Re: Tape Migration

use disp=old,label=(50,blp) 3 parts to a std lbl so 16 files is 48 actual skips and 49 is the 17 std lbl so 50 should get you right into the data of the 17th file. John C On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 4:53 AM, venkat kulkarni wrote: > Hello Group, > > > Is there any way to bypass label written

Re: Tape Migration

ns to restrict the use of BLP. You may need to check with the data admin folks. > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On > Behalf Of venkat kulkarni > Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2018 1:54 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Tape M

Re: Tape Migration

Of venkat kulkarni Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2018 5:09 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Tape Migration Hello , I run tapemap and able to list all volume backup dataset on tape. /SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=* //DASD1DD UNIT=3390,VOL=SER=REST01,DISP=OLD //TAPE DD UNIT=359D,DISP=SHR

Re: Tape Migration

Hello , I run tapemap and able to list all volume backup dataset on tape. /SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=* //DASD1DD UNIT=3390,VOL=SER=REST01,DISP=OLD //TAPE DD UNIT=359D,DISP=SHR,DSN=BKUP.PROH19.TP ,LABEL=(1,BLP), //VOL=SER=(PROD01) In above DD stmt, we

Re: Tape Migration

venkat kulkarni wrote: >We already tried with option BLP and receive below error. Please post the full DD statement with that BLP. >ADR389E (001)-BKIOR(01), INVALID INPUT ON DDNAME TAPE, INPUT DATA SET NOT > PRODUCED BY DFDSS OR DFSMSDSS >ADR389E (001)-TDDS (07), INVALID INPUT ON DDNAME TAPE,

Re: Tape Migration

Hello Elardus, We already tried with option BLP and receive below error. ADR101I (R/I)-RI01 (01), TASKID 001 HAS BEEN ASSIGNED TO COMMAND 'RESTORE ' ADR109I (R/I)-RI01 (01), 2018.262 09:21:32 INITIAL SCAN OF USER CONTROL STATEMEN ADR016I (001)-PRIME(01), RACF LOGGING OPTION IN EFFECT FOR THIS

Re: Tape Migration

venkat kulkarni wrote: >Is there any way to bypass label written inside the tape and let system use >the name of tape we provide. like below. Yes, via RACF and/or JES2 setting for your job. >We are getting below issue, while restoring BKUP.PROH19.TP dataset from PROD01 >tape. But we

Tape Migration

Hello Group, Is there any way to bypass label written inside the tape and let system use the name of tape we provide. like below. We are getting below issue, while restoring BKUP.PROH19.TP dataset from PROD01 tape. But we encountered issue because initially BKUP.PROH19.TP dataset was backed up

Re: 3480/3490 Tape Migration Services

Luminex, has virtualization appliance and provides migrations services *Carlos Bodra IBM Certified zEnterprise Sao Paulo - SP - BRAZIL* Em 30/07/2015 14:58, Tony Harminc escreveu: On 30 July 2015 at 13:02, Pfister, Nathan

3480/3490 Tape Migration Services

List; I am possibly looking to contract out a migration of legacy data mainly housed on 3480 and 3490 tapes. We no longer have the capability to read these tapes (as we no longer have the drives necessary) so I want to virtualize these tapes (z/OS and VSE tapes both). I was wondering if

Re: 3480/3490 Tape Migration Services

Luminex comes to mind... -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Pfister, Nathan Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 1:02 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: 3480/3490 Tape Migration Services List; I am possibly looking

Re: 3480/3490 Tape Migration Services

[mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Pfister, Nathan Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 10:02 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: 3480/3490 Tape Migration Services List; I am possibly looking to contract out a migration of legacy data mainly housed on 3480 and 3490 tapes. We no longer

Re: 3480/3490 Tape Migration Services

McElroy Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 1:15 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: 3480/3490 Tape Migration Services Luminex comes to mind... -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Pfister, Nathan Sent: Thursday, July 30

Re: 3480/3490 Tape Migration Services

: Thursday, July 30, 2015 1:17 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: 3480/3490 Tape Migration Services This may be a silly thought. Could you attach something like a 3490 autoloader to your Virtual tape system and just do the process in house. Maybe rent one (limited lease)? Some

Re: 3480/3490 Tape Migration Services

On 30 July 2015 at 13:02, Pfister, Nathan nathanpfis...@donegalgroup.com wrote: I am possibly looking to contract out a migration of legacy data mainly housed on 3480 and 3490 tapes. We no longer have the capability to read these tapes (as we no longer have the drives necessary) so I want to