From QuickRef(TM):
00D35E00
Explanation
DB2 has detected an error while
Add a DD statement for SMPTLIB with storage info (volser, unit, storclas,)
Or
Update the CSI to add the same information to the SMPTLIB dddef
HTH,
snip
Subject: smpe receive issue IKJ56228I
We had this this issue before but I don't recall how it was fixed.
We have a products receive files
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 12:38:28 +, Tim Brown wrote:
BROWSEDB.CFED.HABIA10.SMPMCS Line Col 001 080
Command === Scroll === PAGE
* Top of Data
**
Hi Dave,
Regarding the renaming of CA Mainframe Software Manager to CA Chorus Software
Manager, this occurred in the latest GA version r5.1, released in February
2013. There were a lot of other cool features added as well.
New look and feel
Task Policy management which allows you to manage
John Dawes wrote:
Of late we have been having allocation problems where the job is unable to
allocate the first extent and fails on jcl error etc.
Please post the JCL statements and exact JCL error messages so others can help
you.
Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht
Elardus,
Here is the error message :
IEF344I ISCMURP3 PROC001 SORTOUT - ALLOCATION FAILED DUE TO DATA FACILITY SYST
IGD17273I ALLOCATION HAS FAILED FOR ALL VOLUMES SELECTED FOR DATA SET
HESD.KDM.SOR085.SOR1.HESPJZ.X IGD17277I THERE ARE (287) CANDIDATE VOLUMES OF
WHICH (260) ARE ENABLED OR
We're scheduling our second round of NON-concurrent TS7740 maintenance, and so
far we've had no other kind.
If there are others on the list who have IBM TS7740: are you always asked to
take your box offline for maintenance or is it just these two latest software
changes?
I didn't see an obvious way to format the linkage stack for an SRB. Neither
SUMM FORMAT nor 2.2 did the job.
Eventually I browsed the storage using CR15.
What did I mess?
--
Binyamin Dissen bdis...@dissensoftware.com
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar Grill - Israel
Allan
Thanks for the help. I have changed the Threshold to 60. Would Space
Management (Primary Secondary) be affected because of the new threshold?
From: Staller, Allan allan.stal...@kbmg.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Tuesday, 12 March 2013 1:23
Allan,
While I agree that the High Threshold should be 80 (or in that vicinity), SMS
does not PREVENT allocations above the High Threshold, it merely tries to
direct them to a volume below that threshold.
The last line of the error msg. is the problem. 51 volumes lack the free space
to allow
Asked some time ago..do not have copy of reply. and not finding in Arch..
ASG/Mobius
We have Non-AFP and AFP reports also have PDF's and JPG's stored on the
Mainframe/Mobius...Need a means to convert from Mobius/Mainframe to a PCL
supported printer..
Goal eliminated need for AFP/IPDS
What if *all* of the volumes are at/near the high threshold (20%)?
Very often there are candidate volumes defined to SMS, but that do not
physically exist (which could be the 51 volumes lacking space for the
allocation).
snip
While I agree that the High Threshold should be 80 (or in that
VPS from Levi/Ray/Shoup (LRS). Performs AFP to PCL translation (among other
things).
HTH,
snip
Asked some time ago..do not have copy of reply. and not finding in Arch..
ASG/Mobius
We have Non-AFP and AFP reports also have PDF's and JPG's stored on the
Mainframe/Mobius...Need a means to
Not sure if these fit your needs but products like VPS (LRS), Infoprint Server
(IBM), and I think MacKinney has something.
These products have components (probably optional, priced) that can transform
various input to various output formats.
I do not have any of these products but AFAIK they
McKinney
Dave Gibney
Information Technology Services
Washington State University
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
On Behalf Of Staller, Allan
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 10:56 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re:
looking to see if anyone used Mobius for this function...not looking to
buy another vendor ..
not finding it at there site..maybe called something else..
From: Staller, Allan allan.stal...@kbmg.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 03/12/2013 12:55 PM
Subject:Re: ASG/Mobius
No, volumes which are above the threshold but have available space are put into
a secondary allocation list. Those volumes under the high threshold are in a
primary allocation list. SMS then searches for a volume which will satisfy the
allocation. At least that's the way it was explained to me
Ron,
Mobius does not support that ability. If the data is in AFP format in
Mobius (mainframe), then the output from Mobius via normal distribution on
the mainframe will be in AFP output. Now the web viewer will use the
built in AFP viewer to display the data and then print from there. There
interestingwill keep that in mind...
what about the Mobius Windows...server...??
From: craig.p...@fotlinc.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 03/12/2013 01:28 PM
Subject:Re: ASG/Mobius
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Ron,
Mobius
The Mobius Server can store its files in different format with that
add-on from ASG. The default is store it in their DAT format.
Thanks,
Craig
From: Ron Wells ron.we...@slfs.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU,
Date: 03/12/2013 13:30
Subject:Re: ASG/Mobius
got ya tks..
From: craig.p...@fotlinc.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 03/12/2013 01:36 PM
Subject:Re: ASG/Mobius
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
The Mobius Server can store its files in different format with that
add-on
True question. What interest has Oracle and many other vendors in a pricing
model that involve the number of procs used instead on cpu size?
The regular pricing model used for mainframes for years is based on
measures of the proc size in Mips/MSUs. The vendors are losing licenses
(revenue)
Don't get me wrong. I like CA-MSM. But, I just updated it to 5.0 in November.
And due to the uncertainty of continuing a mainframe presence here, when I drop
in 5.1, I will have literally updated MSM 4 times since I last updated a real
CA product :(
Dave Gibney
Information Technology Services
We recently upgraded to 1.13. Today, I ran afoul of:
From:
z/OS UNIX System Services
Command Reference
Document Number SA22-7802-14
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/BPXZA5C0/SHCMDDES.FILE.6
SHCMDDES.FILE.6
Files
file uses the following
David,
Yes, your understanding is the same as mine. The primary eligible device
list contains volumes that will not exceed the max threshold if the primary
space is allocated there. This is sorted on performance criteria. The
secondary eligible device list has volumes with enough free space to
On 13/03/2013 9:41, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
Presumably this is to avoid regressing user mods to members of /etc.
But there's a way to deal with this. Years ago I took a class in SMP/E
software maintenance (Amdahl taught it). One of the exercises was
to APPLY a USERMOD then attempt to APPLY
On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 10:01:57 +1100, Andrew Rowley wrote:
I'm not sure how it is packaged in z/OS, but in general I think it is
incorrect to replace the /etc directory when installing a new version of
the operating system - the same way you would not drop in a totally new
SYS1.PARMLIB.
lol - you
On 13/03/2013 12:00, Shane Ginnane wrote:
On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 10:01:57 +1100, Andrew Rowley wrote:
I'm not sure how it is packaged in z/OS, but in general I think it is
incorrect to replace the /etc directory when installing a new version of
the operating system - the same way you would not
On Mar 12, 2013, at 6:01 PM, Andrew Rowley wrote:
On 13/03/2013 9:41, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
Presumably this is to avoid regressing user mods to members of /etc.
But there's a way to deal with this. Years ago I took a class in
SMP/E
software maintenance (Amdahl taught it). One of the
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 22:56:35 -0500, Ed Gould wrote:
I am semi surprised that there wasn't and ++HOLD Action on the Function.
Anyone?
Yes. Good idea.
On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 14:47:40 +1100, Andrew Rowley wrote:
Would a written procedure to merge a delivered and existing SYS1.PARMLIB
be any
30 matches
Mail list logo
