Ed Jaffe asks...
> Out of curiosity, which software products allocate CSA in keys A-
> F?
I know of one major vendor's storage management product that right up
until the last time I looked (more than a year ago) ran in key 10
(X'A0') and used a bunch of CSA in key 10. The developers thought it was
Howard Brazee wrote:
On 25 Jul 2007 13:27:47 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (McKown, John)
wrote:
While I appreciate everyone's appreciation, I like John's
analogy best. :)
Yeah I'd like to see a step van carrying an Abrams tank.
It is simple. Disassemble it at the source
>Don't know if that's it what your are looking for, these are the messages
>showing the console names at ipl.
IEA630I OPERATOR *SYSLG0S NOW ACTIVE, SYSTEM=CP25 , LU=*SYSLG0S
IEA630I OPERATOR *DICNS0S NOW ACTIVE, SYSTEM=CP25 , LU=*DICNS0S
IEA630I OPERATOR *ROUTE0S NOW ACTIVE, SYSTEM=CP25 , LU=ROU
<http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070725/tc_nm/
quantum_computing_dc_1;_ylt=Ap_vjcqDm0wY6_fhbxqMXcEE1vAI<
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: G
Hi All,
We are a 30 years MF organization in the finance area.
We are thinking of migrating into CICS Plex environment
(as part of Parallel Sysplex Data Sharing)
in order to improve availability and performance.
The problem is that a big part of our application
projects were written with CICS
Earnie Allen wrote:
We have PDSMAN in-shop, but I do not believe I can use it for this
particular change because not only is the ACCT info different in most
cases, but also because there does not now exist any "standard" ACCT field
info to key on and do the replace. Thus the need for the projec
Stephen Mednick wrote:
I don't know where you are situated at the moment but there always seems to be a
demand in some of the Asia/Pacific areas, Singapore, Hong Kong etc. Maybe you
should learn Chinese.
H. Any application programmer training leads? I've taught
in Singapore, sold course ma
On Jul 25, 2007, at 5:37 PM, Kenneth E Tomiak wrote:
--SNIP---
Consider what the requirement is. Someone trying to mass edit a
bunch of
members has a hard time convincing me an outage from using a free
method
to make multiple changes requires a ven
On 24 Jul 2007 21:40:20 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main Timothy
Sipples wrote:
>
>William Richter writes:
>>Internal customers do not ask your question, "How do you measure the total
>
>>performance of the whole IT organization?"
>>They are really only interested in the total cost of acquistion or
On Jul 25, 2007, at 2:01 PM, Mark H. Young wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 08:40:09 -0400, Carroll, William
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there any way to secure certain clist from unauthorized use?
For example if I don't want applications to get into the wlm,
Application, how would I do it? If it
I don't know where you are situated at the moment but there always seems to be a
demand in some of the Asia/Pacific areas, Singapore, Hong Kong etc. Maybe you
should learn Chinese.
Stephen Mednick
Computer Supervisory Services
Sydney, Australia
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe
>Is there a city/country in the world with a real shortage of M/F sysprogs?
We always think so.
But, I have been dumped twice in the last three years!
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / arc
Hi Rez,
In principle, you only need one job, and a vacancy is where and
when you find it.
Some sysprog could overdose on the weekend and shuffle off his/her
mortal coil, creating a vacancy that you can fill Monday. It's life on
the ocean wave.
You could approach an multi-national outsourc
Is there a city/country in the world with a real shortage of M/F
sysprogs?
TIA,
Rez
Ready
for the edge of your seat?
Check out tonight's top picks on Yahoo! TV.
http://tv.yahoo.com/
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 15:38:47 -0700, Schwarz, Barry A
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Is anyone else receiving spam from SHARE on behalf of various
vendors.
>One or two more and I'll be angry enough to look up how to block the
>entire domain.
>
>Instead of wasting my time with this garbage, maybe the
Is anyone else receiving spam from SHARE on behalf of various vendors.
One or two more and I'll be angry enough to look up how to block the
entire domain.
Instead of wasting my time with this garbage, maybe they could fix the
web scheduling tools which consistently refuse to show more than a
fract
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 22:40:32 -0500, Ed Gould <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Jul 24, 2007, at 10:04 PM, Kenneth E Tomiak wrote:
>
>
>Yea but are they supported 24x7 ? Or do you get a response well maybe
>in the next few weeks I will get a chance to look at it etc.
>
>Cost is not important when yo
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 10:28:19 -0500, Mark H. Young
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>We just IPL'd our sand box with z/OS 1.7 and are muddling thru. One thing
>I've noticed though, is in SDSF from the:
>
>HQX7720 - SDSF PRIMARY OPTION MENU -
-
>
>At the bottom of the s
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 14:21:44 -0500, Paul Gilmartin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 19:27:27 +0100, Terry Sambrooks wrote:
>>
>>Historically IEBCOMPR gave up if there were 10 consecutive errors, and I
>>believe it still does.
>>
>What's an "error"? SYNAD entered? I'd give up on o
http://searchdatacenter.techtarget.com/qna/0,289202,sid80_gci1265623,00.html?track=NL-576&ad=598271&asrc=EM_NLT_1860635&uid=5437138
I'm just the messenger, put down the gun...
...phsiii
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / arch
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 15:27:31 -0500, McKown, John
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chase, John
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 3:23 PM
>> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
>> Subject: Re: Mainframe sho
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of McKown, John
> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 3:00 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Mainframe shops held hostage, Itanium alliance says
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From:
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 16:39 -0400, Farley, Peter x23353 wrote:
> > No, they're releasing a threading library (which I doubt will be of much
> > value to us here).
>
> Why not? GCC under z/Linux + TBB should work
I yield! (I generally wear my z/OS hat when I'm perusing ibm-main and
my Linux hat
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Brazee
> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 3:55 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Mainframe shops held hostage, Itanium alliance says
>
>
> On 25 Jul 2007 13:27:47 -0700, [E
MAINFRAME SHOPS HELD HOSTAGE, ITANIUM ALLIANCE SAYS
Mark Fontecchio, News Writer
After joining the Mainframe Migration Alliance this week, an Itanium
Solutions Alliance spokesperson discusses why migrating off the
mainframe to Itanium is a sound choice.
http://searchdatacenter.techtarget.com/qna/
Hello,
I am curious if you are using the SYSVIEW-generated SMF 110 (CMF-like subtype
1, transaction and
dictionary information) records, or are you using the native SYSVIEW CICS data
for reporting? And
are you generating these transaction reports directly from SYSVIEW or from
another reporting
On 25 Jul 2007 13:27:47 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (McKown, John)
wrote:
>> > While I appreciate everyone's appreciation, I like John's
>> > analogy best. :)
>>
>> Yeah I'd like to see a step van carrying an Abrams tank.
>>
>
>It is simple. Disassemble it at the source, ship it quickly and
Warner Mach wrote:
Intel is going to open-source a C++ compiler for parallel Processing:
http://www.computerworld.com/blogs/node/5894
I believe that's not quite it... they are not throwing out a compiler,
but a C++ library.
They are open-sourcing the C++ template library used for implementin
Mark:
Contact me off-line for more specifics and I'll see what I can do to help.
Adam
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Steely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To:
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 8:46 AM
Subject: SYSVIEW 11.5
I know this is a long shot, but I ne
> -Original Message-
> From: David Andrews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 4:30 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Is Parallel Programming Just Too Hard?
>
> On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 16:15 -0400, Warner Mach wrote:
> > Intel is going to open-source a C++ c
Cessna will be welding 26,000 Cessna 180's together in an effort to
compete
with the military's C-5 cargo jets...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message:
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 16:15 -0400, Warner Mach wrote:
> Intel is going to open-source a C++ compiler for parallel Processing
No, they're releasing a threading library (which I doubt will be of much
value to us here).
--
David Andrews
A. Duda and Sons, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chase, John
> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 3:23 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Mainframe shops held hostage, Itanium alliance says
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > Fr
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Gary Green
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]','','','')">[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of
> >> Gary Green
> >> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 2:17 PM
> >>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Steffens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 11:18 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Compare two disk files
>
> Does anyone know of a slick (accurate) way to compare two files which
> reside on two seperate tapes?
Chris, the
While I appreciate everyone's appreciation, I like John's analogy best. :)
>> -Original Message-
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]','','','')">[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Green
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 2:17 PM
>> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
>> Subj
Intel is going to open-source a C++ compiler for parallel Processing:
http://www.computerworld.com/blogs/node/5894
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Green
> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 2:17 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Mainframe shops held hostage, Itanium alliance says
>
>
> Interview about why everyone should migr
Gary,
Thanks! I needed a good laugh this afternoon. There is so much factually
wrong in that article, it was amusing. And at the bottom, there is a
link to a CA article by Vincent Re that counters some of it, especially
when you look at the Top 10 reasons link he has for staying with the
mainframe
>Interview about why everyone should migrate away from the mainframe.
Sure. And who is the Mainframe Migration Alliance? It's every vendor who wants
to steal IBM's mainframe customers. Click the "Membership Directory". IMO this
article is FUD and the Mainframe Migration Alliance is bogus.
Bob S
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 13:28:35 -0500, John P Kalinich wrote:
>
>The OFFLOAD subcommand offloads members of a PDS to a member of
>a PDS or a sequential data set. An IEBUPDTE "./ ADD NAME="
>control statement is added before each output member and ISPF
>statistics are included for use by the PDSLOAD p
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 19:27:27 +0100, Terry Sambrooks wrote:
>
>Historically IEBCOMPR gave up if there were 10 consecutive errors, and I
>believe it still does.
>
What's an "error"? SYNAD entered? I'd give up on one of those.
-- gil
ummm, so what if someone copies it into their own clist lib, modifies the id
check code, then runs it?
Been there..had to be there actually. we had an oldie where the
original developer went off to other pursuits. my id was not
authorized..45 seconds later it was.
locks are meant to kee
Interview about why everyone should migrate away from the mainframe.
http://searchdatacenter.techtarget.com/qna/0,289202,sid80_gci1265623,00.html?track=NL-576&ad=598271&asrc=EM_NLT_1860635&uid=1900046
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
Chris
If you have File-AID MVS you can do a
simple compare,
compare two different types of files,
compare without most if not all false positives,
compare with record layouts,
compare with different output files,
only those fields that are different,
comparisons with tolerances,
read ahead
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 13:23:41 -0500, Chase, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Chauhan, Jasbir
>>
>> John, Are you suggesting there is a separate code page for
>> SDSF and ISPF. I'm using ISPF as an example here because
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 08:40:09 -0400, Carroll, William
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Is there any way to secure certain clist from unauthorized use?
>For example if I don't want applications to get into the wlm,
>Application, how would I do it? If it can be done.
>Thanks In Advance.
>
>
>
>
>Bill Ca
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 11:55:18 -0500, Mark H. Young wrote:
>
>What I've got to figure out is why it sometimes slips into that mode on my
>z/OS 1.4 system, clear out of the blue. It's nice to now know how to fix it
>quick, but WHY does it happen to begin with? Oh, another mystery. So it's
>off on
William Smith of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List
wrote on 07/25/2007 12:55:12 PM:
> Also, and I'm not sure if it's in the free version of PDSTOOLS - but I
know
> it's in StarTool from Serena, there is a subcommand "SEPARATE" that will
> (and quoting the manual) ". . . splits a member or data se
Hi,
In response to a recent post on how to compare two files on tape, several
people recommended IEBCOMPR.
Last time I read the Utilities Manual the section on IEBCOMPR recommended
SUPER-C instead of IEBCOMPR.
Historically IEBCOMPR gave up if there were 10 consecutive errors, and I
believe it st
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Chauhan, Jasbir
>
> John, Are you suggesting there is a separate code page for
> SDSF and ISPF. I'm using ISPF as an example here because the
> raw data (pds)does show extended attributes when browsed.
Though I am b
How do you define a "brief" update? Especially in computer time with
the current processors? Better technique would be to reload the module
into dynamic LPA than turn off protection, modify, turn on protection, I
would think.
Wayne Driscoll
Product Developer
JME Software LLC
NOTE: All opinions
John, Are you suggesting there is a separate code page for SDSF and
ISPF. I'm using ISPF as an example here because the raw data (pds)does
show extended attributes when browsed.
Regards,
Jasbir
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
The MVS monitors I know about that support storage viewing and
alteration allow for this. Some like TMONMVS automatically fix an LPA
pages which is being modified. SYSVIEW is aware of the status and will
prompt you to page fix it yourself " DUMP025W ALTER not valid, address
0933B002 is page protec
That's why some (older) vendor code was required to be loaded into FLPA
with no page protect.
Jon L. Veilleux
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(860) 636-2683
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 1:55
On Jul 25, 2007, at 12:42 PM, Anthony Saul Babonas wrote:
DASDVOL profiles can help here..
This was before that option.
Ed
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf
Of Ed Gould
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 12:21 PM
To
On Jul 25, 2007, at 12:42 PM, Phil Kingston wrote:
Then should you not protect ICKDSF itself?
How... at the time there was no security bult into ICKDSF.
If your authorised to run it in batch, then why not through TSO.
They weren't authorized to run it in batch.
Protect ICKDSF from unauth
A real oldie but goodie is the famous "LISTPDS" assembler program written
by Gene Czarcinski of NASA Goddard Space Flight Center in the early 70s for
the 360/95 when he was its system programmer. Bill Godfrey, my former
office mate at PRC at Goddard back in the 70s, added some nice
enhancements.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Binyamin Dissen
> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 12:28 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Is a page protected?--how to determine
>
>
> On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:08:42 -0500 Paul Sch
Then should you not protect ICKDSF itself?
If your authorised to run it in batch, then why not through TSO.
Protect ICKDSF from unauthorised users rather than execs?
Phil.
z/OS Systems Programming Consultant
Website www.zostek.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion L
DASDVOL profiles can help here..
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Ed Gould
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 12:21 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Secure clist
On Jul 25, 2007, at 9:56 AM, Wayne Driscoll wrote:
Binyamin Dissen wrote on 07/25/2007 08:41:30 AM:
> DFSORT can do a line compare, detecting inserts, reformats and deletes?
You can use the SPLICE function of DFSORT's ICETOOL to do various types
of "matching". For some examples, see the "Create files with matching
and non-matching records" Smart
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:08:42 -0500 Paul Schuster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
:>On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 07:27:15 -0400, Peter Relson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:>
:>>OK, I'll bite. Why do you "need to determine"?
:>>
:>>If you have any reason to think that the page is protected (presumably
:>>because yo
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 11:51:32 -0500, Tom Schmidt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 11:30:44 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
>
>>There's just a tad bit of virtual storage up there to use. By default it
>>is 510T. ;-) But for a vendor to use it, they must ensure a minimum
>>OS level of z/
On Jul 25, 2007, at 9:56 AM, Wayne Driscoll wrote:
But what was purpose of this? Was there a security exposure
identified?
If so, what was it? Or was it a case of "well, it's always been done
this way."
Wayne Driscoll
Product Developer
JME Software LLC
NOTE: All opinions are strictly my ow
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Chauhan, Jasbir
>
> Running z/OS 1.7 -- Ran a job that creates Letters in
> Spanish. These Letters do print in Spanish, when sent to a
> printer -- but when displayed in SDSF, the extended
> attributes are missing.
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 07:27:15 -0400, Peter Relson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>OK, I'll bite. Why do you "need to determine"?
>
>If you have any reason to think that the page is protected (presumably
>because you did it or might have done it), then you can just unprotect it.
>A page does not need to
Running z/OS 1.7 -- Ran a job that creates Letters in Spanish. These
Letters do print in Spanish, when sent to a printer -- but when
displayed in SDSF, the extended attributes are missing. Any ideas.
Regards,
Jasbir
--
For IBM-MA
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:36:04 -0400, Earnie Allen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Yeah.. noticed that ... later.
>
>We didn't experience that when we went to 1.7 .. or when going to 1.8 a
>couple of weeks or so ago.
>
>
>
>Earnie Allen
>Senior Systems Programmer
>MVS Systems Software
What I've got to
If you are a SyncSort 1.2 customer. There is a simple 2 step
application that will create 3 files: additions, deletions and inserted
records. If you would like further information on how to do this please
contact me offline and I will send you a manual which demonstrates how
to do this using the
Mark Zelden wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 10:56:00 -0500, McKown, John
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm likely insane, but I'd like to see some "common storage" like [E]CSA
in the above the bar area. Simple SAM64 to switch to AMODE(64), store
the data, then SAMxx to go back to 31 or 24 bit amode.
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 11:30:44 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
>There's just a tad bit of virtual storage up there to use. By default it
>is 510T. ;-) But for a vendor to use it, they must ensure a minimum
>OS level of z/OS 1.5. Since 1.6 EOS is September, developing something
>new that uses shared s
Eric,
DB-L is at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VMESA-L has morphed into IBMVM at LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
-mark
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Loriaux
> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 10:27 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject:
Yeah.. noticed that ... later.
We didn't experience that when we went to 1.7 .. or when going to 1.8 a
couple of weeks or so ago.
Earnie Allen
Senior Systems Programmer
MVS Systems Software
WORLDSPAN, LP
Phone: 404-322-2799 FAX: 404-322-4653
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Remember: It takes teamw
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 11:38:33 -0400, Earnie Allen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>For just such times as that (rare cases where for some reason the command
>line shows up other than where I expect) .. I have a couple of clists that
>I store in a system SYSPROC library.
>
>If my command line is at the
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 10:33:49 -0500, Mark Steely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>From the SDSF command line type in SETTINGS. Then remove the / from the
>command line at bottom.
>
>Thank You
>
YES, that worked just fine.
I am a hater of bottom of the page command lines.
So the *menu* from the tool
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 10:56:00 -0500, McKown, John
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>I'm likely insane, but I'd like to see some "common storage" like [E]CSA
>in the above the bar area. Simple SAM64 to switch to AMODE(64), store
>the data, then SAMxx to go back to 31 or 24 bit amode.
>
There's just a t
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 11:33:53 -0400, Earnie Allen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Mark ... that ISPF "quirk" ...
>
>If you have a ISPF Primary Option of '0', you should be able to correct that.
>
>0 Settings Terminal and user parameters
>
>
>
>
>Earnie Allen
>Senior Systems Programmer
>MVS System
I notice that lately (I believe this behavior is new), the E-mail
updates that I receive of PMR updates have the Abstract appended
to the Subject header. This is useful. I'll let others worry
about whether they can access IBMLink to view the update.
BTW, I notice that AST notifies me that PQ9624
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 10:51:11 -0500, Walt Farrell wrote:
>On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 09:39:03 -0400, Lizette Koehler
>>Under RACF I have placed a CLIST in a secured data set and had RACF set to
>>EXEC rather than READ on the data set.
>>Seemed to work and it did not impact the usage of the CLIST.
>
>I can
--
I'm likely insane, but I'd like to see some "common storage" like [E]CSA
in the above the bar area. Simple SAM64 to switch to AMODE(64), store
the data, then SAMxx to go back to 31 or 24 bit amode.
John, I do
I can believe that would work for a data set in SYSPROC, but I believe it
would not work for SYSEXEC.
It still has the problem that Binyamin noted, though. You really need to
protect access to the data or functions the CLIST performs, as otherwise the
u
--
My boomerang won't come back. :-D
-
How's that wad of gum on the bedpost, John? :-D
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access i
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Scott
> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 10:49 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: DSPSERV
>
>
> Ed
>
> I thought that a CADS approach to intercepting SMF records
> was approp
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 09:39:03 -0400, Lizette Koehler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Under RACF I have placed a CLIST in a secured data set and had RACF set to
>EXEC rather than READ on the data set.
>
>Seemed to work and it did not impact the usage of the CLIST.
I can believe that would work for a da
Ed
I thought that a CADS approach to intercepting SMF records was appropriate -
like you I would not recommend a blanket replacement of ECSA with CADS.
Using CADS as a intercept record buffer from IEFU8x has a fairly short
path-length and is a safe method of performing this specific task - ther
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of John Eells
>
> [ snip ]
>
> So while you can complain to us about nearly anything (smile), . . .
My boomerang won't come back. :-D
-jc-
--
Fo
I know this is a long shot, but I need some help and not a lot of time.
We use SYSVIEW to cut CICS records. Sysview 11,5 was installed and we
noticed 3 month later that the reports that we generate to record
transaction count, response time, and number of transactions stopped
working. This is when
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 09:32:41 -0600 Howard Brazee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
:>On 25 Jul 2007 08:22:06 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Binyamin Dissen)
:>wrote:
:>>:>Does anyone know of a slick (accurate) way to compare two files which
reside
:>>:>on two seperate tapes?
:>>Simple equal/not equal? IEB
Rob Scott wrote:
By the way, I applaud your decision to convert ECSA usage to a CADS - that is a
sensible solution.
Personally, I don't like SCOPE=COMMON data spaces (CADS). Exceeding
MAXCAD requires an IPL. (The default is 50.) And, don't forget the
maximum number of entries in a PASN-AL
For just such times as that (rare cases where for some reason the command
line shows up other than where I expect) .. I have a couple of clists that
I store in a system SYSPROC library.
If my command line is at the BOTTOM and I want it on TOP ...
(CMDLNTOP)
PROC 0
SET &ZPLACE = ASIS
ISPEXEC VPUT
Trust me ...that's how I took care of that problem here.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Earnie Allen
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 10:34 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SDSF z/OS 1.7 Quirk
Mark ... that ISPF "quirk
>From the SDSF command line type in SETTINGS. Then remove the / from the
command line at bottom.
Thank You
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark H. Young
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 10:28 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject:
Mark ... that ISPF "quirk" ...
If you have a ISPF Primary Option of '0', you should be able to correct
that.
0 Settings Terminal and user parameters
Earnie Allen
Senior Systems Programmer
MVS Systems Software
WORLDSPAN, LP
Phone: 404-322-2799 FAX: 404-322-4653
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 25 Jul 2007 08:22:06 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Binyamin Dissen)
wrote:
>:>Does anyone know of a slick (accurate) way to compare two files which reside
>:>on two seperate tapes?
>
>Simple equal/not equal? IEBCOMPR.
>
>More complex? ISPF source compare can run batch.
More complex comparisons ca
We just IPL'd our sand box with z/OS 1.7 and are muddling thru. One thing
I've noticed though, is in SDSF from the:
HQX7720 - SDSF PRIMARY OPTION MENU --
At the bottom of the screen, we have:
COMMAND INPUT ===> S
Wouldn't IEBCOMPR work?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chris Steffens
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 11:18 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Compare two disk files
Does anyone know of a slick (accurate) way to compare two
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 10:18:03 -0500 Chris Steffens
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:>Does anyone know of a slick (accurate) way to compare two files which reside
:>on two seperate tapes?
Simple equal/not equal? IEBCOMPR.
More complex? ISPF source compare can run batch.
--
Binyamin Dissen <[EMAIL PRO
Does anyone know of a slick (accurate) way to compare two files which reside
on two seperate tapes?
Thank you
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: G
But what was purpose of this? Was there a security exposure identified?
If so, what was it? Or was it a case of "well, it's always been done
this way."
Wayne Driscoll
Product Developer
JME Software LLC
NOTE: All opinions are strictly my own.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Disc
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
