Hi John,
Try a DFDSS copy with this mod on.
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/zos/v1r12/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.ibm.zos.r12.adru000%2Fd6021.htm
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of John Hooper
Sent: Thursday,
Superb indeed !!!
THANKS!
Jan
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Shane Ginnane ibm-m...@tpg.com.au wrote:
Seems to be all better ... touch wood.
Thanks to any and all who facilitated its recovery. - Darren especially I
guess.
Shane ...
I have lost count of the number of times, I have put Shift Supervisor
in incident records, only to have pointed out to me later that I forgot the
f .
Regards,
Neil Haley
nha...@ca.ibm.com
Storage Software Mainframe Support
http://www.ibm.com/systems/z/ | http://www.about.me/NeilHaley
Hello,
We have defined IEFUSI as dynamic exit and ADDed it in PROGxx.
Now I have modified the module, UPDATEd LLA and want to activate the new
version of the module, but I can't find a method to do so. All I can
find is to make a private PROGxx member with an EXIT DELETE followed by
an EXIT
Vernooij, CP - SPLXM wrote:
Hello,
We have defined IEFUSI as dynamic exit and ADDed it in PROGxx.
Now I have modified the module, UPDATEd LLA and want to activate the new
version of the module, but I can't find a method to do so. All I can
find is to make a private PROGxx member with an EXIT
John Eells wrote:
We have defined IEFUSI as dynamic exit and ADDed it in PROGxx.
Now I have modified the module, UPDATEd LLA and want to activate the new
version of the module, but I can't find a method to do so. All I can find is
to make a private PROGxx member with an EXIT DELETE
John Eells ee...@us.ibm.com wrote in message
news:502e44b6.90...@us.ibm.com...
Vernooij, CP - SPLXM wrote:
Hello,
We have defined IEFUSI as dynamic exit and ADDed it in PROGxx.
Now I have modified the module, UPDATEd LLA and want to activate the
new
version of the module, but I can't
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 09:24:38 -0700, John Mattson john_matt...@ea.epson.com
wrote:
It seems to me that most of the auditors I encounter are fresh out
of college. Perhaps auditing is a sort of boot-camp for young
accountants. My impression is that they are given a book to follow, and
as
Just a reminder...today is the last day to take the SHARE survey. Thank you to
those who did!
www.share.org/mvs
Mary Anne
On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 13:50:22 -0700, Edward Jaffe edja...@phoenixsoftware.com
wrote:
The SHARE MVS Program has created a survey to help determine which topics to
include
On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 09:44:20 -0500, Mark Zelden m...@mzelden.com wrote:
On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 13:35:09 +0200, Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
kees.verno...@klm.com wrote:
Hello,
We have defined IEFUSI as dynamic exit and ADDed it in PROGxx.
Now I have modified the module, UPDATEd LLA and want to
Fifty percent savings in residence time are likely to be reflections
of larger block sizes, asynchronous, overlapped I/O operations
(possible, even easy, with BSAM), or both.
Some measurements would be in order.
John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA
On 8/17/12, Dana Mitchell mitchd...@gmail.com
On Aug 17, 2012, at 10:04 AM, John Gilmore wrote:
Auditing is not 'boot camp'. All professional firms do, however, make
quasi-exploitative use of their junior, recent-graduate employees.
Everything depends upon how in detail this scheme is used. IBM's law
firm, Cravath, Swaine Moore,
John,
I agree with you on you observations about auditors been through a fair share
of them.
Management education wouldnt hurt either.
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
On Aug 17, 2012, at 11:04 AM, John Gilmore jwgli...@gmail.com wrote:
Auditing is not 'boot camp'. All professional firms do,
Elardus,
That's funny.love it its like people pronouncing across with a 't'
...there is no 't' in across
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
On Aug 17, 2012, at 9:46 AM, Elardus Engelbrecht
elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za wrote:
Neil Haley wrote:
I have lost count of the number
I'm copying a number of DASD volumes this weekend and have a question.
Which comes first at IPL:
execution of the Commndsx member of Parmlib or the duplicate volume msg.?
I'm hoping I can prevent the dup msg. by coding COM='V 10EE,OFFLINE '
for those volumes that won't vary
The duplicate volume message will win.
Mark Jacobs
On 08/17/12 11:56, O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C] wrote:
I'm copying a number of DASD volumes this weekend and have a question.
Which comes first at IPL:
execution of the Commndsx member of Parmlib or the duplicate volume msg.?
I'm hoping
Duplicate volume message comes first
Edouard A. Myers
Senior Information Technology Specialist Office of the Chief Technology Officer
DC Government
3919 Benning Road, NE, Suite 400
Washington, DC 20019
Phone : 202-727-4017
Cell: 202-215-1712
Fax: 202-727-3880
Email: edouard.my...@dc.gov
Thank You Mark and Edouard.
Dave O'Brien
NIH Contractor
From: Myers, Edouard (OCTO) [edouard.my...@dc.gov]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 11:58 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IPL sequence question
Duplicate volume message comes first
Edouard
Way back when, we used to call a memory leak something else on the mainframe. I
have used memory leak for so long I forgot what that term was. Oh well.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Scott Ford
Sent: Friday, August
At 22:13 +0200 on 08/16/2012, R.S. wrote about Re: Auditors Don't Know Squat!:
BTW: PTF name is misleading. It stands for Program *Temporary* Fix,
while it's quite permanent, especially when compared to APAR fix.
It is a Temporary fix until the next release of the program where all
of the
On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 16:40:28 +, Ward, Mike S wrote:
Way back when, we used to call a memory leak something else on the mainframe.
I have used memory leak for so long I forgot what that term was. Oh well.
Back in that day, IBM never said memory, but always storage.
Language evolves; we must
On 17 August 2012 12:40, Ward, Mike S mw...@ssfcu.org wrote:
Way back when, we used to call a memory leak something else on the mainframe.
I have used memory leak for so long I forgot what that term was. Oh well.
The term core cancer was popular in the VM world.
Tony H.
Google just got a bunch of searches for oleo strut!
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 1:15 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Auditors Don't Know Squat!
On
Kees -
You can exploit the use of system symbolic in batch using an IEFUJV exit. We
have been doing this for several years.
Frank.
GSG Systems Engineering
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
Sent:
Mike Ward posted:
Way back when, we used to call a memory leak something else on the
mainframe. I have used memory leak for so long I forgot what that term
was.
I think I remember hearing storage creep.
Cheers,,,Steve
Steven F. Conway, CISSP
LA Systems
z/OS Systems Support
Phone:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Steve Conway steve_con...@ao.uscourts.gov
wrote:
I think I remember hearing storage creep.
Yeah, we had some of those. Their offices were a mess and they didn't bathe
often enough.
Oh, wait, you're talking software...yeah, core cancer or storage creep
were
Hadn't heard core cancer, that's pretty graphic VM problem...
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
On Aug 17, 2012, at 1:17 PM, Tony Harminc t...@harminc.net wrote:
On 17 August 2012 12:40, Ward, Mike S mw...@ssfcu.org wrote:
Way back when, we used to call a memory leak something else on the
Can we have two JES2 printer
defs - PRT() and PRT() – pointing to the same physical device, within
the same FSS? It seems like it might put the FSS into an occasional
paradox. I don’t want to end up seeing “JES2” and the word
“catastrophic” on the same message.
TIA
CICS and VTAM were the kings of chewing up storage...
Steven F. Conway, CISSP
LA Systems
z/OS Systems Support
Phone: 703.295.1926
steve_con...@ao.uscourts.gov
From: Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 08/17/2012 02:43 PM
Subject:Re: Auditors
zedgarhoo...@gmail.com (zMan) writes:
Yeah, we had some of those. Their offices were a mess and they didn't bathe
often enough.
Oh, wait, you're talking software...yeah, core cancer or storage creep
were what I was weaned on.
re:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2012k.html#89 Auditors Don't Know
If this is what you mean:
PRINTDEF CCWNUM=46,
DBLBUFR=YES,
FCB=STD1,
LINECT=60,
NIFCB=STD8,
NIUCS=GT12,
RDBLBUFR=NO,
SEPPAGE=(LOCAL=FULL,REMOTE=HALF),
TRANS=YES,
UCS=0,
NEWPAGE=1
PRT(1)
We define a production printer in JES/FSS/PSF and a test printer in the same
JES/FSS/PSF and they are physically the same printer without any problems. At
least that I know of:)
Brad Wissink
Information Technology Services
Iowa State University
515-294-3088
If it ain't broke, you ain't
I agree with all you said - that's the correct definition. Additionally, they
are temporary because you can apply them and restore them. They are not
permanent parts of the code. Until you accept them, of course. But who in
they're right mind would ever do that? ;+)
W dniu 2012-08-17 18:50, Robert A. Rosenberg pisze:
At 22:13 +0200 on 08/16/2012, R.S. wrote about Re: Auditors Don't Know
Squat!:
BTW: PTF name is misleading. It stands for Program *Temporary* Fix,
while it's quite permanent, especially when compared to APAR fix.
It is a Temporary fix until
Russell,
This is a physical tape which has been put aside after it was ejected from the
ROBOT. I was able to change the status from no to yes by using the tape
librarian's code. However, if there is a batch utilitity (if you have one) to
do this it would be greatly appreciated.
Alan,
Thanks I will give it a try.
From: Starr, Alan alan_st...@calpers.ca.gov
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Thursday, 16 August 2012 12:19 PM
Subject: Re: TLMS - CHANGING THE STATUS OF A TAPE
G'day John,
Run the TLMSINQR utility via the CATINQR
I remember VTAM doing that, serious gobble ...Steve..and of course CICS
Scott J Ford
Software Engineer
http://www.identityforge.com/
From: Steve Conway steve_con...@ao.uscourts.gov
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 2:44 PM
Subject:
In
of1a25d1f0.ca6c550d-on88257a5d.0014c951-88257a5d.00157...@sce.com,
on 08/16/2012
at 08:54 PM, Skip Robinson jo.skip.robin...@sce.com said:
IIRC ISPF in batch requires all the standard DD
allocations or it just won't work at all. Period.
Yes, except that they can be dynamic rather than
Memory Leaks, Core Cancer, Storage Creep, etc., are, collectively,
PROGRAMMER ERRORS.
I can remember our 1976 Thursday afternoon SYSPROG meetings at Sun Oil in
Dallas to review the slow growth in the size of CSA after each weekend's
IPL,
to see if we thought we would have to IPL Thursday night or
I looked at the V1.13 glossary and found
program temporary fix (PTF)
For System i, System p, and System z products, a package containing
individual or multiple fixes that is made available to all licensed
customers. A PTF resolves defects and might provide enhancements. See also
fix pack,
Here's a question... hope no one gets offended...
How many systems programmers do programming as part of their systems
programming job?
Frank
From: Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 9:40 AM
Subject:
On 2012-08-17 18:39, Chip Grantham wrote:
I looked at the V1.13 glossary and found
program temporary fix (PTF)
That's what it's been for as long as I can remember...
--
Regards, Gord Tomlin
Action Software International
(a division of Mazda Computer Corporation)
Tel: (905) 470-7113, Fax:
Yeah, I was on a CICS 1.4 system written in macro level COBOL, storage
violations were a dine a dozen everyday. Before started identifying them and
fixing them.
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
On Aug 17, 2012, at 6:26 PM, Barry Merrill ba...@mxg.com wrote:
Memory Leaks, Core Cancer, Storage
I used to do a lot in a VM shop before I became the SNA guy.
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
On Aug 17, 2012, at 7:19 PM, Gerhard Postpischil gerh...@valley.net wrote:
On 8/17/2012 6:43 PM, Frank Swarbrick wrote:
How many systems programmers do programming as part of their systems
Hi Bill,
Yes, you can have multiple names for one physical printer and define the names
to JES2 like you normally would. You can have them in the same FSS too. In your
PSF proc, prntdev statement, be sure to include a disconnect interval setting
(I use DISCINTV=10 ) so that the printer will
Scott Fagen wrote at length about PMR/APAR/PTF.
One thing I've found interesting after 25+ years at various vendors is that
IBM's model seems to work the best in the real world: Multiple PMRs can funnel
into one APAR; one APAR can funnel into multiple PTFs. If an APAR is taken and
turns out to
46 matches
Mail list logo
