Phoenix Software has (E)JES, and Syzygy has SyzSPOOL/z and SyzMAIL/z.
SDSF also has mail capability of some sort (adding mail notification to jobs
and maybe some more related functionality).
- KB
--- Original Message ---
On Saturday, April 22nd, 2023 at 2:42 AM, Longnecker, Dennis
Thanks Timothy for confirming that. We are planning to implement a sysplex
where we want a critical application to have high availability without a
parallel sysplex. The solution being discussed is to install the
application on two LPARs but have it active only one at any time due to
dataset
Based on my experience (I have no inside knowledge), IEARR is a very simple
non-space-switching PC program that calls your specified EP as a
subroutine, and same goes for the ARR address. It's very simple... no
subtask is involved, nor any of the privilege modifications that PCs would
normally be
It just seemed to me that IOF wasn't keeping up with SDSF. I didn't know
about the email thing. Sounds like a good enhancement.
Rob
On Fri, Apr 21, 2023, 20:43 Bob Bridges wrote:
> By the way, just to respond to that one feature you like about IOF, you can
> simulate that in SDSF by writing
By the way, just to respond to that one feature you like about IOF, you can
simulate that in SDSF by writing a REXX. If you're not a programmer at
heart then it isn't as good, I realize.
---
Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313
/* The more sophisticated the technology, the more
Ack! I ~like~ IOF!
Can't answer your question, though. My current client uses SDSF; the one
before that used SYSVIEW. Hm, I do have contacts at an IOF site, though; I
think I'll ask Gary what the word is there.
---
Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313
/* The more
Hello
.
.
Can anyone add some additional information regarding IEAARR.
I am trying to clean up an existing Associated Recovery Routine,
by first using IEAARR to drive a Target Routine that is designed to
Abend and drive the Associated Recovery Routine.
.
This works well .. I have No issues with
That assumes that normal unauthorized users can access DCOLLECT data and
reports generated from it (not necessarily true) or if they have access to the
data, that they also have access to the tools needed to process it and the
knowledge of how to use those tools (neither one necessarily true)
For future reference, HSM DCOLLECT reports are also available if you want
reports for larger amounts of information.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with
I do this often enough that it's the first thing that occurred to me, too.
Dunno as I'd agree with "pointless", though. Some of my REXXes check to see
whether the exec was called as a TSO command or Edit macro - with or without
the TSO prefix, in other words, from an ISPF command line - and
Please excuse me if this is been asked already, haven't seen it.
https://www.triangle-systems.com/End%20of%20IOF%20Support.shtml
We have used IOF for quite a awhile, and frankly it has some wonderful
functionality that I haven't seen in SDSF (like the ability to send the output
to email
Paul,
I hate to say it... but hacking the brain via audio has been around a while.
I don't know how many braille-based hacks are out there.. maybe it is
incentive for us all to return to "punch cards" (get it.. braille .. kind
of like a punch card)
Rob
On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 4:24 PM Rick
ANY and ALL intercommunication brings risk.
DISABLING it has COSTS. We use computers from the get-go for the sake of
AUTOMATION.
Disabling copy-n-paste does not prevent your fingers typing what you see
on the screen (either direction).
Disabling your fingers would render you measurably less
On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 at 11:33, Seymour J Metz wrote:
> > IMHO it is not related to the group.
>
> How is a question about the HMC on an IBM mainframe not related to
> IBM-MAIN?
>
Not the group IBM-MAIN - the group the OP mentioned in "I created a custom
group that contains a subset of the LPARs
On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 15:35:38 +, Mark Jacobs
wrote:
>
>I can assign a different activation profile for the same physical lpar in each
>group. I can see the benefits and potential problems by doing so. The team
>discussed it this morning and we're all good now.
>
At a previous shop, we had
Hi Dave,
Thanks for the response.
No I am not editing the target data directly. We are working out of a pds
separate from SMPe libraries.
The user mod looks like what I'm after. I will look into that..
On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 13:37:15 -0500, Dave Jousma wrote:
>On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 13:10:19
On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 13:10:19 -0500, Bill Giannelli
wrote:
>various jobs for Db2 software maintenance, such as DSNTIJUZ DSNTIJUA DSNTIJRT.
>Bill
>On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 10:19:07 -0500, Dave Jousma wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 06:36:40 -0500, Bill Giannelli
>>wrote:
>>
So, those are DB2 jobs.
various jobs for Db2 software maintenance, such as DSNTIJUZ DSNTIJUA DSNTIJRT.
Bill
On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 10:19:07 -0500, Dave Jousma wrote:
>On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 06:36:40 -0500, Bill Giannelli
>wrote:
>
>>Do many of you out there use SMP/E JCLIN processing to track and save job
>>updates?
>>1) You could use IPOUPDTE also.
David,
AFAIK , IPOUPDTE can only work on PDS but does NOT work with sequential
datasets. OP hasn't specified if the input is a pds or sequential datasets.
File-Manager handles both PDS and sequential files.
>>2) Does File manager do "intelligent changes"
Or use TSO EDIT.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Sri
h Kolusu [skol...@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2023 12:23 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
But to be clear, this all has nothing to do with (mentioned) JCLIN
processing, right?
On 4/21/2023 8:51 AM, David Spiegel wrote:
Hi Bill,
You could treat JCL (with line numbers on) as a ++MAC in SMP.
Each "PTF" (++MACUPD) could be IEBUPDTE Control cards (e.g. ./ CHANGE
followed by numbered
Hi Kolusu,
1) You could use IPOUPDTE also.
2) Does File manager do "intelligent changes" like ISPF Edit? (If Source
String and Target String are different lengths, does the "line" beyond
the change get shifted, or, if there multiple blanks, not necessarily)
Regards,
David
On 2023-04-21
>> Is there a way to do this Edit stuff without a separate macro?
Billy,
If you have access to FILE Manger tool then you can pass the parms as variables
to job and it will update the file. Here is a simple example
// EXPORT SYMLIST=*
// SET SRCSTRNG='BILLY '
// SET TGTSTRNG='ASHTON'
/*
On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 15:18:32 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>It's simple, but, IMHO, pointless. At the beginning of the macro, you test the
>current environment. If it's not ISREDIT, then call EDIT with an initial macro.
>
The initial command environment will be TSO in either case. You may be
Hi Bill,
You could treat JCL (with line numbers on) as a ++MAC in SMP.
Each "PTF" (++MACUPD) could be IEBUPDTE Control cards (e.g. ./ CHANGE
followed by numbered "cards".
Regards,
David
On 2023-04-21 08:51, Bill Giannelli wrote:
SCLM seems geared towards COBOL and PLI not JCL?
On Fri, 21
W dniu 21.04.2023 o 17:32, Seymour J Metz pisze:
IMHO it is not related to the group.
How is a question about the HMC on an IBM mainframe not related to IBM-MAIN?
I did not say IBM-MAIN. I mentioned "custom group that contains a subset..."
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
As it turned out I answered my own question yesterday late afternoon. I can
create multiple groups, and assign the same lpar to as many groups as I desire.
I can assign a different activation profile for the same physical lpar in each
group. I can see the benefits and potential problems by
> IMHO it is not related to the group.
How is a question about the HMC on an IBM mainframe not related to IBM-MAIN?
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Radoslaw Skorupka <0471ebeac275-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Friday, April
W dniu 21.04.2023 o 16:57, Billy Ashton pisze:
Hey Rexxers, I suspect that this is simple, but my old, feeble brain
can't find the answer.
Is it possible to use a Rexx program to edit a file (maybe a PDS
member, maybe a flat file, shouldn't care) and to issue ISREDIT
commands there, but not
W dniu 20.04.2023 o 16:37, Mark Jacobs pisze:
I created a custom group that contains a subset of the LPARs defined on that
CEC. When I assign an activation profile to an LPAR in the custom group, the
new assignment isn't being reflected in the Systems Management tab for the
LPARs I changed,
On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 06:36:40 -0500, Bill Giannelli
wrote:
>Do many of you out there use SMP/E JCLIN processing to track and save job
>updates?
>Currently we do not make use of this and manually keep JCL up to date.
>It seems there is a value to have SMPe ke
>
Bill,
No one has asked yet,
It's simple, but, IMHO, pointless. At the beginning of the macro, you test the
current environment. If it's not ISREDIT, then call EDIT with an initial macro.
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Billy Ashton
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2023
Hey Rexxers, I suspect that this is simple, but my old, feeble brain
can't find the answer.
Is it possible to use a Rexx program to edit a file (maybe a PDS member,
maybe a flat file, shouldn't care) and to issue ISREDIT commands there,
but not by using a separate macro? IOW, I want to have a
SCLM has been functionality stabilized for many years now - I would suggest
trying to find another alternative.
Perhaps use Git for z/OS ?
You could maintain the master JCL in zFS directories under Git control with a
"deployment" method to copy to run-time PDS/Es.
There is also Lionel Dyke's
SCLM seems geared towards COBOL and PLI not JCL?
On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 22:18:52 +1000, Wayne Bickerdike wrote:
>Bill,
>
>If SCLM is installed there is a sample project you can work from. That
>should be a good starter.
>
>There is a set of JCL members to set up a project, use that as a basis.
>
Yes. I wondered the same thing: who is asking, and WHY?
/etc/security is increasingly common on POSIX systems. If something "out
there" in your enterprise is getting tripped-up by it, methinks that
something needs fixing.
-- R; <><
On 4/18/23 14:48, Marna WALLE wrote:
Hi Lizette,
Bill,
If SCLM is installed there is a sample project you can work from. That
should be a good starter.
There is a set of JCL members to set up a project, use that as a basis.
Any questions, just keep asking away.
On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 9:57 PM Bill Giannelli
wrote:
> Hi Wayne,
> I see SCLM
Hi Wayne,
I see SCLM now in ISPF. I wasnt aware of it.
Is the IBM online doc good enough for a SCLM newbie?
thanks
Bill
On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 06:48:00 -0500, Bill Giannelli
wrote:
>hi wayne,
>what is SCLM?
>On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 21:43:25 +1000, Wayne Bickerdike wrote:
>
>>I would use SCLM if you
hi wayne,
what is SCLM?
On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 21:43:25 +1000, Wayne Bickerdike wrote:
>I would use SCLM if you don't have another source management tool.
>
>On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 9:37 PM Bill Giannelli
>wrote:
>
>> Do many of you out there use SMP/E JCLIN processing to track and save job
>>
I would use SCLM if you don't have another source management tool.
On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 9:37 PM Bill Giannelli
wrote:
> Do many of you out there use SMP/E JCLIN processing to track and save job
> updates?
> Currently we do not make use of this and manually keep JCL up to date.
> It seems
Do many of you out there use SMP/E JCLIN processing to track and save job
updates?
Currently we do not make use of this and manually keep JCL up to date.
It seems there is a value to have SMPe ke
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
41 matches
Mail list logo
