I'm getting the following on a DIAGNOSE of a particular catalog -
IDC11374I THESE ADDITIONAL CATALOG REFERENCED VOLUMES WERE ENCOUNTERED:
ESASPL
but when I do a LISTCAT ALL against it, there is no reference to ESASPL in
the LISTCAT output. How do I remove the reference to ESASPL.
Jim
On 16/02/06, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02/16/2006
at 03:03 PM, Steve Flynn [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Things are getting weird.
Not really; you're just expecting REXX to have CLIST semantics.
Bingo, sort of...
After much gnashing of teeth,
A point made in http://www.isham-research.co.uk/dd.html for about the last
couple of years.
Scan down to data stick.
--
Phil Payne
http://www.isham-research.co.uk
+44 7833 654 800
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
Kopischke, David G. wrote:
Infrequent Greetings,
I'm trying to get moving on a z/OS upgrade. Using IBM's original
stated direction of supporting four z/OS releases concurrently, I
planned to upgrade to z/OS 1.6 this spring.
I just reviewed the z/OS withdrawal dates and 1.6 is proposed
In a recent note, Greg Price said:
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 23:01:18 +1100
The only potential hassle I see is if you don't have enough
data to fill the data set *and* you want the rest of the data
set pre-formatted. (Whether you wanted this or not would
depend upon the BDAM
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could one use a modest size data set and concatenate it
with itself multiple times?
Yes, that would work.
Could one use EXECIO in a Rexx EXEC, in which case no
source data set whatever is necessary? This depends on
whether EXECIO tolerates DSORG=DA.
Perhaps EXECIO
In a message dated 2/17/2006 6:59:48 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Scan down to data stick.
Probably needs updating a bit. My PC(2 yrs old-3 hardrives) has 4 USBs on
back, 2 on front and one in the keyboard. My sister has an old 933Mhz
Pavillion(it runs Draw
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:02:04 -0700, Timothy Sipples
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know of one customer that's been in production on z/OS 1.6 since
September 1, 2004. (Maybe they read this list.)
That's 23 days before GA, so I guess z/OS is doing pretty well in the
stability and quality department.
On Feb 17, 2006, at 12:02 AM, Timothy Sipples wrote:
I know of one customer that's been in production on z/OS 1.6 since
September 1, 2004. (Maybe they read this list.)
That's 23 days before GA, so I guess z/OS is doing pretty well in the
stability and quality department. :-)
Anyone want to
http://cwflyris.computerworld.com/t/302317/248833/9454/0/
Who knows maybe they will spend this to get all the bugs in DFP:)
Ed
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Went to run an ISPF exec.
I get an allocation error on file IBMUSER.CPPTEMP1.SCPPWORK
I tried to manually allocate the file and I get Duplicate file on volume.
So on Data Set List Utility I put in IBMUSER and I don't see the file.
But if I look at the VOLSER the file is on, sure enough it shows
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Pace
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 9:53 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Catch 22 - File problem
Went to run an ISPF exec.
I get an allocation error on file
Timothy Sipples wrote:
I know of one customer that's been in production on z/OS 1.6 since
September 1, 2004. (Maybe they read this list.)
That's 23 days before GA, so I guess z/OS is doing pretty well in the
stability and quality department. :-)
Anyone want to see if they can set a new
This is likely stupid, but I cannot find any documentation that says
that moving the SYS1.VOLCAT.VGENERAL catalog from one volume to another
is any different from moving any other catalog. I guess the basic thing
would be to ensure that it is not updated during the move.
But just for my comfort,
It's our policy to support releases for three years, which means we
intend to withdraw R6 from service in September 2007. This has not
been announced yet, so it is not official; nonetheless, it's the way
I'd bet.
That date is listed on the EOS page as projected but not announced.
--
Bruce A.
OK. Now I'm getting confused ... I went back to the FM's and
Enterprise Cobol 3.3.0 and previous
SEARCH ALL
WHEN phrase (binary search)
If the WHEN relation-condition is specified, the compare is based on the
length and sign of data-name. For example, if the length of data-name is
shorter than
The fact that USB ports are on the backs of PCs (rather than the
fronts) indicates they were designed for cubicle-dwellers.
I have three computers at home with USB ports on the front. I also have
cables that allow back mounted USBs to be used easily. They were not
designed for
Probably needs updating a bit
Technology's a bitch.
(That will probably get me another SnottyGram from Bell Helicopter's firewall
for
inappropriate sexist language. Seufz.)
Didn't the CIA ban Furbies a while back?
I now find I carry - pretty much by default - a huge memory capacity:
a) I
Ah, but do you own a pocket protector?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Phil Payne
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 12:21 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Pod slurping?
Probably needs updating a bit
Technology's a bitch.
Bruce Black wrote:
It's our policy to support releases for three years, which means we
intend to withdraw R6 from service in September 2007. This has not
been announced yet, so it is not official; nonetheless, it's the way
I'd bet.
That date is listed on the EOS page as projected but not
In a message dated 2/17/2006 11:23:54 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We have lost the glass-house discipline, and I think we are the poorer for
it because the
philosophy used to percolate. The glass house no longer sets the standards,
and that's not
good.
That didn't perzactly work either.
DELETE IBMUSER.CPPTEMP1.SCPPWORK NVR FILE(DISK1)
IDC3014I CATALOG ERROR
IDC3009I ** VSAM CATALOG RETURN CODE IS 50 - REASON CODE IS IGG0CLE4-88
IDC0551I ** ENTRY IBMUSER.CPPTEMP1.SCPPWORK NOT DELETED
IDC0001I FUNCTION COMPLETED, HIGHEST CONDITION CODE WAS 8
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 08:36:57 -0800, Edward E. Jaffe wrote:
Timothy Sipples wrote:
I know of one customer that's been in production on z/OS 1.6 since
September 1, 2004. (Maybe they read this list.)
That's 23 days before GA, so I guess z/OS is doing pretty well in the
stability and quality
If you go to ISPF 3.4 and put in both the data set name and the volser
where it lives from which you want to delete it, what happens if you use
line command D on it?
Don Imbriale
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
Of Mark Pace
Sent:
Tom Schmidt wrote:
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 08:36:57 -0800, Edward E. Jaffe wrote:
Timothy Sipples wrote:
I know of one customer that's been in production on z/OS 1.6 since
September 1, 2004. (Maybe they read this list.)
That's 23 days before GA, so I guess z/OS is doing pretty well in the
Up in the upper right hand corner I get -
Data set not cataloged
Mark D Pace
Senior Systems Engineer
Mainline Information Systems
1700 Summit Lake Drive
Tallahassee, FL. 32317
Office: 850.219.5184
Fax: 888.221.9862
http://www.mainline.com
This e-mail and files transmitted with it are
This may sound silly, but in VSE land I would use DITTO PVT and just
delete the VTOC entry. Is that a No-No in MVS?
Mark D Pace
Senior Systems Engineer
Mainline Information Systems
1700 Summit Lake Drive
Tallahassee, FL. 32317
Office: 850.219.5184
Fax: 888.221.9862
http://www.mainline.com
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 09:56:58 -0800, Edward E. Jaffe wrote:
Tom Schmidt wrote:
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 08:36:57 -0800, Edward E. Jaffe wrote:
Timothy Sipples wrote:
I know of one customer that's been in production on z/OS 1.6 since
September 1, 2004. (Maybe they read this list.)
That's 23 days
I moved it - just like any catalog.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 10:38 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Dummy question about VOLCAT.
This is likely stupid, but I
A little more history -
I did a LISTCAT of every catalog on my system and found them defined in the
master catalog of my driver system, which I had imported into this system's
master catalog. Don't know if that helps any.
Mark D Pace
Senior Systems Engineer
Mainline Information Systems
1700
You have a VVDS missing from your catalog that doesn't coincide with the
catalog backpointer in the VVDS.
I usually do something like this:
//S1 EXEC PGM=IDCAMS
//D01 DD UNIT=3390,VOL=SER=volser,DISP=OLD
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Pace
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 11:45 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Catch 22 - File problem
That didn't perzactly work either.
DELETE IBMUSER.CPPTEMP1.SCPPWORK
So I found a delete non-vsam
DELETE file-name FILE(file) PURGE CATALOG(cat)
That did the trick.
Thanks to all that tried to help.
Mark D Pace
Senior Systems Engineer
Mainline Information Systems
1700 Summit Lake Drive
Tallahassee, FL. 32317
Office: 850.219.5184
Fax: 888.221.9862
On the other hand, if you are cozy with your security administrator, ask
Which is also me. I'm like a VSE shop. I do everything.
To print a VVDS for a volume:
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSINDD *
PRINT INFILE(DISK)
//DISK DD DSN=SYS1.VVDS.Vvolser,DISP=SHR,UNIT=SYSALLDA,
//
I've been looking for most of the week. I see that storage is not tracked for
report classes in RMF but I haven't been able to find a place where this is
documented. I've checked the RMF manuals but haven't found anything saying so.
Does anyone know where I can find this documented? I need
Bruce Black wrote:
So, from the info Ron and Bruce provided, it sounds like multi-GB single-
threaded disk output can get 30-40 MB/sec these days. Impressive! I
don't know if even the newest and fastest tape can compare with those
numbers.
The newest IBM mainframe drive TS1120 claims a
Dave Kopischke wrote:
I knew I didn't dream this:
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg245976.pdf
OS/390 supports the coexistence of up to four consecutive releases. While
the
four-release coexistence policy applies to JES2, the fact that a JES2
installation
can be staged has been taken
Is there any IBM public list about what DASD vendors suppport GDPS?
The three mainframe DASD vendors supported GDPS in 2000.
I know, because we had all three (IBM, EMC, HDS) in our GDPS environment.
That shouldn't have changed in 6 years.
-
-teD
I’m an enthusiastic proselytiser of the
The *latest* STK/Sun drive is T1. 120MB/s claimed. Capacity like
TS1120: 500GB uncompressed.
thanks. I had not even heard about it.
STK needs to check their web site. To quote the numbers I did, I went
to the storagetek,com web site and clicked on tape drives. The page
that comes up
Sorry for responding to my own post.
That should have said ... 2001 ... 5 years.
-Original Message-
From: Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 00:00:00
To:IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: GDPS and DASD Vendors
Is there any IBM public list about what DASD
We have an external coupling facility that is only used about 2%.
We have four LPARs on an 890 with 3 shared general purpose engines and one
IFL for VM/Linux, so all engines accounted for.
We have been requested to create a production coupling facility LPAR that
will share the general purpose
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:51:51 +0100, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks very promising.
Yes .. on the other hand when we look at DASD manufacturers numbers .. you
wonder why some of us are looking for larger time frame for backup ...
the numbers say that we need few minutes to save few teras
Ok
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:23:09 -0600, Giovanni Cerquone
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any IBM public list about what DASD vendors suppport GDPS?. If
so, could you please provide me with the URL?
I dont'know why my post did not get through , i'll re-ask .
My question : If you talk about DASD
Can anybody tell me the CA product using the CAZ prefix? I'm thinking
JCLCHECK, but I can't remember. The reason I ask is that I just got a new
product today, the IBM Application Performance Analyzer (their STROBE
replacement) and some genius at IBM decided to use the CAZ prefix. Can't
wait
Yes, JCLCheck.
Tom Sims
Trident Services
Thomas Conley wrote:
Can anybody tell me the CA product using the CAZ prefix? I'm thinking
JCLCHECK, but I can't remember. The reason I ask is that I just got a
new product today, the IBM Application Performance Analyzer (their
STROBE replacement)
From: Frank Leblanc
We have been requested to create a production coupling facility LPAR that
will share the general purpose engines.
It will replace the external CF, thus saving money in maintenance, etc.
M - everyone's at the mercy of bean counters.
Has anyone else tried this and what
We also moved from standalone CF to ICF for financial reasons. But our
management had the foresight to spring for some ICF engines in the
process. They reasoned that enough money would be saved just on
maintenance to justify the extra CPs.
An additional saving for many shops is memory.
Can anybody tell me the CA product using the CAZ prefix? I'm thinking
JCLCHECK, but I can't remember. The reason I ask is that I just got a
new
product today, the IBM Application Performance Analyzer (their STROBE
replacement) and some genius at IBM decided to use the CAZ prefix.
Can't
wait
In a message dated 2/17/2006 5:48:43 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hmmm. The IBM genius would have been within his/her rights. IBM has
documented for eons that they own names in the A-J range.
Guess a quicky would be copy CA:CAZ modules into a separate PDS then
From: Craddock, Chris
Hmmm. The IBM genius would have been within his/her rights. IBM has
documented for eons that they own names in the A-J range.
Agree whole-heartedly.
Unfortunately as Tom alludes, it's the customer that has to wear the
consequences.
Tom, you're kicking the wrong vendor.
Craddock, Chris wrote:
Hmmm. The IBM genius would have been within his/her rights. IBM has
documented for eons that they own names in the A-J range.
Perhaps. But, coming out of the Matrix into the real world, one
quickly realizes the IBM packaging genii ought to make allowances for
A few minutes - you must have old kit...
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bruno Sugliani
Sent: Saturday, 18 February 2006 6:12 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Disk vs Tape scenario
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:51:51
On Feb 17, 2006, at 6:52 PM, Edward E. Jaffe wrote:
Craddock, Chris wrote:
Hmmm. The IBM genius would have been within his/her rights. IBM has
documented for eons that they own names in the A-J range.
Perhaps. But, coming out of the Matrix into the real world, one
quickly realizes the IBM
From: Edward E. Jaffe
Craddock, Chris wrote:
Hmmm. The IBM genius would have been within his/her rights. IBM has
documented for eons that they own names in the A-J range.
Perhaps. But, coming out of the Matrix into the real world, one
quickly realizes the IBM packaging genii ought to
At 10:42 +1000 on 02/18/2006, ibm-main wrote about Re: CAZ? modules:
IBM also reserve SVC numbers - another requirement that CA flout.
OTOH - IBM's hands are not 100% clean when it comes to observing
reserved SVC Numbers Rules. I seem to remember that while they
reserve SVCs 200 (or is
Ed Gould wrote:
On Feb 16, 2006, at 7:40 AM, Walt Farrell wrote:
On 2/15/2006 5:32 PM, Jerry Vernon wrote:
We are trying to restrict the execution of certain programs by LPAR
so we
can just license them by processor. The one in particular we are
looking
at is COBOL. By limiting COBOL
On Feb 17, 2006, at 9:59 PM, Thomas Conley wrote:
Freakin' Aussies
Thomas:
Remember they are upside down:)
Ed
- Original Message - From: ibm-main [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 7:42 PM
Subject: Re: CAZ? modules
57 matches
Mail list logo
