Hi
Cross posted
I am trying to copy a java load module JVMLDMxx using TSO ISHELL copy
function to a preallocated dataset with the attribute(library type,
recfm=u,blocksize=32760).
It fails with message
THERE ID A RECORD FORMAT ERROR FOR A MVS DATASET SYS5.JAVA.LOADLIB. EITHER
THE OUTPUT RECORD
Thanks Lizette.
I have verified with 3.4 and listcat - same results
there are other datasets in the catalog that list on both LPARs
and F CATALOG confirms it's allocated on bot LPARs
Elaine
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
What happens if an SMF exit modifies the SMF record? Do the next exit in the
chain, SYS1.MANx and/or the stream see the modified record, or is the exit
only modifying a "private copy" of the SMF record?
It would seem to me to be an important point, and the documentation is
pretty much silent (or
One of my first contracting jobs was working for state gov'mt, y2k, and my
first task was to apply maint to the current OS, the SMP/E environment was
pointing to a live sandbox system, I pointed this out to my boss, and he said
yeah, we do this all the time, :( so I understand where David is
Yep, I did.
S. Veryl Ellis
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
John McKown
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2019 3:41 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SYS1.MIGLIB and LNKLST
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 2:38 PM Veryl Ellis
wrote:
> Ah Ha!!!
> The doc
Applying maintenance to a target SYSRES volume.
I never apply maintenance to a running system.
S. Veryl
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Jousma, David
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2019 3:32 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SYS1.MIGLIB and
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 2:38 PM Veryl Ellis
wrote:
> Ah Ha!!!
> The doc I have for "Removing or Compressing a Dataset in an Active LNKLST"
> did not discuss using the UNALLOCATE for LINKLIB, MIGLIB, etc.
>
> That worked.
> I was able to delete and reallocate a larger SYS1.MIGLIB on my target
>
Ah Ha!!!
The doc I have for "Removing or Compressing a Dataset in an Active LNKLST" did
not discuss using the UNALLOCATE for LINKLIB, MIGLIB, etc.
That worked.
I was able to delete and reallocate a larger SYS1.MIGLIB on my target SYSRES.
These systems are not production environments.
Thank you
Veryl,
You are getting a lot of feedback that I consider a bit scary. Can you
clarify something? Are you trying to apply maintenance to your running
SYSRES? Or a copy of it, and are dealing with that type of enqueuer? If the
latter, then yes, allocate a .NEW version of MIGLIB, copy the
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 2:19 PM Carmen Vitullo wrote:
> I would not do anything to remove ENQ from the running systems MIGLIB
> what I normally do is on the target volume
> 1) allocate a new SYS1.MIGLIB.NEW - larger primary and more dir blocks
> 2) copy the existing target MIGLIB to the new
I would not do anything to remove ENQ from the running systems MIGLIB
what I normally do is on the target volume
1) allocate a new SYS1.MIGLIB.NEW - larger primary and more dir blocks
2) copy the existing target MIGLIB to the new MIGLIB
3) if you have authority you should be able to RENAME ON
Allocate the new larger data set on target sysres as SYS1.MIGLIB.NEW then do a
rename using a utility that does not perform an enqueue.
See:
http://www.cbttape.org/~jjaeger/nodsi.html
In the example at this site they are doing a scratch. Just put in RENAME cards
instead like the following:
Without using SYSLIB MIGLIB(user.miglib) in an active PROGxx member, you won't
be able to remove SYS1.MIGLIB from the system. A quick read of the doc seems to
imply that you can issue a SET PROG=xx command to add it, then remove
SYS1.MIGLIB, but I wouldn't do it myself.
Mark Jacobs
Sent from
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 1:59 PM Veryl Ellis
wrote:
> I'm applying maintenance to my target SYSRES and the target SYS1.MIGLIB
> ran out of space (S/D37).
> Can anyone tell me how to get SYS1.MIGLIB out of the running Link List
> concatenation, so I can delete and reallocate a larger target
I'm applying maintenance to my target SYSRES and the target SYS1.MIGLIB ran out
of space (S/D37).
Can anyone tell me how to get SYS1.MIGLIB out of the running Link List
concatenation, so I can delete and reallocate a larger target SYS1.MIGLIB?
The standard SETPROG LNKLST stuff to delete a DSN
I can say I've done this also, removed the include additional
qualifiers, not good timing, right after I created a new master catalog for my
2.1 or 2.2 systems YIKES!
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "Dana Mitchell"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Tuesday, June 11,
I have never found much barrier to entry with the IBM Business Partner process.
The HUGE obstacle is customer inertia and conservatism. Customers may complain
about software costs, but they are the big barriers to entry for small
competitors. At my former employer we had customers say
Right.
A wild branch could do anything, but I think the damage from key 0 is more
likely than that you happen to hit some privileged instruction.
I think you misunderstood my two bullets. The first was the potential damage
from supervisor state. The second was potential damage from key 0. Much
On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 17:28:44 +, Jesse 1 Robinson
wrote:
>We had a 'catalog anomaly' recently were one person got a different list of
>data sets under 3.4 than I did, both of us using the same search criterion.
>Turns out we had different selections set In the options list:
>
I
On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 08:57:38AM -0500, John McKown wrote:
> I am not finding this. I want to change the PKM for my running, APF
> authorized, program to include key 0. Why? So that I can switch in and out
> of key 0 using an SPKA instruction rather than MODESET. But mainly so that
> I can use
We had a 'catalog anomaly' recently were one person got a different list of
data sets under 3.4 than I did, both of us using the same search criterion.
Turns out we had different selections set In the options list:
Confirm Data Set Delete
Confirm Member Delete
Include Additional
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 11:26 AM Bob Bridges wrote:
> If that's what it stands for I should think those aren't just the big
> three but the ~only~ three. At least, I've never heard of any others.
> Which is odd, when you think about it; surely there's someone out there
> wanting to break into
If that's what it stands for I should think those aren't just the big three but
the ~only~ three. At least, I've never heard of any others. Which is odd,
when you think about it; surely there's someone out there wanting to break into
the market? So says my capitalist assumptions. But
On 6/11/2019 4:49 AM, Peter Relson wrote:
Whether or not a page is page-fixed, for example, is not part of the
architectural definition.
Right. We and (I assume) everyone else use PFTCADS for that.
--
Phoenix Software International
Edward E. Jaffe
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segundo, CA
Hi John,
I don't want to derail the current thread, but, now that you've
mentioned sub-optimal mainframe practices ...
Approximately 35+ years ago, I worked at a multi-national food company
whose datacenter manager came from the school of penny wise and pound
foolish.
His "strategy" of dealing
What are you using to list the Datasets?
IDCAMS?
3.4?
Other tool?
Just verifying apples to apples
Also, list the catalog - From both LPARs - MVS Console Command
F CATALOG,REPORT
Provides general information on the status of the catalog address space.
Current settings for CAS parameters
LPARA SYSCAT SCS001123CCATALOG.ICF.VSCS001 VCATICF
LPARB SYSCAT SCS001123CCATALOG.ICF.VSCS001 VCATICF
Thanks,
Elaine
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 8:20 AM Pommier, Rex
wrote:
> John,
>
> No spares in the array? Or did a fail-over fail as well? If no spares,
> that sounds more like a bone-headed management move to try to save a couple
> bucks. Not absolving the admin from responsibility but it sounds like a
>
John,
No spares in the array? Or did a fail-over fail as well? If no spares, that
sounds more like a bone-headed management move to try to save a couple bucks.
Not absolving the admin from responsibility but it sounds like a bigger
problem.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM
Hi,
Probably not the kind of input you're expecting but it'll be helpful to someone
nonetheless.
If you're a huge shop where a terabyte is not really a big deal, I would urge
you to check out VAST data, and some of their Tech Field Day talks on YouTube.
That stuff looks pretty much bulletproof
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 7:40 AM Mike Schwab wrote:
> The problem with SSD storage is that the blocks in a matched set of
> device start to fail at the same rate. Run long enough and you get
> enough bad blocks in all devices and they all fail at roughly the same
> time loosing the entire raid
That’s not completely true. Current Enterprise level SSD's have stacked
"reserve cells" that are mapped in as a cell degrades. This take place on the
drive itself. Modern Hardware Raid controllers are constantly monitoring array
and individual drive degradation and notify of an issue. The
The problem with SSD storage is that the blocks in a matched set of
device start to fail at the same rate. Run long enough and you get
enough bad blocks in all devices and they all fail at roughly the same
time loosing the entire raid group, you don't have enough time between
failures to replace
>You can't get much more "GUPI" than issuing the LPTEA instruction.
LPTEA gets you the address, but is the page table entry itself PI? No.
Anything beyond what is architecturally required to be in the PTE should
not be considered part of the programming interface.
Any program that chooses to
Yes, it's there..
Anyway, I've sorted it.
Missed including a basic header - Content-type: application/json
It's dumb that the HTTP 400 error is non-descriptive..
– Vignesh
Mainframe Infrastructure
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
ITschak Mugzach
Ok this helps a lot. Now I have to install java as well to invoke jzos..
Thanks
On Tue, 11 Jun, 2019, 2:56 PM Richards, Robert B., <
01c91f408b9e-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> I am going the PTF route for the first time today and think it will still
> produce the same code, so my
I am going the PTF route for the first time today and think it will still
produce the same code, so my guarded answer is yes until proven otherwise.
Here is part of the JCL that answers your initial question:
/SCRT EXEC PROC=JVMPRC86,JAVACLS='com.ibm.scrt.SCRTe'
Bob
-Original
I looked in my code. You nedd to add a call (hwthset) for
HWTH_XLATE_RESPBODY_A2E as well.
ITschak
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 11:22 AM Sankaranarayanan, Vignesh <
vignesh.v.sankaranaraya...@marks-and-spencer.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It looks like I'm unable to translate the request body from EBCDIC
Hi
Yes I am going through the SCRT guide.. just wondering if a java part is
required or not ?
On Tue, 11 Jun, 2019, 2:44 PM Richards, Robert B., <
01c91f408b9e-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> Jake,
>
> Not exactly. Producing SCRT reports involves:
>
> 1) Collecting certain SMF
Jake,
Not exactly. Producing SCRT reports involves:
1) Collecting certain SMF records (IIRC, 70, 72 and 89) from all lpars from the
second day of the month until the first day of the following month.
2) Obtaining the latest version of the SCRT code from the IBM SCRT website,
downloading and
On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 23:32:21 -0500, Elaine Beal wrote:
>These LPARs do share a master catalog.
>LOADxx syscat has the same parm on both LPARs
>
>A listcat of the master shows the alias entry
>
>ALIAS -,SYS7.R30
>
>Thanks,
>Elaine
>
Can you please show us the complete LOADxx member each
Yes, I have set verbose on and I see the headers and response.
As I said, it shows the first and last 40 bytes of request body and the
equivalent in hex.
When I compare the hex values to a 'hex on' listing of the json payload in a
dataset / USS file, they are identical.
Does this mean the
Hi,
Is there a possibility of performance degradation if SSD storage is added to
SMS storage group that consists mainly of 15K SAS storage. Database tables are
written to the storage group.
We use a Dynamic Provisioning pool at disk subsystem level.
Regards
Nedbank Group Limited Internal
If you set verbose mode a trace is written to sysout, so you will be able
to see the http headers and response.
ITschak
בתאריך יום ג׳, 11 ביוני 2019, 11:29, מאת Sankaranarayanan, Vignesh <
vignesh.v.sankaranaraya...@marks-and-spencer.com>:
> Code order --
>
> ReturnCode = -1
> DiagArea. = ''
>
Code order --
ReturnCode = -1
DiagArea. = ''
address hwthttp "hwthset ",
"ReturnCode ",
"RequestHandle ",
"HWTH_OPT_REQUESTMETHOD ",
Hi,
It looks like I'm unable to translate the request body from EBCDIC to ASCII (in
REXX), when using the HWTH_OPT_TRANSLATE_REQBODY with a value of
HWTH_XLATE_REQBODY_E2A
.. in the address hwthttp call.
I'm using code based on SYS1.SAMPLIB(HWTHXRX1).
I see a HTTP 400 error saying Bad request,
Hi
Well I must say I am quite new to SCRT and never ran it before .
I understand this talks about the capacity reports and this report was
asked by one of our ISV vendor.
Is there a JCL which is standard to run on to obtain reports ?
Jake
On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 13:57:12 -0700 Charles Mills wrote:
:>> Key0 is much much more dangerous than supervisor state (IMHO)
:>Interesting. I never thought of that, but I agree. Which is the more likely
:>error?
:>- You accidentally code some privileged instruction that you did not intend?
48 matches
Mail list logo
