Dear All,
Is it possible to print the dasd accumulation report based on a RACF
default Group + Including the users connected to the RACF default Group, so
that we can generate as a single value ? LSTPRT via ISMF for around 500
default Group looks to be cumbersome and all the RACF Default Group
Mark Zelden wrote:
It's not on my web site.
1) It is IBM copyrighted code.
2) My changes were done for a client.
But my comments that I posted told you exactly what I changed from the sample
and the IBM changes match exactly what you posted.
Thanks. I will look around, reread your kind comments
Barbara Nitz wrote:
This is just type 100 - 102 records on 2 out of 11 LPARS BTW.
For some reason - the word overkill came to mind.
Yes, whoever had the bright idea to put DB2 tracing into SMF should be shot.
Or place those DB2 subsystems in 'Siberia' (Special WLM class) and grab a small
dump
In
CAE1XxDFG9DZMu=+npbg4tc4pgc2wcydx2gnsrt8vnpke_qu...@mail.gmail.com,
on 06/20/2012
at 02:36 PM, John Gilmore jwgli...@gmail.com said:
Anciently, under OS/PCP and OS/MFT, the Linkage Editor issued a
RESERVE for the DASD volume on which the target PDS for its output
load module resided in much
In
2a9e1363b91de94a874408de46f0b32daf44ad4...@cwm-ex-mbc-1.dcgov.priv,
on 06/20/2012
at 03:19 PM, Myers, Edouard (OCTO) edouard.my...@dc.gov said:
If I compile an Enterprise Cobol 3.4 module under a z/OS v1r11
system and its LE version can I run that same module on a z/OS
V1R9 system with
Hi Ron,
very glad to hear that your problem is solved now and all works for you !
Sometimes a few explaining words are very usefull for further understanding
of manuals/presentations. At least that is my experience ...
If there should occure any further problems pls. feel free to address them
I have reviewed Shmuel's language, and it still seems to me that he
was equating a hardware RESERVE with an ENQ macro, but the distinction
you make is of course a valid one.
My problem with Shmuel's posts is that they are often contentious for
trhe sake of contention, but this time he may well
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu] On Behalf Of John Gilmore
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 8:17 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Why is GRS ENQ needed in SMFDUMP program?
I have reviewed Shmuel's language, and it
On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 23:31:51 -0500, Barbara Nitz nitz-...@gmx.net wrote:
This is one of those problems you
don't have until you have it if you normally have spare cycles. WLM
is funny that way. :-)
Yes, and PHBs don't understand that. So whoever screams loudest gets IMP=1
until *everyone*
Using the ISPF panels to put it the output to disk will generate JCL. Look
at the JCL generated to find the libraries needed.
Thank you and have a Terrific day!
Jonathan Goossen, DTM
ACT Mainframe Storage Group
Personal: 651-361-4541
Department Support Line: 651-361-
For help with
On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 23:31:51 -0500, Barbara Nitz nitz-...@gmx.net wrote:
We've never had a problem keeping up even during heavy periods
Then you're lucky. How big is your standard in-storage SMF buffer?
Max size - 1G
How many DB2s do you run on any one lpar? We went through quite a few hoops
Supposably CA-View supports SAPI, but the book says you can only select output
by output class, DEST, and FORM. Anybody out there know any other way to
expand the selection criteria, writer, jobname, programmer name, etc?
Regards,
Tom Conley
From Jamie Pease – Chairman GSE Enterprise Security Working Group
Ladies and Gentlemen,
Just to remind you that the next meeting of the
GSE Enterprise Security Working Group
will take place on Wednesday 27th June in Central London.
Full details including the agenda can be found at
I don't know the history of SMFDUMP within samplib, but since it is
apparently not shipped in supported z/OS releases, I would guess that it
is not appropriate to use on said releases.
It is possible that the user of the sample is supposed to change
SMFRNAME to something like
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 09:47:32 -0500, Thomas Conley pinnc...@rochester.rr.com
wrote:
I'd like to take a private survey to determine which sites have enabled both
MIDAW and zHPF, or if you haven't enabled either or both, why. It's come to
my attention that some sites may not have enabled these
In my previous post I mistyped in mentioning alternate security product.
I meant instead an alternate serialization product (e.g., MIM) which may
have rules different than GRS.
Peter Relson
z/OS Core Technology Design
--
For
In
e3bdb5aee89ab14caaf930af702759a409f...@exmbx2010-1.campus.mcgill.ca,
on 06/20/2012
at 09:28 PM, Uriel Carrasquilla uriel.carrasqui...@mail.mcgill.ca
said:
1024 bytes = 1 Kilobyte
Actually, 1000 bytes = 1 Kilobyte and 1024 bytes = 1 Kibibyte.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and
In ecj4u7dd2vt0gv0t30od9a27mqmbivg...@4ax.com, on 06/20/2012
at 07:29 PM, Clark Morris cfmpub...@ns.sympatico.ca said:
Would you think better of Crovitz if his quoting VINTON Cerf was
transformed by me to his quoting VINCENT Cerf?
No, because the error I commented on was in the original
In
cae1xxde8oowf8pdjqa0ypnyj0xahusade2sqqnfxvddv9ot...@mail.gmail.com,
on 06/21/2012
at 04:14 PM, John Gilmore jwgli...@gmail.com said:
Since he probably has a PC he could of course use the Windows
calculator.
What if he's not running wiondoze on his PC?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz
(Seymour J.)
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 9:22 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Subject: Re: convert Decimal to bytes
In
I attached a text screen print. The lines are the input field lines. I will
resend.
Doug
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Peter Relson
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 11:53 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Why
On 6/22/2012 7:00 AM, Mark Zelden wrote:
Reminds me of a joke in the recording studio when doing a mix and
to make everything louder than everything else. :-)
Or when on-stage and everyone keeps turning up their volume... :-)
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Parkview
On 6/22/2012 5:37 AM, McKown, John wrote:
I am fairly sure that Shmuel's comment was about the RESERVE macro, not the
hardware function. The RESERVE macro is logically equivalent to a SYSTEMS level
ENQ plus a hardware reserve (unless the GRSRNL converts it to not do the
hardware RESERVE).
23 matches
Mail list logo
