Hello,
I am able to get RMF3B messages on on my syslog. But I unable to find the
way to get these message like below when DASD activity rate goes above
limit on console.
Can you please suggest way of achieving this task .
+RMF100I 3B: Processing WFEX Report...
+RMF100I 3B: Name Reason Critical
-0595 Mobile
626-543-6132 Office ⇐=== NEW
robin...@sce.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Joel C. Ewing
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2018 10:07 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: CPU Utilization
When
03, 2018 10:10 PM
>>> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>>> Subject: AW: Re: CPU Utilization
>>>
>>>> No, IEFUTL is called INSIDE an Address Space as often as specified in
>> SMFPRMxx in
>>> statement JWT.
>>>
>>>
>>> and it
On 07/04/2018 06:46 AM, Peter Hunkeler wrote:
>> But if you specify the desired time on the job statement (the OP said 30
> min?), IEFUTL would get called and could take the desired action (extend for
> another 30 after generating some console message?).
>
>
>
>
> I stand corrected. I had in
On Wed, 4 Jul 2018 03:24:00 -0500, Vince Getgood wrote:
>Saurabh,
>How much is your management willing to spend on achieving this requirement?
>
>From the few posts that I've seen, I'd suggest no-one here does this now, or
>has ever done it. If a company wants to monitor it's mainframe
>But if you specify the desired time on the job statement (the OP said 30
min?), IEFUTL would get called and could take the desired action (extend for
another 30 after generating some console message?).
I stand corrected. I had in mind he wanted an alert when some address space
consumes more
Saurabh,
How much is your management willing to spend on achieving this requirement?
From the few posts that I've seen, I'd suggest no-one here does this now, or
has ever done it. If a company wants to monitor it's mainframe resource usage
dynamically, it buys and impliments a product. (BMC
Of Peter Hunkeler
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2018 10:10 PM
> > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> > Subject: AW: Re: CPU Utilization
> >
> > >No, IEFUTL is called INSIDE an Address Space as often as specified in
> SMFPRMxx in
> > statement JWT.
> >
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf
> Of Peter Hunkeler
> Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2018 10:10 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: AW: Re: CPU Utilization
>
> >No, IEFUTL is called INSIDE an Address Space as oft
Thanks for reply. We don't have BMC Mainview or IBM Omegamon or any third
party product except Netview from ibm.
I read about RMFM3B from rmf user guide also but not much help to setup
this for CPU usage . Can anybody help me to achieve this task .
On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 10:22 PM, Feller,
>No, IEFUTL is called INSIDE an Address Space as often as specified in SMFPRMxx
>in statement JWT.
and it would also be called when the CPU time used exceeds the time limit
of the job or step (TIME= parameter). But this means also that the exit is most
never called.
And since we're at
If you have BMC Mainview or IBM Omegamon (or some other monitoring software)
consider looking at those to monitor and alert you about CPU usage. Among
other things that is part of what they are created for.
Thanks..
Paul Feller
AGT Mainframe Technical Support
-Original Message-
From:
This sounds like something that could be done with a product like BMC Mainview
for z/OS or ASG TMON for z/OS (or other). I think alerts can be set for CPU
usage in these products.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
On Tue, 3 Jul 2018 14:42:21 +0300, saurabh khandelwal
wrote:
>Hello Group,
>
>We have requirement to trigger alert to operator console, once CPU
>utilization for any address space or any Job or any running STC reach to
>certain pre defined number. Like any job or address space or STC consuming
saurabh khandelwal wrote:
>Can IEFUTL exit also provide live CPU usage detail by every job, stc, address
>space, omvs etc and send alert to operator console, if any set limit for CPU
>is exceeded .
No, IEFUTL is called INSIDE an Address Space as often as specified in SMFPRMxx
in statement JWT
I read about RMFM3B from below white paper
http://www-03.ibm.com/support/techdocs/atsmastr.nsf/c6192fb3a432612485256d970082de57/399938068ea32df786256e2a005e8c8e/$FILE/RMF_WTO_2010.pdf
but i am not sure, how to implement this for checking live cpu usage for
every stc, jes job , omvs etc and
Hello,
Thanks for reply. Can IEFUTL exit also provide live CPU usage detail by
every job, stc, address space, omvs etc and send alert to operator console,
if any set limit for CPU is exceeded .
On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 6:53 PM, retired mainframer wrote:
> You might look at IEFUTL in the MVS
You might look at IEFUTL in the MVS Installation Exits manual to see if it can
do what you want.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf
> Of saurabh khandelwal
> Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2018 4:42 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: CPU Utilization
On Tue, 3 Jul 2018 14:42:21 +0300, saurabh khandelwal
wrote:
>Hello Group,
>
>We have requirement to trigger alert to operator console, once CPU
>utilization for any address space or any Job or any running STC reach to
>certain pre defined number. Like any job or address space or STC consuming
Workload Manager is your friend.
Hmmm - *IF* you understand the (history of the) workload, the SLAs, the
expectations of the customer, the politics, ...
And WLM itself of course.
Take it from me, it is bloody difficult to walk into a site and make sensible
determinations that will be
Thanks a lot for everyone and appreciate your time and help, I
will consider the recommendations given as i move on, Thanks again!
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 11:00 AM, nitz-...@gmx.net nitz-...@gmx.net wrote:
Not sure how Workload Manager is being used or configured at your shop.
From the
Probably your mainframe capacity enginneer should have this in his Mind.(It
really requires a professional approach)
Peter.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 3:45 PM, RCG rkcgowda1...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks a lot for everyone and appreciate your time and help, I
will consider the recommendations given
Yeah, then sometimes you need outside help to make things better. Perf.
Assoc, Watsonwalker.com, even IBM has tuning services. They are for a fee. It
might mean spending thousands to save millions in software/hardware
upgrades.
In a message dated 11/8/2012 3:01:45 A.M. Central Standard
Some manglers feel us techies, experienced ones, are a dime a dozen
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
Tell me and I'll forget; show me and I may remember; involve me and I'll
understand. - Chinese Proverb
On Nov 7, 2012, at 10:46 PM, Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca wrote:
I don't contribute
snip
Also trying to figure out any batch loads that are of not high priority to run
over a non-peak hours which might help a bit to it,
/snip
This is a techno-political question which only the customer can answer
snip
Any expert advice on the other ways that i can consider to help would be
Running 100% is not bad. What is bad is missing SLA's. So if you are not
missing SLA's, you don't have an immediate problem. If your shop is like most
shops, the work load is growing and that can lead to missing SLA's in the
future.
I would do the following:
1) Look for 'hot spots', first
Appreciate the prompt response and help Chris Allan, I will consider the
advises given and look to see those areas of improvement, Thanks again!
Regards,
RKC
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Blaicher, Christopher Y.
cblaic...@syncsort.com wrote:
Running 100% is not bad. What is bad is
Don't take this the wrong way, but performance analysis and tuning isn't
something you pick up in your spare time. You need to get a professional
involved. That's not me, so this isn't self-interested.
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Blaicher, Christopher Y.
cblaic...@syncsort.com wrote:
Workload Manager is your friend.
Cram on this before attempting anything else. It is your primary tool to
accomplish your objectives, but you need to understand how the tool works.
If you don't know which end of the hammer to hold you'll never drive in the
nail.
If you don't have SAS and MXG,
: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 10:04:08 -0500
From: cblaic...@syncsort.com
Subject: Re: CPU Utilization
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Running 100% is not bad. What is bad is missing SLA's. So if you are not
missing SLA's, you don't have an immediate problem. If your shop is like
most shops, the work
As has been stated before, Capacity and Performance is not a casual thing that
you can do over lunch. That being said, you can look at a few things. 100% is
not a bad thing, modern mainframes are designed to run at 100%. The question is
whether things are being delayed. If you have access to
I don't contribute to this list very much, but I feel I should in this case.
Performance/Capacity Management is not learned overnight. Nor is it a subject
where a couple of nuggets on a list serve will solve your problems.
Is SMP/E learned overnight?
Is being a DBA?
COBOL programmer?
RACF
Not sure how Workload Manager is being used or configured at your shop.
From the original description, I am assuming that that installation runs more
than one lpar on the box, most probably with lpar weights that reflect
importance of the lpars. If the OP happens to work on an lpar that is not
33 matches
Mail list logo
