:Subject: CA-DISK QUESTION : LISTD
:
:Hallo Members,
:
:I am running a LISTD report of all archived dsns. I am able to display the
following fields:
:LISTD FIELDS=(DSNAM,ARCDT,ARKEY,EXPDT,FLGSC,DS1JN,DS1UD)
:
:My question is how can I display the DSCB field. I checked the LISTD
FIELDS
That is where I looked originally before I posed the question. I don't see
list field parm for DCB.
From: Vernooij, CP - SPLXM kees.verno...@klm.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 2:59:31 AM
Subject: Re: CA-DISK QUESTION : LISTD : CORRECTION
Correct,
Have
.mail.gq1.yahoo.com...
That is where I looked originally before I posed the question. I don't see
list field parm for DCB.
From: Vernooij, CP - SPLXM kees.verno...@klm.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 2:59:31 AM
Subject: Re: CA-DISK QUESTION : LISTD
---snip---
It is like Benjamin said: DCB is the combination of LRECL, BLKSIZE,
RECFM, DSORG, DIRBLKcount etc. and they all have their FIELDS parms.
There is no thing like 'DCB=8000' in JCL either.
Hallo Members,
I am running a LISTD report of all archived dsns. I am able to display the
following fields:
LISTD FIELDS=(DSNAM,ARCDT,ARKEY,EXPDT,FLGSC,DS1JN,DS1UD)
My question is how can I display the DSCB field. I checked the LISTD FIELDS
parms but nothing seems to satisfy this
Can't you just run a rebuild?
Lucy Arnold
Storage Manager
U.C. Davis Medical Center
916-734-5498
From: willie bunter williebun...@yahoo.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: 09/20/2011 10:07 AM
Subject:CA-DISK QUESTION : LISTD
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM
Sorry, I made a typo. Instead of DSCB it should read DCB. My appologies.
From: willie bunter williebun...@yahoo.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 1:06:20 PM
Subject: CA-DISK QUESTION : LISTD
Hallo Members,
I am running a LISTD report of all archived dsns. I am
Lucy, Thanks for the tip I will take a look.
From: Lucy Arnold lucy.arn...@ucdmc.ucdavis.edu
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 1:13:04 PM
Subject: Re: CA-DISK QUESTION : LISTD
Can't you just run a rebuild?
Lucy Arnold
Storage Manager
U.C. Davis Medical Center
916-734
-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
:Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 1:06:20 PM
:Subject: CA-DISK QUESTION : LISTD
:
:Hallo Members,
:
:I am running a LISTD report of all archived dsns. I am able to display the
following fields:
:LISTD FIELDS=(DSNAM,ARCDT,ARKEY,EXPDT,FLGSC,DS1JN,DS1UD)
:
:My question is how can I
Allocate a small Files Data Set to rebuild into - don't use your
production one!
Lucy Arnold
Storage Manager
U.C. Davis Medical Center
916-734-5498
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
Hello CA-DISK and TS7700 VTS users,
CA has released PTF RO17315, which solves a problem that you may
already have solved yourselves in the past.
Until RO17315 CA-DISK assumed that a TS7700 virtual tape had a size of
800MB. You may have solved this problem by setting the CARTPRCT
Has this post been sent out to the group? I don't see it anywhere.
Thanks,
Kees.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the
Received here this morning at 7:57AM EST.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Kees Vernooij
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 1:59 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Check (was: Attention CA-DISK and TS7700 VTS users
Peter,
Thanks for the confirmation,
Kees.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
Deaver jeffrey.dea...@securian.com wrote:
From: Jeffrey Deaver jeffrey.dea...@securian.com
Subject: Re: CA-DISK QUESTION
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Received: Wednesday, September 22, 2010, 6:15 AM
Usually gets me what I need...
//LISTD EXEC LISTD
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSIN DD *
LISTD
...@yahoo.ca]
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 7:50 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: CA-DISK QUESTION
Jeffrey,
I tried your suggestion and it gave me only 2 dsns that are archived. I
executed the job over again without the DUPLICATE parm and I got the same
result. When I checked
:
From: John H Kington john.king...@convergys.com
Subject: Re: CA-DISK QUESTION
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Received: Wednesday, September 22, 2010, 11:54 PM
Esmie,
Do you have more than one files dataset? If so, use mfiles dd and concatenate
all of the files datasets.
Regards,
John
513-723-7527
,
I tried your suggestion and it gave me only 2 dsns that are
archived. I executed the job over again without the DUPLICATE parm and
I got the same result. When I checked for my dsns and there are about
73 which are archived and it showed just one.
Are the two datasets it gave you -
.
--- On Wed, 9/22/10, John H Kington john.king...@convergys.com wrote:
From: John H Kington john.king...@convergys.com
Subject: Re: CA-DISK QUESTION
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Received: Wednesday, September 22, 2010, 11:54 PM
Esmie,
Do you have more than one files dataset? If so, use
that are
already on DASD which prompted my post.
--- On Wed, 9/22/10, John H Kington john.king...@convergys.com wrote:
From: John H Kington john.king...@convergys.com
Subject: Re: CA-DISK QUESTION
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Received: Wednesday, September 22, 2010, 11:54 PM
Esmie,
Do you
Kees,
Your suggestion worked. Thanks. Now I have to find a way of just listing the
A8.
Thanks.
--- On Thu, 9/23/10, Vernooij, CP - SPLXM kees.verno...@klm.com wrote:
From: Vernooij, CP - SPLXM kees.verno...@klm.com
Subject: Re: CA-DISK QUESTION
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Received: Thursday
Data set was scratched at time of archival.
0100 40 Data set was uncataloged at time of archival.
0010 20 Data set was recataloged to CA Disk pseudovolume.
0001 10 Archived due to EXPLICIT request.
Note: If this bit is off, Archived by RETAIN
1000 08 Data set was archived via EXCP
Jeffrey,
Thanks very much for your help. Thanks to all who responded to my post. You
all have been extremely helpful.
--- On Thu, 9/23/10, Jeffrey Deaver jeffrey.dea...@securian.com wrote:
From: Jeffrey Deaver jeffrey.dea...@securian.com
Subject: Re: CA-DISK QUESTION
To: IBM-MAIN
-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of esmie
moo [esmie_...@yahoo.ca]
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 8:01 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: CA-DISK QUESTION
John,
No, there is only 1 files dsn. I tried the following :
LISTD FIELDS=(DSNAM,FLAG1B,DSORG,VOLNO,ATIME,ARCDT)
and it listed all
Good Morning Gentle Readers,
Is there a way of knowing what datasets are archived in the ARCHIVE Control
file? I have an auditor wanting to know what dsns have been archived.
Thanks.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
Did you look at the LISTC LISTF jobs?
Lucy Arnold
Storage Manager
U.C. Davis Medical Center
916-734-5498
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message:
Our CA-DISK proclib contains a proc called LISTD - I believe it is a supplied
proc. We execute the proc with a SYSIN of LISTD and it produces the DATA SET
NAME INDEX listing.
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m
Usually gets me what I need...
//LISTDEXEC LISTD
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSINDD *
LISTD DUPLICATES,FIELDS=(DSNAM,VOLNO,ARCDT,ATIME,EXPDT,ARKEY)
Jeffrey Deaver, Engineer
Systems Engineering
jeffrey.dea...@securian.com
651-665-4231(v)
IS - Creating competitive advantage with technology.
Hello forumers,
Has anyone experienced with Tivoli ABAR for z/OS and CA-DISK and
willing to share with me his insights?
Thanks,
Arye Shemer.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email
Sandro,
Are you referring to section 4.5.5, Creating commands from the extract
data ?
If so, the text does NOT say there is a sample REXX. It DOES say: -
A REXX program can be used to generate the restore commands from the list
We recommend using the REXX language to do this
In the REXX
Hello,
We are currently migrating from CA-Disk (formerly SAMS:Disk and even DMS) to
DFHSM. Most of the CA-Disk tasks have already been replaced by HSM functions
and commands. z/OS 1.7.
To address the conversion of old archive and backup versions, the long
lasting ones made with CA-Disk
Hi,
Is it possible to rename archived dsns (CA-DISK (DMS)) without having to
recall them to disk?
Thanks
-
Shape Yahoo! in your own image. Join our Network Research Panel today
willie bunter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi,
Is it possible to rename archived dsns (CA-DISK (DMS)) without
having to recall them to disk?
Thanks
No, you can alter a lot in the FDS, but not the name.
Kees
Hallo,
Does CA-DISK provide some utility to inquire about dsns which have been
archived. I checked the doc but I did not find much info. I found something
about LISTDMS. I tried the command but it keeps searching for my userid. It
returns back with :
ADSDM484 3543 NO RECORDS
Does CA-DISK provide some utility to inquire about dsns
which have been archived. I checked the doc but I did
not find much info.
Look at the LISTD utility.
Jeffrey Deaver, Engineer
Systems Engineering
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
651-665-4231(v)
651-610-7670(p
Willie,
DSNAME = O00130./
The command I tried is : LISTDMS ARC.
You can try LISTD DSNAME=(/) to see if you
can find any datasets. You need to point to
the correct files dataset if you have more
than one.
Regards,
John
--
Hi,
Are there any other OEM products that preform similar functions as
CA-Disk ?
TIA
Dean
Dean Montevago
Sr. Systems Specialist
Visiting Nurse Service of New York
(212) 609 - 5596
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
Are there any other OEM products that preform similar functions as
CA-Disk ?
Innovation's FDR product(s).
Jeffrey Deaver, Engineer
Systems Engineering
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
651-665-4231(v)
651-610-7670(p)
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
HSM (IBM)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Jeffrey Deaver
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 2:58 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CA-DISK
Are there any other OEM products that preform similar functions as
CA-Disk
Hi All,
I'm converting from CA-Allocate CA-Disk to DFSMS and DFSMSHSM.
We're at z/OS 1.7.
In my CA-Disk environment, I have multiple L1 migration volume pools.
For example, Production data is migrated to L1 DASD that is mirrored to
our DR site, while test/devl data is migrated to non
Bob,
Is your test environment totally segregated from your Production
environment or is the DASD shared?
-Original Message-
From: Lester, Bob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 10:50 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: CA-DISK to DFSMSHSM
Hi All,
I'm
@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CA-DISK to DFSMSHSM
Bob,
Is your test environment totally segregated from your Production
environment or is the DASD shared?
--
This e-mail transmission may contain information that is proprietary
to mirror a few more dasd volumes.
Dave O'Brien
-Original Message-
From: Lester, Bob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 11:03 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CA-DISK to DFSMSHSM
Hi Dave,
DASD is shared between PROD/TECH LPARS. PROD/DEV/TEST all on same
as well.
Cheaper to mirror a few more dasd volumes.
Dave O'Brien
-Original Message-
From: Lester, Bob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 11:03 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CA-DISK to DFSMSHSM
Hi Dave,
DASD is shared between PROD/TECH LPARS. PROD/DEV
to either ML1 or ML2.
Richard J Habres
AVP - Merrill Lynch
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 11:16 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CA-DISK to DFSMSHSM
Bob
Any CA-DISK gurus out there? I am struggling with certain parms such as
PCTUSED, PCTSECONDARY, CONVERT etc. The manual is informative but I am not
sure if I understand it enough so as to convert the jcl parms to those of
either FDR or DFDSS. For example, how can I correctly code
Tom,
2086-350 Z/890 about 27k per year for HSM.
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Tom Brannon
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 11:55 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: HSM and CA-Disk
Allan,
You indicated
Thanks Kevin,
I brought this up and was just told that DFHSM is a high cost item and
therefore we would not reap a savings.
I thought it was packaged with DFSMS as a no cost item.
Can someone set me straight?
Thanks
Tom
--
For
List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom Brannon
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 10:32 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: HSM and CA-Disk
Thanks Kevin,
I brought this up and was just told that DFHSM is a high cost item and
therefore we would not reap a savings. I thought
, you pay for HSM, because
you can prefer CA-DISK, DFSORT is extra paid, because there is Syncsort,
etc. In fact I don't remain any optional (paid) feature not having
competition replacement
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
Allan,
You indicated price is one reason to convert from CA-Disk to HSM.
Do you (does anyone) have any real numbers for the cost of CA-Disk vs
DFHSM?
If so can you Email them to me?
Thanks,
Tom
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
Price? Save them some money and they will love you...
snip
Dear list,
at our shop (zOS 1.4 on a z890, three LPARs, Sharks DASD, tiny SMS
environment) we have CA-Disk installed and we are evaluating whether is
worth migrating to HSM. Can any of you point to whatever
documentation/book/test cases
cc:
Discussion List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
.EDU HSM and CA-Disk
stored under Unix System Services
BrightStor CA-Disk Backup Restore for UNIX System Services has been
suggested.
Do you use this product? Does it live up to it's claims?
Did you consider it and decide to go another direction? Why?
Did you have it and then got rid of it for reasons
There is also Upstream from Innovation (the FDR company).
True. please see
http://www.innovationdp.fdr.com/products/upstream/upsunix.cfm
--
Bruce A. Black
Senior Software Developer for FDR
Innovation Data Processing 973-890-7300
personal: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sales info: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks guys! We'll check it out.
Lynette
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bruce Black
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 7:22 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: BrightStor CA-Disk Backup Restore for UNIX System
Services
Cross-posted to MVS-OE and IBM-Main
We're looking at products comparable to IBM Tivoli Storage Manager for
USS
For backup and restore of data stored under Unix System Services
BrightStor CA-Disk Backup Restore for UNIX System Services has been
suggested.
Do you use this product? Does
PROTECTED]...
Neal,
The reason that I would like to go for the 'MERGE' tool is that you can
provide a list of input tapes.
XCOPY requires, to my knowledge, a dataset list as input for the copy
process.
This means that I have to setup a process that collect the datasetnames
that are stacked with CA
Lieven,
When I converted the 3480s to 3490Es using the CA-DISK MERGE utility, I
would do 50 input tapes at a time. These tapes then went to one of five
output tapes. The output tapes were grouped by how long the backup dataset
was retained. Doing the conversion this way would took about 6-8 hours
Folks,
I need some help with an older version of CA-DISK 9.0.2.
The client needs to convert some old 3480 CA-DISK backups to some higher
capacity media.
They want to keep the CA-DISK environment.
For the moment I see 2 options.
1) use XCOPY to copy all backup tape volumes onto higher capacity
Lieven,
why don't you just use the Merge procedure? This will also consolidate the
data efficiently to fully utilize the new tapes.
Kees.
Lieven Borgs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Folks,
I need some help with an older version of CA-DISK 9.0.2.
The client
The problems is that the client wants to keep the old volumes as well.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
Hey,
If you record the VOLSER of all those 3480 they can be put back into the
CA-DISK system after the conversion is done. There is a CA-DISK utility
available to perform that function. But it must be done after the conversion
is complete so you do not reprocess the 3480's again.
Regards,
Neal
63 matches
Mail list logo
