On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 17:15:09 -0700, Tom Brennan wrote:
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
I'd love to be able to select vi as my editor under ISPF (but not all
the time.))
Now you made me think: vi using SNA would mean you need to send each
individual keypress to the mainframe and get a response. That
On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 19:50:40 -0500, Ed Gould wrote:
To be fair its both SYNCSORT and DFSORT.
Probably true - but I've not seen Syncsort for decades.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
On Sep 15, 2014, at 10:49 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 22:21:12 -0500, Ed Gould wrote:
I am not so sure that is the case (ISPF edit) . The issue is as I see
it that there is no xedit for MVS .
Its relatively easy to change the ISPF primary menu to use another
How? Does
On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 22:57:07 -0500, Ed Gould wrote:
I *think* member selection etc is part and parcel of ispf/pdf. But if
it isn't then the replacement would have to do the member selection.
I think that no one has done one so you are treading on new territory.
Of course there may be one out
On Sep 15, 2014, at 10:57 PM, Ed Gould wrote:
-SNIP__
editor, but AFAIK there isn't one out there(anyone know of one?)
nedit. http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/features/unix/
library/IBM+Redbooks/index.html#nedit
-- gil
On Sep 15, 2014, at 11:43 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 22:57:07 -0500, Ed Gould wrote:
I *think* member selection etc is part and parcel of ispf/pdf. But if
it isn't then the replacement would have to do the member selection.
I think that no one has done one so you are
On Sun, 14 Sep 2014 00:29:11 -0500, Ron Thomas wrote:
Here we need to make this file as below by appending zeros to the 1'st byte of
each number only if the length of the number is 4 .
*only if the length of the number is 4 *
What about 3 or 2 or 1 digits ?.
Trivial in awk - but it seems
This 'problem', if that is the right word for it, is trivial in
any---well, almost any---programming language.
The OP, like many others here, does not appear to want or even to have
considered writing a programmed resolution of his problem. He wants
to use sort control statements instead. He
if the length is 4 or less than 4 need to append zeros to it and make it 5 byte
length. Thanks!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO
if the length is 4 or less than 4 need to append zeros to it and make it 5
byte length. Thanks!
Like I said, trivial.
And doesn't need compiling. And last I benchmarked, was faster anyway. But that
was a (smallish) one-off on zLinux, not z/OS ...
As a genera rule, I'd stack perl up against
I agree that Sort may not be as easy as a programming language.
For example, with REXX you can do LEFT(var,5,'0') or RIGHT(var,5,'0') and that
will place zeros up to the number of positions.
In Unix, or Perl, or COBOL, or EASYTRIEVE, or Assembler, not hard to do.
I have found many places
If using SORT then you can use:
INREC IFTHEN=(WHEN=(4,2,CH,EQ,C' '),BUILD=(C'00',1,3,5,75)),
IFTHEN=(WHEN=(5,1,CH,EQ,C' '),BUILD=(C'0',1,4,5,75))
I only used IEHIBALL to syntax check that statement, but I think its
correct.
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 9:41 PM, Shane Ginnane ibm-m
. He wants
to use sort control statements instead. He can certainly do so too,
but why?
If one's accustomed tool is a hammer ...
Change control procedures may be stricter for programs than for
utility control statements, but why? I've heard this as an argument
for resisting classification
if the length of the number is 4 . This being a parmcard if
someone entered a 5 digit then no need to apend a zero . Could some one let me
know how to do the same in sort?
REXX is very handy and useful to fix this.
1 - 04043
04045 - 04060
04062 - 04108
04110 - 04700
04705 - 04706
04708 88
Yeah, but the problem description and sample output don't match. If the
length is 5 the last numeric is appended to make the length 6?
In a message dated 9/14/2014 9:04:47 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
brianmfra...@gmail.com writes:
I only used IEHIBALL to syntax check that statement, but
/2014 14:52
Subject:Re: SORT JCL
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
I agree that Sort may not be as easy as a programming language.
For example, with REXX you can do LEFT(var,5,'0') or RIGHT(var,5,'0') and
that will place zeros up to the number
the same work with DFSORT or ICETOOL, and was surprised when the SORT
job ran in about 25% less clock time than my own simple program. All I
could guess is that DFSORT has some DASD tricks to speed things up, like
you say.
Martin Packer wrote:
Without wishing to appear a die hard defender of DFSORT
I have tried this control card and not getting the correct result. below is the
one i got, the 2'nd field is not getting reflected .
1 - 4043
04045 - 4060
04062 - 4108
04110 - 4700
04705 - 4706
04708
04714
04719
04723
Thanks
Ron T
You forgot to show us the control card.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
On Behalf Of Ron Thomas
Sent: Sunday, September 14, 2014 8:21 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SORT JCL
I have tried this control card
of the number is 4 . This being a parmcard if
someone entered a 5 digit then no need to apend a zero . Could some one let me
know how to do the same in sort?
1 - 04043
04045 - 04060
04062 - 04108
04110 - 04700
04705 - 04706
04708 88
04714
04719
04723
67
Thanks
/2014 00:06
Subject:Re: DF/SORT question (challenge?)
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Try adding close=free to the DD statement
Ed,
When using DFSORT applications, FREE=CLOSE cannot be used on any DD
statements except DFSPARM.
Thanks,
Kolusu
IBM
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 19:21:00 -0500, Shane Ginnane wrote:
awk '{print hlq.$1.file}' dfsort.input
Even OMVS should be able to achieve that. Can't see any reason for a sort.
Limit on number of open files? OP said hundreds or thousands.
-- gil
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 7:35 AM, Paul Gilmartin
000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 19:21:00 -0500, Shane Ginnane wrote:
awk '{print hlq.$1.file}' dfsort.input
Even OMVS should be able to achieve that. Can't see any reason for a sort.
Limit
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 07:35:05 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
Limit on number of open files? OP said hundreds or thousands.
Rebuke accepted - maybe I can (now) see a need for a sort.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff
for each value in that field. If I were doing
this, I'd sort on the field and have an output exit that allocated and
opened the dataset for each value, closed and freed it on a control
break and told the sort not to create any output.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO
to create a separate dataset that would contain all occurrences of
that field.
ITYM a separate file for each value in that field. If I were doing
this, I'd sort on the field and have an output exit that allocated and
opened the dataset for each value, closed and freed it on a control
break
Before I tried the solution cited below (TYVM BTW), I set up a test
manually with some interesting results. The input file is not sorted, and
I'm only doing SORT FIELDS=COPY. All I want to do is to break up the file
into a bunch of little files.
Test #1. Read my input file, 229,762
Okay, let me say up front, I know nothing about the abilities of SORT other
than simple sort this file on these keys and give me the output in this file.
Okay, we're good?
Here's my question. If (can) sort insert records into its output on a break in
key?
If so, why not sort the input file
.
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 11:28:51 -0500, Hardee, Chuck
chuck.har...@thermofisher.com wrote:
Okay, let me say up front, I know nothing about the abilities of SORT
other than simple sort this file on these keys and give me the output in
this file. Okay, we're good?
Here's my question. If (can
: TonyIcloud-OPERA tonybabo...@icloud.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 08/21/2014 09:25 AM
Subject: Re: DF/SORT question (challenge?)
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Before I tried the solution cited below (TYVM BTW), I set up a test
manually with some
)
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/ice1ca60/3.14
Thanks
Kolusu
DFSORT Development
IBM Corporation
From: TonyIcloud-OPERA tonybabo...@icloud.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 08/21/2014 09:43 AM
Subject:Re: DF/SORT question (challenge?)
Sent
Here's my question. If (can) sort insert records into its output on a
break in key?
If so, why not sort the input file and, on each key break, generate an
IEBUPDTE add control card and the write the record that belong to that
card until the next key break. Do this for each key break
In 0944307717662460.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu, on
08/20/2014
at 12:13 PM, Paul Gilmartin
000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu said:
Strange DSN syntax,
Have you checked the TRAILER3 keyword of OUTFIL in the DF/SORT
documentation?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
I have a dataset that contains records with a field, by which I need to
create a separate dataset that would contain all occurrences of that
field. For example the file, FB100, looks like
value1 other data.
value1 other data.
value1 other data.
value2 other data.
value2 other
Have you considered writing a program which dynamically allocates the
output files?
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 7:34 AM, TonyIcloud-OPERA tonybabo...@icloud.com
wrote:
I have a dataset that contains records with a field, by which I need to
create a separate dataset that would contain all
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 9:34 AM, TonyIcloud-OPERA tonybabo...@icloud.com
wrote:
I have a dataset that contains records with a field, by which I need to
create a separate dataset that would contain all occurrences of that field.
For example the file, FB100, looks like
value1 other data.
Looks good, I'll try it out. Thanks. I'd be curious about a UNIX (aka
the dark side) solution. I need the practice.
P.S. Sam, thanks for the response but we need to keep this out of the
development area due to change control constraints. REXX is viable
because we can tap dance around
of Florida
(352) 273-1298
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of John McKown
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 10:58 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: DF/SORT question (challenge?)
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 9:34 AM
John McKown wrote:
I concur with everything what John said.
Well, assuming that performance is not an overriding concern, I would have two
steps. The first would be a DFSORT which sorts the records in order by the
field in question.
And drop the duplicates too. DFSORT can do that for you.
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 10:26:30 -0500, Elardus Engelbrecht wrote:
Just curious, do you need to add BLKSIZE?
SDB is your friend. He was probably just calling attention that
he was relying on it.
For the first few datasets to practise on the ALLOC, I would like to see what
is in OUTPUT. Then if
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 10:20:43 -0500, TonyIcloud-OPERA wrote:
Looks good, I'll try it out. Thanks. I'd be curious about a UNIX (aka
the dark side) solution. I need the practice.
P.S. Sam, thanks for the response but we need to keep this out of the
development area due to change control
TIOT size. The
IBM-supplied default TIOT size is 32K.
//*
//* BUILD DYNAMIC OUTFIL CARDS AND DDNAMES FOR EACH GROUP OF RECORDS *
//*
//STEP0100 EXEC PGM=SORT
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 10:01:00 -0700, Sri h Kolusu wrote:
...
'DISP=SHR,DSN=Your.Split.PDSE(OUTF',101,4,')')),
Strange DSN syntax, but perhaps I'm looking with a JCL bias.
I understand that PDSE allows multiple members open for output
concurrently. (FSVO multiple; what's the
Gilmartin 000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 08/20/2014 10:13 AM
Subject: Re: DF/SORT question (challenge?)
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 10:01:00 -0700, Sri h Kolusu wrote:
...
'DISP
I once allocated a PDSE, and using DF/SORT, wrote 1,000 members to it in
one pass of data. I was tempted to try 10K output members but my beverage
wager was already won. When I get a bit of time, since I already have
devised a technique to generate N number of DD statements and OUTFIL
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 12:54:02 -0500, TonyIcloud-OPERA wrote:
I once allocated a PDSE, and using DF/SORT, wrote 1,000 members to it in
one pass of data. I was tempted to try 10K output members but my beverage
wager was already won. When I get a bit of time, since I already have
devised
On Aug 20, 2014, at 12:54 PM, TonyIcloud-OPERA wrote:
I once allocated a PDSE, and using DF/SORT, wrote 1,000 members to
it in one pass of data. I was tempted to try 10K output members
but my beverage wager was already won. When I get a bit of time,
since I already have devised
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 08/20/2014 03:28 PM
Subject: Re: DF/SORT question (challenge?)
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
On Aug 20, 2014, at 12:54 PM, TonyIcloud-OPERA wrote:
I once allocated a PDSE, and using DF/SORT, wrote 1,000 members
Good reason to try the other sort.
Ed
On Aug 20, 2014, at 6:06 PM, Sri h Kolusu wrote:
Try adding close=free to the DD statement
Ed,
When using DFSORT applications, FREE=CLOSE cannot be used on any DD
statements except DFSPARM.
Thanks,
Kolusu
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN
I am sure the other sort also frequently closes and reopens several, if not
most DDs also.
:)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
On Behalf Of Ed Gould
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 4:47 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject
awk '{print hlq.$1.file}' dfsort.input
Even OMVS should be able to achieve that. Can't see any reason for a sort.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists
On Aug 20, 2014, at 6:53 PM, Gibney, Dave wrote:
I am sure the other sort also frequently closes and reopens
several, if not most DDs also.
:)
Well lets ask them on here. Does Syncsort Open/Close its DD
statements prohibiting Free=close ?
Ed
Ron,
I am not sure how you can compare the results of
SORT FIELDS=(1,4,CH,A,26,9,CH,A),EQUALS
with
SORT FIELDS=(26,9,CH,A,71,4,BI,A),EQUALS.
In the first case you are sorting on the ASIS first followed by the field
at position 26 and in the second case you are sorting on the contents
i have done the same , that too also when we do compare the 2 o/p files there
is order difference comming.
Thanks
Ron T
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu
...@gmail.com
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Date: 07/30/2014 06:12 AM
Subject: Re: SORT JCL
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
i have done the same , that too also when we do compare the 2 o/p
files there is order difference comming.
Thanks
Ron T
..
DCDDCDC44FE000200070058CCFFECDCFF4001900
65581407141506263176531006424730696000D002C000C000C4600636856C009E00
Below one is with the modified sort card where the same data is in 71'th 4 byte
binary data
6558140714150557LAPOELA 641547059W
Ron,
Are you sure you are running the 2 sorts with the SAME INPUT Files?
The first sort has
+1+2+3+4+
6558 641547059W
But the output from the 2nd sort has 2 records for the same key
combination.
+1+2+3
Kolusu.
See the below , the number of records is same in both the cases , only the
sequence is the issue
Old one
6558140713175118BWGILBE 641547059W...DF00WCOH56 ..
6558140714150557LAPOELA 641547059W...DF00WCOH56 ..
@listserv.ua.edu wrote on
07/30/2014 08:42:14 AM:
From: Ron Thomas ron5...@gmail.com
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Date: 07/30/2014 08:42 AM
Subject: Re: SORT JCL
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Kolusu.
See the below , the number of records is same
Ok Kolusu. I have send the details. Thanks.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Thanks Kolusu. Here is the sort card i used SORT
FIELDS=(1,4,CH,A,26,9,CH,A),EQUALS which is in the ASIS case where in the
modified sort card SORT FIELDS=(26,9,CH,A,71,4,BI,A),EQUALS.
The issue is data in the ASIS the 1-4 bytes is same as in the TOBE the only
change is the data
Team.
The below are the sort cards we are using. The first one is the existing one
and 2'nd one is the new one.
ASIS - SORT FIELDS=(1,4,CH,A,5,6,CH,A,11,6,CH,A)
Modified - SORT FIELDS=(71,4,BI,A,5,6,CH,A,11,6,CH,A),EQUALS
In the ASIS data is the customer number and 71,4 position also
ASIS - SORT FIELDS=(1,4,CH,A,5,6,CH,A,11,6,CH,A)
Modified - SORT FIELDS=(71,4,BI,A,5,6,CH,A,11,6,CH,A),EQUALS
Please let me know why then the difference is comming in the sort as we
are not changing any other fields?
Ron,
Your Original sort card did NOT have the EQUALS which means
Hello.
I have file in which first 1-4 bytes is character format, the file is comming
from a different vendor and they have now changed to S9(09) COMP . We have SORT
card that is using (1,4,CH,A), this now we are seeing a different order. Could
some one please let us know how to get the same
] On
Behalf Of Ron Thomas
Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2014 7:59 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: SORT JCL
Hello.
I have file in which first 1-4 bytes is character format, the file is comming
from a
different vendor and they have now changed to S9(09) COMP . We have SORT
card
have file in which first 1-4 bytes is character format, the file is
comming from a different vendor and they have now changed to S9(09) COMP .
We have SORT card that is using (1,4,CH,A), this now we are seeing a
different order. Could some one please let us know how to get the same
order what
On Sun, 20 Jul 2014 21:58:42 -0500 Ron Thomas ron5...@gmail.com wrote:
:I have file in which first 1-4 bytes is character format, the file is comming
from a different vendor and they have now changed to S9(09) COMP . We have SORT
card that is using (1,4,CH,A), this now we are seeing a different
Can you enlight me, WHY they do that?
While I'm aware it is possible, I see no reason to do that.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
W dniu 2014-07-14 22:19, Doug pisze:
Some shops allow the sort volumes to be used for datasets that are passed
between jobs and the last job of the series
jo.skip.robin...@sce.com
From: Mike Schwab mike.a.sch...@gmail.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU,
Date: 07/14/2014 02:58 PM
Subject:Re: Cleanup Sort Volumes
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
We have some small datasets from started tasks. Don't
323-715-0595 Mobile
jo.skip.robin...@sce.com
From: Mike Schwab mike.a.sch...@gmail.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU,
Date: 07/15/2014 07:08 AM
Subject:Re: Cleanup Sort Volumes
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Exactly. The task starts
We have datasets dynamically allocated to our Sort volumes which don't get
deleted. I was wondering if other shops have a process in place to delete
datasets older than xx days from sort volumes? If so, would you please share
your method for doing this.
Thanks,
Scott
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 12:40 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Cleanup Sort Volumes
We have datasets dynamically allocated to our Sort volumes which don't get
deleted. I was wondering if other shops have a process in place to delete
datasets older than xx days from sort volumes
Shouldn't the real question be: Why are my sort files staying around after the
job's complete?
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Doug
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 12:58
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: Cleanup Sort Volumes
SMS management class
SMS management class
Delete in 7 days.
.
On Jul 14, 2014, at 12:39, Scott Starkey sxstar...@gmail.com wrote:
We have datasets dynamically allocated to our Sort volumes which don't get
deleted. I was wondering if other shops have a process in place to delete
datasets older than xx days
My €0.02: It is strange that temporary datasets survived end of job.
Usually it is the system responsibility to clean up after the job.
Assumption: nobody gave the SORTWK datasets permanent names.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
---
Treść tej wiadomości może zawierać informacje prawnie
And what are and why are sort volumes?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 10:07 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Cleanup Sort Volumes
Shouldn't the real
I assumed scratch volumes.
Temps should not hang around.
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Gibney, Dave
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 13:58
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: Cleanup Sort Volumes
And what are and why are sort volumes
Agree with you Ted. (finally :-)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 10:07 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] Cleanup Sort Volumes
Shouldn't the real
Don't remember when it started. Maybe DB/2 v5 or so, some of the utility
jobs started shipping with
DISP=(MOD,DELETE,CATLG) for the some of the intermediate files-supposedly
for rerun purposes.
Naturally it was the big honkers that failed blocking the pool until it got
rectified.
In a
Some shops allow the sort volumes to be used for datasets that are passed
between jobs and the last job of the series 'is supposed to' issue a delete.
(or not) grins.
.
On Jul 14, 2014, at 13:09, R.S. r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl wrote:
My €0.02: It is strange that temporary datasets
Doug:
Maybe the author mis spoke when he indicated sort volumes.
Personally I would think that system generated name would be sort
work data sets .
BTW I use IEHPROGM with scratch vtoc,sys,vol=sysallda=work0x
If its in use then the system won't scratch it.
Ed
On Jul 14, 2014, at 3:19 PM
We have some small datasets from started tasks. Don't delete until
the next IPL.
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Doug dsh...@bellsouth.net wrote:
Some shops allow the sort volumes to be used for datasets that are passed
between jobs and the last job of the series 'is supposed to' issue
...@gmail.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU,
Date: 07/14/2014 02:58 PM
Subject:Re: Cleanup Sort Volumes
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
We have some small datasets from started tasks. Don't delete until
the next IPL.
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 3
Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
626-302-7535 Office
323-715-0595 Mobile
jo.skip.robin...@sce.com
From: Mike Schwab mike.a.sch...@gmail.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU,
Date: 07/14/2014 02:58 PM
Subject:Re: Cleanup Sort Volumes
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM
I have a minor DF/SORT application that works on one LPAR and fails on
another. The leading zero appears to be the culprit.
PARSE=(%01=(ABSPOS=31,ENDBEFR=C'.',FIXLEN=8)), works cc=0,
but if I specify 08 (zero-eight) for FIXLEN
PARSE=(%01=(ABSPOS=31,ENDBEFR=C
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu wrote on
06/20/2014 03:08:28 PM:
From: Tony's Basement Computer tbabo...@comcast.net
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu,
Date: 06/20/2014 03:08 PM
Subject: df/sort parameter error. fixlen with leading zero
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU wrote on
05/07/2014 12:36:00 PM:
From: Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com
On Wed, 7 May 2014 12:28:25 -0400, Bill Ashton wrote:
... The file is a VB file with LRECL=0 and BLKSIZE=4096. ...
???
If you ask the wrong question, the
Hi friends...you have been helpful to in so many areas so far, and now I
have a question about using SORT.
I have an application that creates a CSV file (sort of) on the mainframe.
The data rows start with a field DATA before the actual data fields, and
there is a Header row that has a lot more
On Wed, 7 May 2014 12:28:25 -0400, Bill Ashton wrote:
... The file is a VB file with LRECL=0 and BLKSIZE=4096. ...
???
-- gil
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
more?
The following DFSORT JCL will drop the trailer record and remove the first
5 bytes for the detailed records.
//STEP0100 EXEC PGM=SORT
//SYSOUT DD SYSOUT=*
//SORTIN DD DISP=SHR,DSN=Your Input VB file
//SORTOUT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSINDD *
OPTION COPY,VLSCMP
OMIT COND=(5,7,CH,EQ
the 7 extracted words to build your
new
header.
:: -Original Message-
:: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
On
:: Behalf Of Bill Ashton
:: Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 9:28 AM
:: To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
:: Subject: Use SORT to manipulate
In
of87d06c78.43f4a289-on80257cc2.002a9f6c-80257cc2.002c3...@uk.ibm.com,
on 04/22/2014
at 09:02 AM, Martin Packer martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com said:
VIO has, in any case, been seen as CPU expensive. Because it's
simulating a device. I would, however, quite like to see VIO in
Memory reborn - with
...@patriot.net
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Date: 23/04/2014 12:20
Subject:Re: SORT ando MEMLIMIT best practice
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
In
of87d06c78.43f4a289-on80257cc2.002a9f6c-80257cc2.002c3...@uk.ibm.com,
on 04/22/2014
at 09:02 AM
Of Martin Packer
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 13:42
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SORT ando MEMLIMIT best practice
I don't disagree: I didn't really talk implementation but I want to see very
large temp data sets in memory, controlled via DFSMS and not too expensive.
First step is very
On 4/22/2014 4:58 PM, Shane Ginnane wrote:
Linux (on x86_64) has been doing it forever - goes even further, allowing
reference to a 32 Gig heap rather than just 4 Gig.
z/OS Java compressed references also go to 32G. (The USE2GTO32G= keyword
on the IARV64 macro should provide valuable insight
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2014 16:31
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: SORT ando MEMLIMIT best practice
o What are the consequences of allocating SORTWKn to VIO?
DFSORT
...@klm.com
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Date: 22/04/2014 07:40
Subject:Re: SORT ando MEMLIMIT best practice
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
On Mon, 21 Apr 2014 23:03:24 +0100, Martin Packer martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
wrote:
I think the term pointer compression is relevant here - to java heap
just above 2GB.
Yes. Very clever. I was trying to find a link to post and found this:
On Tue, 22 Apr 2014 08:46:40 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
On Mon, 21 Apr 2014 23:03:24 +0100, Martin Packer wrote:
I think the term pointer compression is relevant here - to java heap
just above 2GB.
Yes. Very clever.
...
I didn't realize it was being done on other platforms also.
Linux (on
On Mon, 21 Apr 2014 07:01:50 -0500, Tom Marchant wrote:
On Fri, 18 Apr 2014 14:07:29 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
Are there separate pools of real storage for above the bar and below the bar?
Pools? No. Pools are a software concept.
Real storage with real addresses 2 GiB are below the bar.
801 - 900 of 1029 matches
Mail list logo
