AMEN!
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Sam Siegel
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 7:26 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Knowledgecentre versus the library server
I'm with you Scott ... I like to
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 19:09:09 -0500, Shane Ginnane wrote:
Reading Kolosu's latest admonishment to gil, I trundled through the links for
completeness.
The first (knowledgecentre) took minutes to load - yes *minutes*. The others
just popped up.
Another great technological leap backwards.
On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 10:24:21 -0400, Scott Ford wrote:
I would rather download the PDFs,I'm think personally, it's easier more me.
Not me. I still prefer the .boo. In fact, most of the time, I
still use the z/OS 1.13 books rather than the current doc
unless I'm going to print part of it, or
Hi Liz,
The information is in the subject. I tried to access JOBNUM and other
information that are seen in SDSF LOG cmd, but are not available to TSO
CONSOLE/GETMSG commands. Anyway, it's not an issue as I used the masking
option of the $T CJ command.
Regards,
ITschak.
ITschak Mugzach
Z/OS,
Bookmanager Read TSO is still my favorite
, quirks and all.
No waiting. No fishing around for what website might have some doc.
I am on TSO and my problem is on the mainframe so I look up what I need in
seconds...one copy for everyone!
On Wednesday, March 11, 2015, Paul Gilmartin
In
CAOdPEgQ9WMzGL-coxOoxF-HLyCUrxPaA22Ntq=wl9tf3s+p...@mail.gmail.com,
on 03/11/2015
at 07:07 PM, Itschak Mugzach imugz...@gmail.com said:
The information is in the subject. I tried to access JOBNUM and other
information that are seen in SDSF LOG cmd,
LOG displays syslog and is not analogous
In 9655256407995553.wa.m42tomibmmainyahoo@listserv.ua.edu, on
03/11/2015
at 11:16 AM, Tom Marchant
000a2a8c2020-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu said:
Not me. I still prefer the .boo.
Soo do I, but I could live with PDF if IBM would provide bookshelf and
bookindex files, even if I had to
In
CAG5iWUQJd5RT-Sn50kpYXKuF2Er_nNisZ=rgf2bmf_p52l6...@mail.gmail.com,
on 03/11/2015
at 04:44 PM, Dan Little dwlit...@gmail.com said:
Bookmanager Read TSO is still my favorite
I prefer to have the bki, bks and boo files on a network file server,
so that I can get to them from a PC even if I'm
Charles,
I agree , I search then if i find the .boo I download the PDF. The searches
are much faster on you local pc for sure..
Regards,
Scott
On Wednesday, March 11, 2015, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org wrote:
Agreed on this also. Prefer PDF to KC except for the most trivial of
quick
Hi Scott,
I tried the ROUTE command (ROUTE xxx,REPLY nn,Y). It failed by RACF as
all other commands comes from non typical addressspaces.
I think I don't have fingers to count the (new) z/os versions not
sup[ported since the one I am running on... I compared the macros between
1.7 and 1.13 and
And if TSO is down?
In a message dated 3/11/2015 3:45:02 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
dwlit...@gmail.com writes:
...one copy for everyone!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 16:44:53 -0400, Dan Little wrote:
Bookmanager Read TSO is still my favorite
, quirks and all.
No waiting. No fishing around for what website might have some doc.
I am on TSO and my problem is on the mainframe so I look up what I need in
seconds...one copy for everyone!
Not
Easy alignment to a 256 byte boundary?
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 18:57:53 -0400 David Cole dbc...@colesoft.com wrote:
:Per the new PoOps:
:
:
:LZRG R1,D2(X2,B2) [RXY-a]
:
:The second operand, with the rightmost byte set to zero, is placed
:at the first-operand location. [snip] for LZRG, the first and
Lucas Rosalen wrote:
Mike is right.
At 2:01 you've added 3600s (to make it 3:01), so JES2 tried to catch up as
the interval had already been more than satisfied.
Indeed and this is documented,
quote
If, at 1:15 a.m., the clock is set ahead two hours, making the current time
3:15 a.m., the
I searched the archives and found a very similar problem to mine in the thread
https://listserv.ua.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0606L=IBM-MAINP=R34295I=-3X=D02C315241E55CCC48Y=abend922%40gmail.comd=No+Match%3BMatch%3BMatches
back in 2006 and ably answered by Rob Scott. I seem to have a very similar
Itschak Mugzach wrote:
I am trying to itercept msg$hasp890 in order to get the class. I then wish to
change job class. The problem is that job number is not accessable to the
getmsg command. Any help?
What command did you used to get $HASP890? Please post the command and the
results as well
The new tools are not as available, reliable, or efficient as their
predecessors [1].
[1] In a bout of frustration I complained to a duty manager about the
performance and availability of one of the new tools.
I was informed that it was still the same old green screen application w/a GUI
front
Itschak Mugzach wrote:
The command synrax us $dn,all,q=xeqk
I tried out your command just as is and got $HASP650.
I then tried $dn,all and see CLASS=A for one job as an example. So I don't see
what the problem is.
Please look at my other questions, I believe you may have a problem using
Dusting off this old thread:
I set a slip trap that included the TCPIP address space in the address spaces
to be dumped. TCPIPCS socket detail on that slip dump gives me:
TCPIP Socket Analysis
BLS18100I ASID(X'002B') 01F0_2280 not available
The address
I am trying to itercept msg$hasp890 in order to get the class. I then wish
to change job class. The problem is that job number is not accessable to
the getmsg command. Any help?
Regards
Itschak
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
The command synrax us $dn,all,q=xeqk
Utschak
בתאריך 11 במרץ 2015 15:20, Elardus Engelbrecht
elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za כתב:
Itschak Mugzach wrote:
I am trying to itercept msg$hasp890 in order to get the class. I then
wish to change job class. The problem is that job number is not
I can tell you the intent. Each allocation of above-2G storage fits into
one of 5 should I include it in the dump? categories --
- like region (default for private)
- like LSQA
- like CSA (default for common)
- like SQA
- do not dump automatically
The intent is to dump like x when 'x' is
There is also quite an overhead...up to 30%...when you use an initial value
INITIMG(x'40') with a GETMAIN.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the
Hi Shane,
First of all, I want to make it known that I'm not a fan of the
knowledgecenter, but that being said I tried your little unofficial experiment.
The KC link did come up noticeably slower this morning for me as well, but in
my case it was a matter of about 5 seconds versus about a
Oops. I dyslex'd the whole thing. Nevermind.
At 3/11/2015 04:06 AM, Binyamin Dissen wrote:
Easy alignment to a 256 byte boundary?
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 18:57:53 -0400 David Cole dbc...@colesoft.com wrote:
:Per the new PoOps:
:
:
:LZRG R1,D2(X2,B2) [RXY-a]
:
:The second operand, with the
In 7676853980546110.wa.nitzibmgmx@listserv.ua.edu, on 03/11/2015
at 07:41 AM, Barbara Nitz nitz-...@gmx.net said:
How come a slip dump does not dump common storage above the bar
despite both SQA and CSA being set?
Did the IARV64 macro have DUMP=NO or XMFCTRL_XDUMP_NO?
--
Shmuel
*Usually* not.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Lou Losee
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 8:47 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Economics of Mainframe Technology
Is there a link to the keynote or the
In 002401d05bd3$e8dda010$ba98e030$@gmail.com, on 03/11/2015
at 03:18 PM, Robin Atwood abend...@gmail.com said:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Please check your listserv options for IBM-MAIN. It looks like you
were sending format=flowed but the listserv did not preserve your
Works fine for me and responds with msg hasp890. Anyway, i realized i was
on a wrong root. I don't need the job number. Just change the class with
job mask like this:
$t jq,/jm=xxx,q=xeq,/c=k,c=j
Best
ITschak
בתאריך 11 במרץ 2015 15:33, Elardus Engelbrecht
elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za כתב:
I would rather download the PDFs,I'm think personally, it's easier more me.
On Wednesday, March 11, 2015, Staller, Allan allan.stal...@kbmg.com wrote:
The new tools are not as available, reliable, or efficient as their
predecessors [1].
[1] In a bout of frustration I complained to a duty
I'm with you Scott ... I like to have the pdf on local disk.
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 7:24 AM, Scott Ford idfzos...@gmail.com wrote:
I would rather download the PDFs,I'm think personally, it's easier more me.
On Wednesday, March 11, 2015, Staller, Allan allan.stal...@kbmg.com
wrote:
The
I do not believe that you can use non-character data in the NAME or TASK values
in GIVE/TAKESOCKET.
Try using a test program with a single subtask with a known value - eg
TEST0001
Also ensure that the DOMAIN value is correct in your CLIENT structure is
correct (for both give and take) and
32 matches
Mail list logo
