Chase, John pisze:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Thompson, Steve
SNIPPAGE
I am so glad you brought this up.
Does anyone remember who Accenture was?
Arthur Andersen, IIRC.
No. Former name of Accenture was Andersen Consulting (www.ac.com), not
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009 00:29:10 -0600 Ron Thomas ron5...@gmail.com wrote:
:I have 2 timetsamps fields of 26 bytes, i need to compare both of them and
:find out which one is greater, is there any sample routine which will take
care
:all the critera's involved?
As you say 26 bytes, I would presume
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 9:20 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: editting testing COBOL code (was:Now is time for banks to
replace core system according to
Chris -
There are two TSO commands:
errno 76630291
ReasonCode: 76630291
Module: EZBTCFCN ErrnoJr: 657 JRTCPERROR
Description: Tcp returned an error identified by the return code
***
bpxmtext 76630291
Notice: unknown modid, reason text may be incorrect
JrTcpError: Tcp returned an error
I think that using a later copy step works because the time window
involved is shorter and so collisions, two programs having the same PDS
open for output with DISP=SHR, would be less likely but could still occur. I
have seen that abend happen for link-edit steps.
Using DISP=OLD will solve this
2009/12/1 McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.com:
Does anybody have RDz and use it with COBOL?
I use RDz with PL/1, though I doubt it'd be much different for COBOL.
The main differences (vs. editing in ISPF) are that I do my initial
compiles as local syntax checks until the code is ready
Does this job execute w/o error at the vendor site?
If so, what are they doing that your site does not (or vice versa)?
If NOT, change vendor! (Who wants to trust/rely on a vendor who does not
even test his installation deck?)
Mike Kerford-Byrnes
Yes this is Db2 time stamp, but is comming in to the application from outside
and in the program received in a container, so i need to use cobol only to
manipulate and get the difference.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Stock, Roger W rst...@bu.edu wrote:
Hi all,
A vendor supplied me with a very large single job to install their
software (10,000+ lines).
The jobs abends the JES2 converter:
IEC031I D37-04,IFG0554P,JES2,JES2,SYS9,VIO ,
2009/12/2 Ron Thomas ron5...@gmail.com:
Yes this is Db2 time stamp, but is comming in to the application from outside
and in the program received in a container, so i need to use cobol only to
manipulate and get the difference.
Well, if both are represented as standard COBOL representations
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ken Porowski
2010 may be bad enough
Temporary dataset names will begin with SYS10ddd
(SYSyyddd.Thhmmss.RAnnn.jobname.Rnnn)
Depending on your security software (RACF, ACF2, Top Secret) and your
specific
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Bill Klein
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 4:03 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: editting testing COBOL code
Snipped
You have something set up VERY strangely if you think RDz
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 9:38 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Now is time for banks to replace core system
according to Accenture
In
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009 08:57:41 -0500, Stock, Roger W wrote:
I did get it to work by deleting some 2000+ lines of comments.
I did try the SUB command but it failed also.
Yup. If the failure is occurring in JES, tweaking upstream
components won't help.
The jobs abends the JES2 converter:
IEC031I
While this discussion has evolved into a discourse on HLLs and library
support, I would like to make an observation.
A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away, Accenture was Arthur Anderson
Consulting. My company contracted with them to assess the status of our
technology and its direction.
I have had a vendor send me such a deck. Not only did I have to insert
a JOB statement, I also had to modify the DSNs in the CLIST included in
the deck.
Further, this jobstream contained a few object decks, so the editing was
tricky due to having CAPS OFF. The vendor even crowed about how good
There is an ongoing discussion on the CICS-L list about doing a STORAGE macro
or GETMAIN/FREEMAIN. Some are saying that these functions can result in a
wait for the CICS QR TCB (the TCB under which most of the CICS transactions
are run). The discussion has now become that the STORAGE macro
I believe the scenario is that the tape was physically destroyed while in the
library, manually removed, and therefore cannot be ejected.
The ATL should already know the volume is gone; all we need to do is deleted
the volume entry from RMM.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
As far as I know, Storage just uses a different mechanism (PC) to invoke the
same code that Getmain/Freemain uses. Since the PC runs under the TCB that
invokes it, I don't understand why anyone thinks there will be a wait of any
type. Since Storage doesn't suffer an SVC interrupt, it's probably
A PC-cp doesn't have any sort of implicit wait, so I don't see what they
are referring to in that sense. Both GETMAIN (a type one SVC) and the
STORAGE PC routine will, at some point have to get the local lock, which
will cause a suspension if and only if the lock is unavailable.
It can always be worse. I once saw a vendor's SE give a 10- or 20-page
printout to a colleague of mine, who then sat at a keypunch for several hours
punching cards to match the VERIFY and ZAP hex data for the dozens of PTFs
described in said hand-out. This vendor apparently could not
I did get it to work by deleting some 2000+ lines of comments.
I did try the SUB command but it failed also.
Thanks for the suggestion.
Roger
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Jim McAlpine
Sent: Wednesday, December 02,
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009 07:58:20 -0600, McKown, John
john.mck...@healthmarkets.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Ken Porowski
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 4:19 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Date /
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 17:19:18 -0500, Ken Porowski ken.porow...@cit.com wrote:
2010 may be bad enough
Temporary dataset names will begin with SYS10ddd
(SYSyyddd.Thhmmss.RAnnn.jobname.Rnnn)
Depending on your security software (RACF, ACF2, Top Secret) and your
specific rules the SYS10 could fall
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Bob Shannon
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 10:25 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: question on STORAGE function - TCB may become
non-dispatchable?
As far as I know,
A debugging investigator made wary by previous encounters with Dr. Murphy
should assume that any hypothetically possible situation will occur, and
especially if the consequences are the most severe. So the TCB occasionally is
being suspended because the local lock is not available.
I have
Looks like LISTSERV up mail distribution down. Sent Darren a post but no
telling when he'll get it(if mail is down). Hmmm...'if you don't get this
send me a txt msg'...chuckle
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Ken Porowski
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 4:19 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Date / Time simulation?
2010 may be bad enough
Temporary dataset names will begin with
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Rick Fochtman
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 6:55 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Now is time for banks to replace core system
according to Accenture
McKown, John wrote:
Anybody have a definate response as to whether a STORAGE function can cause the
TCB to become z/OS non-dispatchable. I agree that it is not a good idea to do
this in CICS.
Work unit non-dispatchability is the key. They are throwing around the
term WAIT
Not sure what the 'SE' is
SE is Space Efficient:. We write code to exploit it, but we don't use it for
any practical purpose.
Bob Shannon
Rocket Software
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
Not sure what the 'SE' is, but we use Flashcopy on both of our DS8100's. It is
a little cumbersome, but it seems to work pretty well to take a PIT copy of any
number of volumes in that unit.
Flashcopy can be a key component of a pretty slick DR strategy with XRC and
GDPS. There is a Redbook
Bill Fairchild wrote:
A debugging investigator made wary by previous encounters with Dr. Murphy
should assume that any hypothetically possible situation will occur, and
especially if the consequences are the most severe. So the TCB occasionally is
being suspended because the local lock is
1)ad/cycle cobol/370 alt
2)enterprise cobol v4 ??
thanks in advance
mace
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
SE means space-efficient. See
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/dsichelp/ds8000ic/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.storage.ssic.help.doc/f2c_spc_effnc_3icy8z.html,
inter alia.
Bill Fairchild
Software Developer
Rocket Software
275 Grove Street * Newton, MA 02466-2272 * USA
Tel:
If I read the alert from CA properly they do not recognize a 2010
TEMPDSN properly otherwise all would be fine.
The workaround is to add specific rules for the 2010 TEMPDSN dataset
name format to allow access to all users.
Top Secret does allow a SYS1 (no dot) as a valid generic dataset prefix
Not much. For more details, see the COBOL upgrade/conversion guides.
HTH and good luck.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
larry macioce
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 10:50 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: what is
Mark Yuhas said:
A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away, Accenture was Arthur Anderson
Consulting. My company contracted with them to assess the status of our
technology and its direction. While it was a foregone conclusion they would
recommend a shift to UNIX, I was totally underwhelmed
I am curious as to why the developer wants to bypass normal CICS storage
services (which probably is just a case of compare-and-swapping a chunk on some
sort of SM domain queue)
This sounds very much like a case of Doctor, it hurts when I do this ...
Rob Scott
Developer
Rocket Software
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009 11:31:24 -0500, Bill Fairchild wrote:
It can always be worse. I once saw a vendor's SE give a 10- or 20-page
printout to a colleague of mine, who then sat at a keypunch for several hours
punching cards to match the VERIFY and ZAP hex data for the dozens of PTFs
described in
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Rob Scott
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 11:02 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: question on STORAGE function - TCB may become
non-dispatchable?
I am curious as to why
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Rob Scott
I am curious as to why the developer wants to bypass normal CICS
storage services (which probably is
just a case of compare-and-swapping a chunk on some sort of SM domain
queue)
This sounds very much
Good point. Our process is working by coincidence.
Time to took for a better approach. Thanks.
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 05:23, Big Iron billlalo...@rocketmail.com wrote:
I think that using a later copy step works because the time window
involved is shorter and so collisions, two programs
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
john.mck...@healthmarkets.com (McKown, John) writes:
What! You don't fondly remember the joys of running a Stage 1 / Stage
2 sysgen? How you could be productive
Well if the intent is to support above the bar storage, then GETMAIN or
STORAGE won't help, as they only manage 24 or 31 bit storage. Requests
for above the bar storage require usage of the IARV64 service. Since the
storage is owned by the address space, this service will still require (at
In 52bc4b80912010934w67887d68u6cc96a670a3ac...@mail.gmail.com, on
12/01/2009
at 09:34 AM, Guy Gardoit ggard...@gmail.com said:
Any moron can load Windows,
Any moron can buy a box with windoze preinstalled. Loading it yourself is
another matter.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and
In 4b14fd2e.6f0f.008...@efirstbank.com, on 12/01/2009
at 11:25 AM, Frank Swarbrick frank.swarbr...@efirstbank.com said:
Obviously one solution is to single thread the compiles. But I'd rather
not if I don't have to. Any other solutions? If I changed to DISP=OLD
would this eliminate the
Mark Yuhas wrote:
I have had a vendor send me such a deck. Not only did I have to insert
a JOB statement, I also had to modify the DSNs in the CLIST included in
the deck.
Further, this jobstream contained a few object decks, so the editing was
tricky due to having CAPS OFF. The vendor even
Does this job execute w/o error at the vendor site?
If so, what are they doing that your site does not (or vice versa)?
If NOT, change vendor! (Who wants to trust/rely on a vendor who does not
even test his installation deck?)
The error occurred in the converter. This means the job was
Hal Merritt wrote:
Not much. For more details, see the COBOL upgrade/conversion guides.
I disagree. Check out
http://www.trainersfriend.com/COBOL_Courses/D704O.HTM
it has an overview of differences by release since COBOL II.
HTH and good luck.
-Original Message-
From: IBM
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Martin Kline martin.kl...@yrcw.com wrote:
Wow. I don't recognize your name, but I went through exactly the same
experience with the woefully inexperienced staff from AA. They burned $35M
of the company's money before being booted out the door. Yet, they were
On 1 Dec 2009 14:05:49 -0800, edja...@phoenixsoftware.com (Edward
Jaffe) wrote:
I wonder, is there some sort of dooms day coming? Are people doing DR
testing by setting their clocks ahead to 2012? :-)
If the doomsday is Y2K level, then it could be cost effective to IPL
a test machine with a
On 2 Dec 2009 09:45:14 -0800, st...@trainersfriend.com (Steve
Comstock) wrote:
Reminds me of one of the great pieces of wisdom (not sure where it
came from, lost in the mists of time): user friendly is programmer difficult
Too often programmers create user interfaces in a way that is easy
to
On 02 Dec 09 08:18:10 -0800, Charlie Gibbs cgi...@kltpzyxm.invalid
wrote:
This is why I tell people that interactive is a synonym for manual.
It stops a lot of GUI enthusiasts dead in their tracks, at least for
a few seconds.
I'll have to remember that.
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
rfocht...@ync.net (Rick Fochtman) writes:
I wouldn't mind looking back at the good old days, but only for
hysterical purposes. SIO/TIO/HIO are NOT areas I would
On 1 Dec 2009 13:59:08 -0800, shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net (Shmuel Metz
, Seymour J.) wrote:
Who is we? I don't believe that I'm the only one one this list to write
that I would never want to go back to the good old days.
I don't know of anybody who wants everything that went with those
days.
On 2 Dec 2009 00:17:46 -0800, r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl (R.S.)
wrote:
Does anyone remember who Accenture was?
Arthur Andersen, IIRC.
No. Former name of Accenture was Andersen Consulting (www.ac.com), not
Arthur Andersen.
It was separate entity lng time before Enron bankrupcy.
If
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
Pierre Fichaud pr...@videotron.ca writes:
Most banks have SLAs with acquiring institutions like FirstData,etc as
far as transaction turnaround times are
Can some one post the instruction for subscribing to the assembler discussion
list.
Thanks
Paul D'Angelo
Nutrition
Improve your career health. Click now to study nutrition!
Are there any MVS Operator commands that will list address spaces that have
connected to work load manager ?
Connected - I mean an address space that has issued IWMCONN or IWME4COnn.
I do not have Omegamon nor do I have TMON.
Will RMF display such information ?
THANKS
Paul D'Angelo
I believe the Binder uses ISPF-style enqueues to allow OPEN for output
with SHR access without any problems. When needing updates with SHR and
utilities that do not support ISPF-style enqueues, our approach has been
to change the job step to invoke a front-end program that gets the
required
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009 12:50:00 EST, Greg Smith r...@epaibm.rtpnc.epa.gov wrote:
Does this job execute w/o error at the vendor site?
If so, what are they doing that your site does not (or vice versa)?
If NOT, change vendor! (Who wants to trust/rely on a vendor who does not
even test his
So perhaps a combination of the two is in order. Write to a temporary PDS
during the translate and then use DISP=OLD on the copy from the temp PDS in to
the actual PDS.
Yet another frustating issue in going to z/OS. Oy.
Thanks for the ideas.
Frank
On 12/2/2009 at 3:23 AM, in message
All,
Are system or installation defined system symbols other than SYSPLEX or
SYSNAME available for use in ACS routines? Looking at the manuals, it
is not clear.
Thanks in advance.
_
Dave Jousma
Assistant Vice President, Mainframe
Does IEBCOPY use the same enqueue strategy as the Binder?
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 14:29, Joel C. Ewing jcew...@acm.org wrote:
I believe the Binder uses ISPF-style enqueues to allow OPEN for output
with SHR access without any problems. When needing updates with SHR and
utilities that do not
R.S. wrote:
And Andersen Consulting is (was) not Arthur Andersen.
According to the Accenture item in Wikipedia, It was once part of Arthur
Andersen. See the article for more information as to how the name became
Accenture.
KG
You can change the name but crooks remain crooks.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accenture
Accenture originated as the business and technology consulting division of
accounting firm Arthur Andersen.
.
.
In 1989, that division split from Arthur Andersen and began using the name
Andersen
Depends on where the filler cap and timing chain is. I tried it on a 190d
and it was real messy. Guess if you were careful could pour it down the
dipstick...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009 12:51:15 -0700, Frank Swarbrick wrote:
So perhaps a combination of the two is in order. Write to a temporary PDS
during the translate and then use DISP=OLD on the copy from the temp PDS in to
the actual PDS.
Yet another frustating issue in going to z/OS. Oy.
It's even
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 00:29:42 -0600, Chase, John jch...@ussco.com
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Hardly nonsense. On Win or Mac, when Firefox tells me it
needs an update, I click on Update. A few minutes later,
it tells me
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009 15:21:03 -0500, Don Leahy wrote:
Does IEBCOPY use the same enqueue strategy as the Binder?
I believe IEBCOPY's strategy is, It's your foot and your gun ...
Use DISP=OLD if you care.
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 14:29, Joel C. Ewing wrote:
I believe the Binder uses ISPF-style
On 2009-12-02 at 12:14 concerning Re: question on STORAGE function -
TCB may become non-dispatchable?, John Chase jch...@uss...com
wrote to IBM-Main :
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Rob Scott
[snip] why [snip] bypass normal CICS storage services [snip] sounds
very much
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 15:10:57 -0600, Mark Zelden mark.zel...@zurichna.com wrote:
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:58:23 -0600, John McKown wrote:
CA is adopting this type of process as well with their Mainframe 2.0. I
was at the demo and was impressed.
I saw their demo at SHARE. I was impressed
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
Anne Lynn Wheeler l...@garlic.com writes:
we had been called in to consult with small client/server startup that
wanted to payment transactions on their server;
Howard Brazee pisze:
On 2 Dec 2009 00:17:46 -0800, r.skoru...@would you snip my address.com? (R.S.)
wrote:
Does anyone remember who Accenture was?
Arthur Andersen, IIRC.
No. Former name of Accenture was Andersen Consulting (www.ac.com), not
Arthur Andersen.
It was separate entity lng
Hal Merritt pisze:
Not sure what the 'SE' is, but we use Flashcopy on both of our DS8100's.
SE = Space Efficient. That sugests something like IBM/STK Snapshot. It
is *similar* to the snapshot.
It is a little cumbersome, but it seems to work pretty well to take a PIT copy of any number of
Well according to both my recollection, and Wikipedia (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accenture)
Accenture started out as a division of Arthur Andersen, but split from
Arthur Andersen in 1989, but was still part of the AWSC administrative
entity. It wasn't until August of 2000 that Andersen
kgold...@gmail.com (Kim Goldenberg) writes:
According to the Accenture item in Wikipedia, It was once part of
Arthur Andersen. See the article for more information as to how the
name became Accenture.
long-winded related reply
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2009q.html#77
--
40+yrs
On 12/1/2009 at 2:46 PM, in message
20091202171512.5d106f58...@smtp.patriot.net, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote:
In 4b14fd2e.6f0f.008...@efirstbank.com, on 12/01/2009
at 11:25 AM, Frank Swarbrick frank.swarbr...@efirstbank.com said:
Obviously one solution is to
-snip--
P.S. Anybody doing any linked-list processing in 64-bit space? Having
trouble comparing link keys to find insertion points.
What kind of problems?
unsnip
--snip-
While this discussion has evolved into a discourse on HLLs and library
support, I would like to make an observation.
A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away, Accenture was Arthur Anderson
Consulting. My company contracted with
snip--
It can always be worse. I once saw a vendor's SE give a 10- or 20-page
printout to a colleague of mine, who then sat at a keypunch for several hours
punching cards to match the VERIFY and ZAP hex data for the dozens of PTFs
Anne Lynn Wheeler wrote:
part of the redo of sio/tio/hio for xa (aka 811 for the nov78 date on
the documents) was the enormous pathlengths in mvs ... being able to
redrive queued i/o after completion of previous i/o.
Hmphhh..
In the dept of other possible ways by the hardware to damage
I've been using WS_FTP Pro between Windows XP and conventional z/OS
datasets for some time now with no problems.
I just tried to access some OMVS files and they are displaying very
strangely in WS_FTP. If I leave the filter blank, then all directories and
files have access permissions (you
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009 18:32:25 -0800, Charles Mills wrote:
I've been using WS_FTP Pro between Windows XP and conventional z/OS
datasets for some time now with no problems.
I just tried to access some OMVS files and they are displaying very
strangely in WS_FTP. If I leave the filter blank, then all
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009 18:32:25 -0800, Charles Mills wrote:
I've been using WS_FTP Pro between Windows XP and conventional
z/OS
datasets for some time now with no problems.
I just tried to access some OMVS files and they are displaying very
strangely in WS_FTP. If I leave the filter blank, then
Bill is correct- you need to set the host type. It would be nice if they
made auto-detect a bit smarter. Firefox has the same issue. I have one
profile for when I transfer datasets (auto-detect0, another profile for
HFS/OMVS (UNIX).
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Bill Godfrey
2009/12/2 Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com:
BTW, I tried:
/bin/cp /some/file //'DATA.SET.NAME(MEMBER)'
It gets an exclusive ENQ on SYSDSN 'DATA.SET.NAME'. That's
probably CRTL or LE behavior.
Um, isn't that just a side effect of the DYNALLOC it doubtless does
for the dataset? If you
At 15:33 -0600 on 12/02/2009, Paul Gilmartin wrote about Re: IEC143I 213-30:
It's even worse than you've learned so far. If you use
static (JCL DD DISP=OLD) allocation, the exclusive ENQ
will be obtained at job initiation and persist through
the last step that mentions the data set, regardless
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
i...@vmfacility.fr (Ivan Warren) writes:
Hmphhh..
In the dept of other possible ways by the hardware to damage
performance when preventing I/O queue processing
Thanks. That's the solution exactly. I had looked around for something like
that but I didn't find it. After I saw your two posts I looked a little
harder. g I've got the session now configured as UNIX (standard) and it
seems to work perfectly. I need to figure out how to clone it to one
--- On Wed, 12/2/09, Rick Fochtman rfocht...@ync.net wrote:
From: Rick Fochtman rfocht...@ync.net
Subject: Re: Now is time for banks to replace core system according to Accenture
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: Wednesday, December 2, 2009, 5:53 PM
--- On Wed, 12/2/09, Rick Fochtman rfocht...@ync.net wrote:
From: Rick Fochtman rfocht...@ync.net
Subject: Re: Jes2 Converter abend d37
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: Wednesday, December 2, 2009, 6:00 PM
snip--
It can always be worse.
93 matches
Mail list logo
