Re: RC 24 from ISRSUPC (Was 0C4 from TSOEXEC IEBCOMPR)

2014-03-18 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In 2445830881854866.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu, on 03/17/2014 at 11:03 AM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said: No, and no. LINKMVS prefixes the programmer-supplied parameter with a halfword length field and passes the result as a single parameter to the called program.

Re: RC 24 from ISRSUPC (Was 0C4 from TSOEXEC IEBCOMPR)

2014-03-18 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Mon, 17 Mar 2014 18:49:15 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: on 03/17/2014 at 11:03 AM, Paul Gilmartin said: No, and no. LINKMVS prefixes the programmer-supplied parameter with a halfword length field and passes the result as a single parameter to the called program. Still not right;

Re: RC 24 from ISRSUPC (Was 0C4 from TSOEXEC IEBCOMPR)

2014-03-17 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In cc42e2f56d60f24fb8a6bcc639d1d9632c665...@samtcasxmb13.usa.dce.usps.gov, on 03/14/2014 at 09:01 PM, Hansen, Dave L - Eagan, MN dave.l.han...@usps.gov said: Sorry for the delay. We don't have ISRSUPC in the SYS1.LPALIB. LINK worked, but I didn't figure out the error. I gave you the wrong

Re: RC 24 from ISRSUPC (Was 0C4 from TSOEXEC IEBCOMPR)

2014-03-17 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Mon, 17 Mar 2014 10:34:05 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: I am not sure what LINKPGM would do for me. It would start the parameter with a halfword length field instead of passing the length as a separate parameter. No, and no. LINKMVS prefixes the programmer-supplied parameter with

Re: RC 24 from ISRSUPC (Was 0C4 from TSOEXEC IEBCOMPR)

2014-03-14 Thread Hansen, Dave L - Eagan, MN
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin Sent: Friday, March 07, 2014 5:56 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: RC 24 from ISRSUPC (Was 0C4 from TSOEXEC IEBCOMPR) On Fri, 7 Mar 2014 22:41:44 +, Hansen, Dave L - Eagan, MN wrote: 44 *-* /* CALL *(ISRSUPC

Re: RC 24 from ISRSUPC (Was 0C4 from TSOEXEC IEBCOMPR)

2014-03-10 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In 6209480351328263.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu, on 03/09/2014 at 06:51 PM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said: A string containing an unmatched apostrophe. %member 'foo should work just fine. And it was in an ISPSTART context; Then you're dealing with ISPF issues, not

Re: RC 24 from ISRSUPC (Was 0C4 from TSOEXEC IEBCOMPR)

2014-03-10 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Sun, 9 Mar 2014 23:41:12 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: And it was in an ISPSTART context; Then you're dealing with ISPF issues, not just REXX and TSO issues; it has nothing to do with what % allows. Try, at the command line, %rexx say arg(1); exit; ' Yes, but I never claimed it

Re: RC 24 from ISRSUPC (Was 0C4 from TSOEXEC IEBCOMPR)

2014-03-10 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In 7695529832117020.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu, on 03/10/2014 at 10:04 AM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said: Yes, but I never claimed it was just REXX and TSO issues, merely that there was a context in which EXEC worked but '%' didn't. No, what you claimed was There are

Re: RC 24 from ISRSUPC (Was 0C4 from TSOEXEC IEBCOMPR)

2014-03-09 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Sun, 9 Mar 2014 08:52:02 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote: on 03/08/2014 at 09:07 PM, Paul Gilmartin said: The syntactic restrictions are different. There are parameter strings that I can pass with EXEC that % disallows. Such as? A string containing an

Re: RC 24 from ISRSUPC (Was 0C4 from TSOEXEC IEBCOMPR)

2014-03-08 Thread Walt Farrell
On Fri, 7 Mar 2014 17:56:05 -0600, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote: On Fri, 7 Mar 2014 22:41:44 +, Hansen, Dave L - Eagan, MN wrote: 44 *-* /* CALL *(ISRSUPC) */ 45 *-* CALL *(ISRSUPC) 'FILECMP,DELTAL' L CALL *(ISRSUPC) 'FILECMP,DELTAL' I was told by IBM I

Re: RC 24 from ISRSUPC (Was 0C4 from TSOEXEC IEBCOMPR)

2014-03-08 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In cc42e2f56d60f24fb8a6bcc639d1d9632c658...@samtcasxmb13.usa.dce.usps.gov, on 03/07/2014 at 10:41 PM, Hansen, Dave L - Eagan, MN dave.l.han...@usps.gov said: I was told by IBM I don't have ISRSUPC in the SYS1.LPALIB. That shouldn't matter. From z/OS TSO/E Command Reference, SA22-7782-11:

Re: RC 24 from ISRSUPC (Was 0C4 from TSOEXEC IEBCOMPR)

2014-03-08 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In 3530218517098767.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu, on 03/08/2014 at 10:28 AM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said: Of course, LINKMVS supports multiple parameters, such as alternate DDNAME lists; I don't know that CALL does this. It does not. with LINKMVS I can pass a parameter

Re: RC 24 from ISRSUPC (Was 0C4 from TSOEXEC IEBCOMPR)

2014-03-07 Thread Hansen, Dave L - Eagan, MN
: Re: RC 24 from ISRSUPC (Was 0C4 from TSOEXEC IEBCOMPR) In 9380636879776208.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu, on 03/06/2014 at 04:20 PM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said: So, in Rexx: address TSO call *(ISRSUPC) 'FILE' That will work, but it's overkill. Why not use

Re: RC 24 from ISRSUPC (Was 0C4 from TSOEXEC IEBCOMPR)

2014-03-07 Thread Hansen, Dave L - Eagan, MN
weekend, Dave -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) Sent: Friday, March 07, 2014 2:18 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: RC 24 from ISRSUPC (Was 0C4 from TSOEXEC IEBCOMPR

Re: RC 24 from ISRSUPC (Was 0C4 from TSOEXEC IEBCOMPR)

2014-03-07 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Fri, 7 Mar 2014 22:41:44 +, Hansen, Dave L - Eagan, MN wrote: 44 *-* /* CALL *(ISRSUPC) */ 45 *-* CALL *(ISRSUPC) 'FILECMP,DELTAL' L CALL *(ISRSUPC) 'FILECMP,DELTAL' I was told by IBM I don't have ISRSUPC in the SYS1.LPALIB. I had to use LINKMVS to get it to work.

Re: RC 24 from ISRSUPC (Was 0C4 from TSOEXEC IEBCOMPR)

2014-03-06 Thread Sri h Kolusu
Dave, Here is a rexx exec to invoke ISRSUPC in rexx /* REXX */ ADDRESS TSO ALLOC FI(NEWDD) DA('PMSBDH.VPS.LRS.AFP.V2R10.FDEFLIB') SHR ALLOC FI(OLDDD) DA('VPS.LRS.VPS.V2R10.FDEFLIB') SHR ALLOC DD(OUTDD) DA(*) REU ALLOC F(SYSIN) DUMMY REUSE CALL *(ISRSUPC) 'FILECMP,DELTAL' FREE FI(NEWDD

Re: RC 24 from ISRSUPC (Was 0C4 from TSOEXEC IEBCOMPR)

2014-03-06 Thread Farley, Peter x23353
Dave, I don't see an ALLOC for DD SYSPRINT in the ISRSUPC code. Note the text of the error for that RC=24 seems to agree: RC 24 is ERROR. I/O Error writing to the **output listing file** (emphasis mine) HTH Peter -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List

Re: RC 24 from ISRSUPC (Was 0C4 from TSOEXEC IEBCOMPR)

2014-03-06 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In cc42e2f56d60f24fb8a6bcc639d1d9632c657...@samtcasxmb13.usa.dce.usps.gov, on 03/06/2014 at 10:01 PM, Hansen, Dave L - Eagan, MN dave.l.han...@usps.gov said: address TSO alloc fi(newdd) da('A3ZP.PROD.CICS(pgm)') shr reu address TSO alloc fi(olddd) da('A3WD.APPROD3.CICS(pgm)') shr