Re: make /etc/ smaller

2020-06-25 Thread Mike Hochee
You may want to look at... zfsadm shrink (https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.3.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r3.ioea700/zfsadm_shrink.htm) HTH, Mike -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Mark Charles Sent:

Re: make /etc/ smaller

2020-06-25 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 21:36:04 -0500, Mark Charles wrote: >My in use /etc/ ZFS has grown to the limit of a DASD volume. I found that >IMWEBSRV was writing to /etc/websrv1/logs/access_log for 2 years. > There's a misdesign here. This ought to be in /var/log. Start an issue with the vendor.

make /etc/ smaller

2020-06-25 Thread Mark Charles
My in use /etc/ ZFS has grown to the limit of a DASD volume. I found that IMWEBSRV was writing to /etc/websrv1/logs/access_log for 2 years. I deleted all the logs using these commands: rm /SYSTEM/etc/websrv1/logs/access_log; touch /SYSTEM/etc/websrv1/logs/access_log That file is now small but

Re: FACT was Re: COBOL and C

2020-06-25 Thread Seymour J Metz
One processor; 8 virtual processors. Six microsecond memory cycle. That may not sound like much, but it was respectable for a 1960 midrange computer; better than a 7070, not as good as a 7090 FACT had language support for dealing with hierarchical record structures; to bad that never made it

Re: [External] Hitachi RAID box going out of support

2020-06-25 Thread Pommier, Rex
Who's maintaining your z9? Is that still supported by IBM? I know that years ago at a prior site, we had a couple HP-branded Hitachi boxes that we were migrating off, and we went to a third party service contract for the HP disk. When an HDA failed, I actually swapped it out and sent it to

FACT was Re: COBOL and C

2020-06-25 Thread Clark Morris
[Default] On 27 Apr 2020 04:13:21 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main sme...@gmu.edu (Seymour J Metz) wrote: >> And CPL before that (born in 1963). Yes, COBOL has roots in FLOW-MATIC >(mostly, with a light dusting of COM-TRAN), > >"FACT is fiction"? (Honeywell) The first full-time job I had coming

Re: Hitachi RAID box going out of support

2020-06-25 Thread Jerry Whitteridge
The question shouldn't be how reliable the box might be out of support but more how critical is the data and access to it in the event that something **does** go wrong. You mention your apps are critical, how comfortable is you management in risking the loss of the data ? Jerry Whitteridge

Hitachi RAID box going out of support

2020-06-25 Thread Nightwatch RenBand
We have a 10 year old Hitachi RAID box which Hitachi tells us is going out of support. Only two applications are left of the old z9 machine but they are critical. Latest estimate from programmers is that they will migrate off in 12 to 18 months. So, based on you folks experience, is it

Re: DB2 View issue

2020-06-25 Thread Binyamin Dissen
I question that. What do you see there? On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 20:12:41 +0300 saurabh khandelwal wrote: :>I tried this too. But doenst have view create definition :> :>On Thu, 25 Jun 2020, 11:54 Ron Hesketh, wrote: :> :>> Hi Suarabh, :>> Try the Statement column in SYSIBM.SYSVIEWS. :>> :>>

Re: DB2 View issue

2020-06-25 Thread saurabh khandelwal
I tried this too. But doenst have view create definition On Thu, 25 Jun 2020, 11:54 Ron Hesketh, wrote: > Hi Suarabh, > Try the Statement column in SYSIBM.SYSVIEWS. > > Regards, > Ron > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf > Of saurabh

Re: Does adding real storage require an IPL?

2020-06-25 Thread Vernooij, Kees (ITOP NM) - KLM
That is exactly how it works: in the activation profile you specify the memory and reserved memory for an LPAR. That is all it will see after activation with that profile. Kees -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Michael Babcock Sent: 25 June 2020

Re: Does adding real storage require an IPL?

2020-06-25 Thread Michael Babcock
We recently added some unassigned memory to our production LPAR and IPL’d. The memory did not show. We had to deactivate the LPAR and reactivate it to add the memory.This was on a z14-ZR1 with z/OS 2.3. On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 5:31 AM R.S. wrote: > W dniu 23.06.2020 o 02:07, Charles Mills

Re: Does adding real storage require an IPL?

2020-06-25 Thread R.S.
W dniu 23.06.2020 o 02:07, Charles Mills pisze: Today is real storage day. Sorry for the elementary questions. The folks that own the box as a whole have added memory to our LPAR. Do we need to IPL to pick that up in z/OS, or is there a command or similar process? I thought I heard at a SHARE

Re: DB2 View issue

2020-06-25 Thread Ron Hesketh
Hi Suarabh, Try the Statement column in SYSIBM.SYSVIEWS. Regards, Ron -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of saurabh khandelwal Sent: Wednesday, 24 June 2020 6:44 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: DB2 View issue Dear Group, In

Re: CL/ / Supersession

2020-06-25 Thread Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw
I am curious here. This isn't my field really. If the traffic is only encrypted to the end application (TN3270) then what happens when a user signs on to CL/SS itself. It appears to me that the password would be sent in the clear. Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw Consultant 'Dance like no one is