Re: Makes me love most of my z/OS software vendors.

2012-11-29 Thread Edward Jaffe
On 11/26/2012 8:01 AM, Mark Zelden wrote: Lucky you! It takes me at least 2 hands to count the times an ISV product has crashed a system I've worked on. And these were supported versions. Things like PSA overlays, UCB overlays etc. Of course over the years IBM has added lots of code and

Compression Services again.

2012-11-29 Thread Massimo Biancucci
Hi everybody, I'm interested in deeper informations about compression services provided by SMS. In particular I'd like to know where find documentation on how does it work. From my observations, compression saves disk space but it's not a good idea from a CPU (and it's obvious) and elapsed

Re: OMVS su -

2012-11-29 Thread Hunkeler Peter (KIUP 4)
/etc/profile would probably be the correct place to setup the different PATH and other settings. However, to execute that (or any other initialization script) I think requires su - as we were initially discussing. I agree. But the OP's problem is that is it more or less unpredictable which MVS

Re: Extending VTOC

2012-11-29 Thread af dc
Hello Guys, I got a silmilar problem, two many dsns got VTOC full, is this REFORMAT safe to run when DASD is alocated by stcs ??? Or is it advisable to put dasd DISNEW, move all dsns (if not locked by the stcs) and then do the REFORMAT ?? Thx, Antonio CEcilio On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 1:25 PM,

Re: Usefullness (or not) of STOC/LOC instructions?

2012-11-29 Thread Lloyd Fuller
- Original Message From: McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.com To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Sent: Wed, November 28, 2012 4:06:00 PM Subject: Re: Usefullness (or not) of STOC/LOC instructions? -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List

Re: Compression Services again.

2012-11-29 Thread Knutson, Sam
The right data (compressible) with the right R/W mix can be very beneficial. We compress SMF data on disk and SVC dumps using SMS. Both compress well and the performance in many use cases has been improved as well as considerable disk space savings. Innovation IAM compression is great and very

Re: Usefullness (or not) of STOC/LOC instructions?

2012-11-29 Thread Peter Relson
It's too complicated to explain here, and you wouldn't understand anyway And I'd add and since it is not part of the programming interface we would not explain it within the documentation anyway because if we did we might well have to maintain that behavior in the future for compatibility.

Re: New way to do UCB lookups

2012-11-29 Thread John Gilmore
This is the second time in recent days trhat Shmuel has commented adversely on one of my posts. In both cases he is the one who is talking nonsense, in this case flagrant nonsense; but he of course has every right to do so. John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA

Re: Compression Services again.

2012-11-29 Thread David Andrews
On Thu, 2012-11-29 at 03:57 -0500, Massimo Biancucci wrote: From my observations, compression saves disk space but it's not a good idea from a CPU (and it's obvious) and elapsed time (less obvious) point of view. Elapsed time? Better see for yourself if you haven't already. I saw elapsed

Re: Usefullness (or not) of STOC/LOC instructions?

2012-11-29 Thread Tom Marchant
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 08:07:13 -0500, John P. Baker wrote: According to the z/Architecture Principles of Operation, SA22-7832-09, page 5-9, all 64 bits of the index register are used. Correct. And on the next page, quote In forming the intermediate sum, the base address and index are treated as

Re: Usefullness (or not) of STOC/LOC instructions?

2012-11-29 Thread Alan Altmark
On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 16:21:05 -0800, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org wrote: LOL. Ain't it the truth! Possibly even too much bother to explain to the tech writers or I don't have a precise enough logical grasp of it to translate its operation into English sentences. The Architects write the POO.

Re: Usefullness (or not) of STOC/LOC instructions?

2012-11-29 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 04:29:25 -0800, Lloyd Fuller wrote: The latter can also run into issues in AMODE 64. The index register is always 32 bits, not 24, 31, or 64 depending upon AMODE. Waste the extra nano-second, use the comma. It is meaningful. I hadn't known that; I'm behind in my reading;

Re: PRISM or CORTEX VSE to MVS conversion aid (?) MVSMS CZX2PTRT

2012-11-29 Thread Charles Mills
FWIW: The blowup is a S0C4-10. A cursory examination of the dump reveals that the vendor is SISRO, which was acquired by ASG in 2000. I am suggesting to the customer that he pursue that angle. Thanks, all. Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List

Re: Usefullness (or not) of STOC/LOC instructions?

2012-11-29 Thread Charles Mills
Alan, a thousand pardons. I was thinking of vendor manuals in general. IBM manuals are frankly IMHO among the best in the industry, and I have always thought the POO/PoOp/whatever was among the best of the IBM manuals. Related digression: why is that *hardware* manuals (any vendor) always seem

Re: Usefullness (or not) of STOC/LOC instructions?

2012-11-29 Thread Tony Harminc
On 29 November 2012 07:29, Lloyd Fuller leful...@sbcglobal.net wrote: The latter can also run into issues in AMODE 64. The index register is always 32 bits, not 24, 31, or 64 depending upon AMODE. Waste the extra nano-second, use the comma. It is meaningful. I think you're muddling the

Re: New way to do UCB lookups

2012-11-29 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In cae1xxdf-ycp4hb98wrnk1twf1heqgbh_mx76arfstwovtrk...@mail.gmail.com, on 11/29/2012 at 08:26 AM, John Gilmore jwgli...@gmail.com said: This is the second time in recent days trhat Shmuel has commented adversely on one of my posts. Don't make stupid errors and I won't comment on your stupid

Re: Usefullness (or not) of STOC/LOC instructions?

2012-11-29 Thread Don Poitras
In article 6123004369926276.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu you wrote: On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 04:29:25 -0800, Lloyd Fuller wrote: The latter can also run into issues in AMODE 64. The index register is always 32 bits, not 24, 31, or 64 depending upon AMODE. Waste the extra

Re: Usefullness (or not) of STOC/LOC instructions?

2012-11-29 Thread Lloyd Fuller
I was muddling. It is always 64 bit in zArch. My point still remains: save yourself and follow-on programmers time and effort - put in the comma. Lloyd - Original Message From: Tony Harminc t...@harminc.net To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Sent: Thu, November 29, 2012 12:53:00 PM

Re: Usefullness (or not) of STOC/LOC instructions?

2012-11-29 Thread Alan Altmark
On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 15:39:56 -0500, John Gilmore jwgli...@gmail.com wrote: I must, however, add that unpredictable is sometimes in some IBM publications used as a polite euphemism for It's too complicated to explain here, and you wouldn't understand anyway. In my 30 years of creating,

Re: Extending VTOC

2012-11-29 Thread Mike Schwab
You can continue to use the volume while online. New extents or new dataset allocations enqued until completed. Defrag could get some DSCBs back. We use 74 track VTOCIX and 600 track VTOC on a Mod 9, it will fill up if used for all 1 track datasets. On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 5:52 AM, af dc

Re: Usefullness (or not) of STOC/LOC instructions?

2012-11-29 Thread Alan Altmark
On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 14:35:22 -0500, Tony Harminc t...@harminc.net wrote: It would be unforgivable if the architects baked in I'm sure this was going to say something interesting... Of course! Everything I say is interesting! (To me, anyway!) :-) I was going to say that it would be

Re: SYNCSVCD (Was: What happens when an LPAR gets interupted.)

2012-11-29 Thread Ron MacRae
I'm playing with a similar type fix, but a permenant one, not a zap. We come into the AS via XMS and then decide where to schedule the work. If we detect a dump is in progress we schedule the work to a TCB instead of an SRB. It seems to work. If we dump our AS then all the work stops until the

Re: Usefullness (or not) of STOC/LOC instructions?

2012-11-29 Thread Tom Marchant
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 11:09:39 -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote: (The worst case was the 6502, which ignored carries out of the low half of the address, at least sometimes.) No, it didn't. You are talking about the conditional branch instructions. The branch offset is an 8-bit signed integer. When

Re: New way to do UCB lookups

2012-11-29 Thread John Gilmore
Shmuel has urged me, rudely, to RYFM. Doing so, I find begin extract The LOAD macro is used to bring the load module containing the specified entry name into virtual storage, if a usable copy is not available in virtual storage. Control is not passed to the load module; instead, the load

Re: New way to do UCB lookups

2012-11-29 Thread Bill Fairchild
John, You didn't read widely enough. What you read is correct, necessary, but not sufficient. In the Authorized Assembler Services Reference book, in the section on the LOAD services, for the keyword GLOBAL=YES, is this text: Note: A load request with the GLOBAL=YES, (YES,P), or (YES,F)

Re: New way to do UCB lookups

2012-11-29 Thread Bill Fairchild
Slight correction. A non-GLOBAL load will not let other address spaces find your load module implicitly, but it will let other tasks in your address space find it through the LOAD service. Bill Fairchild Programmer Rocket Software 408 Chamberlain Park Lane * Franklin, TN 37069-2526 * USA t:

Re: Usefullness (or not) of STOC/LOC instructions?

2012-11-29 Thread Gerhard Postpischil
On 11/29/2012 2:52 PM, Alan Altmark wrote: They are very experienced at knowing when to use a fine-point pen vs. a broad brush. I don't want to start an argument, but I have pet peeves with some of the design. For example, the TRAP instructions cause an exception unless trapping is properly

Re: Usefullness (or not) of STOC/LOC instructions?

2012-11-29 Thread Edward Jaffe
On 11/28/2012 12:39 PM, John Gilmore wrote: I must, however, add that unpredictable is sometimes in some IBM publications used as a polite euphemism for It's too complicated to explain here, and you wouldn't understand anyway. Sometimes they do that because they get pressured to retrofit a

Re: New way to do UCB lookups

2012-11-29 Thread John Gilmore
My last post has elicited several off-list clarifications and caveats, which were certainly valuable. They were also, in a sense, irrelevant. I had used the behavior of LOAD and DELETE to make the point that z/OS and its predecessors must and do virtualize some operations. Shmuel's comments,

Re: Usefullness (or not) of STOC/LOC instructions?

2012-11-29 Thread Edward Jaffe
On 11/29/2012 4:29 AM, Lloyd Fuller wrote: The latter can also run into issues in AMODE 64. The index register is always 32 bits, not 24, 31, or 64 depending upon AMODE. Waste the extra nano-second, use the comma. It is meaningful. In forming the intermediate sum, the base address and

reomving COMPACTION from SMS DATALCLASS

2012-11-29 Thread Munif Sadek
I am thinking of removing COMPACTION for all our SMS DATACLASS specification.. Is there any Gotcha? It has been in use for historical purposes but does not give us anything except occasional job failures when STOP X37 can not manage Extended format Compacted datasets.. Do I need to DSCOPY