In 2714322107556392.wa.paulgboulderaim@bama.ua.edu, on
02/19/2012
at 01:24 AM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
I stand corrected. You can't use REUSE when the new allocation is to
a PATH;
Is that a bug or a feature? It sounds BAD, unless IBM has accepted an
APAR on it.
--
In 1485085136024538.wa.paulgboulderaim@bama.ua.edu, on
02/18/2012
at 09:55 PM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
A prior operation might have allocated those DDNAMEs to UNIX paths
and neglected to free them.
Are you saying that REUSE doesn't work if the ddname is allocated to a
In
CAJTOO5_QkPcWrxtOEfo9HsKKedP8J3G64fjPpmL7kc+Z5=v...@mail.gmail.com,
on 02/18/2012
at 06:58 PM, Mike Schwab mike.a.sch...@gmail.com said:
Another program could have those DDNAMEs assigned to different
DSNAMEs.
That's as much of an issue for the FREE as it is forr the ALLOC with
REUSE.
--
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 12:50:40 -0500, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
I stand corrected. You can't use REUSE when the new allocation is to
a PATH;
Is that a bug or a feature? It sounds BAD, unless IBM has accepted an
APAR on it.
TSO/E Command Ref. says:
In
ofaff521d9.e5166561-on422579a6.0021ef5d-802579a6.00224...@za.ibm.com,
on 02/16/2012
at 08:14 AM, Mark Jones markj...@za.ibm.com said:
FREE F(INDD1)
FREE F(OUTDD1)
FREE F(SYSIN)
ALLOC FI(INDD1) DSN('x..aaa') SHR
ALLOC FI(OUTDD1) DSN('x..bbb') SHR
ALLOC FI(SYSIN)
Another program could have those DDNAMEs assigned to different DSNAMEs.
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote:
In
ofaff521d9.e5166561-on422579a6.0021ef5d-802579a6.00224...@za.ibm.com,
on 02/16/2012
at 08:14 AM, Mark Jones
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 18:38:28 -0500, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
Why not
ALLOC FI(INDD1) DSN('x..aaa') REUSE SHR
ALLOC FI(OUTDD1) DSN('x..bbb') REUSE SHR
ALLOC FI(SYSIN) DSN('x..ccc') REUSE SHR
A prior operation might have allocated those DDNAMEs to UNIX
paths and
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 18:58:50 -0600, Mike Schwab wrote:
Another program could have those DDNAMEs assigned to different DSNAMEs.
Do you believe that an allocate command with the REUSE option would
fail to free a DDNAME allocated to a DSNAME?
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour
:: Subject: Re: Subject: SV: REXX IEBCOPY Continuation?
::
:: Another program could have those DDNAMEs assigned to different DSNAMEs.
::
:: On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
:: shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote:
:: In
::
ofaff521d9.e5166561-on422579a6.0021ef5d-802579a6.00224
:: -Original Message-
:: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
:: Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
:: Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2012 7:56 PM
:: To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
:: Subject: Re: Subject: SV: REXX IEBCOPY Continuation?
::
:: On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 18:38:28
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 21:30:34 -0800, retired mainframer wrote:
::
:: ALLOC FI(INDD1) DSN('x..aaa') REUSE SHR
:: ALLOC FI(OUTDD1) DSN('x..bbb') REUSE SHR
:: ALLOC FI(SYSIN) DSN('x..ccc') REUSE SHR
::
:: A prior operation might have allocated those DDNAMEs to UNIX
::
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:14:03 +0200 Mark Jones markj...@za.ibm.com wrote:
:Hi
:I havent had a problem with this
:/* REXX */
:FREE F(INDD1)
:FREE F(OUTDD1)
:FREE F(SYSIN)
:ALLOC FI(INDD1) DSN('x..aaa') SHR
:ALLOC FI(OUTDD1) DSN('x..bbb') SHR
:ALLOC FI(SYSIN)
Hi
I havent had a problem with this
/* REXX */
FREE F(INDD1)
FREE F(OUTDD1)
FREE F(SYSIN)
ALLOC FI(INDD1) DSN('x..aaa') SHR
ALLOC FI(OUTDD1) DSN('x..bbb') SHR
ALLOC FI(SYSIN) DSN('x..ccc') SHR
NEWSTACK
V1 = C I=((INDD1,R)),O=OUTDD1
V2 = SELECT
received this communication in error,
please contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in its entirety,
whether electronic or hard copy. This communication may contain nonpublic
personal information about consumers subject to the restrictions of the
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. You may
, December 21, 2011 4:28 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: TCPIP question - on the subject of more than one stack per zOS
image
There's no compelling reason, as far as I know, to run more than one stack with
the progress that has been made. IBM recommends that you do not.
There's a set of four
In 1322103310.15944.yahoomailmob...@web161401.mail.bf1.yahoo.com, on
11/23/2011
at 06:55 PM, Ed Gould ps2...@yahoo.com said:
How about IEHIOSUP :)
Okay, that's two. Any more?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see
H IFCDIP00
Ed
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
In 1322004261.2492.yahoomailmob...@web161402.mail.bf1.yahoo.com, on
11/22/2011
at 03:24 PM, Ed Gould ps2...@yahoo.com said:
I do not know if the OEM has been integrated into any of IBM
offerings or not , I semi doubt it. The real point is that it (sort)
is a parameterized program not a true
GRIN...
How about IEHIOSUP :)
Ed
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
John Chase wrote:
| Everybody has a SORT utility. Not everybody has a [PL/I|other
HLL] compiler.
This, I suppose, is nearly true. Not quite everyone has DFSORT or
SYNCHSORT, and almost everyone has some IBM statement-level
procedural-language compiler and the HLASM; but neither of these
John,
I think you would be hard pressed not to find a MVS machine that did not have
some sort of sort installed. now whether it is. The full compatibility of the
two main sorts are equilivant. One can quible over one point or the other but
they are running neck and neck. What made our
Huh
Sent from my iPhone
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
In 010701cc4285$58d528f0$0a7f7ad0$@us, on 07/14/2011
at 07:22 PM, Jim Thomas j...@thethomasresidence.us said:
I have on several occasions, to include the recent, received emails
that look very legitimate
Did you look at the Received: header fields?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg
In
of2ed73c5c.89f2a509-on852578cd.006adaa6-852578cd.006ae...@avon.com,
on 07/14/2011
at 03:27 PM, August Carideo august.cari...@avon.com said:
PROFS was Ollie North's downfall
When a person shoots himself in the foot, I don't blame the pistol.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and
PROFS was Ollie North's downfall
Actually, it was the site's VERY GOOD backup philosophy that
kept backups long-term, and the PROFS implementation at that
site that when the user deleted a message, it wasn't deleted.
Barry Merrill
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour
J.)
In 010701cc4285$58d528f0$0a7f7ad0$@us, on 07/14/2011
at 07:22 PM, Jim Thomas said:
I have on several occasions, to include the recent, received emails
that look very legitimate
Did
ba...@mxg.com (Barry Merrill) writes:
PROFS was Ollie North's downfall
Actually, it was the site's VERY GOOD backup philosophy that
kept backups long-term, and the PROFS implementation at that
site that when the user deleted a message, it wasn't deleted.
almost every such datacenter
-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Chase, John
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 10:40 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: FW: Mysterious Email (original had no subject)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf
@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 10:00 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: FW: Mysterious Email (original had no subject)
In 010701cc4285$58d528f0$0a7f7ad0$@us, on 07/14/2011
at 07:22 PM, Jim Thomas j...@thethomasresidence.us said:
I have on several
Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 10:00 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: FW: Mysterious Email (original had no subject)
In 010701cc4285$58d528f0$0a7f7ad0$@us, on 07/14/2011
at 07:22 PM, Jim Thomas j...@thethomasresidence.us said:
I have on several occasions
V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: FW: Mysterious Email (original had no subject)
Thread-Index: AcxDAl+8t4hTmoeMSZmi7SUYKEQCTQAAqTkwAAC45NA=
References: 010701cc4285
...@bama.ua
.edu Subject
Re: FW: Mysterious Email (original
had no subject)
07
In e1d3f3180c8e6f49b6deab25488ecb9b09b8f...@usilms11.ca.com, on
07/15/2011
at 11:58 AM, Hardee, Charles H charles.har...@ca.com said:
I'm using 2007 and when I right click on the message and choose
message options in the list, I get internet headers in the
display. Is that what you're looking
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Hardee, Charles H
I'm using 2007 and when I right click on the message and choose
message options in the list, I get
internet headers in the display. Is that what you're looking for?
YES!! Exactly!!
Thanks,
, John
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 2:33 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: FW: Mysterious Email (original had no subject)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Hardee, Charles H
I'm using 2007 and when I right click on the message and choose
message
: Thursday, July 14, 2011 8:12 AM
To: undisclosed-recipients
Subject:
Regarding: File sent to JDC1 at S390VM on 07/14/11 at 9:06:41
File sent from JCHASE at INTERNET
File name: JCHASE NOTE, size: 17 records
We have received the file shown above because it was sent
On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 08:45:06 -0500, Chase, John jch...@ussco.com wrote:
Anybody ever gotten anything like this before? We don't run VM, and
I've not sent any files to IBM since April, when I last opened a PMR.
Apparently a former IBMer was subscribed to IBM-MAIN and left without
On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 09:53:00 -0500, Walt Farrell wfarr...@us.ibm.com wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 08:45:06 -0500, Chase, John jch...@ussco.com wrote:
Anybody ever gotten anything like this before? We don't run VM, and
I've not sent any files to IBM since April, when I last opened a PMR.
Chase, John wrote:
Anybody ever gotten anything like this before? We don't run VM, and
I've not sent any files to IBM since April, when I last opened a PMR.
Give Walter Farrell the full e-mail header. That will give you and him the
trail from where that mail is coming from.
The part
Subject
ibm-m...@bama.ua Re: FW: Mysterious Email (original
.edu had no subject
: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Elardus Engelbrecht
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 1:18 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: FW: Mysterious Email (original had no subject)
Chase, John wrote:
Anybody ever gotten anything like this before? We don't run VM
Hi,
How do I find out, researching control blocks, preferably, if running Top
Secret or RACFon z / OS?
Thanks in advance.
José ADAUTO Ribeiro
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
Hi,
How do I find out, researching control blocks, preferably, if running Top
Secret or
RACFon z / OS?
Thanks in advance.
It depends on what you are looking for.
Do you want the ACEE, Data Sets? Are you going to use a program (written in
Assembler or PL/I) or something like REXX or
'.'
Exit
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Lizette Koehler
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2011 3:14 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Looking for Control Blocks
and for the data areas:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/ICHZC4A0/1.39
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Lizette Koehler
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2011 3:14 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re
'.'
Exit
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Lizette Koehler
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2011 3:14 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Looking for Control Blocks (Subject Added
Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Jose Adauto Ribeiro
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2011 3:28 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Looking for Control Blocks (Subject Added)
Oh, you are very fast.
Thans Lindy Mayfield and Lizette Koehler
Does someone have a web page that is list of forums for various
mainframe subjects?
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Lindy Mayfield
lindy.mayfi...@ssf.sas.com wrote:
No problem. It was pretty much right in my face when you asked the question.
For RACF questions there is a specific list. Of
Here is a list from the CBT tape page
http://www.cbttape.org/internet.phtml
Mark Hammond
-Original Message-
From: Mike Schwab [mailto:mike.a.sch...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2011 1:59 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Looking for Control Blocks (Subject Added)
Does
Last time I tried many of the links were obsolete. For lsoft I use the
CATALIST function and do searches. Unfortunately everybody's not lsoft.
In a message dated 5/18/2011 2:03:42 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
markhamm...@ateras.com writes:
http://www.cbttape.org/internet.phtml
Has anyone had experience changing Changeman PDSs to PDSEs?
John R. Whitehair
MVS Systems Programmer
Forethought Financial Services
812-933-6730 (office)
john.whiteh...@forethought.com
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
Subject added
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:00:48 -0400, Whitehair, John
john.whiteh...@forethought.com wrote:
Has anyone had experience changing Changeman PDSs to PDSEs?
John R. Whitehair
MVS Systems Programmer
Forethought Financial Services
812-933-6730 (office)
john.whiteh...@forethought.com
only gave an analysis of the symptoms but he went a step
further and traced the cause.
What I'm going to do is: I'm going copy the subject and edit it to
remove any strange and unreadable characters. Then I will copy it
back on IBM-MAIN's web page during a reply and then if something is
still
In listserv%201102101413290988.0...@bama.ua.edu, on 02/10/2011
at 02:13 PM, Elardus Engelbrecht elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za
said:
What is it that changed the IBM-MAIN subject headers? :-( :-(
What I see is:
1. The original Subject is unencoded ASCII
2. The modified Subject has
Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
What I see is:
1. The original Subject is unencoded ASCII
2. The modified Subject has extraneous blanks, is RFC 2047
encoded and ends with a non-ASCII character; the code page and
the charset varies from message to message.
I waited for your kind reply
Hi to all IBM-MAIN friends and enemies ... :-)
What is it that changed the IBM-MAIN subject headers? :-( :-(
See these threads which started with 're discovering' and 're disc overing',
etc.
I can assure you that I used IBM-MAIN's web pages at bama.ua.edu where I
create a new post and where I
On 2/10/2011 12:13 PM, Elardus Engelbrecht wrote:
Hi to all IBM-MAIN friends and enemies ... :-)
What is it that changed the IBM-MAIN subject headers? :-( :-(
See these threads which started with 're discovering' and 're disc overing',
etc.
John Gilmore.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 12:27:59 -0800, Edward Jaffe
edja...@phoenixsoftware.com wrote:
On 2/10/2011 12:13 PM, Elardus Engelbrecht wrote:
Hi to all IBM-MAIN friends and enemies ... :-)
What is it that changed the IBM-MAIN subject headers? :-( :-(
See these threads which started with 're
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 12:27:59 -0800, Edward Jaffe
edja...@phoenixsoftware.com wrote:
On 2/10/2011 12:13 PM, Elardus Engelbrecht wrote:
Hi to all IBM-MAIN friends and enemies ... :-)
What is it that changed the IBM-MAIN subject headers? :-( :-(
See these threads which started with 're
On 2/10/2011 12:42 PM, Walt Farrell wrote:
Or, at least, something in the email client that John is using to reply to
messages.
Possibly something home grown. It doesn't identify itself with a User-Agent:
tag in the mail headers.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 13:19:00 -0800, Edward Jaffe
edja...@phoenixsoftware.com wrote:
On 2/10/2011 12:42 PM, Walt Farrell wrote:
Or, at least, something in the email client that John is using to reply to
messages.
Possibly something home grown. It doesn't identify itself with a
User-Agent:
tag
problem.
I tried to explain it in my post of May 4, 2010.
http://bama.ua.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind1005L=ibm-mainP=16716
Since then, I have seen more examples of the fully-revealed subject line in the
website of the assembler-list at
http://listserv.uga.edu/archives/asm370.html
most recently
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of john gilmore
Scott Rowe wrote:
| The linkedit/Binder still uses a hardware reserve.
I has been a very long time since it did so, materially as opposed to
formally. For the Linkage
Editor the reserve has been
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 01:56:51 +, john gilmore john_w_gilm...@msn.com wrote:
I suggest that Mr. Rowe conduct a simple experiment, as I just did. Bind a
set of object modules into library
A and write something into dataset B, located on the same notional volume.
He will find that he can do
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 08:58:29 -0600, Walt Farrell wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 01:56:51 +, john gilmore wrote:
I suggest that Mr. Rowe conduct a simple experiment, as I just did. Bind a
set of object modules into library
A and write something into dataset B, located on the same notional
John,
I am so very sorry that I confused you by my use of uses versus use in
my reply, but my intended point still applies: Binder and/or Linkage editor
processing still issue a RESERVE against their target (at least in the case
of a PDS). I would suggest that there are far more egregious errors
In AANLkTi=tPeHFJnRX-=TEEaZL=rvzuszt3e5i8od-b...@mail.gmail.com, on
01/25/2011
at 11:06 AM, Scott Rowe scott.r...@joann.com said:
I have no need or desire to perform your simple
experiment, as it would prove nothing, since even if the RESERVE is
making it to the hardware without being
Yes, GTF could certainly do it, and I think the ENQ monitor would also. My
point was that his experiment would prove nothing.
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net shmuel%2bibm-m...@patriot.net wrote:
In
Scott Rowe wrote:
| The linkedit/Binder still uses a hardware reserve.
I has been a very long time since it did so, materially as opposed to formally.
For the Linkage Editor the reserve has been converted into a global enq using
GRS for many years. Moreover, whjil;e I cannopt prove it in
--- cross posted to the PL/1 mailing list ---
Thank you for your answer. I will take a look at the 3.9 documentation.
We are using 3.6 and 3.7, planning to migrate to 3.9 this year.
I've read the LE programming guide of z/OS 1.10, and from there I took
the information that COBOL and PL/1 are
Someone (I think) was requesting information about COBOL SQL. I saw this from
IBM and it may/may not help you.Best practices for System z softwareIt's the
beauty of SQL: You can code it in many ways and still get the same results. But
depending on your technique, including how you structure
John,
What's up with the subject lines getting destroyed when you post? It
makes threading difficult.
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
mailto:mzel...@flash.net
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net
Paul Gilmartin writes:
begin snippet
For pure division-method, surely. Modulo 64 merely extracts the rightmost 6
bits of the original string. But you had suggested CKSUM, then modulo. And if
CKSUM is of high quality, I'd expect
any modulus to give good results.
end snippet
This response may
I stand corrected - I thought I had created Exit #53 when we migrated to
z/OS 1.4.
Anyway, I have used the similar code in Exit #3 since 1988.
Yes, I assembled Exit #53 with a USER Environment and it is loaded in
the LPA.
LOADMOD(JES2X003) STORAGE=PVT
LOADMOD(JES2X053) STORAGE=LPA
JES2X053
Itschak Mugzach writes:
And you have Camouflage (datamasking.com) , 1st on Gartner and forrester.
Maybe. Camouflage is very late to the z/OS party (but much better late than
never, of course):
http://www.datamasking.com/pressreleases.aspx?id=44
Gartner has a magic quadrant reporting
Timothy, Don't take it personally. May be they are in top 5. I don't care.
This is a fact that I can't recall where I've seen. A Gartner/Forrester
customer can get an analyst to speak with and find out himself.
They might entered late on z/os, but they are pure Java: No CPU cost if you
have zAAP,
Itschak Mugzach wrote:
They might entered late on z/os, but they are pure Java: No CPU cost if you
have zAAP, so they are far away from older solutions running on z/os and
make use of a CP and influence TCO. I've seen few sites that stepped back
from datamasking projects when they discovered that
True, and if you use encryption device, like an accelerator, the overhead is
minimal as well...
ITschak
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 5:01 AM, Phil Smith p...@voltage.com wrote:
Itschak Mugzach wrote:
They might entered late on z/os, but they are pure Java: No CPU cost if
you
have zAAP, so they
Thompson, Steve wrote:
I have been watching subject lines get munged for a while. And so I thought
I'd try to track it down.
Thanks for spotting this.
In this case it appears to get started when John Gilmore replied to a posting.
The above subject started out as:
Calculate Tape Bytes to Tracksþ
I noticed that the munging consists of adding a space after every 10th
character of the subject line. In some cases it may appear to be
irregular rather than every 10th character, but that is only because an
already munged subject line has been re-munged after Re: or
something was added
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
john gilmore
Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 9:16 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Calcul ate Tape B ytes to Tr acks
I have been watching subject lines get munged for a while. And so I
Wouldn't it be interesting if IBM could do something like this:
http://www.serverwatch.com/news/article.php/3877861/IBM-Adopts-Novells-Linux-OS-for-Lotus-Websphere-Appliances.htm
.
for z/OS? Or am I going insane again? Would it be useful to run multiple z/OS
appliances as separate images a
on 3033 or 4341, or any uniprocessor LPARs I had in early PR/SM and
MLPF.
Ron
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of
Ed Gould
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 10:37 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: [IBM-MAIN
In
135331393-1271025860-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-19192267...@bda026.bisx.prod.on.blackberry,
on 04/11/2010
at 10:44 PM, Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca said:
The cry of the coward.
Nonsense; you clearly don't understand the difference between courage and
recklessness. As he
From: Ron Hawkins ron.hawkins1...@sbcglobal.net
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Tue, April 13, 2010 3:58:22 AM
Subject:
Ed,
My perceived observation is that varying devices and paths in z/OS takes
much longer and uses more resources than it did many moons ago
We have a batch job that uses the COMMAND program to issue commands.
One of the uses is to issue 580 V ,ONLINE commands. These are
directed to one menber of a SYSPLEX (no ROUTE command involved).
The user complains that sometimes some of the commands don't execute, as
witnessed by a
We have a batch job that uses the COMMAND program to issue commands.
One of the uses is to issue 580 V ,ONLINE commands. These are
directed to one menber of a SYSPLEX (no ROUTE command involved).
The user complains that sometimes some of the commands don't execute, as
witnessed by
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Field, Alan C.
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 10:21 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: REPOST with Subject: COMMAND processing limit??
We have a batch job that uses the COMMAND
Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of
Field, Alan C.
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 8:13 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: [IBM-MAIN]
We have a batch job that uses the COMMAND program to issue commands.
One of the uses is to issue 580
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 10:20:50 -0500, Field, Alan C. wrote:
The user complains that sometimes some of the commands don't execute, as
witnessed by a subsequent job failing because one or more of the volumes
are off line.
The commands don't execute? Or perhaps you mean that at some
time after a
Alan,
In OS/390 V2.9 (I think) IBM provided an mvs command called CMDS. It can
display or remove various types of MVS commands from the queue.
You might want to put a trigger in place to issue the CMDS SHOW when this job
starts to see what all else might be going on.
CMDS D or CMDS DISPLAY
tree.
Alan
From: Field, Alan C.
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 10:21
To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: REPOST with Subject: COMMAND processing limit??
We have a batch job that uses the COMMAND program to issue commands.
One
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 10:29:31 -0500, McKown, John
john.mck...@healthmarkets.com wrote:
Part of the console restructure was to through away commands and
responses when the *CONSOLE* (or was it *MASTER*?) address space's region
started getting full. There is even a message to tell you of this
quote
Also, no messages are thrown away, every message is queued to the log
_before_ it is considered for queueing to a console
Didn't NETView used to have a method of suppressing messages from both/either
the SYSLOG and the NETLOG?
I seem to recall two options for both of these:
SYSLOG(x)
From: Ron Hawkins ron.hawkins1...@sbcglobal.net
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Mon, April 12, 2010 10:46:05 AM
Subject:
Alan,
I regularly bring 100s of volumes offline and online and have not seen this
problem. I submit the jobs in the same way as you do
You're assuming my GMail name isn't my real name. Not a safe assumption. The
display name, the email account name, and the actual name are unrelated.
So, you really are:
zedgarhoo...@gmail.com
I doubt it!
We don't even know if you're really Ted, now do we?
No you don't, but I'm not hiding
On 4/11/2010 at 06:44 PM, Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca wrote:
The cry of the coward.
You have to be willing to stand up and be counted, or your comments are just
noise.
Up until now I've shared your view that you get unfairly criticized on this
list. Now I'm going to killfile you for
I'm hoping someone else has gone through this exercise. We have STK 9840s
emulating 3490s. We are about to install 9840Ds and migrate our HSM Backups and
ML2 data from 9840As to 9840Ds.
We currently have 2200 specified for our 9840As
TAPEUTILIZATION(UNITTYPE(3490) PERCENTFULL(2200))
What is
JES2 or JES3?
Does the jobclass have the appropriate authority via the COMMAND= operand?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
??? ???
Sent: Sunday, February 07, 2010 12:23 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject:
hi,
I'm running
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Schwarz, Barry A
Sent: Monday, February 08, 2010 1:39 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: (no subject) maybe Entering command via JES
JES2 or JES3?
SNIP
$HASP690 -- JES2
SNIP
Does
1 - 100 of 304 matches
Mail list logo
