We have a mixed Cobol environment involving VS Cobol 2 programs compiled
with RESident. We do not want to recompile tons of programs and considering
the option to relink the Cobol load modulwe to replace the stub module
(igzebst) with an updated one. My questions are:
* will relinked Cobol
Hi
I would like to ask more experienced sysprogs regarding real storage manager.
Is it possible to limit number of frames of real storage on job level? The
MEMLIMIT/REGION parameters limit virtual memory of whole address space however
I would like to limit the only real memory while the
MCCAFCTH is not applicable in this case. You are correct that this is a LPAR
level control.
The only out of the box solution I can think of is to run the job V=R' . See
VRREGN in SYS1.PARMLIB(IEASYS00).
NOTE: An IPL is*REQUIRED* to change this value.
Of course, you could write a driver
Your test cannot be done by limiting the real storage of an individual job.
Paging is done by the system in response to the real storage usage of the
entire system. If you want to test the Java application is a storage
constrained environment, you must make the system storage constraint.
This
According to the link below REXAPI04 should exist in SEZAINST, but I don't see
it on z/OS 2.1, z/OS 1.13 and z/OS 1.12 here. Any suggestions as to where it
might be, or whether it actually exists?
Thanks
Steve
Looks like it is actually EZARXS04 in SBLSCLI0.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Austin
Sent: 04 August 2015 10:48
To: 'IBM Mainframe Discussion List'
Subject: TCPIP.SEZAINST(REXAPI04)
According to the link below REXAPI04 should exist in SEZAINST, but I don't see
it on z/OS 2.1, z/OS
Try TCPIP.SEZAINST(EZARXR04)
HTH,
snip
According to the link below REXAPI04 should exist in SEZAINST, but I don't see
it on z/OS 2.1, z/OS 1.13 and z/OS 1.12 here. Any suggestions as to where it
might be, or whether it actually exists?
Thanks
Steve
Thanks so much for this Kolusu - it works great...I did notice that I had
different record counts in 2 of the 3 files, due to the SUM setting. This
identified a problem in my data, which I was able to clean up at the same
time. So all is now well!
Have a great day - mine is already starting to be
1. IiRC, V=R is no longer supported. I could be wrong -- it happens sometimes.
2. The reason for the 'high' frame count is because the job needs them.
Limiting them, yourself if it were possible, would strangle the job. z/OS
(srm/wlm) knows best as to who needs what and, in general, it's
In
30561312.1438632004095.javamail.r...@elwamui-rustique.atl.sa.earthlink.net,
on 08/03/2015
at 01:00 PM, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com said:
If you use this URL, you can find any list
Only those on LISTSERV.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position;
V=R won't help anyway since every virtual page is backed by a real page, hence
no paging.
Dennis Roach, CISSP, PMP
IT Security Administration Senior Analyst
2727 Allen Parkway, Wortham Building 3rd Floor, Houston, TX 77019
Work: 713-831-8799
Cell: 713-591-1059
Email: dennis.ro...@aig.com
I'm not sure if you can artificially limit the frames available, but I
would expect that the effect of paging on a Java application would be
BAD. Very bad.
Java needs to perform regular garbage collection. Garbage collection is
likely to touch most of the frames in the address space. It is
eamacn...@yahoo.ca (Ted MacNEIL) wrote:
1. IiRC, V=R is no longer supported. I could be wrong -- it happens sometimes.
snip
V=R remains supported.
--
John Eells
z/OS Technical Marketing
IBM Poughkeepsie
ee...@us.ibm.com
--
One option would be to use the open source POI libraries from Java, called from
COBOL via JNI. Warning, JNI is not for the faint of heart.
Jonathan Eosze | Sr Computer Sys Engr | IT Operations
Mainframe Management 1 (IMS), Information Technology, USAA
-Original Message-
From: IBM
Here's one on ebay:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/IBM-3278-Vintage-Workstation-1977-3278-2-Terminal-370-/201375652652?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0hash=item2ee2ec9b2c
Watch out for the sticker shock!
Donald H. Blake
ITS EO DCH, Information Technology Specialist 4 (Systems Programming)
IBM Mainframe Online
In some cases, the amount real storage occupied by an application can be
influenced by the app itself. When we were rolling out DB2 V10, one smallish
LPAR ran so short of real storage that it crashed. I even added some real
storage to no avail. IBM finally recommended changes to DB2 run-time
Okay. I knew I might have been wrong.
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: John Eells
Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2015 13:01
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: Limit number of frames of real storage per job
eamacn...@yahoo.ca (Ted MacNEIL) wrote:
1.
I'm waiting for a model that has 24 PF keys :)
--- elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za wrote:
From: Elardus Engelbrecht elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: replacement CRTs for 3278s
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 14:34:45 -0500
Blake, Don
W dniu 2015-08-04 o 19:41, Blake, Don (ITS) pisze:
Here's one on ebay:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/IBM-3278-Vintage-Workstation-1977-3278-2-Terminal-370-/201375652652?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0hash=item2ee2ec9b2c
Watch out for the sticker shock!
I have several 3278's for free. Loco Poland.
I mean
Blake, Don (ITS) wrote:
Here's one on ebay:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/IBM-3278-Vintage-Workstation-1977-3278-2-Terminal-370-/201375652652?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0hash=item2ee2ec9b2c
Watch out for the sticker shock!
Ouch!!! That is a sticker shocker! It is about R30,441 and that is a good
deposit
On Tue, 4 Aug 2015 14:13:57 +, Vlcek, Vitezslav Vit
vitezslavvit.vl...@ca.com wrote:
Hi
I would like to ask more experienced sysprogs regarding real storage manager.
Is it possible to limit number of frames of real storage on job level? The
MEMLIMIT/REGION parameters limit virtual memory
21 matches
Mail list logo
