5 minutes is a new one on me. 2 secs, 10 secs are common WLM intervals.
15 mins is common for RMF but I *have* seen 5 mins for RMF where the
installation sets it that way.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
One 5 minute interval is the length of the buckets in which MSU
consumption is gathered to calculate the 4 hour running average of the
MSU consumption. However, I can't think of any action based on this that
would generate a 'hang' every interval.
What is your SMF recording interval? And what is
Hi
We tried this last year (not under VM) without success.
Gerry
Sent from my iPhone
On 1 Aug 2013, at 03:45, Con Vasilikakis cvasi...@csc.com.au wrote:
Hi,
We are looking to run z/OS 1.7 (without the z196 toleration maintenance on)
on a z196 under z/VM 6.2
Does anyone know if this
Hi Folks
There must be one, but I cannot find it for looking.
All I want to do is find the name of the aggregate mounted at a given point
e.g. tell me what (if anything) is mounted at /fred
Thanks
Andrew
--
For IBM-MAIN
I am running z/OS 1.13 and using the IBM Ported Tools sftp client. I have some
JCL from a few years back that I am using but it doesn't work anymore. Any
suggestions or observations would be appreciated.
//SFTP EXEC PGM=BPXBATCH,
// PARM='PGM /bin/sftp -b
TEC1:$ bpxmtext 0B1B0473
BPXPREXC 02/28/13
JRLocalSpawnNotAllowed: A request to spawn a local child process could not be
completed because of conflicting inheritance
I did that, but it didn't help me.
--- david.jou...@53.com wrote:
From: Jousma, David david.jou...@53.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: sftp
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 11:27:09 +
TEC1:$ bpxmtext 0B1B0473
1) Are you using transaction management or region management?
2) As a diagnostic tool, set the RMF III interval to 15 seconds (instead of
default 100) so that you can see what is happening.
HTH,
snip
There are about a thousand questions here that we should have answers to but
don't, so please
SMF statistics interval? RMF statistics interval?
It's not easy to catch running SRBs. Such as the the ones SMF dispatches
in every address space (think DB2 DBM1) every statistics interval to
rattling the chains to collect EXCP data. (RMF Monitor II). SMFPRMxx
entries for DDCONS and
Richard,
In IBM Ported Tools release 1.2, IBM changed the sftp command to be APF
authorized.
This is why you can't local-spawn it from BPXBATCH
I actually don't see how your original JCL would have ever worked:
BPXBATCH with PARM=PGM will *not* local spawn the command, so the DD:CMDS
won't be
Hi Richard
This item is out on developer works
Feb 24, 2009... BPXBATCH FAILED BECAUSE SPAWN (BPX1SPN) OF /BIN/LOGIN FAILED
WITH RETURN CODE 009D REASON CODE 0B1B0473
Search result
URL:http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=252697
-Original Message-
Hi,
if with aggregate you mean the dataset try:
df /yourshare
for instance:
(LPAR)user/u/user df /datas
Mounted on FilesystemAvail/TotalFiles
Status
/datas (EXPL.USS.LPAR.DATAS) 792/1440 4294967272
Available
(LPAR)user/u/user df /notexists
Mounted
You want the fldata_t. I don't see a UNIX Callable Service to do this.
But there is a C function.
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/edclb1c0/3.282
You can call C functions from LE enabled HLASM code, COBOL, PL/I , and (of
course) C.
===
You could also do a spawn to
Yes - I want the Vsam dataset name, but I want to access it via a callable
service (Assembler or Rexx) so I can build a Healthcheck.
Thanks
Andrew
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Massimo Biancucci
Sent: 01 August
I suggest that you ask your question on mvs-oe, where Bill Schoen at IBM
might see it.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
How can I migrate the contents of our current production RACF DB from the z/OS
V1r4 system to the new z/OS V1R14 system?Any procedure step by step? Are there
more information on IBM Site.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
On 08/01/13 10:39, Zoran Trifunović wrote:
How can I migrate the contents of our current production RACF DB from
the z/OS V1r4 system to the new z/OS V1R14 system?Any procedure step
by step? Are there more information on IBM Site.
Two things. there is no zOS 1.14. The latest available
I 'm sorry migration to z/os1.12
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
You need to download the migration guides from IBM website. Follow the entries
for RACF
Also from the migration presentations from Marna Walle. They will provide
information on what to look for
If you use the phrase
ibm z/os migrating marna
in an internet search,
All,
We are receiving a status code 16/24 while performing a KSDS VSAM 'READPREV'.
This exception only occurs when the key is specified but does not occur if it
is not entered through our UI.
References point to it having MicroFocus origins, but we are running this on
the mainframe under
Kirk, I've installed your software and it is working. Thanks for the
suggestion!
--- k...@dovetail.com wrote:
From: Kirk Wolf k...@dovetail.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: sftp
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 08:07:56 -0500
Richard,
In IBM Ported Tools release
If you go to SYSLOG at the time of the error, you might find some additional
messages (IEC or other)
Also, the CICS log may help.
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of John Weber
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013
Could you state:
What version of CICS?
What version of z/OS?
Is this native VSAM File or RLS?
Also, a quick peek at the manual on READPREV in CICS shows
16 INVREQ
RESP2 values:
24
A READPREV command is issued for a file for which the previous
STARTBR or RESETBR command has the
On Thu, 1 Aug 2013 15:25:55 +, John Weber wrote:
All,
We are receiving a status code 16/24 while performing a KSDS VSAM 'READPREV'.
This exception only occurs when the key is specified but does not occur if it
is not entered through our UI.
References point to it having MicroFocus
Hi Lizette,
We are using CICS TS 4.2 and are on z/OS 1.13.
I'll have to look back to the STARTBR and see what it entails.
Thanks...
John
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Thursday, August 01,
GENERIC is definitely the culprit. It uses it for a keyed read only. Hence it
works for a non-specified key.
However, this code functions properly on MicroFocus.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Norbert Friemel
Thanks to all who have replied-all good grist for the mill. At least everyone
didn't say Oh, yeah, that's when WLM does x so it's obviously that. (Well,
maybe not at least - that might have been a GOOD thing!)
We're getting with the customer today to find out more.
In a886260d-5074-45c1-8d41-c50f481fe...@comcast.net, on 07/31/2013
at 10:38 PM, Ed Gould edgould1...@comcast.net said:
Programmers HATE altered GOTO's
Unless they're ALTER kockers (-;
It might be smart programming
FSVO smart.
but the debugging can (and is) a PITA.
When the debugging is a
Programmers HATE altered GOTO's
I hated them 35 years ago. Hopefully they were never used in new code after
that.
Bob Shannon
Rocket Software
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
In 1972, as a new hire, I was given the task of maintaining an entire
COBOL application that was written with altered gotos and not a single
perform.
When I asked why, I was told that their standard was to use altered
gotos instead of performs, because they were more efficient.
This ruling was
Our LPAR had only one CPU and still failed.
On 1 August 2013 14:53, Bob Shannon bshan...@rocketsoftware.com wrote:
This issue has been discussed before. The oldest system that will IPL on a
z196 is 1.8. Older systems will enter a Wait in WLM code. I believe that
someone previously posted
Sperry used to have a balanced tree search that all compilers and assemblers
used. Very small very fast. Less than 200 lines of code, but used instruction
modification depending on paths taken. Fairly long intro, but we started
getting in some large modeling routines from some of the big labs.
What seems to have fallen through the cracks in this [tangential]
discussion is that the use of code-modification schemes, ALTER and the
like, in a routine makes it non-reentrant.
This in my view is the crucial objection to their use.
--
John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA
On Thu, 1 Aug 2013 17:50:10 -0400, John Gilmore wrote:
What seems to have fallen through the cracks in this [tangential]
discussion is that the use of code-modification schemes, ALTER and the
like, in a routine makes it non-reentrant.
This in my view is the crucial objection to their use.
One
On 2/08/2013 7:30 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Thu, 1 Aug 2013 17:50:10 -0400, John Gilmore wrote:
What seems to have fallen through the cracks in this [tangential]
discussion is that the use of code-modification schemes, ALTER and the
like, in a routine makes it non-reentrant.
This in my
The problem here is a C -language one. C wots not of function
variables; but it does admit, as a sort of afterthought, of pointers
to functions. This is enormously convenient but highly problematic.
Ritchie realized this; and in his new super-C and super-UNIX this and
many other problems of its
Hi all
In working on PCREGREP, the grep utility of the PCRE package I am porting to
z/OS, I've encountered an issue that I do not know how to resolve:
I figured out that z/OS behaves mostly like UNIX and not like Windows, so I
added my macro to this line:
#if (defined HAVE_SYS_STAT_H amp;
Put the following at the top of your source file.
*#define* *_POSIX_SOURCE*
BTW, I would *seriously* advise you to to build your software in the
UNIX file system and not PDS members. The only time I use a PDS is when
I'm forced to by
my employers and that's because our home grown SCM
I won't go into my programmers were so dumb that...
We had smart ones too but none of them could do assembler.
We had another rule that the only language that could be used in
production was COBOL.
Since none of them knew assembler getting called at 0 something in
the morning to debug
39 matches
Mail list logo
