-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
För Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
Skickat: den 20 februari 2013 01:20
Till: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Ämne: Re: SV: SV: Article for the boss: COBOL will outlive us all
In
This manual micro-managment is exactly what we do, by REXX, though. The
problem is that batch gets unlimited resources as long as the lpar is not
capped and chases your lpar into capping. So we try to avoid capping
during online periods (07:00 - 19:00) by assigning batch jobs dynamically
(by
I just finished an XCF Transport Class evaluation. Our largest class was 40K
and we found we were having a fair amount of message degradation because we
have messages bigger than 40k and the resizing was slowing things down. At the
recommendation of the Parallel Sysplex Best Practices guide,
Hi List,
I am struggling with the SYSEVENT QVS macro.
Coding:
MVC QVSLEN,=AL4(QVS_LEN)
LAR1,QVS
SYSEVENT QVS
Bottom of the program
IRAQVS QVS=YES, +
DSECT=NO
And included the CVT macro
CVT
Did you check your listing for the CVT macro?
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:47:41 +0100 jan de decker jan.je...@gmail.com wrote:
:Hi List,
:
:
:I am struggling with the SYSEVENT QVS macro.
:
:
:Coding:
:
:MVC QVSLEN,=AL4(QVS_LEN)
:LAR1,QVS
: SYSEVENT QVS
:
:Bottom of the
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1Sect2=HITOFFd=PALLp=1u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htmr=1f=Gl=50s1=8,380,676.PN.OS=PN/8,380,676RS=PN/8,380,676
quote
Automatic deletion of temporary files
*Abstract*
Methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer program products
feature
What an innovation - creating a file with an expiration date. ::smh::
I can't even pretend to be surprised...
Steven F. Conway, CISSP
LA Systems
z/OS Systems Support
Phone: 703.295.1926
steve_con...@ao.uscourts.gov
From: John McKown john.archie.mck...@gmail.com
To:
I am going to pat. a gas tank ...
From: John McKown john.archie.mck...@gmail.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 02/20/2013 07:26 AM
Subject:USPTO does another goodie.
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Thank you for the info Kirk! :-)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Kirk Hubbard
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 7:26 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: XCF transport classes
I just finished an XCF Transport
Did you look at your LISTING?
Might your source have an END statement before it?
What do you see in the XREF for the CVT fields?
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:34:41 +0100 jan de decker j...@jedsp.net wrote:
:Hi Binyamin,
:
:
:Yes, at the bottom of the program I have
:
:
: CVT
I am by no means an assembler expert, but are you sure you should use the word
CVT? It is pointing to the DSECT, right?
I think that if the problem was with the expansion of the macro, the ASMA044E
would happen in the previous line (as CVTPTR is part of the macro):
374 58F0 0010
Sorry, forgot to put this in the other e-mail. If you want the CVT address all
you need is:
L Rxx,16(0,0)
Since the CVT is always at this same position.
Regards,
Leonardo Vaz
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of
Thank you. It worked... It sure helps to know what you are looking for because
now I found it in the users guide now. Thanks a lot!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 07:52:40 -0600, Ron Wells wrote:
I am going to pat. a gas tank ...
Method and apparatus for storing and transporting highly flammable liquids and
delivering said liquids to an external apparatus with a mechanism to allow for
the
introduction of additional liquids to the
Shmuel is right, and this thread is symptomatic.
Before dual-case devices became available the use of single-case ones
was clearly defensible because inescapable.
The defense of the continued use of single-case ones once dual-case
replcements had become available, notionally on economic grounds,
von Neumann, as many of you presumably know, created working models of
self-reproducing entities, which do so at random, asexually, in an
agitated pea soup of spare parts.
Sequences like egg-chicken-egg (or, pace Gerhard, chicken-egg-chicken)
have also been modeled, as have explicitly sexual
Hello.
I have 2 files of 80 bytes length and need to compare using joinkeys to get the
matched and unmatched records in each of 2 files. The issue is data that need
to be joined is a binary data. The picture clause is s9(09) comp which is the
customer number and this is the 1'st field in the
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 18:31:40 -0600, Jim Mooney jmoo...@princesscruises.com
wrote:
Can anyone explain why? Does ispf suppress informational msgs, while the
FileAid application does not?
(I know... next step call the vendor) but thx for any input,
Jim,
It is not that ISPF suppresses the
On 2/20/2013 7:47 AM, jan de decker wrote:
378 0 320+ L 15,CVTSRM-CVT(,15)
ASMA044E Undefined symbol - CVT
The base of the CVT is named CVTMAP, not CVT. IBM tends to be extremely
inconsistent about naming.
Gerhard Postpischil
Bradford, Vermont
From a quick look at the CVT macro, if you specify DSECT=YES, then you
should have a
CVT DSECT
generated for you.
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Gerhard Postpischil gerh...@valley.netwrote:
On 2/20/2013 7:47 AM, jan de decker wrote:
378 0 320+ L
I think what Gerhard meant is that Jan should have L
15,CVTSRM-CVTMAP(,15) instead of L 15,CVTSRM-CVT(,15)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of John McKown
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 12:06 PM
To:
On 2/20/2013 11:21 AM, Leonardo Vaz wrote:
I think what Gerhard meant is that Jan should have L 15,CVTSRM-CVTMAP(,15) instead
of L 15,CVTSRM-CVT(,15)
This is being generated by the SYSEVENT macro, and is therefore
under IBM's control.
--
Richard
Hello,
I think there's not difference if the keys are binary or not, anyway could you
please give us more hints about the join ?
Are the keys unique in both files or not ?
Could you provide a print screen of both files ?
Regards.
Massimo
Da: Ron Thomas
Thanks everybody for helping me out
In the end it came down to this:
For my application I need a kind of CVT and CVTX called LACVT and LACVTX.
In one of the macro's I coded a labeled USING with CVT as the label for
my own LACVT.
This was a hard one.
Again, thanks to you all.
Best
Prior work: OS/360 1964 (and successors) Expiration Date field.
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Steve Conway
steve_con...@ao.uscourts.gov wrote:
What an innovation - creating a file with an expiration date. ::smh::
I can't even pretend to be surprised...
Steven F. Conway, CISSP
--
Mike
On 02/20/2013 08:58 AM, John Gilmore wrote:
Shmuel is right, and this thread is symptomatic.
Before dual-case devices became available the use of single-case ones
was clearly defensible because inescapable.
The defense of the continued use of single-case ones once dual-case
replcements had
Ron,
The JOINKEYS feature indeed treats the keys to compare as binary. If both
files have keys in binary format, you can compare them straight away
without any normalization. However if you have 1 key in binary and the
other key in ZD/PD/UFF/SFF format then you need to normalize them. You can
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 07:26:41 -0600, John McKown john.archie.mck...@gmail.com
wrote:
So, just put an expiration time as part of a file name and you can patent
it? These people have their head where the sun don't shine. OK, maybe
nobody else has done this _exact_ thing. But, really? Of course, in
With permission of the author, David Boyes of Sine Nomine, I'm copying
this, largely unedited. CHANGE ALL 'z/VM' 'z/OS' and it's mostly relevant.
Some feedback:
Good news, your z/VM systems support secure FTP (RFC 4217).
The FTPS functions don't work without some kind of certificate
jwgli...@gmail.com (John Gilmore) writes:
They opposed providing every programmer with his or her own terminal:
terminals were not needed all the time; they could be shared, as
keypunches had been. They opposed the use of color terminals,
describing them as costly frills. They opposed the
Does this list really need more traffic cops telling others what to post?
John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the
Does this list really need to devolve into yet another extremely off-topic
topic?
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Gerhard Postpischil gerh...@valley.netwrote:
On 2/19/2013 7:54 AM, Peter Relson wrote:
Since the chicken and egg situation was (correctly) mentioned,
A chicken and egg
And there are situations in which such a network-oriented scheme is an
excellent idea. I do have a quibble. I suspect that an
implementation
by figuring out the most recent modification date/time among all the
chunks of the file, across all the relevant servers, and comparing
that with the
Steve,
I think that I will instead treat IBM-MAIN as a species of disclosure
journal. That way anyone who wants to circumvent a patent on the
original notion will be able to use my public-domain one to do so.
My idea is not of course a really new one. In the old days---I have
no notion how
On Wednesday 20 February 2013 02:15:51 Thomas Berg wrote:
It's not the features that are bad in those instances, but rather the
syntax for requesting the features; that syntax is about as far from
the purported English-like character of COBOL as you can get.
I can't immediately see that
Is there anyone out there who uses IMP-PKA keys and does not use the Trusted
Key Entry (TKE) workstation, and would be willing to answer a few questions?
Thanks,
Frank
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
I am not sure where is the best place to post. But I thought I would start
here.
I have a need for the Solaris 7 (yes about 1990 something) software for a
box I have. I have a license for the Solaris but not the software.
If someone has a copy I can copy or acquire, that would be great.
For what its worth, some of those you've mentioned are either IBM extensions,
Micro Focus extensions, or both. Specifically, all of the COMP[UTATIONAL]-#
usages. COMPUTATIONAL-X is Micro Focus. FUNCTION-POINTER and
PROCEDURE-POINTER are IBM, which MF followed. PROGRAM-POINTER is COBOL 2000.
Some things improved when the future of COBOL was wrested from
Codasyl, and some did not. We still have the proliferation of
distinctions among entities that ought not to be distinguished,
distinctions without substantive differences.
The three entities
pointer
procedure-pointer
program-pointer
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 21:19:16 -0500, John Gilmore wrote:
pointer
procedure-pointer
program-pointer
are the poster children for this dubious practice. I know what the
differences among tgherm are, but if pointer had not been misconceived
in the beginning they would have been unnecessary. (There
I am having many problems with the IBM debug tool but what is driving me nuts
right now. This is a little difficult for me to explain so hopefully someone
will remember the old TSO TEST commands. What I want to do is (using old TSO
Test terminology)
qualify a
at label goto label2
qualify b
at
Hi
If you re searching for something similar to TEST , with the HLASM
Toolkit IDF you are better. as with the Debug Tool
On 21.02.2013 05:00, Donald Likens wrote:
I am having many problems with the IBM debug tool but what is driving me nuts
right now. This is a little difficult for me
42 matches
Mail list logo
