I disagree with your assessment of the "way it is" for sites.
It's an unnecessary change which was forced on us because of an error due to a
request from a single user. It's not like the HMC is in and of itself an SMTP
server. THe HMC doesn't have the capability to be an SMTP server. It's
On 27 January 2017 at 19:21, esst...@juno.com wrote:
> My understanding is for broadcast requests, the SSI checks every
> subsystem to determine if each subsystem is interested in the requested
> function.
> .
> If the SSI finds a subsystem that is interested in the requested
Paul,
The ssvt consists of a header, 256 byte table, and function routines. The 256
byte table can have two meaning sets of values; zero and greater than zero. If
the function code is zero, then the sub system is not interested in the
function. If the function code is greater than zero
On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 14:53:58 -0500, Rick Troth wrote:
>On 01/27/17 14:48, Charles Mills wrote:
>> I*think* that generally that message is output by the application.
>> The application calls strerror() which returns that string,
>> and then the application prints it. I think your argument
>> is
.
I have been reading the MVS Using The Subsystem Interface
.
I need some clarification on SubSystem Interface (SSI) Function Routines.
These are the function Routines defined by the IEFSSVTI and
IEFSSVT TYPE=REQUEST macros.
.
My understanding is for broadcast requests, the SSI checks every
David:
This could be a big deal with some companies. A company 6that I used to work
for battled every request this and it took months t6o get it done.
I vote the KISS methodology. If there is a security issue it MUST be hi lighted
as well.
If you opt for your way there should be a big bullet
What *is* the language? stat() and strerror() sound like C/C++. My C library
FM says of stat()
If unsuccessful, stat() returns -1 and sets errno to one of the following
values:
Error Code
Description
...
ENOENT
There is no file named pathname, or pathname is an empty string.
Nothing about
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Rick Troth wrote:
> On 01/27/17 14:48, Charles Mills wrote:
>
>> I*think* that generally that message is output by the application.
>> The application calls strerror() which returns that string,
>> and then the application prints it. I think
On 01/27/17 14:48, Charles Mills wrote:
I*think* that generally that message is output by the application.
The application calls strerror() which returns that string,
and then the application prints it. I think your argument
is with the application, not LE.
Sure, except the application in
I *think* that generally that message is output by the application. The
application calls strerror() which returns that string, and then the
application prints it. I think your argument is with the application, not
LE.
Or perhaps I misunderstand the exact context of your question.
Charles
A customer is getting "EDC5129I no such file or directory". The file in
question doesn't exist, but that's okay (it will exist next timeslice),
so the message is annoying.
This would make sense for a command, but it's happening as a side effect
of a function call. I've seen this kind of
That would be great if you could do that. We have the same problem here with
newer folks trying to subscribe.
_
Dave Jousma
Manager Mainframe Engineering, Assistant Vice President
david.jou...@53.com
1830 East Paris, Grand
That is my current company email situation. It may seem heavy handed, but notes
deemed to be spam are simply flushed. My predefined Junk folder contains only
what I put there by inbox rule. I can take the issue back to the email guru who
originally diagnosed the problem if there's some hope of
There is a lot of things that can happen:
- the sender may be blacklisted (i.e. sending IP-address is
automatically rejected)
- reverse DNS lookup does not work (i.e. symbolical name does not match
IP address)
- no or incorrect SPF-entry (sender policy framework)
- other local filters may
At two places I worded at, one using Lotus Notes I never see Junk mail and some
good mail unless I call the help desk
and now here, currently MS-OE some mail deemed as junk never gets to me, they
use a google service to weed out junk, and i get a quarantine email message
telling me what emails
On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 17:01:58 +, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:
>My analysis: There is something missing in the confirmation email that causes
>my company email system (Outlook) to reject the note as spam without
>notification.
And it didn't go into your Junk folder?
--
Tom Marchant
By experimentation, V5.2 cannot perform INITCHECK at any OPT level even with
REGION=1536M (the largest region I am allowed to use here) for very large
programs (30K+ lines actual code). It does succeed at OPT(1) and OPT(2) for
more reasonably-sized programs (less than 6K lines) with
Todd,
I don't see SHA-512 CPACF number in the paper that you reference. I can't
find any benchmarks for z13 CPACF.
For non-specialized hardware, (like GPUs):
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Non-specialized_hardware_comparison
It looks here like an AMD Radeon 6970 will do around 400 million SHA-256
"Actually, Tom Ross in his migration presentation recommends this procedure:..."
Yes, unfortunately that was May 2016, and INITCHECK appeared in September 2016.
The reference I was making was to the V6.1 Migration Guide. The advice seems
not to be in the MG for V5.2, although INITCHECK is
Hi Todd,
I know that SHA-256 is available in CPACF (and I've written Assembler code
to use it).My assumption is that using Vector integer instructions to
solve many hashes in parallel would be more efficient. CPACF SHA-256 (for
one hash) is much better than equivalent GP Integer
I sent a request to Listserv Thursday afternoon:
SUBSCRIBE IBM-MAIN Skipperoo Robinson
I have not received any reply in my inbox. Today I sent the same request from
my home email (ATT/Yahoo/Outlook) and got back an immediate response.
My analysis: There is something missing in the
I see that I was wrong in saying that Timothy didn't try to answer John's
question. I see now that he did, and suggested that you could use unused
CPU cycles (that didn't contribute to MSU-metered costs).This would
assume that the delta electricity costs of a running vs waiting z13 CPU
were
Kirk, you don't need to program the SHA-256 algorithm in software - it's
available as a hardware instruction using CPACF. I don't have performance
numbers handy for SHA-256, but you can see SHA-512 performance in this paper:
> z/Series machines are not geared towards floating point operations the way
> commodity GPUs, FPGAs, or purposely built BitCoin miners are.
Remember that the main thing you need to do for bitcoin mining are hashing
operations. The z machines have the hash algorithms built in to the CPACF
Are there z13 benchmarks for Bitcoin mining? How many profitable Bitcoin
miners are running z13s? (I would guess that the answers are "no", and
"none")
Running Hyperledger Blockchain node/server and Bitcoin mining are
*completely* different things. Hyperledger Blockchain does not have a
dave.g4...@gmail.com (Dave Wade) writes:
> High Speed card readers read all columns of the card at the same time,
> so they have 80 sensors, and read the card row-by-row, allowing much
> faster reading. There is no reel of tape that has inertia that has to
> be controlled on a stop.
> A card deck
Thanks Jeffrey. I will pass that on here.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Holst, Jeffrey A
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2017 9:30 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: COBOL V5.2 question: INITCHECK option
Nothing more I can think of.
DAF would be an easy way to verify your SMF data.
ICETOOL or SYNCTOOL can also read SMF Data and extract based on SMF Type and
Date/time range. This has been posted and should be in the archives.
Lizette
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe
Actually, Tom Ross in his migration presentation recommends this procedure:
Best Practices for COBOL V5/V6 Migration
To find out if users have invalid data, IBM has recommendations for
migrating to COBOL V5/V6:
1. Compile with SSRANGE, ZONECHECK and OPT(0) for initial code
changes and unit test
–
I am pleased to invite you to the mid-year GSE Large Systems Working Group
event. The event will be held on 28th March 2017 at CA offices Berkshire.
If you wish to attend the event, please follow the registration link:
http://lsx.gse.org.uk/content/content_event_register.php?id=17
Agenda
I encountered this same issue while installing COBOL V6.1. Seeing no
documentation about this, I opened a PMR.
I think that part of the resolution was to document this.
The explanation that I got was that while there was no technical reason for the
incompatibility, the point of OPTIMIZE(0)
Thanks Lizette.
I checked my report and it does have record count of 15,421 for that
specific time range and record type. This confirms that I am on the
right track.
On Thu, 1/26/17, Lizette Koehler wrote:
This is exactly the same change your network people will have to make to
support mail from every other system they have. Exchange, Unix boxes, etc all
have to do this.
Using DNS is a part of the use of electronic mail in today's world - similar
checks are in the standard configuration for
>(I admit I could miss the information in the thread)
>
>What was the speed of tape reader or card reader?
>Of course I don't mean the device in motion transported on the wheels,
>but rather data transfer in bytes per second. ;-)
>
>--
>Radoslaw Skorupka
>Lodz,
High Speed card readers read
On Thu, 26 Jan 2017 20:56:27 -0600, Mike Schwab wrote:
>Initially, the numeric / zero checks would not work like before. I
>know there is an parm to make it work like before in 6.1. Not sure if
>they applied it to 5.2.
>
>IBM Cobol Documentation page. Click on Version
Although I can't see it documented, I suspect that INITCHECK can only be
offered as a side-effect of the complex analysis which is already done for the
higher levels of optimisation, and which is not done at the lowest level of
optimisation (OPT(0)). The message is probably correct, but the
36 matches
Mail list logo