Hi All,
One of our application programmer has created a PDS with below attributes :
Data Set Name . . . :
TPUN011.NEWMAPST
General Data Current
Allocation
Management class . . : **None** Allocated blocks . :
741
Storage class . . . : TPUSC
Jags,
Is there a chance that someone has written directly to the PDS without
specifying a member name?
I recall past posts have mentioned that this will corrupt a PDS.
A scan of your Type 14/15 SMF records may identify the culprit.
Ron
Ron Hawkins
Complex Test Lab - Mainframe, Technical
W dniu 2011-10-24 08:07, jagadishan perumal pisze:
Hi All,
One of our application programmer has created a PDS with below attributes :
Data Set Name . . . :
TPUN011.NEWMAPST
General Data Current
Allocation
Management class . . : **None** Allocated
jagadishan perumal jagadish...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:canhhcyrsdw_reish_oibs2_kjmpclypuzbmr8udtz_vnoyi...@mail.gmail.com
...
Hi All,
One of our application programmer has created a PDS with below
attributes :
Data Set Name . . . :
TPUN011.NEWMAPST
General Data
Hi Jags,
There is no directory. Directory space is the third parameter on the space
allocation when allocating a PDS. Either he forgot to code it, or it was 0.
Ask the programmer to delete the dataset and create it again, with directory
space.
HTH,
Linda
- Original
This is not a PDS, it has 0 directory blocks. (Maximum dir. blocks : 0)
But it says Data set name type : PDS
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
kees.verno...@klm.com wrote:
jagadishan perumal jagadish...@gmail.com wrote in message
A PDS with zero tracks cannot contain data, a PDS with zero dir. Blocks
cannot contain members.
Specify directory blocks.
Kees.
jagadishan perumal jagadish...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:CANHhCyS-gcXY8XnJ1QJBQC=6teqtnmslznjitq+locfqrto...@mail.gmail.com
...
This is not a PDS, it has 0
W dniu 2011-10-24 09:05, jagadishan perumal pisze:
This is not a PDS, it has 0 directory blocks. (Maximum dir. blocks : 0)
But it says Data set name type : PDS
Yes, it says, so what?. It says PO, PDS, *and* directory 0. That means
your dataset (partially) looks like PDS, but it cannot hold
Hi All,
I will ask the programmer to delete and re-create the dataset. Meanwhile I
will examine His JCL(PDS allocation).
Regards,
Jags
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
kees.verno...@klm.com wrote:
A PDS with zero tracks cannot contain data, a PDS with zero dir. Blocks
jagadishan perumal wrote:
This is not a PDS, it has 0 directory blocks. (Maximum dir. blocks : 0)
But it says Data set name type : PDS
Believe them. Trust me on this one.
Your dataset is defined on the OUTSIDE as a PDS, but the INTERNAL organization
is corrupt (Max Dir Blocks = zero).
Hi
Thank you
We have a HTML site (web page) with SYSLOG or JOBLOG.
I would like to set a hyperlink to the messages.
It works if the message in LOOKAT( example
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/zoslib/lookat?required=release=ZOS/V1R12msgid=BPXF024I)
but if it is a DB2 MQ or CICS
I am out of the office until 10/26/2011.
For Mainframe z/OS ,CICS MQ assistance,
Please call Mainframe Services HOTLINE 312/444-5106 : Option 1
Email group: Mainframe Services HOTLINE
Note: This is an automated response to your message BLDL error Cause
sent on 10/24/2011 1:07:19.
This is
Hi all,
Please excuse what is possibly a very stupid question:
Do I need always to put the fully qualified dataset name in LINKLIST/LINKLIB or
can I use an alias?
If I use an alias what happens at IPL, how do I ensure that the catalog will be
loaded properly, where do I specify the alias - or
From: Dell'Anno, Aurora Emanuela aurora.della...@ca.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Do I need always to put the fully qualified dataset name in LINKLIST/LINKLIB
or can I use an alias?
If I use an alias what happens at IPL, how do I ensure that the catalog will
be loaded properly, where
do
Hi All,
One of our application programmer has created a PDS with below attributes
:
Data Set Name . . . :
TPUN011.NEWMAPST
General Data Current
Allocation
Management class . . : **None** Allocated blocks . :
741
Storage class . . . : TPUSC
Do I need always to put the fully qualified dataset name in
LINKLIST/LINKLIB or can
I use an alias?
If I use an alias what happens at IPL, how do I ensure that the
catalog will be loaded properly, where
do I specify the alias - or should I just NOT use an alias here?
The Init and
How can you have a PDS with ZERO directory blocks?
-jc-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of jagadishan perumal
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 1:07 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: BLDL error Cause
Hi All,
One
On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 06:57:33 -0400, Lizette Koehler wrote:
In most cases full track blocking will work fine.
Did I miss the announcement that block sizes greater than 32K are
supported? What release was that?
--
Tom Marchant
Hi,
What release was that?
Its 1.8
Regards,
Jags
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Tom Marchant m42tom-ibmm...@yahoo.comwrote:
On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 06:57:33 -0400, Lizette Koehler wrote:
In most cases full track blocking will work fine.
Did I miss the announcement that block sizes greater
Hi,
I opened a Service Request Help Desk query and an IBMLink Help Desk
feedback but no sign that either is going to get this resolved.
Just to reality check is anyone else having difficulty sending
documentation to testcase.software.ibm.com ?
This is using PUTDOC or manual FTP and it
Sam,
did you try to enter a password? As far as I know the testcase ftp server
requires a password, when using ftp command line, even you are logging in as
anonymous.
If it does not work, try to log in via the http interface via
https://testcase.boulder.ibm.com
There you do not need to enter a
try giving it a password contaning @
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Knutson, Sam sknut...@geico.com wrote:
Hi,
I opened a Service Request Help Desk query and an IBMLink Help Desk
feedback but no sign that either is going to get this resolved.
Just to reality check is anyone else
Sam, my normal JCL is failing as well, same error.
MA
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 08:36:27 -0400, Knutson, Sam sknut...@geico.com wrote:
Hi,
I opened a Service Request Help Desk query and an IBMLink Help Desk
feedback but no sign that either is going to get this resolved.
Just to reality check is anyone else having difficulty sending
documentation
I thought tht testcase was done away with.
The new ip address is
FTP.EMEA.IBM.COM (192.109.81.7)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Mark Zelden
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 8:58 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re:
Just to elaborate:
At the time the LNKLIST is initially created (IPL), the catalog address space
has not yet started. The only catalog that can be accessed at this time is the
master cat, and alias processing is not yet available. Hence the use of
VOL=XX coding and/or use of system symbols
Did I miss the announcement that block sizes greater than 32K are
supported? What
release was that?
--
Tom Marchant
Okay a slight clarification. 32K is the largest I know of for full track
blocking on DASD. Not sure about EAVs or Tape. The discussion of Full
Track Blocking revolves
On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 19:29:11 -0500, Wayne Driscoll wdri...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Please explain how all TCB's under a given JSTCB will point to the same
TIOT is incorrect, but every TCB with the same TCBJSTCB will normally
have the same TIOT is true, when the two statements make the same point?
I
On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 09:12:00 -0400, Lizette Koehler wrote:
Did I miss the announcement that block sizes greater than 32K are
supported? What release was that?
--
Tom Marchant
Okay a slight clarification. 32K is the largest I know of for full track
blocking on DASD.
Ok. 32K has been
In
ofd8dc7f3f.55794369-on85257933.001026f8-85257933.00115...@us.ibm.com,
on 10/23/2011
at 11:09 PM, Peter Relson rel...@us.ibm.com said:
Despite the harsh opinions expressed, I find it somewhat hard to
believe that the owners of this code would not agree to document the
behavior that has
In 6795006467018006.wa.m42tomibmmainyahoo@bama.ua.edu, on
10/24/2011
at 07:19 AM, Tom Marchant m42tom-ibmm...@yahoo.com said:
Did I miss the announcement that block sizes greater than 32K are
supported?
Yes, but it was for tape.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
In
canhhcyrsdw_reish_oibs2_kjmpclypuzbmr8udtz_vnoyi...@mail.gmail.com,
on 10/24/2011
at 11:37 AM, jagadishan perumal jagadish...@gmail.com said:
Maximum dir. blocks : 0
?
When he tries to allocate a member within the dataset :
TPUN011.NEWMAPST(map), he gets a message as BLDL error
1. Was
Hi All,
We know that management class takes care of expiration of
dataset(sms-managed), but in one of our system(Where management class
routine is not in place) user is able specify expiration of dataset using
ISPF 3.2 and management class space looks blank. Does it mean the dataset
has taken the
Actually, no. There are 3 requirements for using JSCTB=YES on an attach
macro, the first is that you have to be authorized, the second is that you
have to have NO subtasks that have been attached without JSTCB=YES
specified and the third is that you must be a JOB STEP TCB. Also,once
you
Walt,
Thanks, I missed an important qualifier what I should have said was all
non-job step TCB's under a given JSTCB will point to the same TIOT.
===
Wayne Driscoll
OMEGAMON DB2 L3 Support/Development
wdrisco(AT)us.ibm.com
Peter Relson's point is an important one.
In my experience almost no one confuses a task with a TCB, but the
ambiguous use of SRB is common. People talk, for example, of
scheduling an SRB, but never of despatching a TCB.
It is probably too late; but it would have been useful to make a
On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 10:03:58 -0500, Wayne Driscoll wdri...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Walt,
Thanks, I missed an important qualifier what I should have said was all
non-job step TCB's under a given JSTCB will point to the same TIOT.
No, that still doesn't work, Wayne, as it still has that ambiguous ues of
hi Jake,
the ones without the Management class, would still be tracked via the ACS
routines and there would be routines run via DFS* or thridparty tools to
have expiration and deletion/after actions into account.
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Jake anderson justmainfra...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi
On 24 October 2011 02:07, jagadishan perumal jagadish...@gmail.com wrote:
When he tries to allocate a member within the dataset :
TPUN011.NEWMAPST(map), he gets a message as BLDL error I tried searching
some error related to PDF as starting with ISR but I was not able to
fetch any error
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu wrote on 10/22/2011
12:50:06 PM:
On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 12:33:21 +0200, Monika Amiss
monika.am...@arcor.de wrote:
Is it possible to get an MCS-Console (osa-icc,3270-x) to print out
to 132 bytes width (or more). now our 3270-emulation
On 10/24/2011 8:19 AM, Tom Marchant wrote:
Did I miss the announcement that block sizes greater than 32K are
supported? What release was that?
It depends on your definition of supported - I had a job that
used BSAM to manipulate blocks larger than 32K (disk and tape).
If you have an even
We just purchased some new IBM DS8800 DASD and along with it bought TPCR and
got TPCR 4.2 to be installed on the IBM 2096s. We run WAS V7.0 and now learn
TPCR V4.2 needs WAS V6.1 for it to work. Back when we upgraded from WAS V6.1
to WAS 7.0 because of IBM pressure to get off V6.
IS
A programmer I am working with is getting a file from Unix which will be sent
to the mainframe. This will be using FTP.
The process is we receive the file from the Unix system and it is placed on a
Windows 2008 server.
Then from the Windows 2008 it is going to be FTP'd to the mainframe.
Is
Lizette:
Yep sure is, use binary, it will not translate the characters. I use it all the
time for exactly that purpose
Scott J Ford
Software Engineer
http://www.identityforge.com
From: Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent:
In
of5be197b2.1ea188a2-on86257933.00517983-86257933.00524...@us.ibm.com,
on 10/24/2011
at 09:58 AM, Wayne Driscoll wdri...@us.ibm.com said:
Actually, no. There are 3 requirements for using JSCTB=YES on an
attach macro, the first is that you have to be authorized,
Are you sure that the
In 056c01cc924e$84278a70$8c769f50$@mindspring.com, on 10/24/2011
at 09:12 AM, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com said:
If you are running on OS/390 2.10 or later, then you know that BSAM,
BPAM and QSAM support LBI on disk, tape, spooled, subsystem and dummy
data sets
Not on disk.
--
Lizette,
It has been years since I worked with Unix FTP, but Windows also uses the
CRLF and I routinely FTP between my PC and the Mainframe. All I do is
specify a text transfer and the FTP utility does the translation. I get
one PC text line to one mainframe text line. Mine are usually FB LRECL
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 3:10 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: CRLF in Unix being translated on Mainframe to x'25'
A programmer I am working with is getting
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 3:10 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: CRLF in Unix being translated on Mainframe to x'25'
A programmer I am working with is getting
John:
We package and ship our executes in binary format...We build JES2 xmits,
download them as binary and the customer uploads from Windoze to z/OS using a
binary option, not 'CR LF' , otherwise the data is unusable. I think if memory
servers me right its because we ship loadlibs
Scott
In
capd5f5ryy38n9t9_r2dy2jukcek9o6tmkovtu1o0psnqbqh...@mail.gmail.com,
on 10/24/2011
at 11:03 AM, John Gilmore johnwgilmore0...@gmail.com said:
People talk, for example, of scheduling an SRB, but never of
despatching a TCB.
They do, however, talk of dispatching a TCB, sometimes in
Then from the Windows 2008 it is going to be FTP'd to the mainframe.
Is there a way to keep the CRLF command at the end of each line?
And will the ainframe recognize it as a newline?
What we really want is the UNIX file to be individual
(FB Lrecl 946) going into the mainframe.
It seems
In
6598855.1319487016267.javamail.r...@elwamui-darkeyed.atl.sa.earthlink.net,
on 10/24/2011
at 04:10 PM, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com said:
A programmer I am working with is getting a file from Unix which will
be sent to the mainframe. This will be using FTP.
What are the original
BTW, do local politics allow going directly to z/OS instead of
therough the W2008 box?
As for politics.
It must be done this way, Unix, to Win2008, to Mainframe.
No options here.
I have tried several tests. Either I only get one record up on the mainframe
or the data is definately in bin
You're out of line, Shmuel. You may prefer 'dispatch' to 'despatch',
but they are equally legitimate alternative spellings.
Moreover, while I should ordinarily let 'excrutiating' pass without
comment, I shall not do so this time. I find no entry in the OED for
it. It is an unambiguous
Liz:
For NOTEPAD++, which I also use, you will need to make sure that the file that
arrives into Windows has the x'0D0A' , as Shmuel said its the CRLF characters.
From Windows to the Host(z/OS) you could go binary for sure. I would verify
that the data arrives in Windows ok, before doing the
Lizette,
I think John's suggestion has merit. On the first transfer (Unix to Windows)
are you specifying ascii or binary? Specifying ascii should correctly
translate the Unix new line to the Windows CRLF. Then your second transfer
(Windows to z/OS) should work correctly. This also explains
You two should prpbably get a room.
--
Regards, Gord Tomlin
Action Software International
(a division of Mazda Computer Corporation)
Tel: (905) 470-7113, Fax: (905) 470-6507
On 2011-10-24 17:41, John Gilmore wrote:
You're out of line, Shmuel. You may prefer 'dispatch' to 'despatch',
but they
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 4:10 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: CRLF in Unix being translated on Mainframe to x'25'
A programmer I am working with is getting
-Original Message-
From: Farley, Peter x23353
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 6:22 PM
To: 'IBM Mainframe Discussion List'
Subject: RE: CRLF in Unix being translated on Mainframe to x'25'
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu]
You may prefer 'dispatch' to 'despatch',
but they are equally legitimate alternative spellings.
They may be legitimate, but NOT equally.
The purpose of communication is to communicate.
NOT to show off your erudition by picking obscure spellings/usage and confusing
people.
Schmuel was probably
On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 17:20:14 -0500, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
on 10/24/2011 at 04:10 PM, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com said:
A programmer I am working with is getting a file from Unix which will
be sent to the mainframe. This will be using FTP.
What are the original and final
On 24 October 2011 17:41, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com wrote:
I have tried several tests. Either I only get one record up on the mainframe
or the data is definately in bin format when it arrives. I have tried BIN
FB, BIN VB, ASCII FB and ASCII VB. So far the 44 records I have
On 24 October 2011 18:20, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote:
No; the Unix new line indication is LF (X'0A'),
For some values of UNIX.
the windoze/DOS new line indication is CRLF (X'0D0A')
Yes.
and the z/OS new line indication for EBCDIC is NEL (X'25').
No. EBCDIC
This does not work going the other direction. If it were available it would
properly be named SBRECVEOL, or something similar; but the fact is it is not an
available option.
From: Farley, Peter x23353 peter.far...@broadridge.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
What method is being used to transport the file from the UNIX box to the
Windows box?
It should not be a straight binary transfer because, as you've noticed, this
does not convert from the UNIX end-of-line delimiter to the Windows end-of-line
delimiter.
It's a fact that some Windows
glen herrmannsfeldt g...@ugcs.caltech.edu writes:
Note, for example, the IBM 2741 does not use EBCDIC, but its
own code, with its own control characters.
but all the 2741 characters were defined in EBCDIC. when cp67 was
installed at the univ in jan68 ... it had 2741 and 1052 terminal ... but
Munif
Having expended a lot of time and energy in providing a response to your
previous post 3270 and EE last month and not having had a response in which
my questions were answered enabling us all to continue with your problem
situation, I wondered whether or not you were one of those posters
Charles
I've kept out of this until I caught what you said here in the Google Groups
digest.
... and reduce it to a single short assembler program that runs and
demonstrates the problem.
This reminded me of a program - in Fortran IIRC - where, in order to clarify a
problem for the newly
Neale
According to the a SHARE presentation ...
The SHARE presentation is good but it does state that it's skipped over some
steps for the sake of keeping the presentation within its time allocation.
Alternatively for a source which doesn't suffer from a time allocation, you
could use what
Steve
Sorry, as far as the z/OS Communications Server IP part of this redbook is
concerned, it's on a downhill trajectory.
Something pretty unforgivable comes to my attention and so many - thread:
Redbook d/l issue - appear keen to use this redbook!
Is there some product or product function
John
Thanks for the - implied - suggestion. I have subscribed to the supposedly
regular update - I have received two so far! - from the redbook site for any
redwhatevers which involve - supposedly since this is a matter of intelligent
indexing - z/OS. I'm hoping this will cover any which
Tony
Let's branch back to being professional.
What an excellent idea! Let's branch back to using terms correctly especially
so that newcomers are not destined to be confused when they have to deal with
the real thing! I'd say that was not only the *professional* approach but also
the kind
Matan
Since my little joke has caused so much fuss, I checked back in the IBM-MAIN
archives that my basic premise, which may not be appreciated by all casually
reading these exchanges, namely that, on the evidence of threads you have
initiated and with the questions raised in which I have
Jon
Get over yourself.
The only response to this is get over your nonsensical instructions to others
to get over themselves. What tosh!
Most of the folks on this list ...
Interesting approach, leading to an exercise in set theory, wouldn't you say?
Most suggests not all, so let's try and
Mary Anne
Arrogant? Pot/Kettle/Black!
I'm a bit lost on the logic of this but it may be more a reflection on the
speaker than the spoken to.
Maybe the girls' age to which Tony Babonas referred is not a necessary
qualification. Possibly Sticks and stones .. stays with some for life.
I
If you don't have anything useful to say there are many subscribers who would
say don't bother to post.
I will not tolerate falsely being accused negatively in public and that's what
arrogant Mr Zelden did.
Chris Mason
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:23:59 -0500, Greg Shirey wgshi...@benekeith.com
Rick
It's good to see that out of Read, mark, learn and inwardly digest, some can
managed two out of four - at least - one lives in hope!
One can note however that this presumably an incorrectly corrected typo - under
the influence of the spelling checker - is not entirely inappropriate: the
Listen to Peter. :)
Ok, if you are using a batch job on z/OS, then you are the client for that
transfer. If the file on Windows has the CRLF (that is Notepad works), then a
ASCII/EBCIDIC transfer to a FB or VB file with a large enough LRECL should
work. You can use the LOCSITE to subcommand to
Rob
From a Summary of Changes in the OS/390 V2R6 MVS Initialization and Tuning
Guide:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/IEA1E106/CHANGES
quote
| As part of the name change of OS/390 OpenEdition to OS/390 UNIX System
| Services, occurrences of OS/390 OpenEdition have
This reply contains a test designed to show what a pointless post it was:
http://aime.ua.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind1110L=ibm-mainD=1O=DP=914102
Chris Mason
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 10:30:18 -0700, Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com wrote:
Amen, Jon, too old to argue anymore
Scott J Ford
Whomever it really is
This reply contains a test designed to show what a pointless post it was:
http://aime.ua.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind1110L=ibm-mainD=1O=DP=914102
Chris Mason
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:27:27 -0400, Ford Prefect ford...@gmail.com wrote:
Jon, I couldn't have said it better.
Hi,
Seen a client using MVS---VSM---SL8500 doing HSM recycle(35).
Thought it was too high.
Found:
http://www.lascon.co.uk/d016001.htm
Virtual Tape Principles
The HSM recycle function can conflict with the VTS reclaim function, so it is
best to set the HSM
the ones without the Management class, would still be tracked via the ACS
routines and there would be routines run via DFS*
Could you please point me to the fine Manual which speaks more about the
above. This would help me in understanding the best practises and narrow
down the unneccessary
On 25/10/2011 13:28 PM, Chris Mason wrote:
Interesting approach, leading to an exercise in set theory, wouldn't you say? Most
suggests not all, so let's try and work out who knows what.
A is all the list subscribers.
B is the subset of A who know of the three letters in the incorrect context.
85 matches
Mail list logo
