I'm interested in how people deal with the case of the functions and what type
of executables people create.
Relevant is discussion of overflow. By Standard fine for COBOL, not fine for C.
sprintf is fun but do I want to interpret a string 4m times to produce a report?
On Thu, 6 Apr 2017 18:28:14 +, O'Connor, Ruth wrote:
And I asked them to confirm that we're not supposed to define their drives with
COMPACT. (Somehow I got the impression that the data will be compressed
automatically when it reaches the Data Domain. Maybe we would use the
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 3:43 AM, Bill Woodger wrote:
> I'm interested in how people deal with the case of the functions and what
> type of executables people create.
>
> Relevant is discussion of overflow. By Standard fine for COBOL, not fine
> for C.
>
> sprintf is fun
Does anyone have a SHARE proceedings CD with these two presentations that you
would be willing to share:
"Plumbers Who Dump CVTs and the Control Blocks that Love Them:MVS/TSO
Pipelines for Systems Programmers", SHARE February 1999, Session 2875, Hobart
Spitz, Paine Webber
"Two Dimensional
On Fri, 7 Apr 2017 06:34:54 +, Vernooij, Kees (ITOPT1) - KLM
wrote:
>>
>> See if you have APAR OA51343 and prereq's installed.
>>
As J.O.Skip mentioned I had a similar issue, but I was joining 2 systems into a
JES2 MAS and there was a previous definition for another SYSNAME in the
definition, after I followed the doc some have pointed me to I was about to
modify the node name and get my jobs running after being submitted,
Some of these are so funny looking at them with today's eyes but back in the
day they were awesome
http://www.computerworld.com/article/3162104/computer-hardware/10-fun-tech-ads-through-the-years.html
--
Lionel B. Dyck
Hey
Does anybody know of any software for mainframe Z/OS where you can send SMS
messages to a mobile phone and maybe make a predefined speak to a mobile
phone.
Or maybe specify a way to do it.
It can be an open source code., or a plugin from a a payable software
company
Of course a free of
That technology has been around for many years, I first saw this provided by a
vendor on a large scale about 12 years ago with CA/OPS and Uni-center
sent text messages based on trapping messages for the console log, I think just
about any automation process / tool can do this now
Carmen
On 4/7/17, 3:47 PM, "David Boyes" wrote:
Anne & Lynn Wheeler l...@garlic.com commented:
> IBM also funded $50M Andrew project at CMU, Andrew File System
Which is still alive and well and in production use at dozens of sites.
It’s now supported on
dbo...@sinenomine.net (David Boyes) writes:
> Which is still alive and well and in production use at dozens of
> sites. It’s now supported on System z hardware as well. AFS offers a
> lot of cool stuff that make continuous availability a reality on
> relatively cheap hardware. It implements a
> I wish IBM would start to embrace Stack Overflow a little bit more as
> the user experience is far superior to DeveloperWorks both in terms of
> UX and effeciency.
Hi David,
I had considered your earlier post. I went with DeveloperWorks based on
some direct feedback I received from
I am helping on an assembler program that is accessing a sequential file
in move mode, yet the move is not happening. R1 points to valid data
after the GET, but the record area specified was not filled in. This
application is being ported from VSE to z/OS.
Code snippets:
OPEN
I love getting affirmation after all these years, but I'm still a bit queasy.
All I did was change from GRS ring to star. No RNL changes. Is the
'QNAME=SYSZVVDS RNAME=volser' conversion still explained?
Note that, despite years of IBM recommendations, we do not convert RESERVE to
ENQ because
If memory serves, OPEN (HPPCTL,UPDAT) should be coded as OPEN
(HPPCTL,'UPDAT') - with quotes around UPDAT (or INPUT or OUTPUT).
On 08/04/2017 00:28, Sam Siegel wrote:
> OPEN for UPDAT might require the GET LOCATE instead of GET MOVE.
>
> Try OPEN for INPUT and see if work area is populated.
>
OPEN for UPDAT might require the GET LOCATE instead of GET MOVE.
Try OPEN for INPUT and see if work area is populated.
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 4:09 PM, Tony Thigpen wrote:
> I am helping on an assembler program that is accessing a sequential file in
> move mode, yet the move is
I seem to remember a similar type problem from very early days of WLM Managed
Initiators. Thanks for the heads up Mark.
Kees, curious if this is a full on WLM Managed environment or a mix of JES and
WLM managed.
From: Mark Zelden
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent:
On 8/04/2017 1:16 AM, Tony Harminc wrote:
On 7 April 2017 at 09:57, David Crayford wrote:
I wish IBM would start to embrace Stack Overflow a little bit more as the
user experience is far superior to DeveloperWorks both in terms of UX and
effeciency.
I find mailing lists
The reason for the difference in runtimes must be simple: the system that has
the GRS Lock structure in its local CPC has much faster access to it. We see
the same with the CA-DISK IXMAINT function that als does massive catalog
searches.
Kees.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM
Correct, but that is not the cause in this situation.
Kees.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Tom Marchant
> Sent: 06 April, 2017 16:51
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Unexplained delays in WLM
I'm reluctant to embark on a tangent here, but facts are important
John McKown wrote:
>ACA == "Affordable Care Act" aka "Obamacare". The law which basically
>tries to socialize medicine like it is in Canada, the U.K., and Europe.
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act contains many
> The S0C1 is because SYS1.SCEELKED isn’t available for the dynamic calls.
SCEELKED is intended to be used at linkedit/binder/ time, not execution time.
What is statically linked is not the code for the C function, but only a little
stub which finds the way to the code at runtime. In the
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Mark Zelden
> Sent: 06 April, 2017 16:58
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Unexplained delays in WLM managed jobclasses
>
> On Thu, 6 Apr 2017 12:08:25 +,
Yes, there's overhead involved in capturing data changes and replicating
them. That's true on every platform. I think you're fundamentally asking
"How much?" The basic, unsatisfying answer is "It depends. Try it." It
depends on the velocity of data changes and the amount of replicated data,
On Thu, 6 Apr 2017 22:33:23 -0500, Bill Godfrey wrote:
>
>Here's what I got in cygwin. No problems so far.
>...
>$ ls -l SC27843005.zip
>-rwx--+ 1 User1 None 867963245 Mar 15 00:00 SC27843005.zip
>
>$ cksum SC27843005.zip
>300300463 867963245 SC27843005.zip
>...
Oops. All my fault. I
Subsequent COBOL V5.2 testing showed that including CEESG003 at link/bind time
also works for COBOL V5.2 dynamic call. SYS1.SCEELKED is still required in
STEPLIB/JOBLIB/LINKLIST for dynamic calls to work.
Thanks again to John M. for starting this discussion. I love learning useful
new ways
On Fri, 7 Apr 2017 11:56:24 -0500, Tom Marchant
wrote:
Thank you for asking. The service is for an IBM z/OS product called DB2
V10 CM8 still in support atleast for a few more months.
The service is required to get to DB2 NFM and then to migrarte to V11.
Yes I do know
Especially now that his namesake is being used for Tax preparation! I don't
know if to think that is the dumbest use of the Watson, or that are Tax
Preparation gotten so complicated that it requires a super computer to do so?
(I lean towards the later :) )
Al Nims
Systems Admin/Programmer 3
Are all z/OS XL C/C++ RTL modules just stubs line this? Or is it just some.?
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Peter Hunkeler
Sent: Friday, April 7, 2017 12:19 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re:
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 8:38 AM, James Wellingtin
wrote:
> Hey
> Does anybody know of any software for mainframe Z/OS where you can send SMS
> messages to a mobile phone and maybe make a predefined speak to a mobile
> phone.
>
> Or maybe specify a way to do it.
>
>
>
On 7 April 2017 at 09:57, David Crayford wrote:
> I wish IBM would start to embrace Stack Overflow a little bit more as the
> user experience is far superior to DeveloperWorks both in terms of UX and
> effeciency.
I find mailing lists (like this one!) offer by far the best
Does z/OS 2.2 support TLS v1.2 for FTP clients without the use of AT-TLS? This
new server we have is (currently) configured to support only TLS v1.2, and
nothing earlier. We're trying to get approval to "back down" to TLS v1.0, but
I figured I'd ask this anyway.
Frank
And now he's spinning in his grave
Doug Fuerst
d...@bkassociates.net
-- Original Message --
From: "Tom Marchant" <000a2a8c2020-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Sent: 07-Apr-17 12:43:48 PM
Subject: Re: 360 announce day
On Fri, 7 Apr 2017 09:15:49
On Fri, 7 Apr 2017 06:16:30 +, Vernooij, Kees (ITOPT1) - KLM
wrote:
>The reason for the difference in runtimes must be simple: the system that
> has the GRS Lock structure in its local CPC has much faster access to it.
>We see the same with the CA-DISK IXMAINT
My prior example, which did both a static and a dynamic call to CUSERID, was
flawed because the statically linked version of CUSERID caused runtime
initialization to happen which does not occur if there is no statically linked
stub.
However, I found the solution to the problem. In the
Good information to know! Thanks!!
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Farley, Peter x23353
Sent: Friday, April 7, 2017 12:07 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Opinion: Using C
On 7/04/2017 9:50 PM, Erin Farr wrote:
Hi,
Our site is currently in the very early stages of dabbling with
Apache Spark on z and was wondering if there is a Listserver or Forum
specifically for Apache Spark on z.
Thanks, Roger
We now have a forum on DeveloperWorks. Tag questions with
We currently use the following options for client connections to an FTPS server:
SECURE_MECHANISM TLS ;Use TLS, if supported by server
SECURE_DATACONN PRIVATE ;Protect data connection when using TLS
KEYRING FTPS/ftpsring ;Key ring for TLS encryption
NETRCLEVEL
360 announce day
http://www-03.ibm.com/ibm/history/exhibits/mainframe/mainframe_PR360.html
--
virtualization experience starting Jan1968, online at home since Mar1970
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Frank Swarbrick <
frank.swarbr...@outlook.com> wrote:
> Are all z/OS XL C/C++ RTL modules just stubs line this? Or is it just
> some.?
>
I did a fast scan, as well as I could, and it sure seems to be most, if
not all. Since they are vectoring to some table via
>
> Hi,
> Our site is currently in the very early stages of dabbling with
> Apache Spark on z and was wondering if there is a Listserver or Forum
> specifically for Apache Spark on z.
>
> Thanks, Roger
We now have a forum on DeveloperWorks. Tag questions with zos-spark.
The link is here:
Hi Lionel,
Google brings up that Hobart has a current LinkedIn entry and this
interesting link which contains a paper from him on pipelines -
https://www.mail-archive.com/cms-pipelines@vm.marist.edu/msg02783.html.
Marty's also on LinkedIn.
Good luck!
Cheryl
-Original Message-
From: IBM
On Fri, 7 Apr 2017 09:15:49 -0700, Anne & Lynn Wheeler wrote:
>360 announce day
>http://www-03.ibm.com/ibm/history/exhibits/mainframe/mainframe_PR360.html
"IBM Board Chairman Thomas J. Watson Jr. called the event the most important
product announcement in the company's history."
--
Tom
On Fri, 7 Apr 2017 10:55:17 -0500, Avram Friedman wrote:
>(From about PUT1106 to date)
What release are you running? I ask because z/OS 1.13 was GA
in September, 2011 and you seem to be looking for maintenance
that goes back farther than that.
--
Tom Marchant
I am supporting a shop with active IBM an active software service contract but
no Software Excel / IBM link.
In such an environment how does a USA customer order preventive service and
enhanced hold data.
(From about PUT1106 to date)
Thank you
Av Friedman
I have dug up "Plumbers Who Dump CVTs and the Control Blocks that Love Them:
MVS/TSO Pipelines for Systems Programmers", SHARE February 1999, Session 2875,
Hobart Spitz, Paine Webber
For Lionel and will send it to him off-list and now starting the search for the
CD/DVD that has it, but it
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 10:55 AM, Avram Friedman wrote:
> I am supporting a shop with active IBM an active software service contract
> but no Software Excel / IBM link.
> In such an environment how does a USA customer order preventive service
> and enhanced hold
Also, RECEIVE ORDER.
John McKown wrote:
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 10:55 AM, Avram Friedman
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 8:28 AM, Dyck, Lionel B. (TRA)
wrote:
> Some of these are so funny looking at them with today's eyes but back in
> the day they were awesome
>
> http://www.computerworld.com/article/3162104/computer-
> hardware/10-fun-tech-ads-through-the-years.html
>
>
I've made (limited) use of SMS-to-text for years. The problem from my
perspective is that you have to know which carrier the phone is connected to.
That's especially tricky these days because users can move their phones from
carrier to carrier without having to change numbers. It's one thing
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Jesse 1 Robinson
wrote:
> I've made (limited) use of SMS-to-text for years. The problem from my
> perspective is that you have to know which carrier the phone is connected
> to. That's especially tricky these days because users can move
On Thu, 6 Apr 2017 11:35:47 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
>On Thu, 6 Apr 2017 15:56:29 +, Jesse 1 Robinson
>wrote:
>
>>This goes back several years when CF and memory resources were more expensive
>>and less flexible than today. Think standalone CF
Hi Tony,
I completely agree.
Linda
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 7, 2017, at 10:16 AM, Tony Harminc wrote:
>
>> On 7 April 2017 at 09:57, David Crayford wrote:
>> I wish IBM would start to embrace Stack Overflow a little bit more as the
>> user
53 matches
Mail list logo