-- snip --
Is there any way that I can identify if any volumes in the 2105 were
created as 3390-9's.
Such as MVS console commands , HCD lookup or actually getting into the
2105?
-- snip --
As you've already seen in the other responses, emulated 3390-9 devices are
just 3390-3 with a certain standa
>All of those display is based on the number of cyl. Haven't seen any other
>indicator
The information is available through QUERY DEVICE STATISTICS, but that just
tells you the number of cylinders, tracks per cylinder, and bytes per track.
This will allow you to query the size of any cusromised
Stitt
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 11:34 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Shark - 2105 Question
The DADSM program on CBT file 527 will give you a list of all
volumes and the number of cylinders capacity, allocated, and free.
There is no way to tell the volume size through HCD. And th
>MP3000 ought not to be a problem. Assuming, of course, your MVS is of a
>recent enough vintage.
>
>HTH.
>
>-Original Message-
>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>Behalf Of Howard Rifkind
>Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 1:29 PM
>To:
a
recent enough vintage.
HTH.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Howard Rifkind
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 1:29 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Shark - 2105 Question
Is there any way that I can identify if any volumes i
In a message dated 4/6/2006 1:30:01 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Such as MVS console commands , HCD lookup or actually getting into the 2105?
===>ds qd,start_ucb,for__volumes,validate
Or if you have PDS85/PDSMAN vols * and sort on trks/cyls
--
: Shark - 2105 Question
Is there any way that I can identify if any volumes in the 2105 were
created as
3390-9's.
Such as MVS console commands , HCD lookup or actually getting into the
2105?
BTW does any one out there who is operating with an MP3000-7060 know
if I could connect w
for each address, issue DS P,devn
IEE459I 13.31.55 DEVSERV PATHS 602
UNIT DTYPE M CNT VOLSER CHPID=PATH STATUS
RTYPE SSID CFW TC DFW PIN DC-STATE CCA DDC ALT CU-TYPE
2000,33903 ,A,000,I12CAT,0F=+ 10=+ 36=+ 37=+ 38=+ 39=+
21050100 Y YY. YY.N SIMPLEX 00 00
Is there any way that I can identify if any volumes in the 2105 were created as
3390-9's.
Such as MVS console commands , HCD lookup or actually getting into the 2105?
BTW does any one out there who is operating with an MP3000-7060 know if I
could connect with a DS8000-2107.
Th
In a message dated 4/4/2006 8:26:56 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>The 3990-6 accepts PPRC commands, but you cannot specify the LSS parm.
The LSS parm was not part of the original implementation, as I recall. My
experience with the 3990-6 did not involve trying
990 and it will reject a command
with LSS specified.
Ron
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of (IBM Mainframe Discussion List)
> Sent: Wednesday, 5 April 2006 1:46 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: 2105
Roy,
Yes it is.
Ron
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Roy Hewitt
> Sent: Wednesday, 5 April 2006 6:46 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: 2105 Question
>
> Ron,
>
> Well it is,
hardware is emulating a 2105 controller. That's what I thought
you meant.
Ron
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Roy Hewitt
Sent: Tuesday, 4 April 2006 9:53 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: 2105 Question
Ron,
When yo
In a message dated 4/4/2006 8:39:20 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>In the TrueCopy case, it means that PPRC commands cannot be used to manage
>the storage because the OS wants to see 2105 format commands with the LSS
>specified, but the controller rejects the comma
Of Roy Hewitt
> Sent: Tuesday, 4 April 2006 9:53 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: 2105 Question
>
> Ron,
>
> When you say 'genned as 3990' I presume you mean how the USP interface
> emulation has been defined.
>
> Roy
>
-
Ron,
When you say 'genned as 3990' I presume you mean how the USP interface
emulation has been defined.
Roy
Ron and Jenny Hawkins wrote:
Michael and I have talked offline and your comment regarding toleration for
2105 devices genned as 3990 may be what he is looking for.
Ron
BTW the ac
Roy,
The various posts have mentioned a few things that we can do with the USP
(and previous generations), and some sites have been able use achieve this
dual personality - but only after some very careful planning.
However, just because you can do something doesn't mean you should do it.
As Rad
Micheal,
I'm still a bit confused? are you talking about the cu groups within the
USP, or CU definitions within HCD (ie CUADD=). Yes they are related, but
I dont understand what you mean by 'Logical CUs accessing the same
disk'. AFAIK each disk (ie 3390) is defined to only one CU image within
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
Does anyone know if it is possible to have a disk device being accessed at
the same time by a 3990 control unit and a 2105 control unit?
It is not!
Differing technology.
Differing back-ends.
*It is possible*. BTDT. I used such (weird in fact) configuration on HDS
9960 ma
On Mon, 3 Apr 2006 22:50:45 -0400, Bruce Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>I'm having trouble understanding exactly what you are asking.
>By USP I assume you mean an Hitachi USP.
MP Reply: Yes, HDS TagmaStor or USP is what I am using.
>As I understand it, the USP
>can have its own disks internal
Does anyone know if it is possible to have a disk device being accessed at
the same time by a 3990 control unit and a 2105 control unit? We are
approaching a situation where we could potentially run out of interfaces
within the array (USP) and if this worked it would alleviate (temporarily
at le
>Does anyone know if it is possible to have a disk device being accessed at
the same time by a 3990 control unit and a 2105 control unit?
It is not!
Differing technology.
Differing back-ends.
-
-teD
I’m an enthusiastic proselytiser of the universal panacea I believe in!
Does anyone know if it is possible to have a disk device being accessed at
the same time by a 3990 control unit and a 2105 control unit? We are
approaching a situation where we could potentially run out of interfaces
within the array (USP) and if this worked it would alleviate (temporarily
at leas
23 matches
Mail list logo
