JOB 'INIT',MSGLEVEL=(0,0),MSGCLASS=Z
//INIT EXEC PROC=INIT
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
mailto:mzel...@flash.net
//www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/redp4328.html?Open
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
mailto:mzel...@flash.net
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html
Systems
ards,
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
mailto:mzel...@flash.net
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html
Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercente
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 07:43:26 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
>
>/* rexx - "zero" a PDS Directory */
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 16:00:39 +0300, Binyamin Dissen
wrote:
>
>That does not change the key.
>
>I wonder what would happen if member GHJK was added and the keys shows th
less
update activity for the master catalog."
You might want to have a look at that chapter and the rest of the manual.
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
mailto:mzel...@flash.net
Mark's MVS Utilitie
quot;downloads" the
same packages from CA's web site and processes them (GIMUNZIP) the same
way you would if you did a "manual install". Just a whole heck of lot quicker.
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
mailto:mzel...@flash.net
DIR.1 = '000E'x/* End of Directory */
"EXECIO 1 DISKW PDSDIR (STEM DIR. FINIS" /* Rewrite Directory */
"FREE F(PDSDIR)"
Exit
s with production Easytrieve and similar HLLs, but I also have been at
shops where they didn't allow it at all in production)
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
mailto:mzel...@flash.net
Mark's MVS Utili
nfrastructure in terms of number
of lines of code, but it is still the business application that will make the
box over utilized or more utilized than a well written app.
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
mailto:mzel...@flash.net
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 15:25:58 -0500, McKown, John
wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
>> [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Mark Zelden
>> Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 3:21 PM
>> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
>> Subj
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 19:42:27 +, Ted MacNEIL wrote:
>
>In a z/OS environment, with access methods, online sub-systems, utilities,
and the like, less than 5% of the code running on the z/Box is user-written.
>
Where did you get that statistic from?
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden C
bttape.org) and indicates
it was copied from the TSO Times Fall 1994 edition, so it is not surprising it
has made its way to more than one shop. I looked at
http://www.tsotimes.com/archives.html and it looks like it only goes back
to 1995.
Regards,
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consul
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 09:51:34 -0600, Howard Brazee
wrote:
>On 24 Jun 2010 15:40:31 -0700, mzel...@flash.net (Mark Zelden) wrote:
>
>>>Is that like the ZOOM or SHOWPROC commands that have come with MVS for
>>>a decade or so?
>>>
>>
>>Come with MVS? P
ember. But instream still seems to me to
be better.
>>
>>Frank
>
>Is that like the ZOOM or SHOWPROC commands that have come with MVS for
>a decade or so?
>
Come with MVS? Please point me to where these are distributed if you can
because I've only seen home grown uti
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 08:51:11 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
>
>
>BTW, I just upgraded from R2 to R3 over the weekend mostly because I was
>interested in the deployment function (but there are some other nice features
>also). In trying to test a deployment, it looks like it will
quot;FIX RESET" command. This "empties"
the PDS / PDSE.
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
mailto:mzel...@flash.net
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html
Sy
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 08:51:11 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
>
>BTW, I just upgraded from R2 to R3 over the weekend mostly because I was
>interested in the deployment function (but there are some other nice features
>also). In trying to test a deployment, it looks like it will onl
naged /
extended format. When it gets that big, they will split it up. They have to
consider doing that now regardless because the size is so close to
being larger than a 3990-3 and that is the largest volume for
many shops still.
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/
#x27;t benefit everyone.
If you have a small environment and only a couple of CA products, then
of course it isn't worth installing and maintaining a somewhat complex
piece of software just to maintain a couple of other pieces of software.
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Z
|
| 3. Inherit |
| |
| |
| |
| |
+-----+
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
mailto:mzel...@flash.net
SMP/E jobs
a few years ago, so I don't need to do it all the time now. :-)
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
mailto:mzel...@flash.net
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mz
ably not an option to do that.That may not be an issue if the
process doesn't fail if the libraries are already cataloged - which they will
be - indirectly - unless it is a new name / library for whatever product we
are deploying. In that case, I would uncatalog the file after copy and
ind
z/OS and you don't have to make off platform
"munging" in sync with z/OS, then I don't think you need CS.
I'm pretty sure CA has a solution also, but I don't know the details. I think
think Compuware's solution(s) may be the best of breed in this area, but
cos
The only downside is needing to change volsers in PROGxx or LPALSTxx
if the data sets are moved to another volume. In most shops, unlikely
without you knowing since the LNKLST dsns are ENQed. Much more possible
with LPALSTxx data sets. At my client it isn't a problem since the ISV
pro
gain.Everything is normal.
Doesn't your /etc/rc have this? If so, the next IPL or OMVS restart with
change it to 644:
# Setup utmpx file
>/etc/utmpx
chmod 644 /etc/utmpx
¦
¦¦ Action: To set a write lock on a file, it must be ¦
¦¦ opened with write access. Reissue the request and ¦
¦¦ specify a file descriptor that has write access to the ¦
¦¦ file.
use they were
more concerned about integrity instead of fuzzy backups) we dynamically
changed MIM to convert those reserves to global ENQs only for the weekend
full volume backups.
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
ESTORE OTHER REGISTERS
LA15,4 SET RETURN CODE TO 4
BR14 RETURN
END
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 08:05:29 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
>On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 22:55:28 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 21:19:05 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
>>>
>>>See REXXSTOR on my web site or CBT file 434. URL below.
>>>
>>Intere
e release (FIN APAR)?
If you can write a little code to (almost) solve the problem, why can't IBM do
something similar (but better / more elegant).
Best Regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and
On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 22:55:28 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 21:19:05 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
>>
>>See REXXSTOR on my web site or CBT file 434. URL below.
>>
>Interesting. Thanks. But isn't this Schr?dinger's cat?
>I can call REXXSTOR
ary j9jit23(11): cannot
initialize JIT
> Could not create the Java virtual machine.
>
>
>I specified 10 for Size on login (but do I really get so
>much? How can I tell? That's K, not bytes, isn't it?)
>
See REXXSTOR on my web site or CBT file 434. URL below.
Mark
ile something like "REXXINTRO.ZIP" on the PC
side.
3) You should now have a usable ZIP file you can UNZIP. The
unzipped file is called REXXINTRO.DOC. The file was created
using Microsoft W
is shared and MIM (MII)
is used. Better controls and SMS rules were put in place to prevent
that and hasn't happened since.
Now VSAM RLS (SMSVSAM) is another story, but that's another thread! :-)
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z
ust as a test or to prove a point, but regardless,
if you or anyone does want full screen ISPF like edit from native TSO
that fully supports PDSE and z/OS Unix, I would suggest picking up a
copy of Greg Price's REVIEW.
http://www.cbttape.org/
Mark
--
M
On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 07:45:57 -0700, Edward Jaffe
wrote:
>Mark Zelden wrote:
>> Ed, I guess your shop isn't big enough or important enough. :-) It's
>> not marked DATALOSS either. My guess is after this thread it will be.
>>
>
>I just complained that i
ngle data set. How did it affect so many data sets and volumes
in your environment?
Thanks for the head's up.
Cheers,
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
mailto:mzel...@flash.net
Mark's
ior to the records being stored by WLM to
be included in a dump too. In this particular case (and all the ones I
have had (other than 1 time), a dump has been good enough.
Different strokes for different folks.
Cheers,
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
t someday.
The same could be said for many other SMF records that people collect and
store, but those could be looked at too. But since IBM has recommended
to turn them off (unless requested to collect) it's pretty much a "no-brainer"
to me.
Regards,
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Cons
sis Reference and IPCS manuals for "WLMDATA".
Regards,
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
mailto:mzel...@flash.net
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden
ram just to fetch me the userid.
>>
>> Some Googling hasn't turned anything up, but it's a pretty generic request,
>> lots of (useless) hits.
>>
>
>If you're running RACF you can use the ACEEUSRI field in the ACEE
>control block to get it.
>
It's th
*/
USER = Storage(D2x(ACEE+21),8) /* point to USERID */
GROUP= Storage(D2x(ACEE+30),8) /* point to GROUP */
Say 'The USERID in the ACEE is:' USER
Say 'The GROUP in the ACEE is:&
On Thu, 27 May 2010 11:11:39 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>On Thu, 27 May 2010 09:57:50 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
>>>>
>>>And renaming the squatter wouldn't have sufficed? (Of course one
>>>must anticipate the need to do this.)
>>
>>I don
On Thu, 27 May 2010 09:43:08 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>On Thu, 27 May 2010 08:00:57 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
>>
>>I need to move / expand the VTOC on a mod 27 and moved a data set that
>>was adjacent. I wanted to allocate a "place holder" so nothing e
upy,
and it was at the front of the volume, for some reason DADSM wasn't
allocating it there until I used ABSTR.
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
mailto:mzel...@flash.net
Mark's MVS Utilities: ht
will suffer (a little more than they already do
today). Depending on how your batch runs and how many data sets
are allocated / deleted compared to actual step run times, you could see
some differences there as well. Online response time shouldn't really
be affected (but start up times could
, you are probably already pushing the limits.
I recall (years ago, before XCF) a client of mine adding a 3rd system to
a GRS ring and the CA-1 scratch runs doubled in wall clock time due
to catalog performance.
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
mailto:
" file systems)
and then IPL to get to z/OS 1.11 anyway, I wouldn't consider it an extra
IPL.If you are referring to the new functionality for sysplex aware
"on a file system basis" provided by OA29619, then yes, that also
takes rolling IPLs, but again, the default for sysplex awa
On Mon, 24 May 2010 16:05:03 -0500, Arthur Gutowski wrote:
>>Has anyone out there quantified the so-called performance benefits of ZFS in
>>R/O mode - outside of the IBM labs?
>On Sun, 23 May 2010 11:35:27 -0500, Mark Zelden
>wrote:
>
>>When zFS file systems are m
On Mon, 24 May 2010 08:26:22 -0500, Elardus Engelbrecht
wrote:
>Mark Zelden wrote:
>>>> Perhaps an initial edit macro set (under that applied) causing problems?
>>>> You could try renaming / deleting BPXWPROF from the ISPPROF data set
>and see what happens.
>
&
On Mon, 24 May 2010 10:34:25 +0100, Jim McAlpine wrote:
>On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 6:20 PM, Mark Zelden wrote:
>
>> Perhaps an initial edit macro set (under that applied) causing problems?
>>
>> You could try renaming / deleting BPXWPROF from the ISPPROF data set
shipped to the owning system. But
the same applies to HFS. Is there another performance benefit you are
referring to?
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
mailto:mzel...@flash.net
Mark's MVS Utilities: htt
You should mount the "sysres" zFS files read only (as you should have been
doing with HFS also). But also make sure you have this in your zFS parms:
romount_recovery=on/* see APAR OA22351 */
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
m
Perhaps an initial edit macro set (under that applied) causing problems?
You could try renaming / deleting BPXWPROF from the ISPPROF data set
and see what happens.
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
mailto:mzel...@flash.net
sharing
systems). With CDSC, only changed records are invalidated from the
cache. With ISC, or a mixture, if any sharing system does an update,
the entire cache is purged.
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
mailto:mzel...@flash.net
On Thu, 13 May 2010 11:15:43 -0500, Patrick Lyon wrote:
>On Thu, 13 May 2010 10:31:39 -0500, Mark Zelden
>wrote:
>
>>Not if you define only 1 profile as GIM.*. I suspect that will suffice for
>>at least 95% of the shops out there. We've already discussed the
>&g
they still probably aren't interested in making the access granular.
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
mailto:mzel...@flash.net
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash
le as GIM.*. I suspect that will suffice for
at least 95% of the shops out there. We've already discussed the
unlikelihood of shops desiring to do something more granular like
giving a certain set of users RECEIVE only (even though it could be done).
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consul
ng a user error leading
to a problem (large number of messages sent to a TSO user who did
not hit enter).
Do you have any "tso app" running under master? (perhaps an automation
product or TSSO)?
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
mailto:mzel
.
Or the opposite - delete all the VVDS entires to dead volumes from catalogs.
I think our dasd guys want to do it as a clean up task from our last DASD
migration. But they never have before and they already got themselves
into trouble once trying to do it. Another "who cares".
Mark
27;t sound like either.
What about logging on with a bare bones logon proc / inital clist and
then trying it? It is almost certainly something within the TSO/ISPF
environment for that LPAR causing it to fail (as opposed to a bug).
What does ALTLIB DISPLAY show you prior to invoking the CLIST?
C
n't have the
APARs applied yet, but they are in my global zone.
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
mailto:mzel...@flash.net
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html
Systems Pr
ion guide. Of course, YMMV and "the past"
goes back to SLED DASD when I actually measured this stuff. Long before
things like PAV and multiple allegiance. That is the nice part about
"modern DASD", you really don't have to worry about these sorts of
things... but they
On Tue, 4 May 2010 16:35:11 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
>It keeps crashing my IE6 session as soon as I start to enter my name.
>
>I tried deleting just to cookies for ca.support and that didn't work so I
>deleted all the cookies and temp files. Then I got further and was
>abl
s I'll try again tomorrow with IE.
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
mailto:mzel...@flash.net
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html
Systems Progra
t logical
errors in this discussion).
I'm not saying I subscribe to this philosophy, but it is something to
think about. I can tell you that I have lots of catalogs sharing
volumes due to dasd migrations over the years (master catalog
excluded).
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 09:21:41 -0500, Elardus Engelbrecht
wrote:
>Mark Zelden wrote:
>>What has changed from years ago (and I don't know exactly when without
>research) is that TIME=1440 used to turn off the accounting in SMF records,
>
>Please explain 'accounting in S
as changed from years ago (and I don't know exactly when without
research) is that TIME=1440 used to turn off the accounting in SMF records,
which is why you'll probably still find TIME=1439 coded in a lot of places .
But TIME=1439 won't keep IEFUTL from being called for a
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 16:02:43 +0200, R.S. wrote:
>Mark Zelden pisze:
>> On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:08:16 +0200, R.S.
wrote:
>>> Last but not least: ZFS does not provide me any additional
>>> functionality. YMMV.
>>>
>>
>> "Me" (you) perhap
), it would be wise to migrate if you haven't
done so already.
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
mailto:mzel...@flash.net
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html
Sy
the
full volume copy (which is what I think you were talking about).
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
mailto:mzel...@flash.net
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html
Systems Program
ACKS"!
>
There were specific ports specified with NODELAYACKS. Those statements
were commented out.
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
mailto:mzel...@flash.net
Mark's MVS Utiliti
dware support).
If you do see it, what is your processor model and driver level? All
z10s running in the environment I am looking at.
The SE checked some other environments in Dallas and didn't see it either.
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
m
t looked at what that flash says, but I will (I'm sure you will too).
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
mailto:mzel...@flash.net
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil
Oops. Sorry... didn't click on the link from that point. I hope that it
wasn't removed due to the RMF enhancement in z/OS 1.11.
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
mailto:mzel...@flash.net
#x27;
Walter,
That was the URL I had also (well, the one I had redirected there), but
a quick search on IBM's web site led me here:
http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/features/wlm/tools/index.html
BTW, with z/OS 1.11 and above this information is now in RMF II.
Cheers,
Mark
--
Mark Ze
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 10:54:09 -0500, Tom Marchant
wrote:
>On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 09:03:02 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
>
>>
>>I share the a single global but multiple target / 2 different dlib zones for
>>the 2
>>companies I support at my client. You have to set the optio
nd explain what you want / need.
Their support is really helpful and can give you the best answer.
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
mailto:mzel...@flash.net
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzel
ne. If there was a single DLIB
zone that wouldn't be an issue... but we elect to keep a one dlib zone
per company to match the different targets and due to (sometimes) different
maintenance cycles.
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
mailto:
Importance 1 with 1 single
period or even SYSSTC for that sort of development environment (or at
least for a subset of users - on the Dallas system I work on, there are
only a few). That would also take care of the next thing that gobbles
up CPU and hurts your TSO response time.
Mark
--
Mark
Yes, but the OP wanted to do it in REXX. Also, I think BCPii is overkill. If
you didn't want to do it in REXX, why not just assembler and diag? Not
to mention the fact that BCPii is new and has had some nasty bugs that could
take down your system / sysplex.
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Z
in the IODF, perhaps get
the current IODF name (see code in IPLINFO) and run an HCD report
and extract the names from that. That would get you CF partitions,
Linux, VM, etc.
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
mailto:mzel...@flash.net
thing when you ready to shutdown z/OS running in a local sysplex or
a monoplex - then do a reset? Obviously you can't do this for a system in
a sysplex.
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
mailto:mzel...@flash.net
ed more of a hint.
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
mailto:mzel...@flash.net
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html
Systems Programming expert at http://expe
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 12:39:22 -0400, Tony Harminc wrote:
>On 20 April 2010 12:35, Mark Zelden wrote:
>
>> There is also a QUIESCE command, which puts the system in a x'CCC'
>> wait state that is restartable. You wouldn't want to normally do that
>> th
601 - 700 of 3790 matches
Mail list logo