On Thu, 1 Jun 2017 18:23:09 -0400, Thomas David Rivers wrote:
>>
>I find that very odd...
>
>strcasecmp() is obliged to convert all upper-case letters into lower-case
>for the comparison.
>
Wouldn't it be a fiasco if it effectively waffled on ligatures?
-- gil
On Thu, 1 Jun 2017 20:10:55 -0400, Thomas David Rivers wrote:
>>
>Dereferencing NULL is undefined behavior - the C implemention
>can do whatever it wants... including ordering a cherry pie for
>your grandmother.
>
Back around MVS 5.2, many library functions checked for NULL
and returned an
We run a DR test approx 3 times a year. We have never done the full fail
over, we just run the DR test in parallel at a remote site.
As far Jesse's question, we haven't explored full failover and going back
to the primary site. We probably could with our replication solution but
currently it's in
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Thu, 1 Jun 2017 11:44:29 -0700, Charles Mills wrote:
(For anyone not familiar, strcasecmp() is documented as
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.2.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r2.bpxbd00/rsrccm.htm
.)
Where I read:
o There are no errno values defined.
What the storm took and what it missed reminded me of my favorite (OT) San
Francisco doggerel:
https://www.lonelyplanet.com/usa/san-francisco/attractions/ap-hotaling-wareh
ouse/a/poi-sig/383939/361858
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> strcasecmp() is obliged to convert all upper-case letters into lower-case
for the comparison
I don't think it is as simple-minded as that (no offense -- you're not
simple-minded either ).
I think @John McKown pretty much nailed it. It's an "abstract" compare that
just happens (well, a little
On 1 June 2017 at 18:23, Thomas David Rivers wrote:
> I find that very odd...
>
> strcasecmp() is obliged to convert all upper-case letters into lower-case
> for the comparison.
IEEE Std 1003.1-2008, 2016 Edition says:
"When the LC_CTYPE category of the locale being used is
There were some really good user experiences on DR at SHARE. Think I was
most impressed with Ryder's plan. They even had it down to who was taking
care of sysprog families while they were busy putting the company back
together.
Doesn't hurt to be inventive. When we had a big F4 Tornado
On Thu, 1 Jun 2017 11:44:29 -0700, Charles Mills wrote:
>
>(For anyone not familiar, strcasecmp() is documented as
> https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.2.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r2.bpxbd00/rsrccm.htm
> .)
>
Where I read:
o There are no errno values defined.
That's surprising and
1) Our plan is documented in 2 parts. One for non Sysprog resources and one
that contains the "sensitive" technical information. Our current plan requires
technical level staff (Mid-level Sysprogs at a minimum). Recovery of the
Mainframe systems is by System Programming staff only. (we do
When BSAM reads a file that has a block prefix length
(the size of which is specified in DCBBUFOF) then the
block prefix is returned in the BSAM data (unlike QSAM
which skips over that data.)
And, there are several accomodations/requirements made
regarding the DCBBLKSI field and the sizes of
Never got traction on two of my questions, which are independent of technology.
-- During a failover (test I would presume), who actually performs the DR
procedure whatever it is? Sysprogs, operators, production control folks, or
someone else? Has anyone dared to bring in a non-technical person
Charles Mills wrote:
It's clearly doing everything in ASCII:
strcasecmp("Z", "0") 122
It's interesting. I use the same compare function for both a sort and for a
binary search, so it all works correctly -- it's just not working the way I
think it is.
Charles
I find that very odd...
Thanks. I pretty much get all of your first paragraph. I just would have
expected on MVS that the letters in the "C" (default) locale would be pretty
much the same as the order of *EBCDIC* characters when looked at as plain 8
byte unsigned integers.
It's one of those things: std::sort and
I get the job name by chasing control blocks, sorry, it works.
I am using ADDRESS SDSF
During my testing I, too, retrieved the output that I was writing from within
my rexx.
It didn't surprise me, but as I worked on the actual task at hand more I was
able to get to identify the actual output I
Gotta jump in here. I know some German. I have training in linguistics, which
means I know *about* languages that I could not survive in for a moment. And I
have experience with English as a Second Language.
I have to take umbrage with the assertion that English is hugely difficult or
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Charles Mills wrote:
> It's clearly doing everything in ASCII:
>
> strcasecmp("Z", "0") 122
>
> It's interesting. I use the same compare function for both a sort and for a
> binary search, so it all works correctly -- it's just not working the
Setlocale() tells me my locale is "C". (I am running POSIX(ON) FWIW.) Is
this expected behavior for Locale C?
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Charles Mills
Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2017 12:44 PM
To:
It's clearly doing everything in ASCII:
strcasecmp("Z", "0") 122
It's interesting. I use the same compare function for both a sort and for a
binary search, so it all works correctly -- it's just not working the way I
think it is.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
What about syslog, I have the syslog daemon running and collecting FTP info.
Here is a sample.
There are some secure and some not secure connections. IP addresses and Userid
changed to protect the innocent. There is also more detailed info in the
debug.log file.
Jun 1 13:50:26 JESH01
In that case, it's even better than you're a long-time member!
I'm quite surprised that it was still in-use 2 years ago; although I was just
as surprised when I found out my system was taken offline a week before I
bought it; so I guess people still do run on old hardware.
As for DASD, you're
I am getting some odd results out of the C library function strcasecmp().
Does someone want to tell me if they see pilot error here?
(For anyone not familiar, strcasecmp() is documented as
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.2.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r2.bp
xbd00/rsrccm.htm .)
I have the
On Thu, 1 Jun 2017 06:37:04 -0500, John Gateley wrote:
>I had a similar problem. In my case I was reading JESYSMSG to check the return
>codes of preceding steps and usually JESYSMSG was there but occasionally it
>was not, and in these cases the job elapsed time was quite low.
>I added a call to
> First, congrats, and welcome to the "basement mainframe club"...it's quiet
> exclusive. :)
I have been part of the club for years! The Cybers outnumber the IBMs
here, but we don't talk about them on this list.
> Second, a running ES/9000 is crazy-hard to come by; so that's a great score!
I
The list is still maintained, but not by John. Very little traffic on it.
Dennis
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Edward Finnell
Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2017 1:54 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re:
First, congrats, and welcome to the "basement mainframe club"...it's quiet
exclusive. :)
Second, a running ES/9000 is crazy-hard to come by; so that's a great score!
Tips: I second what Tom Mathias said - guard that tape better than a nuclear
football.
One of the first things I did once I got
>>All of this with ONE single pass to read the input datasets (which are
very very large sometimes).
Elardus,
I just moved your existing SORT operator as a separate step to check for
empty input. It is the same job you had.
Thanks,
Kolusu
DFSORT Development
IBM Corporation
IBM Mainframe
English is not a mechanical language with a lot of grammatical rules. The
was long time known as the mongrels language since it pull parts and pieces
from other older languages
Steve
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf
I do not know what is on the machine, but I am going to assume that it
may indeed be wiped.
--
Will
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 9:07 AM, W Mainframe
<01304632a58d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> blockquote, div.yahoo_quoted { margin-left: 0 !important; border-left:1px
> #715FFA solid
On Thu, 1 Jun 2017 08:02:12 -0500, John Gateley wrote:
>0.7 was by trial and error, 0.6 was not long enough for a single IEFBR14 job.
>
>I already had the REXX assembler function so I only had to code this
>JRGSTIM('7')
>
That's probably been done enough times by enough programmers to
justify an
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 12:04 AM, Peter Hunkeler wrote:
>
>
>
> What is special about COBOL's standard: Truncation also silently occurs
> with computational fields.
>
> @John:
> There's the DIAGTRUNC compiler option which causes truncation to be
> flagged.
>
Only applies to MOVE
blockquote, div.yahoo_quoted { margin-left: 0 !important; border-left:1px
#715FFA solid !important; padding-left:1ex !important; background-color:white
!important; } Hey Will,
I am curious...What is your OS running in your big iron?Dan
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Wednesday, May 31,
0.7 was by trial and error, 0.6 was not long enough for a single IEFBR14 job.
I already had the REXX assembler function so I only had to code this
JRGSTIM('7')
also I did not know about SYSCALL :-)
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
You can code a WAIT on the ISFSLASH command.
Options for slash (/) commands
INTERNAL
specifies that console ID 0 (INTERNAL) should be used to issue the command
WAIT
specifies that SDSF should wait the full delay interval before retrieving
responses. This option is strongly recommended to ensure
On Thu, 1 Jun 2017 06:37:04 -0500, John Gateley wrote:
>..
>I added a call to an assembler program at the start of the REXX to issue a
>STIMER for 0.7 seconds and then JESYSMSG was always there.
>
How did you arrive at the number, 0.7? Ratner than simply using
SYSCALL 'sleep 1', you wrote a
> From my memory, there were 2 or 3 major levels of 9221 microcode that was
> released and each major release had updates (MCLs). The problem is that even
> if you had a could find the base 9221 microcode that would work with a
> system, the microcode for a specific system includes files that
I had a similar problem. In my case I was reading JESYSMSG to check the return
codes of preceding steps and usually JESYSMSG was there but occasionally it was
not, and in these cases the job elapsed time was quite low.
I added a call to an assembler program at the start of the REXX to issue a
From my memory, there were 2 or 3 major levels of 9221 microcode that was
released and each major release had updates (MCLs). The problem is that even
if you had a could find the base 9221 microcode that would work with a system,
the microcode for a specific system includes files that are
Does John Anderson still maintain his ISV list in Canada? I googled a
little but there's tons of Andersons.
In a message dated 6/1/2017 3:28:55 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
sipp...@sg.ibm.com writes:
Adding to the list of candidate alternatives, for ASG-ViewDirect it might
be IBM Tivoli
Adding to the list of candidate alternatives, for ASG-ViewDirect it might
be IBM Tivoli Output Manager for z/OS or IBM Content Manager OnDemand for
z/OS. For ASG-PRO/JCL, I agree with the RES suggestion. The full product
name is RES Suite J-Man. You might also take a look at SmartJCL from
Vernooij, Kees (ITOPT1) - KLM wrote:
>> If I could only speak Afrikaans on IBM-MAIN, but I believe I'm in the
>> minority... ;-D
>We would understand each other.
Indeed. But some words in both Afrikaans and Dutch have totally different
meaning despite identical spelling.
Many years ago,
Sri h Kolusu wrote:
>Here is a JCL which will give you the desired results. I rearrange your
>INCLUDE conditions in the order of positions and it is easy to read and
>Understand.
Many thanks for your kind help.
After looking at your job, I see that the output datasets are primed first with
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Elardus Engelbrecht
> Sent: 31 May, 2017 18:36
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Language Skills
>
>
> If I could only speak Afrikaans on IBM-MAIN, but I believe I'm
43 matches
Mail list logo