Mark J wrote:
>instruction fetch GTF trace, action=trace,
I think Mark meant an instruction fetch SLIP trap with action=trace to get
a GTF trace. Or ACTION=STRACE - you won't want to look at the data from
the action itself, but this will let a DISPLAY SLIP,ID=xxx show you what
you want, if
Sounds a little better. I, person, will wait for more info. And maybe a few
posts here from people who have used it. I imagine my retirement will be
filled with mind destroying video game playing.
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021, 04:40 Laurence Chiu wrote:
> I just received information from IBM directly
> Not having seen the zOSMF method,
Since you have not actually seen it yet, please allow me to clarify a few
points.
> ... I know serverpac full
> system replacement needs a usercat (that would become the master cat
> if you wanted to replace that and IPL the new system) for allocating
> and
Thanks to all for helping. I wasn't able to do what I wanted directly with
SYSIN, so I ended up using SORT to copy from SYSIN to a file with the same
attributes as the other file in the concatenation (VB204).
//CVSMB13E PROC
//MAILBODY EXEC PGM=SORT
//SYSOUT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSINDD *
I put in my request on Oct. 21st and still have not heard back from IBM
except for the autoresponse email saying that someone from sales will
contact me.
Regards,
Mark Regan, K8MTR
*CTO1 USNR-Retired, 1969-1991*
*Nationwide Insurance, Retired, 1986-2017*
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 5:40 AM
It is what I understood from announcement, once tape drives will not connect
directly to z/OS channel but to VTS for destage.
VTS emulates 3490/3590 and can destage to any kind of tape, it is just a bunch
of bits to be recorded in tape.
Carlos Bodra
IBM zEnterprise Certified
São Paulo – SP –
Hi Maria.
Yes, I do believe that I can create the next z/os software instance very
quickly now that we have a v2.5 instance. We use what the Serverpac dialog
called ‘system upgrade’ , retain the existing master catalog and use indirect
cataloging.
In fact I was so confident that I could do
HI Barbara,
==> I did a 'save as' in the browser and saved the html pages to my laptop. I
expected the content to be on my laptop, but it wasn't. When I opened the html
pages using notepad, there was some small crap in it that was way too small to
be the information I had seen online. I
Hi Marna,
I think you have captured everything.
Like I have stated. I don’t like things done , that I cant see whats being
done in the background, because if there is ever an issue, I would have no idea
where it failed. Or I can change JCL to fix. Because Some IBM messages are
vague..
Hi Keith,
Thanks for sharing!
I did notice your comment: "I re-ordered the Serverpac because the first order
had two target zones (I had assumed that this was because I had accidentally
ordered 2 releases of the same product - node.js IIRC - but it turned out to be
because I received
FWIW I’ve been looking at the offerings to glean the possible uses for open
source development. This is my take on investigation and some discussion with
IBM through their chat mechanism.
IMHO, IBM can eliminate confusion by defining some terms and expectations like
what does development
I doubt that anybody is disparaging curved quotes. What I have seen is people
disparaging software that covertly and inappropriately changes one character to
another. I refer to such a program as a Molly Malone
She died of a favor
From which none could save her,
And that was the end
http://mainframeupdate.blogspot.com/2021/10/mainframes-and-open-source-update.html
Mark Regan
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO
ZDNT at $120/year is be attractive for developing open source z/OS software
attractive if the license allows it. ZD Personal at $5K/year is too expensive
for that purpos, although a hypothetical ZD FOSS version costing more than
ZDNT but still only a few hundred dollars would be attractive.
Well, you're right of course. I saw the original question, thought "I think 1a
is a SUB" and was going to look it up to be sure. Then someone else responded
that it was a SUB and I just went with that. My bad.
So the sequence may have been something like
Input perhaps in UTF-8 translated to
FYI
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port On Behalf Of Bill Bitner
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2021 11:44 AM
To: linux-...@vm.marist.edu
Subject: Redbooks
I do my best to stay out of the rumor business. Chris Konarski just tweeted
that is is a misunderstanding.
For about $5K per year I find Dallas to be a more attractive proposition. Real
z hardware and a modest amount of support. Only restriction AFAIR is "no
production data processing."
YMMV indeed. zD I guess would give you unlimited CPU time and all the DASD
you wanted to buy (you rent additional
The devil is in the details. If the TOS allow you to build your own system,
then you should be able to do everything at Dallas that you can do on a ZD
Whether that is an attractive option depends on the rates.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
Kurt,
We were able to merge datasets when we used CustomPac Installation Dialog to
install ServerPac like the below merged dataset display.
Can we still do that through z/OSMF software Management? Thanks.
Merge Component Data Sets for:
ISP.SISPPENU
Do I have to go through the entire workflow for each clone, or can I quickly
create multiple clones?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Kurt J.
> Does the z/OSMF workflow support the following methodology:
To clarify terminology I'll rephrase your question to what I think you
meant to ask:
Does z/OSMF Software Management, and the z/OSMF workflows supplied with
the IBM ServerPac portable software instance, support the following
> We were able to merge datasets when we used CustomPac Installation
> Dialog to install ServerPac like the below merged dataset display.
> Can we still do that through z/OSMF software Management? Thanks.
No, not at the moment, but we are actively developing a merge data set
capability for the
On 10/29/21 2:27 PM, Doug wrote:
You mean besides the act that we lived through that time, I fixed them,
and everyone I knew that had any knowledge of them at all called the
2321 a "noodle picker?'
Is there any chance that an interview / statement from one or more
people with first hand
I used my personal email account and yet it looked like the IBM rep who
emailed me back is associated with the large corporate bank that I'm
currently working for even though I didn't use a work email account nor
identify myself as such. And I'm not working on the mainframe side with
this bank.
Does the z/OSMF workflow support the following methodology:
1. There are multiple clones for each release, each with its own SMP and zFS
datasets
2. The naming convention for dlib and target volumes encapsulate a release and
a clone within the release
3. The naming convention for SMP and zFS
One of the wiki editors has removed mention of the term "noodle picker" from
[[IBM 2321 Data Cell]] with the explanation "Really remove unreferenced OR".
Does anybody have a reliaible source for this usage that I can cite?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
> Do I have to go through the entire workflow for each clone, or can I
> quickly create multiple clones?
You have to go through an entire deployment operation to clone a software
instance. If you're deploying the same source software again you can Copy
an already completed Deployment which is
You mean besides the act that we lived through that time, I fixed them,
and everyone I knew that had any knowledge of them at all called the
2321 a "noodle picker?'
Sorry, no.
Doug Fuerst
d...@bkassociates.net
-- Original Message --
From: "Seymour J Metz"
To:
The SMF type 90 subtype 31 record is where the system places all the data
related to the command.
You could provide an exit routine associated with the CSVDYLPA exit and
examine the data passed to the exit routine.
You could use the programming interface instead of the command and examine
the
Marna WALLE (mwalle)
@mwalle
·3h
Yeah! The latest PTFs for the z/OS V2.5 Upgrade Workflow refresh
closed today (for APAR OA61406). Also, IBM Documentation was updated
with that latest refresh export. Check out the Summary of Changes for
what was updated.
I Googled 2321 noodle picker and got a bunch of hits.
I just started to paste them here but they are Google links as long as your
arm. Just Google <2321 noodle picker>. Also .
Here it is in a "printed newspaper":
https://forums.theregister.com/post/637087
I found a SHARE presentation and some
IBM OS Optimising Compiler is a product of the 1970s.
VisualAge PL/I is a product of the 1990s or post 2000.
On 2021-10-30 09:41, Charles Mills wrote:
Is VisualAgeR PL/I V2 the same product as 5668-910 IBM OS PL/I
Optimizing
Compiler V2?
Charles
Wiki has some strange rules, and they prefer secondary sources. To me that
sound like a way for errors to creep in, but those are the rules. Anything
printed in a trade journal should work. Could there be something in annals of
computing?
In general, I've found wiki to be a hostile working
Is VisualAgeR PL/I V2 the same product as 5668-910 IBM OS PL/I Optimizing
Compiler V2?
Charles
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO
Not the answer I wanted.
Seriously, thanks.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Robin Vowels
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2021 4:29 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: VisualAge PL/I question
IBM OS
So @Robin, 5668-235 IBM PL/I for MVS was *after* Optimizing V2 and *before*
VisualAge PL/I?
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Robin Vowels
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2021 4:29 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Or RALTER AUDIT(ALL(READ)) for FACILITY CSVDYLPA.** ?
And then use RACFRW, RACFICE, or some such to report it out.
- kb
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Saturday, October 30th, 2021 at 2:45 AM, Peter Relson
wrote:
> The SMF type 90 subtype 31 record is where the system places all the data
That went to my IBM bookmark folder. Thanks!
On 10/28/2021 5:18 AM, Shelia Chalk wrote:
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zdt/12.0.1?topic=release-zos-23-may-2018-edition
try this web site. I found most of the fmid's just the other day.
Thanks
Shelia Chalk at a bank in MISSISSIPPI
Reading this thread it almost seems to me like "zDNT" learner's edition is an
acronym for zDoNotTry. I hope I'm wrong because I want to retire some day and
when I do, it would be fun to have a cheap z/OS learning system/playground to
learn about all the stuff my daytime job doesn't offer me
On 10/29/21 6:38 PM, Pommier, Rex wrote:
Reading this thread it almost seems to me like "zDNT" learner's
edition is an acronym for zDoNotTry. I hope I'm wrong because I
want to retire some day and when I do, it would be fun to have a
cheap z/OS learning system/playground to learn about all
Yeah, I was trying to make a bit of a funny. Guess it didn't work.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Grant Taylor
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2021 8:05 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: IBM ZDNT Learner's Edition - beware
On
It's a shame that those of you in the US are not apparently getting
responses from IBM since based on what I have seen posted in this group
most people would like to have a copy and would need the criteria.
I get a response and since I am not in the US I have to wait until the end
of the year;
Not an FTP answer, but the two seconds difference is an age! I've seen a
problem with long times where it took a long time to establish a session,
because it had a DNS set up problem, and the requests were timing out, and
trying another DNS server which worked.
If you are using abc.xyz.org
I just received information from IBM directly on the product. Currently
it's on a dark launch in the US only but once that has been sorted out it
will be made available to the rest of the world by the end of the year.
T's include (I was only provided an image of the T's and I can't post
this here
44 matches
Mail list logo
