On Wed, 8 Nov 2017, at 22:48, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
> "P-Code" sounds like jargon from UCSD Pascal, which I brushed
> against 30+ years ago. There was no pass two; there was an
> interpreter for the P-Code.
I've always associated P-code with Wirth's Pascal compiler. But it
turns out that
On Wed, 8 Nov 2017 23:20:41 +0100, Bernd Oppolzer wrote:
>
>Just to give an example, how small a runtime library can be:
>
>my New Stanford Pascal compiler has a runtime library, which is also linked
>with every
>Pascal program (in the same way as Dave describes). The Pascal compiler itself
>is
Am 08.11.2017 um 18:47 schrieb Thomas David Rivers:
Frank Swarbrick wrote:
Doesn't that make for fairly large executables?
Well - it can - but a trimmed down C library is surprisingly small.
Of course - if you're dragging C++ into this, then things get bigger; but
again - that's not the
Frank Swarbrick wrote:
Doesn't that make for fairly large executables?
Well - it can - but a trimmed down C library is surprisingly small.
Of course - if you're dragging C++ into this, then things get bigger; but
again - that's not the library usually, it's the templates, etc.. that your
On Tue, 7 Nov 2017 22:07:57 +, Frank Swarbrick wrote:
>Doesn't that make for fairly large executables?
>
That runtime is not monolithic, merely inconveniently megalithic.
Infuriatingly so to a vendor who has chosen to structure its own
product in numerous executables. I believe Dignus
/C++ Runtime Library
Ze'ev Atlas wrote:
>I hope that I word my question correctlyIs the C/C++ Runtime Library installed
>by default on z/OS or is it a product that needs to be licensed separately?In
>other words, if I distribute a software product, written in C, in binary form
>(load m
> On Nov 6, 2017, at 5:58 AM, Thomas David Rivers wrote:
>
>> ——SNIP---
>>
> Let me also speak as a vendor; for Dignus C/C++ (in he default mode of
> operation)
> the runtime is linked with the program. There is no dependency on an
>
Ze'ev Atlas wrote:
I hope that I word my question correctlyIs the C/C++ Runtime Library installed by default on z/OS or is it a product that needs to be licensed separately?In other words, if I distribute a software product, written in C, in binary form (load modules) and that product rely
Thank you everybody for the answers.The ZS, ARCH and TUNE numbers will be taken
into account Ze'ev Atlas
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with
ion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Sunday, November 5, 2017 8:35 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: C/C++ Runtime Library
Just a thought.
>From a vendor perspective I would think you would need a test in your process
>to verify that the
: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Charles Mills
> Sent: Sunday, November 05, 2017 8:30 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: C/C++ Runtime Library
>
> Be aware also of https://ibm.co/2hHaJPC
>
> Charles
>
>
>
Be aware also of https://ibm.co/2hHaJPC
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of John McKown
Sent: Sunday, November 5, 2017 5:59 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: C/C++ Runtime Library
On Sat, Nov 4, 2017
On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 9:48 PM, Ze'ev Atlas <
004b34e7c98a-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> I hope that I word my question correctlyIs the C/C++ Runtime Library
> installed by default on z/OS or is it a product that needs to be licensed
> separately?In other words,
I hope that I word my question correctlyIs the C/C++ Runtime Library installed
by default on z/OS or is it a product that needs to be licensed separately?In
other words, if I distribute a software product, written in C, in binary form
(load modules) and that product rely on the runtime library
14 matches
Mail list logo