On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 19:53:55 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>Some b0rken e-mail software makes proper quoting very difficult. Take m$
>lookout - please!
>
Yet some persist in using it. Worse, some employers requre it.
>
>From: Tony Harminc
>Sent: Wednesday,
On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 14:49:42 -0500, Tony Harminc (t...@harminc.net)
wrote about "Re: VM (Subject clip volume with JCL)" (in
):
> On 14 November 2018 at 14:34, Paul Gilmartin
> <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
>> And, all, please trim the s
PM
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Subject: Re: VM (Subject clip volume with JCL)
On 14 November 2018 at 14:34, Paul Gilmartin
<000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> And, all, please trim the superfluous footers, disclaimers, etc.
> (It's the malign consequence of
On 14 November 2018 at 14:34, Paul Gilmartin
<000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> And, all, please trim the superfluous footers, disclaimers, etc.
> (It's the malign consequence of top-posting.)
Better yet, don't top-post! Selectively quote, insert your comments
where they
On 2018-11-14, at 10:14:07, Nai, Dean wrote:
>
You're welcome.
But, please use a more informative Subject: in the future
for the benefit of members searching the Archives.
And, all, please trim the superfluous footers, disclaimers, etc.
(It's the malign consequence of top-posting.)
-- gil
I have found them to be extremely "picky". I had offered them some 3330 disks,
(I had 40 of them and offered them all to them) and they told me that they only
could use 1, and then complained because the one I sent had "stickers" on it.
The "stickers" (there are 2 on each external drive case)
Remember http://www.computerhistory.org/ -- Computer History Museum.
They love artifacts, documentation, literature, memories:
http://www.computerhistory.org/artifactdonation/
Date:Sun, 20 May 2018 03:39:44 -0500
From:Brian Westerman
Subject: Re: CLIP?
He originally had well thousands
> On May 24, 2018, at 8:49 PM, Paul Gilmartin
> <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2018 20:03:55 -0500, Edward Gould wrote:
>>
>> Our big boss was trying to show the board how he tried to save money. They
>> sort of forced him into getting STC (now STK)
> On May 25, 2018, at 8:21 PM, Paul Gilmartin
> <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2018 19:47:47 -0500, Edward Gould wrote:
>>
>> What we did use from potter was their printer. All the programmers seem to
>> love it as the page size was 8 1/2 by 11.
>>
On Fri, 25 May 2018 19:47:47 -0500, Edward Gould wrote:
>
>What we did use from potter was their printer. All the programmers seem to
>love it as the page size was 8 1/2 by 11.
>I do not remember specifically anything wrong with it although I think it got
>used heavily. It may have had more
> On May 25, 2018, at 1:34 PM, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>
> Have you used Potter tape drives in that time frame? If not, I don't see any
> reasonable argument that you could make.
My mind is cloudy here so I can’t remember anything during that time frame. At
the time the boss was
IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu> on behalf of
Edward Gould <edgould1...@comcast.net>
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2018 1:51 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Subject: Re: CLIP?
> On May 25, 2018, at 10:34 AM, Seymour J Metz <sme...@gmu.edu> wrote:
>
> STC
> On May 25, 2018, at 10:34 AM, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>
> STC drives were the reliable ones. Ever use Potter drives in the late 1970s
> or in the 1980s?
I will argue with you about the reliability of STC/STK drives. At the time we
had a full time (actually a couple) of IBM
;edgould1...@comcast.net>
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2018 9:03 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Subject: Re: CLIP?
> On May 24, 2018, at 2:17 PM, Dan D <zos.j...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Back in the 70's & 80's we had a program to "CLIP" a DASD volume to simply
> change the
We continued to use our home grown LABEL re-write program till ICKDSF came
along. I think they still used ours as it was easier and change is a bitch. I
seem to recall issues with IEHDASDR that screwed up on occasion.
Yes, we wiped the volume best we could then SOLD them to a local LARGE
Edward Gould wrote:
Our big boss was trying to show the board how he tried to save money. They sort of forced him into getting STC (now STK) tape drives. All of a sudden some of our jobs were getting S237 (block count did not match trailers), STC said we had bum tapes, we went through all sort of
On Thu, 24 May 2018 20:03:55 -0500, Edward Gould wrote:
>
>Our big boss was trying to show the board how he tried to save money. They
>sort of forced him into getting STC (now STK) tape drives. All of a sudden
>some of our jobs were getting S237 (block count did not match trailers), STC
>said
> On May 24, 2018, at 2:17 PM, Dan D <zos.j...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Back in the 70's & 80's we had a program to "CLIP" a DASD volume to simply
> change the label (before ICKDSF was available)
> I am stretching my memory but, I believe the precursor to ICKDSF
Back in the 70's & 80's we had a program to "CLIP" a DASD volume to simply
change the label (before ICKDSF was available).
When a tape lead was crunched around the capstan we would simply splice in a
NEW lead. As soon as that tape had completed being used for the current job we
The reflective marker goes back at least as far as the 727 tape drive, but I
never heard the word "clip" in that context.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.e
mber there was a little tool to make a clean cut or "clip" of the
> > half inch tape
> >
> > so that it could load cleanly on the tape drive.
> > Then you had some JCL to put a new label on the tape.
> I don’t go further back than the 360’s, but IIRC the
On Mon, 21 May 2018 17:18:24 -0500, Edward Gould wrote:
>
>I don’t go further back than the 360’s, but IIRC the tape reals also needed a
>reflector. I have never heard of a reflector being applied, anyone?
>
In:
the tape and even less read the tape
> label or the data after that.
> I remember there was a little tool to make a clean cut or "clip" of the half
> inch tape
>
> so that it could load cleanly on the tape drive.
> Then you had some JCL to put a new label on the
It's a rather old acronym, going back to a stand-alone program for the S/360.
The original CLIP could only change the 6-character volser on a DASD volume;
later versions could create a tape volume label.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu> on behalf of
Paul Gilmartin <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2018 10:57 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Subject: Re: CLIP?
On Fri, 18 May 2018 22:15:54 -0400, zMan wrote:
>I have to ask: "Change Label In Place&qu
I seriously doubt that. Certainly I never heard the term in a computer context
prior to the CLIP program of S/360.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu> on
You could trim the tape leader without needing to relabel a tape (or lose data)
as long as you didn't get too close to the shiny spot :-)
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
cut or "clip" of the half
inch tape
so that it could load cleanly on the tape drive.
Then you had some JCL to put a new label on the tape.
--
I hope this helps!
Michel Beaulieu
IBM Services (Canada).
|*|
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jim Mulder
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2018 6:34 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CLIP?
I don't see that term in the IEHDASDR documentation found here:
www.bitsavers.org/pdf/ibm/360/.../GC28-6586-15_OS_Utilities_Rel_21.7_Apr73.pdf
I would gu
He originally had well thousands of boxes of cards but I had to get rid of
several, mostly because they had deteriorated so much plus I had donated
hundreds of boxes that made up (I think all of) cp/67 (which I think later
became cp/370) to MIT and I gave away all of the 96 column cards
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Brian Westerman
Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2018 3:01 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: CLIP?
I checked the storage area of boxes (and boxes) of punched cards that my dad
left me when he died. (He was an IBM PSR back in the 60's-70's), and sure
enough
on the 3rd card of
the deck you can read *CLIP*
That _has_ to be the last surviving card deck incarnation of that
utility...
Mike Shaw
MVS/QuickRef Support Group
Chicago-Soft, Ltd.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / arch
On Sat, 19 May 2018 05:00:48 -0500, Brian Westerman wrote:
>I checked the storage area of boxes (and boxes) of punched cards that my dad
>left me when he died. ...
>
Just curious: How do you have those indexed?
-- gil
--
, amendment or viruses or any consequence thereof.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jesse 1 Robinson
Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2018 12:13 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CLIP?
I got into this biz
[Default] On 18 May 2018 19:14:32 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
zedgarhoo...@gmail.com (zMan) wrote:
>I have to ask: "Change Label In Place" -- as opposed to what? Removing the
>platter and sending it back to IBM to have the label changed?
Is CLIP actually a backronym where
I checked the storage area of boxes (and boxes) of punched cards that my dad
left me when he died. (He was an IBM PSR back in the 60's-70's), and sure
enough there is a deck (two of them) that clearly show "Chg Lbl Id Pgm" on the
top and on the 3rd card of the deck you can read *CL
On Fri, 18 May 2018 18:04:47 -0500, Dale R. Smith wrote:
>On Fri, 18 May 2018 22:08:51 +, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:
>
>>I used the term CLIP (reformat label) today with a colleague who clearly did
>>not understand. Isn't it an acronym? I can't find any hits.
>>
>
I got into this biz in the late 70s. The term CLIP was common parlance for
'label reformat'. I still have several canned JCL members with 'CLIP' in the
member name. If nothing else, the term is unique, while 'reformat' could have
any number of meanings.
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern
NEW
robin...@sce.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of graeme
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2018 4:33 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: CLIP?
Change Label In Place
A standard card deck utility in the softw
On Fri, 18 May 2018 22:15:54 -0400, zMan wrote:
>I have to ask: "Change Label In Place" -- as opposed to what? Removing the
>platter and sending it back to IBM to have the label changed?
>
When I first heard it I assumed it referred to repairing a damaged magnetic tape
by clipping off a couple
Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of graeme
> Sent: Friday, May 18, 2018 4:33 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: (External):Re: CLIP?
>
> Change Label In Place
> A standard card deck utility in the software FE toolbag 50 years ago.
>
> G
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of graeme
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2018 4:33 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: CLIP?
Change Label In Place
A standard card deck utility in the software FE toolbag 50 years ago.
Graeme
> On 19 May 2018, at 08:08, Jesse 1 Robin
Change Label In Place
A standard card deck utility in the software FE toolbag 50 years ago.
Graeme
> On 19 May 2018, at 08:08, Jesse 1 Robinson <jesse1.robin...@sce.com> wrote:
>
> I used the term CLIP (reformat label) today with a colleague who clearly did
> not
-715-0595 Mobile
626-543-6132 Office ⇐=== NEW
robin...@sce.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Dale R. Smith
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2018 4:05 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: CLIP?
On Fri, 18 May
On Fri, 18 May 2018 22:08:51 +, Jesse 1 Robinson <jesse1.robin...@sce.com>
wrote:
>I used the term CLIP (reformat label) today with a colleague who clearly did
>not understand. Isn't it an acronym? I can't find any hits.
>
>.
>.
>J.O.Skip Robinson
>Souther
I've heard/used the term CLIP as long as I've been in this business even though
it's not official technical terminology. I will happily go with Change Label In
Place. Thanks!
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
323
I don't see that term in the IEHDASDR documentation found here:
www.bitsavers.org/pdf/ibm/360/.../GC28-6586-15_OS_Utilities_Rel_21.7_Apr73.pdf
I would guess Change Label In Place
Found an old proc on one of our systems:
BROWSESYS1.PROCLIB(CLIP) - 01.11
Command
Robinson,
You probably may be quoting the VSE/VSAM User’s Guide and Application
Programming commands
CLIP LABEL=DISPLAY - Causes the volume serial number to be displayed on
the system console.
CLIP LABEL=SER=n..n - Causes the existing volume serial number to be
changed to the one specified as n
Took me a moment to remember what CLIP was, but I do not know if it stood for
anything.
Maybe: "Change Label in Perpetuity?" :) [It's Friday, lighten up!]
Al Nims
Systems Admin/Programmer III
UF Information Technology
East Campus
P.O. Box 112050
Gainesville, FL. 32611
(e) ajn...@u
Like clipping a price tag off one piece of clothing and putting it on
another piece of clothing.
The VTOC has only the name changed.
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 5:08 PM, Jesse 1 Robinson
<jesse1.robin...@sce.com> wrote:
> I used the term CLIP (reformat label) today with a colleague who cl
I used the term CLIP (reformat label) today with a colleague who clearly did
not understand. Isn't it an acronym? I can't find any hits.
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
323-715-0595 Mobile
626-543-6132 Office
51 matches
Mail list logo