Hi everyone.
The editor ate (well added to) my text.
The previous message shouldn't have asterisks around the example.
__
Here's an example of a small job network.
NETWORK ONE;
SUBMIT JOB1;
SUBMIT JOB2;
SUBMIT JOB3 AFTER JOB1 JOB2 ENDED;
ENDNET;*
Thanks for the comprehensive information.
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Timothy Sipples
Skickat: den 5 juli 2007 04:36
Till: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Ämne: Re: SV: PCOM questions
...
Both products are compatible with
Ahhh. You're right. I went to the wrong page:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/Shelves/EZ2ZS20I
here the doc is not available in PDF; but at
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/zos/bkserv/zswpdf/enterpr
ise_pli36.html
it is.
Whenever I don't find what I'm looking
Hi folks
I want to change my HSM backup media from tape to DASD. I also want to dispense
with ML2 and just keep everything on ML1 (not yet convinced of the benefits of
DASD ML2).
Does anyone know how I can move my existing 1Tb or so of tape backups onto
DASD, and also how I can move all my
Timothy Sipples wrote:
Well, someone had to pay for PCOMM, the price is AFAIK approx.$250-350
per license
Ah, no. Pet peeve of mine when someone gets the price wrong. :-)
Looking at U.S. prices, right now at ibm.com the highest price you could
possibly pay is US $238. To get that price
I wrote:
Not to initiate another which language is best war, I must admit to
having become somewhat enamoured of perl of late. Must get a copy onto
big iron one day so I can have a play.
To which Ed responded:
Why not put it up this weekend?
Brian,
TAPEMIGRATION(NONE) should turn off any migration to tape.
Setting ML1 days in your SMS Management classes to NOLIMIT will prevent any SMS
managed datasets from leaving ML1.
There's no way to recall from ML2 to ML1 that I know of. You'll have to recall
to Primary DASD then turn around
Are your HSM tape managed by a tape management system? Under the control of an
ATL?
If under HSM control is the setsys value for Tapedeletion?
From: Perryman, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 7/5/2007 7:08 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: HSM
Thanks for that David.
However I tried that recycle on a small range of backup tapes, but the darned
thing infuriatingly keeps picking tape volumes instead of my DASD ones.. Any
ideas where I might be going wrong?
Brian
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
We've got RMM. It's running on a VTS.
I manually ADDVOL'd a single DASD backup volume to experiment with, it shows up
correctly when I do a LIST BVOL.
SETSYS TAPEDELETION is set to SCRATCHTAPE
I changed a couple of other SETSYS values though:
BACKUP(DASD)
RECYCLEOUTPUT(BACKUP(DASD))
Don't
Hi,
We would like to print Adhesive labels on our IBM 3900.
Where can I find the specifications for these labels.
Gadi
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
Is there any rule or policy within RMM that directs allocation of
HMIG.BACKTAPE.**? Obviously I'm not familiar with RMM.
Did you have any tapes show up on your BVOL output as AVAIL? These might have
to be Delvol'd.
Have you re-tried the recycle since changing Recycleoutput?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tom Grieve
To be pedantic, the 2G MEMLIMIT value for CICS TS 3.2 is a
recommendation, not an absolute value. CICS will start up as
long as MEMLIMIT is at least as large as EDSALIMIT (which is
obviously less than
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:03:42 -0500, Jeffrey Deaver
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So SHARE is only 5.714 weeks away now, so I need to start planning. Main
question for this group - How do I go about meeting some of you while I'm
there?
Best place to be snubbed is probably SCIDS. :-) Look me up.
At I.B.M., a Smarter Way to Outsource
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/05/business/05outsource.html?themc=th
http://tinyurl.com/26xg4e
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
Mark Zelden wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jul 2007 09:09:46 -0400, Mark Jacobs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is currently set at 80MB in SMFPARM. The person who picked that
number just reached into a hat for it.
Regardless how that person picked it, it is a IMO a ridiculous number
to set for a
On Thu, 5 Jul 2007 19:09:01 +1000, Shane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wrote:
Not to initiate another which language is best war, I must admit to
having become somewhat enamoured of perl of late. Must get a copy onto
big iron one day so I can have a play.
To which Ed responded:
Why not put
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Timothy Sipples
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 5:21 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Mainframe Blog Posting re: Mainframe Migrations to z
I'd like to draw IBM-MAINers' attention to the latest
On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 07:54 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
You probably can't see it in the picture, but I
have a pony tail which makes me pretty easy to pick out.
Glad you weren't standing next to Barry when I was looking for people I
(sorta) knew ... ;-)
Shane ...
On Wed, 4 Jul 2007 04:14:00 -0500, Lieven Borgs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris,
The difference between the IBM ATL and the STK is that the IBM stuff is SMS
managed.
So you have several options:
1) Code a different esotheric in the JCL for 9840C devices and select devices
that way.
2) If you do
On Wed, 4 Jul 2007 09:09:46 -0400, Mark Jacobs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is currently set at 80MB in SMFPARM. The person who picked that
number just reached into a hat for it.
Regardless how that person picked it, it is a IMO a ridiculous number
to set for a 64-bit storage default. I would
I haven't read the migration guide yet, but I saved this note from
Jonathan Scott (CICS Development Hursley) on the CICS-L list:
CICS 3.2 requires a minimum of MEMLIMIT=2G so that it can allocate a
storage object of this size above the bar, for example to support
containers.
I guess that's a
Good Morning,
I am investigating an error posted on the DASD I/O REQUEST TERMINATED,
EXCESSIVE RETRIES I executed an ANALYZE (using the parms listed below) but no
errors were found :906E ALL DATA 'MACHINE READABLE' WITHOUT ERRORS
ANALYZE DDNAME(DISK1) SCAN SPEED
I then executed
On Thu, 5 Jul 2007 23:16:51 +1000, Shane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 07:54 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
You probably can't see it in the picture, but I
have a pony tail which makes me pretty easy to pick out.
Glad you weren't standing next to Barry when I was looking for
Mark Zelden wrote:
[...]
Chris said the drives were stand alone. Does Sun/STK provide SMC
when they sell stand alone drives? Or is it a cost option? I have never
been at a STK shop that didn't have an automated library along with
HSC (now HSC/SMC), so I have no idea.
AFAIK HSC is paid
I've got a pony tail too although not too much grey (yet).
I figure I might as well let it grow while I still can ... Might end up
losing some IQ points when it goes away grin.
Wonder if we should start a 'long-hair' table at SCIDS ...
Ken Porowski
AVP Systems Software
CIT Group
E: [EMAIL
At 08:31 AM 7/5/2007 -0500, you wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jul 2007 23:16:51 +1000, Shane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 07:54 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
You probably can't see it in the picture, but I
have a pony tail which makes me pretty easy to pick out.
Glad you weren't standing
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of John P Baker
The main publication site for the US is:
http://www.elink.ibmlink.ibm.com/publications/servlet/pbi.wss?CTY=US
The one I use is:
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/zos/bkserv/
But it
Wayne Driscoll wrote:
Pony tail, so I guess that means that you could get mistaken for Mike
Stack or Barry Merrill? vbg
Pony tail or no pony tail, Mark has a unique look all his own -- easy to
pick out of a crowd.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd,
Pony tail, so I guess that means that you could get mistaken for Mike
Stack or Barry Merrill? vbg
Wayne Driscoll
Product Developer
JME Software LLC
NOTE: All opinions are strictly my own.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
Funny you should say that. When I started to reply I originally wrote
but don't confuse me with Barry Merrill :-) . But then erased it.
I of course don't look anything like him. A little less gray too. :-)
I've been told the half faced silhouette of Berry Merrill that's on the
front of his
Hi,
You might want to post the full message id(s) that go with the errors?
z/OS Systems Programming Consultancy
Website www.zostek.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of esmie moo
Sent: 05 July 2007 14:45
To:
Here is the full error message:
*IOS000I 906E,1D,IOE,47,0E00,,04880004,WRKD01,VSXSORT2,
0004000B6E8844AD71104200183F0101004D4CE200048804
I/O REQUEST TERMINATED, EXCESSIVE RETRIES
Phil Kingston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
You might want to post the full message id(s)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Farley, Peter x23353
Sent: Thursday 05 July 2007 08:45
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SV: PCOM questions
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Thomas Berg writes:
Really ? Is there any reference installation that has
PCOMM installed at 64-bit windows and also use it ?
(Wondering because I have heard a lot about problems
to getting software to work on 64-bit windows.)
I'm not sure about 64-bit reference installations specifically,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Timothy Sipples
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 11:24 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SV: PCOM questions
Snipped
Everybody is going to be different as to what their favorite new
- Original Message -
From: Edward Jaffe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 10:42 AM
Subject: Re: SHARE meeting
Wayne Driscoll wrote:
Pony tail, so I guess that means that you could get mistaken for Mike
Stack or Barry Merrill? vbg
Re: FTP, I may be thinking of Host On-Demand here. I know HOD has
definitely got it.
Re: Arbitrary screen sizes beyond Mod5, yes, I think that's a *.WS file
setting.
- - - - -
Timothy Sipples
IBM Consulting Enterprise Software Architect
Specializing in Software Architectures Related to System z
The official reference is the Forms Design Reference which can be found at
http://www.printers.ibm.com/internet/wwsites.nsf/vwwebpublished/3900supt_ww
Bill
On Thu, 5 Jul 2007 14:34:32 +0300, #1490;#1491;#1497; amp;#1489;#1503;
#1488;#1489;#1497; [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
We would like
Arf !
-Original Message-
Ed Finnell
In a message dated 7/5/2007 9:13:29 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Wonder if we should start a 'long-hair' table at SCIDS ...
Or a poodle parlor???
--
In a message dated 7/5/2007 9:13:29 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Wonder if we should start a 'long-hair' table at SCIDS ...
Or a poodle parlor???
** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
Hello,
I have a question regarding PAGTOTL parameter. Our setting is set at
PAGTOTL=(20). We currently have 12 local page datasets defined at IPL.
We would like to add 4 additional local page data sets from a new DASD
pool. Then Page Delete/Drain the original 12. This is necessary
because of
Ugaz, Rick wrote:
Hello,
I have a question regarding PAGTOTL parameter. Our setting is set at
PAGTOTL=(20). We currently have 12 local page datasets defined at IPL.
We would like to add 4 additional local page data sets from a new DASD
pool. Then Page Delete/Drain the original 12. This is
Esmie:
Looks like an I/O error in the Locate Record CCW(47) because it trying tp
access a record outside of its defined extent. The sense byte 0004 is file
protect. Typically, the define extent CCW defines the from and to address
on the disk in which the following channel program will
Rick,
PAGTOTL indicates the number of PARTEs that are built at IPL time. Each page
dataset uses one PARTE. IBMLink has a pretty good explanation of PARTEs and
how they are reused with PAGE ADD/DEL. Search the QA library for document
BDC32239 or PAGTOTL.
Don't forget the first 3 PARTEs
On Thu, 5 Jul 2007 10:13:04 -0400, Ken Porowski wrote:
Wonder if we should start a 'long-hair' table at SCIDS ...
but the short-hairs might complain...
--
Tom Marchant
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tom Marchant
On Thu, 5 Jul 2007 10:13:04 -0400, Ken Porowski wrote:
Wonder if we should start a 'long-hair' table at SCIDS ...
but the short-hairs might complain...
... not to mention the no-hairs...
Tom Marchant wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jul 2007 10:13:04 -0400, Ken Porowski wrote:
Wonder if we should start a 'long-hair' table at SCIDS ...
but the short-hairs might complain...
As well as us no-hairs. :-D
--
---snip--
Hey,
What about being more politically correct (so us womens' is not offended) and
just call it the Wisdom of the Ages???
Lizette
-unsnip
I could live with that. :-D
On Thu, 5 Jul 2007 13:33:51 -0400, Bielskie, Stephen wrote:
PAGTOTL indicates the number of PARTEs that are built at IPL time. Each
page dataset uses one PARTE. IBMLink has a pretty good explanation of
PARTEs and how they are reused with PAGE ADD/DEL. Search the QA library
for document
Hey,
What about being more politically correct (so us womens' is not offended) and
just call it the Wisdom of the Ages???
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tom Marchant
On Thu, 5 Jul 2007 10:13:04 -0400, Ken Porowski wrote:
Wonder if
As well as us no-hairs. :-D
Fleischmütze? I'm back to having a ponytail - most Aussies would remember me
having one.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
I have to agree with Ken's post, Eric - remember that in a lot of ways,
what the server farms are learning to do, you've already done for years;
the RAS attitude is definitely transferable, especially in the DR /
Business Continuity area, also in the area of operational automation:
with the
Is the glass half empty or half full? This is one of the times I like to
quote my father: I'm not getting bald. The problem is that my brains
are growing faster than my hair.
Alan Schwartz
Assurant Corporate Technology
Rick Fochtman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion
We have a lot of FORTRAN engineering programs; not much new development or
maintenance, but when there is it often gets migrate to some variety of
FORTRAN or C with a GUI on a PC.
But you can't get rid of it: many of the engineers that developed the
code have calculated their last structural
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Alan Schwartz
Is the glass half empty or half full? This is one of the
times I like to quote my father: I'm not getting bald. The
problem is that my brains are growing faster than my hair.
I thought that was
On Jul 5, 2007, at 12:47 AM, Clem Clarke wrote:
Hi Tim,
I was going to make this a private message to you, but others may
get something beneficial from this.
As some of you may know, my intention has been to make a Universal,
common use anywhere command language.
Thus far I have
Ron Hawkins said
As well as us no-hairs. :-D
Fleischmütze? I'm back to having a ponytail - most Aussies would remember
me having one.
Well we should probably narrow that down to at least the subset of Aussies that
know you. And none of those would need to look for a pony-tail to spot
Tom,
I'm sorry, but there is no way that I know of to do that.
Thanks,
Andrew Wilt
IBM DFSMSdss Architecture/Development
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 07/05/2007
11:28:50 AM:
I think I'm out of luck, but wanted to verify first. We're z/OS 1.7.
We've had
On Thu, 5 Jul 2007 13:05:41 -0700, Andrew N Wilt wrote:
I'm sorry, but there is no way that I know of to do that.
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 07/05/2007
11:28:50 AM:
We've had a number of small DSS DUMP files written to tape that I want to
move to DISK.
On Wed, 4 Jul 2007 23:45:40 +1000, Shane wrote:
Fishing ???.
A (first) *anonymous* post ???.
Wonder who will be inclined to respond to such ...
Maybe just my suspicious mind at work.
On Wed, 4 Jul 2007 09:58:51 -0500, Compton, John wrote:
It might help to give a proper name and possibly a
OK, I've just got to ask: if you're going to migrate to disk, why not just
leave the data where it was? If HSM or something does compression before
creating the migrated copy, use DFSMS compression for the original data,
perhaps?
I don't see the advantage in migrating data from disk to disk,
---snip
Is the glass half empty or half full? This is one of the times I like to
quote my father: I'm not getting bald. The problem is that my brains
are growing faster than my hair.
--unsnip---
God only
Tim.
Not all disks are created equal. You may have a stack of old Controllers
still connected on ESCON, and a few shiny white boxes with FICON. If you
have a large amount of dormant files wouldn't it make sense to migrate
it to the slower DASD if it is untouched for a time? And leave the fast
http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/07/05/2118203
Knocked frequently in recent years, the site notes that IBM's workhorse
continues to do important work in a number of enterprise environments.
While there are some out there who'd like to see its demise, a true threat to
the Big Iron has
Check out AWSTAPE and see if that helps.
On Thu, 5 Jul 2007 16:00:58 -0500, Paul Gilmartin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jul 2007 13:05:41 -0700, Andrew N Wilt wrote:
I'm sorry, but there is no way that I know of to do that.
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote
On Sun, 1 Jul 2007 18:21:42 -0500, Kenneth E Tomiak
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
XMITMGR is nice but has some limitations.
I plan to include it in FILE760 on the CBTTAPE in August.
Maybe not.
Does anybody have 3330 (or even older), 3350, 3375, or 3380 transmit files
with something more than a
it with its future Blue Gene/P massively
parallel supercomputer.
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/cwire/20070705/ttc-ibm-to-break-petaflops-
barrier-with-78e70a2.html
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions
No ASM2 users out there?
Can anyone give a one-line description of these options? More than they are
part of CA-ASM2. I can guess what some might be, but FRC and DFR escape
me. I am sure I can make something up, but reality would be more
educational.
X$abbbN ASM2 Computer Associates
Ed Gould wrote:
IBM to Break Petaflops Barrier with Blue Gene/P
Computer Business Online via Yahoo! UK Ireland News Wed, 04 Jul 2007
10:44 PM PDT
The race is on to build the first supercomputer that can break 1
petaflops of aggregate number-crunching power, and IBM is hoping to be
the first
This MVS 3.8j tidbit hints the OP started coding something on his S JOB,
command incorrectly. Perhaps using a new symbolic his JOB proc did not have.
As in the earlier post, onmy 1.7 system I can still get it to work without
adding this DDNAME=IEFRDER type of statement.
startup procedure
You may use TV (Tape to VSAM) function of DITTO/ESA.
If the tape block size is less than 32760 bytes, you can use TS (Tape to
Sequential data) function.
When you define the VSAM ESDS for over 32K tape block size, you have to
specify SPANNED parameter and large number of RECORDSIZE that fit the
72 matches
Mail list logo
