Brian Peterson pisze:
I agree 100 % with Mark.
[...]
And I 100% agree with you. Seriously, no irony.
However the my conclusion is the following: There is no need to rush
with HFS-ZFS migration. And I slowly migrate to ZFS, starting with
least important filesystems, leaving root filesystem at
Hello Fred,
one reason the TSO etc does not get the IEF238D WTOR is due to no MOUNT
authority.
another choice might be to shortcut the process and code an exit in FTP.
Regards
Bruce Hewson
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff
Hi Fred
SNIP
Bri P pilgrim...@ntlworld.com
I don't have anything particularly fancy in place, just the FTP server
config statements for the default disk allocation volume, and DCB
parameters, and the rest is just RACF - they don't have write access.
a default disk allocation volume
I am out of the office until 05/03/2010.
I am out of the office. Call my cell if this is an emergency.
Note: This is an automated response to your message Re: JES2 msg $HASP473
for CELL Pool and B32K sent on 4/29/10 20:29:07.
This is the only notification you will receive while this person
Ran into an oddball today.
Needed to quickly diff a couple of z/OS catalogs, and figured it'd be easier
using awk/diff than knocking up
some REXX. So I ran LISTCAT and from SDSF XDC'd the sysprint. Pulled that over
to OMVS to play with,
couple of lines of awk, job done - DEF ALIAS for each
Does the TSO session timeout get its value from
SMFPRM00 JWT(0030)
Is there a way to allow certain TSO users a longer
timeout without having to use an exit.
If it has to be an exit, which one is it.
Tim Brown
Systems Specialist - Project Leader
Central Hudson Gas Electric
284 South Ave
Failing any Non SMS allocation that doesn't have a VOLSER coded should
do the trick.
FILTLIST ANY_VOL INCLUDE(%%)
SELECT
WHEN ((STORCLAS = '' ) AND (ANYVOL NE ANY_VOL))
DO
WRITE '*** ALLOCATION FAILED'
WRITE '*** FOR DD ' DD
EXIT CODE(99)
END
END
It appears to be working again.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Crabtree, Anne D
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 9:03 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: shopz??
Ok.. just making sure it was on their end...
Does the TSO session timeout get its value from
SMFPRM00 JWT(0030)
Yes.
Is there a way to allow certain TSO users a longer
timeout without having to use an exit.
Yes. But, it's an all or nothing proposition, by user.
Allow, through your ESM (RACF, ACF2, or Top Secret), the user to specify
... and
IBM's Unix poaching slows in Q1
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/04/29/ibm_unix_takeouts/
from above
... despite a 17 per cent decline in both Power Systems and System z
mainframe sales.
... snip ...
and ...
In November 2008, HP was perfectly happy to crow that it had converted
more
G'day,
I have been asked if there is away for the user to find out what access they
have to a data set before they attempt to update or read it.
Is their any RACF command that a general user could use to find out the type
access they have to a data set?
Thank you.
Regards,
Herman Stocker
I'm sure that we cannot override SYSPRINT length using idcams or iebgener...
but reading your need you can try using a single step of tso batch like
this, no rexx is needed.
//P0 EXEC PGM=IKJEFT01
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSOUT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSTSPRT DD SPACE=(CYL,(1,1)),UNIT=VIO
//SORTIN
Does the TSO session timeout get its value from
SMFPRM00 JWT(0030)
Yes.
Is there a way to allow certain TSO users a longer
timeout without having to use an exit.
No.
If it has to be an exit, which one is it.
IEFUTL
shamelessplug
http://www.ase.com.au/ltxf.htm
/shamelessplug
Cheers
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
Allow, through your ESM (RACF, ACF2, or Top Secret), the user to specify
their CPU time.
Where? I know of the CPU Max in OMVS segment, but can that LIMIT the CPU
used by a TSO id?
Anything else is an exit.
Right. It is the IEFUTL exit.
Groete / Greeting
Elardus
Stocker, Herman wrote:
I have been asked if there is away for the user to find out what access they
have to a data set before they attempt to update or read it.
Is their any RACF command that a general user could use to find out the
type access they have to a data set?
Yes, let the general
Remember that this will *not* take into account any logic in the RACF exits (if
any) that can upgrade/downgrade the user's access - plus there might be
volser-specific rules in effect as well.
Rob Scott
Developer
Rocket Software
275 Grove Street * Newton, MA 02466-2272 * USA
Tel:
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 06:42:08 -0600 Stocker, Herman
herman.stoc...@avisbudget.com wrote:
:I have been asked if there is away for the user to find out what access they
have to a data set before they attempt to update or read it.
Well, they could ask the security guy.
The real issue is why do
Rob Scott wrote:
Remember that this will *not* take into account any logic in the RACF exits
(if any) that can upgrade/downgrade the user's access - plus there might be
volser-specific rules in effect as well.
I know. The OP asked for a command. My example also assumes there is a
GENERIC
G'day Marco, I'm not so concerned with getting the data across to OMVS, but
more with why the
change in RECFM had such a major impact once the data was there.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
I suppose that you missed FILEDATA:
BINARY means The file described by the DD statement is a byte-stream file
and does not contain record delimiters. The access method does not insert or
delete record delimiters.
TEXT means The file described by the DD statement contains records
delimited by the
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 12:29:25 +, Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca wrote:
Does the TSO session timeout get its value from
SMFPRM00 JWT(0030)
Yes.
Is there a way to allow certain TSO users a longer
timeout without having to use an exit.
Yes. But, it's an all or nothing proposition, by user.
Mark Zelden wrote:
What has changed from years ago (and I don't know exactly when without
research) is that TIME=1440 used to turn off the accounting in SMF records,
Please explain 'accounting in SMF records'. Does that means some SMF
records were not written at all if TIME=1440 is used?
Where
Thank you for you fast response.
To answer the why needed question:
On occasion security has stated that access has been given only later to find
out that the incorrect access was granted or not granted at all. Causing jobs
to fail and time to be lost, therefore the user wants away to check
Shane,
Its always best not to copy the files at all if you don't need to.
Using our free BPXBATCH replacement, it is trivial to use DDs in Unix
shell scripts.
For your example:
//LC EXEC PGM=IDCAMS
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSIN DD *
LISTCAT ... OFILE(LC1)
LISTCAT ... OFILE(LC2)
//LC1
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Graeme Gibson gra...@ase.com.au wrote:
Does the TSO session timeout get its value from
SMFPRM00 JWT(0030)
Which reminds me: I work remotely a lot, and if my connectivity burps, I get
disconnected. Sometimes TSO notices, and when I reconnect I get
Nice thought - but remember I am a visitor wherever I am. Ain't my shop.
Hence my preference to use standard tools where possible.
May not be the best, may not be the fastest, but at least they tend to be
available when I walk
in the door.
And if that software/tool has a problem I want to be
[snip]A GENER of the files to VB prior to sending them to
OMVS indeed confirmed this is what was happening.
Anyone else seen this - or got an explanation ?. gil maybe ... ?
How did you move the OFILE to the filesystem?
--
Peter Hunkeler
CREDIT SUISSE AG
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of zMan
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Graeme Gibson gra...@ase.com.au
wrote:
Does the TSO session timeout get its value from
SMFPRM00 JWT(0030)
Which reminds me: I work remotely a lot, and if my
Please explain 'accounting in SMF records'. Does that means some SMF
records were not written at all if TIME=1440 is used?
Where is that history trivia documented?
Just (very and very) curious... ;-D
ISTR that in MVS 3.8 the initiator task checked the time value for 1440 before
cp //'..' /tmp/file.txt
and/or cat //'..' /tmp/file.txt
Worked fine for VB input, not VBA. Hence my confusion.
Shane ...
On Sat, May 1st, 2010 at 12:46 AM, Hunkeler Peter (KIUP 4) wrote:
[snip]A GENER of the files to VB prior to sending them to
OMVS indeed confirmed this is what was
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Chase, John jch...@ussco.com wrote:
Install z/OS 1.11.
I couldn't remember whether the logon here equivalent had been
implemented in 1.11 or 1.12, but we have a new 1.11 image running in the
sandbox so I tried it and it worked. Logged in from one emulator
Is there a way to allow certain TSO users a longer
timeout without having to use an exit.
No.
YES. But, it's unlimited.
TIME=1440
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Jim McAlpine jim.mcalp...@gmail.comwrote:
Strange, I've just tried the same thing on our z/OS 1.11 system and got -
IKJ56425I LOGON rejected, UserId MAINT already logged on to system S0W1
IKJ56400A ENTER LOGON OR LOGOFF-
Jim McAlpine
Forget that, I forgot
IIRC, it is also a way to verify which profile is covering a file, so if the
SecAdmin said they changed it and it isn't working, you can confirm that the
correct profile was changed.
* Don *
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Stocker, Herman
herman.stoc...@avisbudget.com wrote:
Thank you for
Where? I know of the CPU Max in OMVS segment, but can that LIMIT the CPU used
by a TSO id?
It's got to be in the TSO segment, somewhere.
You can specify it on the fullscreen logon.
Or:
LOGON tso-id TIME(nnn)
That option is definitely controlled by ACF2 -- I know because there's a bug in
their
cp //'..' /tmp/file.txt
and/or cat //'..' /tmp/file.txt
Before posting my question, I ran a LISTC with OFILE, verified
it is VBA-140, then did
cat '//TEMP.LISTCOUT' temp.listcout
I'm baffled that I don't see the ASA char when doing a
cat temp.listcout
afterwards. anyway, I don't see
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 09:21:41 -0500, Elardus Engelbrecht
elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za wrote:
Mark Zelden wrote:
What has changed from years ago (and I don't know exactly when without
research) is that TIME=1440 used to turn off the accounting in SMF records,
Please explain 'accounting in SMF
On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 21:33 -0400, Clark Morris wrote:
To have an application refuse input because of a special character in
2010 is archaic
Nothing for it then, but to enter text base64-encoded. 'course, that'll
complicate search queries.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jim McAlpine
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Chase, John jch...@ussco.com wrote:
Install z/OS 1.11.
I couldn't remember whether the logon here equivalent had been
implemented in 1.11 or 1.12, but we
The all or nothing aspect, is they will NEVER time-out due to CPU consumption.
JWT isn't CPU consumption, it is wait time (JWT=Job Wait Time).
Yes, I know that JWT isn't CPU consumption.
Perhaps I should have been clearer.
TIME=1440/NOLIMIT will cause JWT to be ignored (the exit not being
Please explain 'accounting in SMF records'. Does that means some SMF records
were not written at all if TIME=1440 is used?
SMF TYPE 30.
INTERVAL, Job End, Step End.
I believe, also TYPE 4 TYPE 5.
It was a big issue, back when I started as a Capacity Analyst 30 years ago.
Where is that
Thanks to all and every one who replied to my questions and statements.
I learned some things. Thanks again. ;-D
I really hope the OP got his answers/solutions.
Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
It did the same thing as I tried to paste this WAS transcript below. Doesn't
like
those wacky Y's. But if that's so, then maybe they shouldn't be outputting
wacky Y's. :)
MA
IBM WebSphere Application Server OEM Edition for z/OS Version 7, Release
0
* Version 1.3
Shane, the option FILEDATA=x is available as argument of cp unix command:
-B for Binary
-T for text
-X for exe
cp -T //'yourds' /u/yourfile.txt
bye.
2010/4/30 Hunkeler Peter (KIUP 4) peter.hunke...@credit-suisse.com
cp //'..' /tmp/file.txt
and/or cat //'..' /tmp/file.txt
Before posting my
My boss asked if I could canvass this esteemed group as to whether or not it
still makes sense to implement the MQ portion of SDSF. We are z/OS 1.10 going
to either 1.11 or 1.12. I've never implemented it before and am wondering if I
should.
All replies are greatly appreciated.
Bob
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 16:29:56 -0400, Knutson, Sam wrote:
This is the document I was directed to
http://tinyurl.com/2fg3pgj
The Link is
https://www-304.ibm.com/ibmlink/news/NewsServlet.wss?referrer=newsMaincommand=Getnews_item_id=4405lc=encc=US
IBM standards dictate UTF-8 character encoding for
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 17:11:37 +0200, Hunkeler Peter (KIUP 4) wrote:
cp //'..' /tmp/file.txt
and/or cat //'..' /tmp/file.txt
Before posting my question, I ran a LISTC with OFILE, verified
it is VBA-140, then did
cat '//TEMP.LISTCOUT' temp.listcout
Remember, always, that Classic data sets are
The wacky Y is in fact a Y with an accent aigu or, if you're a French
dropout, an acute accent.
This is an international forum, and what may seem funny municipally may be
offensive elsewhere.
hn Gilmore Ashland, MA 01721-1817 USA
Is that anything like a cute ear ring (acute hearing)? ;-)
TGIF!
john gilmore john_w_gilm...@msn.com 4/30/2010 1:06 PM
The wacky Y is in fact a Y with an accent aigu or, if you're a French
dropout, an acute accent.
This is an international forum, and what may seem funny municipally may
I read in an announcement that at some point the use of MQ for
cross-system information in SDSF is going away. I don't remember if
that comes to being in 1.12, or if it was a futures beyond that, but if
it were me, I wouldn't do it.
Unfortunately, this situation is not that unusual for CA utilities. As we
discover them, we add something (an additional job step, an MPF exit, etc) to
force a non-scrollable message to the operator console (or in some cases to
suppress a non-scrollable message which has no significance).
If someone can tell me what I am doing wrong, I would appreciate it. ISPF
seems to be my nemesis. I have RTFM'd for quite some time, and cannot
understand why this is happening. I have a table that is created with 5
variables. When rows are added to the table, they get 1 extension
IBM came back with an answer. I will be monitoring the CA Dispatch STC.
Should we see this again, we will look at raising its Region size.
Here is their response:
The HASP473 message with RC=0 is primarily informational. The cell
pool get for B32K is from the SAPI SSI which is called
Hi Dave,
I believe that the problem may be related to TBDISPL rather than TBSCAN.
After your first TBSCAN, I assume that you are issuing TBDISPL to facilitate
entering of FIND in the primary command area. If this is indeed the case,
TBDISPL will reset the CRP to 0 if now row is selected when
Posted to IBMVM,Linux390 IBMMain for those who are interested
in one-hour webcasts. This one is about Linux on System z.
Topic: The Linux on System z toolchain in a nutshell
Speaker: Hans-Joachim Picht, IBM Boeblingen
Date: Tuesday, May 4, 2010
Times: 9:00 AM EDT or 2:00 PM EDT
SNIP
I believe that the problem may be related to TBDISPL rather than TBSCAN.
After your first TBSCAN, I assume that you are issuing TBDISPL to facilitate
entering of FIND in the primary command area. If this is indeed the case,
TBDISPL will reset the CRP to 0 if now row is selected when you
Is there any software available that will show the access by dataset(or by
CCHR) for a given volume?
John Norgauer
Senior Systems Programmer
Mainframe Technical Support Services
University of California Davis Medical Center
2315 Stockton Blvd
ASB 1300
Sacramento, Ca 95817
916-734-0536
TMON/MVS gives us that information for a real time snapshot. Can either start
a summary or detail I/O trace and look at the trace once it is completed. I
imagine a GTF I/O would be able to also get you that information, but since we
have TMON, we use that.
Dennis
-Original Message-
John,
Look at the SMF Type 42 subtype 6 record.
Ron
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of
John Norgauer
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 3:01 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: [IBM-MAIN] How to analyze a volume's access by
Stocker, Herman wrote:
To answer the why needed question:
On occasion security has stated that access has been given only later to find
out that the incorrect access was granted or not granted at all. Causing jobs
to fail and time to be lost, therefore the user wants away to check security.
Mark Zelden wrote:
The records were written, just without (some of?) the CPU related data.
MVS 3.8 had sequential SMF data sets (SYS1.MANX and SYS1.MANY
with DCB=(DSORG=PS,RECFM=VBS,LRECL=1000,BLKSIZE=1000)
even though some records - from MF/1 for example - could be longer
than 1000 bytes).
The
61 matches
Mail list logo
