Re: LLA REFRESH after increasing directory

2012-09-27 Thread Tom Marchant
On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 15:14:46 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote: On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 16:04:06 -0400, Ken Porowski wrote: I was a little worried after the first 3 responses of Yes, No, and Maybe. If you have a sandbox LPAR, it is simple to test. I beg to differ. It is simple to try it, testing is a

Re: LLA REFRESH after increasing directory

2012-09-27 Thread Mark Zelden
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 07:34:31 -0500, Tom Marchant m42tom-ibmm...@yahoo.com wrote: On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 15:14:46 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote: On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 16:04:06 -0400, Ken Porowski wrote: I was a little worried after the first 3 responses of Yes, No, and Maybe. If you have a sandbox LPAR,

Re: LLA REFRESH after increasing directory

2012-09-26 Thread R.S.
W dniu 2012-09-26 19:47, Ken Porowski pisze: Does anyone know if an LLA REFRESH will pick up increased directory blocks? I have a loadlib in linklist I need to refresh with all new members but the directory block allocation is too small. I can increase the number of directory blocks dynamically

Re: LLA REFRESH after increasing directory

2012-09-26 Thread Mark Zelden
On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 13:47:06 -0400, Ken Porowski ken.porow...@cit.com wrote: Does anyone know if an LLA REFRESH will pick up increased directory blocks? I have a loadlib in linklist I need to refresh with all new members but the directory block allocation is too small. I can increase the number

Re: LLA REFRESH after increasing directory

2012-09-26 Thread Mark Zelden
On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 13:08:57 -0500, Tom Marchant m42tom-ibmm...@yahoo.com wrote: On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 13:47:06 -0400, Ken Porowski wrote: Does anyone know if an LLA REFRESH will pick up increased directory blocks? It will not. Read the section, Removing or compressing a data set in an active

Re: LLA REFRESH after increasing directory

2012-09-26 Thread Mark Zelden
On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 12:04:10 -0700, Skip Robinson jo.skip.robin...@sce.com wrote: I like the advice to bounce LLA. This should eliminate a timing issue. While LLA is down, the (new) directory will be searched on each fetch. Once LLA is back up, he will have an updated picture of where members

Re: LLA REFRESH after increasing directory

2012-09-26 Thread Mark Zelden
On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 16:04:06 -0400, Ken Porowski ken.porow...@cit.com wrote: Thank you all! I was a little worried after the first 3 responses of Yes, No, and Maybe. If you have a sandbox LPAR, it is simple to test. I just re-tested even though I know I have done this on more than a couple

Re: LLA REFRESH after increasing directory

2012-09-26 Thread King, Jeffrey E
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: LLA REFRESH after increasing directory Importance: High Does anyone know if an LLA REFRESH will pick up increased directory blocks? I have a loadlib in linklist I need to refresh with all new members but the directory block allocation is too small. I can

Re: LLA REFRESH after increasing directory

2012-09-26 Thread Bonaduce, Frank
, September 26, 2012 1:47 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: LLA REFRESH after increasing directory Does anyone know if an LLA REFRESH will pick up increased directory blocks? I have a loadlib in linklist I need to refresh with all new members but the directory block allocation is too small. I