It depends on the version of COBOL in use. COBOL V4.2 and earlier default to
BLOCK CONTAINS 1 if the phrase is not specified in the FD, which is why most
sensible z/OS shop standards call for always using BLOCK CONTAINS 0. I can't
speak for VM or VSE shop standards, I haven't worked in either
Ok and I've read some manuals and the description for this field is, "backups
can be run" but does not mention about a backup required if this field is set
to 'Y'. I guess my question is on the wording for this parm.
I've always interpreted as required if it was set to Yes but I was asked why
[Default] On 10 Oct 2017 20:18:32 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu (Paul Gilmartin) wrote:
>On Tue, 10 Oct 2017 19:17:25 -0700, ste...@copper.net wrote:
>>
>>Your question had to do with manually doing IEBUPDTE commands. The users
>>where I am
To all,
Here is what is possible using only Open Source tools.
- Eclipse based IDE, like the Java developers
- Adding the IBM Aqua Eclipse plugin, here is a link
https://developer.ibm.com/mainframe/products/downloads/
With the IBM plugin, you can do things like submit
Charles
I would recommend hiding naked PLO behind a macro and give the user something
more friendly to code.
In my own PLO-esque macros, I used R14, R15 and R2 - although the macro caller
could obviously either respecify them via some sort of WORKREGS=(Rx,Ry,Rz)
keyword or save and restore
>What is the recommended practice for what
>registers to specify?
Surely there is no "recommended" practice. You use whatever you feel like
that meets your needs. If something is not allowed, that is what the PoOp
would explain. And possibly would also explain things that might not work
under
AUTOBACKUP=Y says backups will be taken by HSM.
However, what the description does not say, is that HSM Auto-backup needs to be
configured.
This is handled by SETSYS AUTOBACKUPSTART and IIRC, SETSYS CYCLE.
CYCLE says which days to perform actions AUTOBACKUP start gives a window for
starting
There aren't enough employees left to justify its existence!
Either that or it broke and there's nobody left who knows enough about
programming to fix it.
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 2:33 PM, John Eells wrote:
> Dyck, Lionel B. , TRA wrote:
>
>> It would appear that the
I need to convert some RACF commands showed bellow to CA-TOP SECRET
commands. Since I do not know nothing about CA-TS syntaxes, can anyone help
me? Or tell me if there is any document about this?
RDEFINE FACILITY LUMXPROC.SFTP.PUT.** LEVEL(00) OWNER(MDIADMIN) UACC(NONE)
RALTER FACILITY
> On Oct 11, 2017, at 4:03 PM, zMan wrote:
>
> There aren't enough employees left to justify its existence!
>
> Either that or it broke and there's nobody left who knows enough about
> programming to fix it.
I would bet on your 2nd option.
Face it, IBM is sliding down
[Default] On 11 Oct 2017 05:33:46 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
peter.far...@broadridge.com (Farley, Peter x23353) wrote:
>It depends on the version of COBOL in use. COBOL V4.2 and earlier default to
>BLOCK CONTAINS 1 if the phrase is not specified in the FD, which is why most
>sensible z/OS
Carlos,
Please see my answers below.
John P. Baker
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Carlos Bodra - Pessoal
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2017 5:14 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: RACF x CA-TopSecret
I need to
On 11/10/2017 11:21 AM, ste...@copper.net wrote:
So how does one merge fixes into source if the "source" numbering is removed?
The fixes may issue delete of lines, addition of lines and replace of lines and there may
be multiple delta decks to be applied anytime one wants to do changes to the
On Oct 10, 2017, at 6:04 PM, ste...@copper.net wrote:
>
> I am quite interested in git. And so I thought I would address a statement
> made about COBOL Numbering, and "standard" numbering locations in source.
>
> There are some products that ship source and do use COBOL
CA TSS team does have a command conversion tool and they can help you
On 12-Oct-2017 6:47 AM, "Lizette Koehler" wrote:
> So if you were not aware
>
> 1) you can post questions on Communities.CA.COM by joining the Top Secret
> community and ask questions there. You need
Rob
Could you share some nice presentations on FTP performance ?
Thanks a lot!
Jason Cai
From: Rob Schramm
Date: 2017-10-12 10:50
To: IBM-MAIN
Subject: Re: Transfer a large number of sequential file from mainframe to
redhat linux V6.5
I know ftp has done a lot of work in performance. I
On 10/11/2017 6:45 PM, Edward Gould wrote:
I would bet on your 2nd option.
I bet it's more like, "Do we want every @$$4073 on the planet to be able
to importune our folks for free consulting?"
Face it, IBM is sliding down the hill to bankruptcy.
IBM is going to rule the world starting
So if you were not aware
1) you can post questions on Communities.CA.COM by joining the Top Secret
community and ask questions there. You need a valid CA Site number
2) If you are licensed for Top Secret, then you could open a Case to CA-TSS and
request assistance.,
3) You could try doing an
I've reached out to a TSS resource. We'll see if we get anywhere that way.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2017 6:17 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re:
Or you can post here and see if there are TSS guys willing to help. John
beat me to it.
Rob Schramm
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017, 9:40 PM Charles Mills wrote:
> I've reached out to a TSS resource. We'll see if we get anywhere that way.
>
> Charles
>
>
> -Original Message-
>
Hi all
We will transfer a large number of sequential file from mainframe to redhat
linux V6.5.
Normally we use FTP or XCOM to transfer file.
Could you tell us wherther there is the best way to transfer file from
mainframe to redhat linux V6.5 for
saving the transfer's time ? for
Try the Top Secret Cookbook. Should have what you need.
Doug Fuerst
Principal Consultant
BK Associates
718.921.2620 (O)
917.572.7364 (C)
d...@bkassociates.net
-- Original Message --
From: "Rob Schramm"
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Sent: 11-Oct-17 9:57:36 PM
I know ftp has done a lot of work in performance. I don't know about
xcom. There were some nice presentations on FTP performance.
Rob Schramm
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017, 10:43 PM ibmm...@foxmail.com
wrote:
> Hi all
>
> We will transfer a large number of sequential file from
On Wed, 11 Oct 2017 23:02:47 -0400, Tony Thigpen wrote:
>They have really messed up their web sites in the last two years. Using
>Doc online now just about impossible. And, many times, they don't even
>give an easy to find PDF download option. (I have found that going back
>up the manual chain
My CA TSS resources endorse John's reply below.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of John P. Baker
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2017 5:32 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: RACF x CA-TopSecret
Carlos,
On Thu, 12 Oct 2017 03:54:44 +, W Mainframe wrote:
>A suggestion...Could be better or not... You could try... Convert your volume
>to a cckd image using Hercules utilies. Once they are converted, you will be
>take advantage of compression and time to this transfer. I did same thing some
A suggestion...Could be better or not... You could try... Convert your volume
to a cckd image using Hercules utilies. Once they are converted, you will be
take advantage of compression and time to this transfer. I did same thing some
thing, with success. Btw there is one a problem, you need to
> On Oct 10, 2017, at 9:23 AM, Paul Gilmartin
> <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 9 Oct 2017 23:56:47 -0500, Edward Gould wrote:
>>
>> Our auditors would hop all over me and my management if we ever did
>> something like what you are talking about. One time I
Thanks for supporting the indexed PDF collection, Gil. I personally
reference it regularly and agree that it's really useful.
Tony, I suspect you're referring to the ability to download the
containing PDF from any KC topic. Since that functionality doesn't exist
right now, the closest
It would appear that the whois.ibm.com site that was very useful to find
contact info for any IBM employee has been removed. Does anyone know if there
is a new url for that service?
--
Lionel B. Dyck <><
Mainframe Systems
Regarding line numbering: git has the ability to run complementary "clean" and
"smudge" filters to be used when moving source between the repo and the working
directory; these might prove useful. See
https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Customizing-Git-Git-Attributes for more
information.
That
This looks interesting. Do you know of a UNIX utility that would replace the
first 6 characters with spaces?
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Jerry Callen
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2017 11:14 AM
The gawk or awk (either one should work here) script utility could do it:
awk -e '{ print " " substr($0, 7) }' < input.file > output.file
Note single quotes (apostrophes) surrounding the script, double quotes within
for the 6 blanks.
HTH
Peter
-Original Message-
From: IBM
I can't find anything that works anymore I used to use www.ibm.com/whois
Everything I try now redirects to the contacts page. That's too bad, that was
a handy service.
On Wed, 11 Oct 2017 14:42:58 +, Dyck, Lionel B. (TRA)
wrote:
>It would appear that the
Yea, my link is 404 now
Maybe IBM is no longer publishing employees to the public
Though it looks like if the employee has a BLOG that might be useful.
Lizette
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Dyck, Lionel B.
000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu (Paul Gilmartin) writes:
> I have not used IEBUPDTE extensively. When I contributed to
> Charlotte, I made more use of CMS UPDATE, which is similar to
> IEBUPDTE, but with further features useful for source code control.
> XEDIT can generate CMS
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 8:48 AM, Pew, Curtis G wrote:
> On Oct 10, 2017, at 6:04 PM, ste...@copper.net wrote:
> >
> > I am quite interested in git. And so I thought I would address a
> statement made about COBOL Numbering, and "standard"
Dyck, Lionel B. , TRA wrote:
It would appear that the whois.ibm.com site that was very useful to find
contact info for any IBM employee has been removed. Does anyone know if there
is a new url for that service?
I sent a note asking what happened to it. I'll let the list know if I
get a
On Wed, 11 Oct 2017 12:01:19 -0700, Anne & Lynn Wheeler wrote:
>
>One of the VM/370 issues was even though (originally CP/67) maintenance
>distribution was all done using the CMS multi-level source ... every new
>release ... they would permanently apply all maintenance & development
>updates and
39 matches
Mail list logo