Tom Marchant wrote:
>What is your point? The contents of in-stream data is not part of
>JCL, any more than the contents of some other data set referenced
>in a DD statement is.
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>There's a qualitative difference. The Reader or Converter must
>inspect every record of an
Not sure what a 'swapbar' is, but I guess it would have to be saved to
your ISPF profile pool (ISPPROF) before you logoff and restored from
there when you logon. If it has a ZVAR name, as in something like
)INIT
.ZVARS = '(ZCMD SPRJ1 LIBB SECTION SEGMENT ABLV ZWSBV BMODEV SMODEV PRMODE +
I've made a lot of use of DBSYNC over the years. But, since I made doing the
Software Upgrade path, I don't have a new RACF db to compare with.
Examining the RACFLIST job turned out to be simpler than I expected. Also, not
nearly as much new stuff, as say there was going from z/OS 1.3 to 2.1 or
On Tue, 5 May 2020 15:07:59 -0500, Tom Marchant wrote:
>On Tue, 5 May 2020 15:03:06 +0800, Timothy Sipples wrote:
>
>>Shmuel Metz wrote:
>>>Regardless of why it is coded that way, the code is in
>>>the C/I and the error message comes from the C/I.
>>
>>Yes, and in-stream data is an intrinsic
On Tue, 5 May 2020 13:12:44 -0500, Kirk Wolf wrote:
>
>"deploy" ?
>
"employ"?
>ISTR that this is your favorite example of using DD's in the shell :-)
>
>cat //DD:MYDD
>
o FSVO "favorite". See Appendix K of the Command Ref. It's not
supported; it may work by happenstance; if it breaks you get
If you don't get any better ideas, DBSYNC from the RACF Goodies page might
help
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Gibney, Dave
> Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2020 11:01 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Serverpac job RACFDLTA
>
> I am
On Tue, 5 May 2020 15:03:06 +0800, Timothy Sipples wrote:
>Shmuel Metz wrote:
>>Regardless of why it is coded that way, the code is in
>>the C/I and the error message comes from the C/I.
>
>Yes, and in-stream data is an intrinsic feature of the Job Control
>Language (JCL). It says so right here,
Gil,
"deploy" ?
ISTR that this is your favorite example of using DD's in the shell :-)
cat //DD:MYDD
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 9:17 AM Paul Gilmartin <
000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> On Tue, 5 May 2020 08:56:59 -0500, Kirk Wolf wrote:
>
> >FWIW, I would love to use
I am installing the archived z/OS 2.3 Serverpac on a z/OS 2.1 system. When
I tried to merge my z/OS 2.1 configuration into the 2.3 configuration, I
received a message that the old was created by a level of the Installation
dialogue too old to merge. So I didn't get a RACFDLTA job generated.
Try using $DACTIVATE command. Not sure if you can enter on 1.13 or if it needs
to be done on 2.2.
A larger CF and CKPT is needed due to the restructuring of the JES2 Spool.
Is your 2.2 system at z11?
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Elaine
I guess I should have asked what are you trying to do?
Do you want a z/OS V1.13 system using the same spool as the V2.2?
Do you need to have the tasks in V1.13 moved to V2.2?
You might want to consider doing a JES2 Offload then shutdown V1.13.
Bring up your systems at V2.2 level and then
Wish it was that easy. But as I stated there are 12 TAPE DRIVES AVAILIABLE for
this job. It is NOT a tape drive not available issue. (wish it was that easy,
went down that path)
Thank you for your response.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
From:
https://www.dellemc.com/en-us/collaterals/unauth/technical-guides-support-information/products/storage/docu95468.pdf
DLS180I DRIVE IS ALREADY ALLOCATED or BOXED The device that is specified
on the DEV= parameter is either already in use or is boxed and cannot be
used. Select a different
I keep getting this message and I cannot seem to figure out what is going on
here we have a DELL TLM and there are 13 tape drives attached VA Z/VM to this
test MVS guest. Has anyone ever had this?
DLMSCR VER 4.42
DLS180I DRIVE IS ALREADY ALLOCATED or BOXED
+TL4000 009E REJECTED COMMAND FROM
Making the CHECKPOINT bigger is not a bad idea, but I would also just verify
you have all the needed PTFs applied to z/OS to allow a mix of z/OS 1.13 and
z/OS 2.2 in the same JES2 MAS.
- V=IBM P=Z/OS JES2
MESSAGES R=V1R13 I=$HASP710 D=M
You will also need to redefine the Structure to correspond with the larger
checkpoint sizes.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Elaine Beal
Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2020 11:00 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: JES2 Checkpoint Size 1.13 to 2.2
One your z/OS 1.13 system define new, larger, checkpoint datasets and perform
the JES2 Checkpoint migration dialog. (Check the fine manuals. This is well
documented.
After running on the new checkpoints, you can then proceed w/the z/OS 2.2
implementation.
HTH,
-Original Message-
From:
Is there a way to save the current swapbar contents, and restore it
on next logon ?
Mike
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Thx David.
Mike
On 5/1/20, David Spiegel wrote:
> Swapped out, waiting, not ready to run.
> (waiting for user to enter a command)
>
> On 2020-05-01 15:09, Mike Stramba wrote:
>> When running the z/os console display command : d,a,l --- What
>> does "owt" mean ?
>>
>> Seems to be associated
We are migrating from 1.13 to 2.2 in a MAS sysplex.
JES2 WARM start, no parm changes.
Checkpoint in z11 mode.
Of course I'm trying to get around having to define a separate JES on 2.2 LPAR
A cold start is a possibility. Right now that's the only possible 'fix' that I
see
When I IPL the first
On 5/4/2020 10:12 PM, Tom Brennan wrote:
I don't think it matters much. If the PC gets hacked then the hacker
can probably figure out ways to get access to the mainframe whether
it's setup to automatically logon or not.
Among the most popular workstation "malware" implants are so-called
On Tue, 5 May 2020 08:56:59 -0500, Kirk Wolf wrote:
>FWIW, I would love to use bash exclusively on z/OS, but without
>_BPX_SHAREAS support:
>
>- there are things that you just can't do, like use DDs
>
Where does a shell employ DDs?
>- the overhead for forking new address spaces is significant
I tried this. Didn’t work for me.
_
Dave Jousma
AVP | Manager, Systems Engineering
Fifth Third Bank | 1830 East Paris Ave, SE | MD RSCB2H | Grand Rapids, MI
49546
616.653.8429 | fax:
What do you mean by ROOT? In sysplex file sharing the ROOT is the SYSPLEX root
that you create, which is typically very small, and only has the required ,
when not sharing ROOT is usually the filesystem IBM supplies. My sysplex root
contains (edited) mountpoints for each LPAR connecting, each
It's a good idea to go through z/OS Version 2 Release 4 UNIX System Services
Planning, GA32-0884-40.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Steve Beaver
FWIW, I would love to use bash exclusively on z/OS, but without
_BPX_SHAREAS support:
- there are things that you just can't do, like use DDs
- the overhead for forking new address spaces is significant for many
tasks.
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 8:06 AM David Crayford wrote:
> To create
On Tue, 5 May 2020 19:32:00 +0800, David Crayford wrote:
>
># switch to bash
>export SHELL=${BASH}
>exec ${BASH} --login
>
Why does that not loop?
Friendlier systems have a "chsh" command.
-- gil
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
Thank you to all who have commented on this thread.
>From the comments and what I have read this is what I
understand
My ROOT needs to be AUTOMOVE
I need to create ALTROOT
My zOSMF needs a PARM('RWSHARE') and UNMOUNT
such that it will shared across the SYSPLEX
To create terminfo colors check out Jerry Callens comment in this thread
https://forum.rocketsoftware.com/t/no-colors-running-over-ssh-in-cygwin/1009/7
On 2020-05-05 8:11 PM, Michael Babcock wrote:
After reading this thread I finally have my command line completion back!
I have Rocket’s Bash
After reading this thread I finally have my command line completion back!
I have Rocket’s Bash installed, set my OMVS segment to the bash shell, used
Bluezone and created a ssh terminal session with VT320, set “disable
dimming colors” and “Use ANSI colors” and set my screen to 32x120. I then
On 2020-05-05 6:39 AM, Wendell Lovewell wrote:
Installing Rocket's bash provided the cursor history scrolling I was looking
for.
I don't perceive a difference between TERM=xterm+256color and TERM=xterm in the
command-line-only functions I use. (I don't see any coloring in the ls or
other
Shmuel Metz wrote:
>Regardless of why it is coded that way, the code is in
>the C/I and the error message comes from the C/I.
Yes, and in-stream data is an intrinsic feature of the Job Control
Language (JCL). It says so right here, among other places:
Hi Barbara,
There seems to be a new command STOP REGION ABDUMP FORCE, but only for some
status of ims regions:
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/apar/PH05432
But it is not properly documented, so we tried several things, but it did not
work.
DFSSTOP0 : Code has been modified to allow region to
33 matches
Mail list logo
