Hi,
Any real world experiences on bringing up a system that was previously part of
a basic SYSPLEX,
whilst keeping it in the same GRS ring as the other SYSPLEX members?
The idea is to bring up this system in XCFLOCAL mode, but I'd still like to
have it in the same GRS ring
as before (for
Lizette and Elardus, thanks for your replies and I'm sorry for wasting
your time. Clearly, from the doc and the results I'm getting, what I'm
trying to do will not work. I can't say why I thought it was working 6
months ago; perhaps in a parallel universe it did.
The intention was to allocate the
Steve Austin wrote:
Lizette and Elardus, thanks for your replies and I'm sorry for wasting your
time.
You're welcome. You did not wasted our time. In fact, due to you question,
Lizette kindly provided a very useful Share link for a presentation which I
find absolutely useful!
Clearly, from
I have checked. Nothing (firewalls) have been changed. I have the same
problem from work and home. I have received answer to my post on this question
(HAS ANYBODY NOTICED.) This problem has been sporadic and has popping up
of late . I haven't heard back from Darren the administrator
Lost in among the excitement of the zEC12 announcement were a couple of other
announcements:
IBM announced that the price of IMS V9 and V10 will rise by between 7% and 11%
from Jan 1, 2013:
http://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/rep_ca/4/877/ENUSZA12-1054/ZA12-1054.OI.BODY.pdf
Similarly, the price
Not sure what you mean.
char[] delimits strings with '\0' in every implementation in the world, I
think.
std::string allows any character and keeps track of length internally.
string::c_str() returns a '\0' terminated char[] everywhere.
I would be interested to see a char[] or std::string
I had some getting going issues -- many of them simply because I was new to C
as well as to z/OS C (but not new to z/OS itself).
I have since found it extremely accessible, and found the productivity gain
over assembler to be addicting.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
Around here, a 9% increase in CICS cost is just another nail in z/OS's coffin.
They raise the price and shove new functionality, which *we* will never use, up
our elided. Oh well, with any luck, I'll be gone before then.
--
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services Group
I think the type of List and what is used in the PARM has a lot to do with it.
LIST TYPE - DELTA LISTS THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE SOURCE DATA SETS
PARM=(LONGL,LINECMP,'','') SHOW DIFFERANCES INSIDE ALL LINES
PARM=(CHNGL,LINECMP,'','') SHOW DIFFERANCES 10 LINES BEFORE AFTER
Steve,
No waste of time. I always try to show that sometimes the answer is out on
the internet if you do some searching. The SDSF REXX/JAVA presentation was
provided since I went to share and was in attendance in that session.
Unfortunately the IBM manuals (and Redbooks) do not keep up with
C does not, at bottom, have strings. It views them as arrays of
single characters.
When it was realized that this is at best a dubious notion,
nul-delimited strings were grafted on to the structure of C, and the
scar tissue shows.
It is, however, possible to declare a string without specifying
OOPS, sorry. Meant to send that internally to others in my group.
--
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services Group
HealthMarkets(r)
9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010
(817) 255-3225 phone *
john.mck...@healthmarkets.com * www.HealthMarkets.com
Confidentiality
It can be done, you need to define and connect CTCs between all the non-sysplex
system(s) and the sysplex systems (see GRSCNFxx
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/zos/v1r12/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.ibm.zos.r12.ieae200%2Fgrscnf.htm).
If you don't fully interconnect the non-sysplex system(s)
If you construct an array by initializing it element by element you
get an array, one that is not nul-delimited or 'of conceptually
unlimited length', whatever that may mean.
If you construct a string by initializing a character array with a
string, you get a nul-delimited string implemented
If you've run for some time with these systems sysplexed, you--and your
user community--may be surprised at the functionality you will lose. I'm
sure that you have good business reasons for dismantling the sysplex, but
there may be less disruptive alternatives. For example, some time ago we
paulgboul...@aim.com (Paul Gilmartin) writes:
And here, I find myself in rare agreement with John G.'s view
(if I understand correctly). A char[] containing no \0 is a perfectly
valid array of char. It is not a string, by C's convention, and there
is no requirement that a char[] represent a
Our CICS v3.2 bill went up something like 10% in 2011. We're on v4.2 now, as
the v3.2 costs were raised give or take a few quid to match those of v4.2.
We're just upgrading to IMS v12 from v10, so there's another 10% on that bill
Now both are rising around another 10% in Jan. Ouch.
IBM would
Esmie moo,
You can use DFSORT JOINKEYS to compare datasets. Check this topic
http://newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Archive/Comp/bit.listserv.ibm-main/2012-05/msg00995.html
Thanks
Sri Hari Kolusu
DFSORT Development
IBM Corporation
Email: skol...@us.ibm.com
Phone: 408-463-2403 Tie Line 543-2403
IBM
Charles Mills wrote:
Just because you *can* create a malformed string with no delimiter does not
mean that my statement about proper C behavior is untrue.
It is a true statement that the z architecture stores integers in big-endian
form. Nonetheless, I *can* create a little-endian
integer
I have had to move a string type field like a parameter to a field like this,
Jobn char[40];
memset(Jobn,'0',sizeof(Jobn));
strcpy(Jobn,x);
Otherwise strcmp fails, where x is the parameter string
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
On Sep 4, 2012, at 1:05 PM, retired mainframer
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com wrote:
I have had to move a string type field like a parameter to a field like
this,
Jobn char[40];
memset(Jobn,'0',sizeof(Jobn));
strcpy(Jobn,x);
Please post additional code and the precise contents of x.
To whom may be interested:
Today, Marian Rejewski - a man who broke Enigma code received Knowlton
Award.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marian_Rejewski
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
(yes, it is off topic)
--
Treść tej wiadomości może zawierać informacje prawnie chronione Banku
I assume you meant '\0' and not '0'.
Unless Jobn has been assigned a string previously, strcmp should fail.
(Actually it would invoke undefined behavior.)
strcpy does not care about the previous contents of the destination.
(strcat does but that is a different function.) If the length of x
On Wednesday, September 5, 2012 2:53:45 AM UTC+10, Joe D'Alessandro wrote:
We have done this to two 3-system parallel sysplexes. One system was removed
from each 3-system sysplex and the removed systems were each defined as a
monoplex and rejoined to their former partners in a GRSPLEX. So
You absolutely should not have to do that. If you do then it is a reportable
and serious bug. strcpy() is utterly documented as setting the terminating
null.
memset(Jobn,'0',sizeof(Jobn));
Assume you mean memset(Jobn,'\0',sizeof(Jobn));
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 15:01:37 -0400, Thomas David Rivers wrote:
cxx: t.c line 3:Error #144: a value of type const char [7] cannot
be used to initialize an entity of type char [6]
char s6[ 6 ] = wombat;
Is there any convenient way to perform this initialization? (I don't
consider either
On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 14:32:12 -0500, Kirk Wolf wrote:
(BTW - strncpy() also zeros bytes after the terminator, if necessary)
For more information, see: http://www.courtesan.com/todd/papers/strlcpy.html
under Common Misconceptions
There's no discernible date of publication of that paper save for
rhal...@evertecinc.com
On Sep 4, 2012 4:42 PM, Matthew Stitt mathwst...@bellsouth.net wrote:
Just received this red alert message:
http://www14.software.ibm.com/support/customercare/sas/f/redAlerts/20120904.html
There is a potential exposure for undetected loss of data or data set
In
CAHm_n2m0YMNqapMVRe=sxzmayt1w9vvzvs+3v25eithm_c6...@mail.gmail.com,
on 09/04/2012
at 12:10 PM, Kirk Wolf k...@dovetail.com said:
But other metal-level language implementations are not care free -
consider length-prefixed strings - the programmer must still check
lengths before moving data.
I had thought to have answered that question. The C construct
char text character[] = 'Lincoln''s Doctor''s Dog' ;
does jobs of that sort.
--jg
On 9/4/12, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 15:01:37 -0400, Thomas David Rivers wrote:
cxx: t.c line 3:Error #144:
Hello
I'm hoping someone can help me with an issue we are experiencing following an
upgrade from z/OS 1.11 to 1.13. We are running an REXX EXEC in batch which
does not run TSO and fails on a s047 abend during an ADDRESS LINKMVS IEHPROGM.
I have noticed other people have had similar
Also, an easy way to display the IKJTSOxx member is to enter the command
PARMLIB in ISPF option 6 (or TSO PARMLIB on any command line). If you have
access, then slowly scroll through the output and look for AUTHPGM and/or
AUTHCMD to see if IEHPROGM is in there. This display will also tell you
Mike Schwab wrote:
I am thinking they are missing the old run time libraries.
It is a good possibility. BTGTT, of course, my programmers are not really
happy with that possibility. :-)
All COBOL library routines are included in LE, so that is NOT a possibility.
What I do see in client shops is
DATA AT PSW 0001CE48 - 58101000 0A6B5023
Data shows a MODESET SVC which does require authorization.
Check the AUTHPGM specifications in IKJTSOxx in SYS1.PARMLIB
Probably need an entry there for IEHPROGM.
K. Kripke
kkri...@mindspring.com
34 matches
Mail list logo
