Ted MacNEIL wrote:
It's not really an "OK, so...". IBM was
attempting to keep everything with the same
release name/number to reduce confusion.
I think this is an example where that failed.
We have enough issues on precision, causing
problems. Why add more?
It's quite true that we try to g
>OK, so the name's confusing. But it's V1.8
of the "toolkit for
>z/OS," not the "z/OS R8 toolkit."
It's not really an "OK, so...". IBM was
attempting to keep everything with the same
release name/number to reduce confusion.
I think this is an example where that failed.
We have enough issues
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
I am attempting to install the XML toolkit
for z/os 1.8.
Back to the future?
1.8 doesn't come out until September!
-teD
Me? A skeptic? I trust you have proof!
OK, so the name's confusing. But it's V1.8 of the "toolkit for
z/OS," not the "z/OS R8 toolkit." More import
I think he means the XML toolkit is 1.8.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1/4/2006 8:54 AM >>>
>I am attempting to install the XML toolkit
for z/os 1.8.
Back to the future?
1.8 doesn't come out until September!
-teD
Me? A skeptic? I trust you have proof!
>I am attempting to install the XML toolkit
for z/os 1.8.
Back to the future?
1.8 doesn't come out until September!
-teD
Me? A skeptic? I trust you have proof!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
Think very, very large. Our XML HFS is about half the size of the z/OS
logical root. (z/OS 1.8? You are certainly in reach-ahead mode.)
Data Set Name . . . : OSR17.OMVS.XML
General Data Current Allocation
Management class . . : **None** Allocated tracks . : 20,58
I am attempting to install the XML toolkit for z/os 1.8. I get to a
certain point in the installation instructions and confusion arises.
Any help would be appreciated. I will summarize below, where I am and
where I am confused.
Thanx in advance
Brad Taylor
1. I have downloaded and read the ins
7 matches
Mail list logo
