On Jun 25, 2005, at 8:03 AM, Stephen McColley wrote:
It wasn't 10 years ago, it was more like 15 or 20, I remember doing a
system upgrade almost 20 years ago now, pre-xa anyway when we got
clobbered with a new set of abends that all turned out to be programs
not closing the dcb's before ending.
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 06/23/2005
at 11:04 AM, Rolf Ernst [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
the question is to which lengths COBOL goes to determine which files
were opened.
No, the question is to what lengths a program should go in an attempt
to work around a broken subroutine; the issue would be
In
!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACABgA9al6NfmUnEOS37fVfUZGYeKQ8Op/[EMAIL
PROTECTED],
on 06/22/2005
at 03:55 PM, Lizette Koehler [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
If my old addled brain is thinking correctly, I believe over 10 years
ago IBM decided to no longer be nice to programs
On 22 Jun 2005 15:56:11 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
If my old addled brain is thinking correctly, I believe over 10 years ago
IBM decided to no longer be nice to programs and require that all programs
close any files they open. And if they did not close them, the system would
then
...
Since you indicated the files were opened (and not closed)
by a BAL subroutine, the COBOL code may not even be aware of it.
...
My Mother used to say:
You use it; you clean it.
Put it back where you got it from.
Always wear clean underwear, in case you get hit by a bus.
The point is:
A
The origional statement was that a different program calling the
subroutine didn't have the abend. If the different program was also
ASM and didn't clean up modules loaded or was linked as a static call,
then the storage would still be available for the system to close the
ACB. sort of an
On 23 Jun 2005 09:04:13 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
Clark,
the question is to which lengths COBOL goes to determine which files
were opened. Since you indicated the files were opened (and not closed)
by a BAL subroutine, the COBOL code may not even be aware of it. It does
take
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
06/22/2005
at 12:11 PM, Kok, Howi [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I'm not sure if I should post this in this list.
Yes; it's the most appropriate list for your question.
I'm not sure if I should post this in this list. Anyway, I hope
some of you can help me out. We have a
If my old addled brain is thinking correctly, I believe over 10 years ago
IBM decided to no longer be nice to programs and require that all programs
close any files they open. And if they did not close them, the system would
then issue a SC03 abend.
Or am I getting too forgetful???
Lizette
: Help on SC03 abend
If my old addled brain is thinking correctly, I believe over 10 years
ago IBM decided to no longer be nice to programs and require that all
programs close any files they open. And if they did not close them, the
system would then issue a SC03 abend.
Or am I getting too
10 matches
Mail list logo
