On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 00:20:12 +, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:
>I'm having trouble imagining a scenario where an EBCDIC representation of an
>address would be useful. The problem is, in a job step situation, how would
>you figure out an address to pass?
>
>//STEP1 EXEC PGM=my-pgm,PARM=???
>
>How wo
On Thursday, November 21, 2019, 12:36:17 PM PST, Seymour J Metz
wrote:
> As ITschak Mugzach wrote, "Try get who enqueues ADMSYMBL dataset,
>or any other commonly (but centrally) used dataset which is outside the
>linklist
> or lpalist." Just remember that there may be users of GDDM who a
The point is to pass an address to an authorised program so that it can call
back the unauthorised program (at a different entry point in (for example)
supervisor state.
So you are saying you can design code which bypasses system integrity. If you
had a program which took that characterised hex
On Monday, November 25, 2019, 05:13:35 AM PST, Joseph Reichman
wrote:
> Where in 31 bit mode you are able to get 31 bit ( private ) storage in a
> other address space > via the ALET parameter on the STORAGE macro this is
> not true for 64 bit storage
OWNER= is only valid with COMMO
I'm having trouble imagining a scenario where an EBCDIC representation of an
address would be useful. The problem is, in a job step situation, how would you
figure out an address to pass?
//STEP1 EXEC PGM=my-pgm,PARM=???
How would I figure out what address to pass?
If instead my-pgm is called
On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 23:26:32 +, Jeremy Nicoll wrote:
>On Mon, 18 Nov 2019, at 19:35, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>> A program designed to run as a jobstep expects a parameter list whose
>> first word points to a halfword length field followed by a character
>> string of that length. The Initiator wi
On Mon, 18 Nov 2019, at 19:35, Seymour J Metz wrote:
> A program designed to run as a jobstep expects a parameter list whose
> first word points to a halfword length field followed by a character
> string of that length. The Initiator will always flag the first word
> with an end-of-list bit. So
Great I will look
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 5:38 PM Jon Perryman wrote:
>
>
> On Monday, November 18, 2019, 05:56:09 AM PST, scott Ford <
> idfli...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > My chief complaint is samples.
> > I spend a lot of time digging for examples.
>
> > Working examples which I can refer
On Monday, November 25, 2019, 05:13:35 AM PST, Joseph Reichman
wrote:
> Where in 31 bit mode you are able to get 31 bit ( private ) storage in a
> other address space via the ALET parameter on the STORAGE macro this is not
> true for 64 bit storage
--
On Monday, November 18, 2019, 05:56:09 AM PST, scott Ford
wrote:
> My chief complaint is samples.
> I spend a lot of time digging for examples.
> Working examples which I can refer to and understand
> (prototype) before I start writing code.
CBTTAPE.ORG has tons of real world code
Charles,
Yes we do, IBM , provided us an entry in the ECVT ...
Scott
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 4:33 PM Charles Mills wrote:
> Do you have an anchor, a place you could store one 32-bit word? If so, a
> lower overhead than GETMAIN is a cell pool. It takes a little work to set
> it up initially, bu
Do you have an anchor, a place you could store one 32-bit word? If so, a lower
overhead than GETMAIN is a cell pool. It takes a little work to set it up
initially, but after that you can get 'n' bytes of reentrant storage very
quickly.
Write me off-line (if you wish) Scott if you want more deta
The OP wants to issue a WTO for diagnostic purposes.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jousma, David
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2019 1:40 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: WTO
I suspect it is the TSS
UUID letters as generated are all lower case, so you could translate them to
upper case without losing any information.
Anything that accepts UUIDs must be prepared to accept upper case, so you would
be good to go.
-- https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4122#section-3
Charles
-Original Messa
Hello Cameron!
I see all lowercase letters on
http://demo.icu-project.org/icu-bin/convexp?conv=ibm-930.
Why do you say there is no support?
Regards,
Leo
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Cameron Conacher
Sent: Monda
Hello folks,
I am here with another question today.
We are a large international company with a market presence in Japan.
We store our mainframe EBCDIC data for these markets in EBCDIC CodePage 930.
This CodePage has no support for lower case English letters.
If I were a distributed platform and I
WTO has a lot more overhead than one GETMAIN; if it's legitimate to issue the
WTO in the exit, then it's legitimate to issue the GETMAIN or STORAGE.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf
I suspect it is the TSS Installation exit. It gets called a lot, has a 100
byte work area, and I suspect you probably don’t want to be doing getmains, etc
or anything else that will cause performance issues. It does execute in KEY
0, supervisor state.
Although, I don’t know what WTO's have t
Jon,
Absolutely agree, this is the first time I have seen this but not
surprising.
Scott
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 12:52 PM Jon Perryman wrote:
>
>
>> On Monday, November 25, 2019, 01:19:47 AM PST, David Crayford <
> dcrayf...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > That's interesting! You said the exit wa
The Devil is in the details. The more information you include, the more likely
someone is to spot the problem. This could be something wrong in your USS
definition, your logmode definition, your TCP/IP definition or the logon
command you used, none of which you provided.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.)
ObNit That's domin name, not DNS name.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Mike Wawiorko <014ab5cdfb21-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2019 5:56 AM
To:
> On Monday, November 25, 2019, 01:19:47 AM PST, David Crayford
wrote:
> That's interesting! You said the exit was re-entrant so how is it
> obtaining the working storage. If it's doing a GETMAIN why don't you
> just increase the size
> of the storage. Why do you have a constraint
Are you on a z14? If so, does your LPAR have at least 8G assigned? z/OS
2.3 will complain otherwise (but not sure if it will prevent login).
On Sun, Nov 24, 2019 at 11:37 PM saurabh khandelwal <
sourabhkhandelwal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Group,
>
> We are in processing of z/OS 2.3 install
Look up that error in Google and you’ll see some workarounds for this.
Make sure you have the latest PTFs on top as there was a PTF to fix the
duplicate entries in one of the files.
You also need to make sure the proper ID/Group owns the files.
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 5:25 AM Peter wrote:
> The
I would like to see the exit doco!
On 2019-11-25 8:46 PM, scott Ford wrote:
David,
It’s the way CA calls the exit. There is a workarea dsect and notes from
CA peppered through the exit and doc saying there is a 100 byte limitation.
Scott
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 4:20 AM David Crayford wrote:
On Thu, 21 Nov 2019, at 20:00, Seymour J Metz wrote:
> Tritus SPF; it is, alas, abandon-ware, but it is able to run ISPF
> dialogs that do not depend on TSO commands or TSO function packages. It
> has regexen, but the syntax is not the same as either ISPF or the major
> PC languages. I would hap
Hi List,
I'm looking for samples of PL/1 code for VSE with DBCS characters using
graphical and mixed DBCS strings and whatever that may be in use in Japan.
I'm also looking for the compiler options required to compile it on a z/VSE 6.1
environment.
Thank in advance.
Best Regards. Mauri.
Where in 31 bit mode you are able to get 31 bit ( private ) storage in a other
address space via the ALET parameter on the STORAGE macro this is not true for
64 bit storage
Thanks
On Nov 25, 2019, at 8:07 AM, Peter Relson wrote:
>
>
> There doesn't seem to be any documentation on what thi
There doesn't seem to be any documentation on what this parm means.
Sure there is, as Michael Stein pointed out. And "owner" is the same for
getmain, storage obtain, IARV64, IARCP64.
Seems like I would have to do a SSAR to point to the secondary asid
and I am
guessing the storage would reside
Got any doc for that exit?
On 2019-11-25 8:46 PM, scott Ford wrote:
David,
It’s the way CA calls the exit. There is a workarea dsect and notes from
CA peppered through the exit and doc saying there is a 100 byte limitation.
Scott
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 4:20 AM David Crayford wrote:
That'
David,
It’s the way CA calls the exit. There is a workarea dsect and notes from
CA peppered through the exit and doc saying there is a 100 byte limitation.
Scott
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 4:20 AM David Crayford wrote:
> That's interesting! You said the exit was re-entrant so how is it
> obtaini
There is only error message under STDERR i see
CWWKS4108E: The system cannot create the LTPA key.
On Mon, 25 Nov, 2019, 3:10 PM Mike Wawiorko, <
014ab5cdfb21-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> D TCPIP,stack_name,N,CON,CLI=IZU*
> stack_name may be null if you've only one IP stack.
>
>
D TCPIP,stack_name,N,CON,CLI=IZU*
stack_name may be null if you've only one IP stack.
Do you see it listening?
If not, look again at your configuration and messages from IZUSRV1.
Some messages may be in Unix log files rather than JES output or syslog. I'm
not sure about this.
Mike Wawiorko
I was able the fix this will the TCPIP host file but still not seeing
IZUSRV1 listening on the port coded in IZUPRMXX parmlib member.
On Mon, 25 Nov, 2019, 2:57 PM Mike Wawiorko, <
014ab5cdfb21-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> is it possible to have an IP address to use ?
>
>
>
> Pre
is it possible to have an IP address to use ?
Pretty unlikely if you are talking about the web interface to zOSMF and trying
to access it from a browser.
Modern browsers understandably impose security rules to protect us all. You'll
need:
· A server certificate
· It must
That's interesting! You said the exit was re-entrant so how is it
obtaining the working storage. If it's doing a GETMAIN why don't you
just increase the size
of the storage. Why do you have a constraint of 100 bytes?
On 2019-11-25 1:11 AM, scott Ford wrote:
David,
True, sorry misread his repl
36 matches
Mail list logo
