Never had either product, but x37 abends went away when we put in SMS.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of gsg
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 4:35 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: StopX37 to CA-Allocate
Our shop uses SMS
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 10/01/2007
07:35:16 PM:
Our shop uses SMS for allocation and StopX37, but we are looking at
replacing
StopX37 with CA-Allocate. Does anyone have any experience coverting from
StopX37 to CA-Allocate or converting off of CA-Allocate
On Oct 2, 2007, at 6:33 AM, John Kington wrote:
We converted many years ago before SMS provided Storage Constraint
Relief. We use CA-Vantage along with CA-Disk so CA-Allocate was a
better
fit. If you are not dependent on notcat 2 processing, you should try
SCR first mostly due to the fact
DUPLICATE NAME EXISTS IN CATALOG
StopX37 and CA-Allocate will detect either condition and can be setup
to delete or uncatalog the old dataset so that the new dataset can
be cataloged.
Regards,
John
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff
What kind of logic did you put in to make the 37 abends go away? Just
installing SMS, doesn't make that happen.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
If the dataset is SMS-managed, you get a jcl error and message
IEF344I R000493N STEP0 DD001 - ALLOCATION FAILED DUE TO DATA FACILITY
SYSTEM ERROR
IGD17101I DATA SET SYS.DMGT.R000493.TEST
NOT DEFINED BECAUSE DUPLICATE NAME EXISTS IN CATALOG
StopX37 and CA-Allocate will detect either condition
NOT CATLGD 2
If the dataset is SMS-managed, you get a jcl error and message
IEF344I R000493N STEP0 DD001 - ALLOCATION FAILED DUE TO DATA FACILITY
SYSTEM ERROR
IGD17101I DATA SET SYS.DMGT.R000493.TEST
NOT DEFINED BECAUSE DUPLICATE NAME EXISTS IN CATALOG
StopX37 and CA-Allocate
8:55 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: StopX37 to CA-Allocate
What kind of logic did you put in to make the 37 abends go away? Just
installing SMS, doesn't make that happen.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
On Oct 2, 2007, at 12:50 PM, John Kington wrote:
Ed,
I always considered it bad design. Chalk it up to user desire
because they
found it expedient. Once in place, it became the new normal and jcl
was
structured to rely upon the automatic error handling. There is no
way to
stop without
Our shop uses SMS for allocation and StopX37, but we are looking at replacing
StopX37 with CA-Allocate. Does anyone have any experience coverting from
StopX37 to CA-Allocate or converting off of CA-Allocate. I'd appreciate any
feedback I can get. Pros/Cons, why you converted off
If you like, I can put you in touch with an expert consultant - but he would
charge you.
He's doing this now for a client in New York.Regards, Bil McKinley Date: Mon,
1 Oct 2007 18:35:16 -0500 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: StopX37 to
CA-Allocate To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Our shop uses SMS
11 matches
Mail list logo