Speaking from experience testing STP in the IBM Poughkeepsie development lab,
on whether “Could we directly modify the role as the target without
intermediate transition steps when z/OS and subsystem are running?”: Yes, you
can use the HMC Manage System Time dialog to go from the current configu
It may also be helpful to refer to the "Best practices for updating a
coupling facility" in the z/OS MVS Setting Up a Sysplex guide in the z/OS
Knowledge Center:
[
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.4.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r4.ieaf100/bestprac.htm
]
Procedure 1 is seems to apply to what
I agree the original question was a bit confusing, but to answer it
directly:
-> System-managed duplexing is definitely not deprecated, but yes there is
an "overhead" to run system-managed duplexing for structures, which is why
a new enhancement was recently released
on z14 (CFLevel 22 and up)
sion List
Hi,
It turned out that the CTN-ID value was coded in Upper case and what we
used to build the CF was in Lower case.
I am still trying to see if CTN-ID values are case sensitive.
Does anybody know if CTN-ID has such constraints ?
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 2:40 AM, Kieron D Hinds
wr
Hi,
It sounds like you have a situation where the CF you're attempting to IPL
is running on a CPC with a different CTNID than the CTNID of the CPC[s]
where other images are already active (z/OS and CFs).
I'd have to compare the CTNID in the output of the IXL160E as well as the
IEA386I from the
Base on the output you posted from IXL015I and IXC359I,
IXL015I REBUILD NEW STRUCTURE ALLOCATION INFORMATION FOR 420
STRUCTURE LOGREC, CONNECTOR NAME IXGLOGR_BOCT,
CONNECTIVITY=DEFAULT
CFNAME ALLOCATION STATUS/FAILURE REASON
CFTST
In case you haven't already, it would be very beneficial for you to spend
some time with the STP Planning Guide - SG24-7280 from RedBooks:
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg247280.html
Also, the STP Implementation Guide - SG24-7281 redbook has explicit
examples of how to configure STP depe
