Re: 4-Hour Rolling Average in sub capacity reporting

2013-12-05 Thread Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
Suresh,

Maybe Mike went home, so I will answer your question:
IBM will always charge the peak of the month, no matter how you changed
the MSUs during the month.
So if you can delay adding MSUs until the second of the next month, they
will not be charged in the current month.
Also if you plan to lower the MSUs, do it before the second of the next
month, then you will be sure to start the new month with the lower
value.

Kees.


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of suresh chacko
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 08:42
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: 4-Hour Rolling Average in sub capacity reporting

Corrected version...

Mike,

That means if i want add or reduce MSU's of the LPAR it's better to
perform the change at the beginning hours of  2nd of every month. Kindly
confirm.
Also advise how IBM will charge on sub capacity changes if I add MSU's
on a later day of month.

Thanks,
Suresh


On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Mike Shorkend
mike.shork...@gmail.comwrote:

 And the period is actually the 2nd of each month to the 1st of the 
 following month.
 On Dec 4, 2013 7:00 PM, Richards, Robert B. 
 robert.richa...@opm.gov
 wrote:

  Yes, either 744/4=186 four-hour intervals or 720/4 or 180 four-hour 
  intervals.
 
  The peak is the highest of those intervals.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
  [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Chokalingam 
  Thangavelu
  Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 10:57 AM
  To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
  Subject: 4-Hour Rolling Average in sub capacity reporting
 
  Hi,
 
  I would like to know how the 4 hour rolling average work in the Sub 
  capacity reporting for a single LPAR.
 
  Will it take the average of every four hour in a month(1st day to 
  30th
  Day) and produce the peak 4 hour average in a month?
 
  Please help me to understand this and
 
  Thanks and Regards,
  Chokalingam
 
 
 
 
 
  The information contained in this electronic message and any 
  attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of 
  the addressee(s)
 and
  may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If 
  you
 are
  not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute 
  or
 copy
  this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all 
  copies
 of
  this message and any attachments.
 
  WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The 
  recipient should check this email and any attachments for the
presence of viruses.
  The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus 
  transmitted by this email.
 
  www.wipro.com
 
  
  -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, 
  send
 email
  to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
 
  
  -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, 
  send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO 
  IBM-MAIN
 

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send 
 email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN




--
*SureshNc*

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: 4-Hour Rolling Average in sub capacity reporting

2013-12-05 Thread suresh chacko
Thanks Vernooij. That answers the qn.

Cheers


On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Vernooij, CP - SPLXM kees.verno...@klm.com
 wrote:

 Suresh,

 Maybe Mike went home, so I will answer your question:
 IBM will always charge the peak of the month, no matter how you changed
 the MSUs during the month.
 So if you can delay adding MSUs until the second of the next month, they
 will not be charged in the current month.
 Also if you plan to lower the MSUs, do it before the second of the next
 month, then you will be sure to start the new month with the lower
 value.

 Kees.


 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
 Behalf Of suresh chacko
 Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 08:42
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Subject: Re: 4-Hour Rolling Average in sub capacity reporting

 Corrected version...

 Mike,

 That means if i want add or reduce MSU's of the LPAR it's better to
 perform the change at the beginning hours of  2nd of every month. Kindly
 confirm.
 Also advise how IBM will charge on sub capacity changes if I add MSU's
 on a later day of month.

 Thanks,
 Suresh


 On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Mike Shorkend
 mike.shork...@gmail.comwrote:

  And the period is actually the 2nd of each month to the 1st of the
  following month.
  On Dec 4, 2013 7:00 PM, Richards, Robert B.
  robert.richa...@opm.gov
  wrote:
 
   Yes, either 744/4=186 four-hour intervals or 720/4 or 180 four-hour
   intervals.
  
   The peak is the highest of those intervals.
  
   -Original Message-
   From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
   [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Chokalingam
   Thangavelu
   Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 10:57 AM
   To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
   Subject: 4-Hour Rolling Average in sub capacity reporting
  
   Hi,
  
   I would like to know how the 4 hour rolling average work in the Sub
   capacity reporting for a single LPAR.
  
   Will it take the average of every four hour in a month(1st day to
   30th
   Day) and produce the peak 4 hour average in a month?
  
   Please help me to understand this and
  
   Thanks and Regards,
   Chokalingam
  
  
  
  
  
   The information contained in this electronic message and any
   attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of
   the addressee(s)
  and
   may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If
   you
  are
   not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute
   or
  copy
   this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all
   copies
  of
   this message and any attachments.
  
   WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The
   recipient should check this email and any attachments for the
 presence of viruses.
   The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus
   transmitted by this email.
  
   www.wipro.com
  
   
   -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
   send
  email
   to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
  
   
   -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
   send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO
   IBM-MAIN
  
 
  --
  For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
  email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
 



 --
 *SureshNc*

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
 email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
 
 For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
 http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain
 confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If
 you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or
 any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other
 action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may
 be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the
 sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message.

 Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its
 employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission
 of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
 Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch
 Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered
 number 33014286
 


 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access 

Re: Has anyone measured CPU savings using external SORT's vs. internal (COBOL) SORT's?

2013-12-05 Thread Martin Packer
A bit late to the discussion but did the O.P. consider REPLACING the COBOL 
code with a pure DFSORT / ICETOOL implementation? That MIGHT remove 
duplicate data moves.

Such a process a customer and I worked together on last week took a 200 
minute job and made it run in 10 minutes. YMMV. :-)

Cheers, Martin

Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM

+44-7802-245-584

email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com

Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog: 
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker



From:   Clark Morris cfmpub...@ns.sympatico.ca
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Date:   04/12/2013 15:57
Subject:Re: Has anyone measured CPU savings using external SORT's 
vs. internal (COBOL) SORT's?
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu



On 2 Dec 2013 06:14:42 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:

Sorry about the late reply.

The last time I seriously looked, the COBOL sort verb invoked the 
installation sort (DFsort, SYNCSORT,).

The COBOL program effectively became the E15/E35 sort exits.

On that basis, I would not expect any significant difference in CPU time 
consumed, *AND* as someone previously noted, a possible significant 
increase in elapsed time.

HTH, 


snip
It has been suggested to management here that there could be potentially 
significant CPU savings from re-engineering application programs such that 
any SORT's are done in a separate step, so that a program with a single 
internal SORT would be broken up into a pre-SORT process followed by an 
external SORT of the massaged data followed by a post-process of the 
SORTed data.
/snip

While the sort products do more efficient I/O than the standard access
methods, this advantage is lost because an extra file may be written
for the sort to read.  In the past the major saving by using stand
alone sorts was due to main memory limitations.  By giving more memory
to the sort the number of intermediate passes could be reduced.  In
today's environment that normally is not a consideration. 

Clark Morris

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN



Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Catalog system for Unix Was: Re: z/OS is antique WAS: Aging Sysprogs = Aging Farmers

2013-12-05 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In
CAE1XxDF6a57+wPEJsLQesOTun3OFeq-ObR=zudw++gw9ceg...@mail.gmail.com,
on 12/04/2013
   at 10:09 AM, John Gilmore jwgli...@gmail.com said:

We're not dealing with what Google wishes to honor, 

Of course we are.

We're dealing with the problem of resolving semantic ambiguity, 

No. We're dealing with a web page that has labels that do not
correspond with what the search engine actually does. There is no
ambiguity in exact.
 
-- 
 Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
 ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html 
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Catalog system for Unix Was: Re: z/OS is antique WAS: Aging Sysprogs = Aging Farmers

2013-12-05 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In
b870629719727b4ba82a6c06a31c29124c5781e...@hqmailsvr01.voltage.com,
on 12/04/2013
   at 07:46 AM, Phil Smith p...@voltage.com said:

Well, common sense would suggest
www.google.comhttp://www.google.com. 

Common sense is frequently wrong.

Try that.

BTDT,GTS
 
-- 
 Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
 ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html 
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Catalog system for Unix Was: Re: z/OS is antique WAS: Aging Sysprogs = Aging Farmers

2013-12-05 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In
caajsdjg7hhfkk5jwq7u9xytddqzfrk9jak2mculh5oogztq...@mail.gmail.com,
on 12/04/2013
   at 11:09 AM, John McKown john.archie.mck...@gmail.com said:

NVT? 

See TELNET PROTOCOL SPECIFICATION, RFC 854.
 
-- 
 Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
 ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html 
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: z/OS is antique WAS: Aging Sysprogs = Aging Farmers

2013-12-05 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In 1mhu99pv4m3ki96ug6d0g46nb44j1bc...@4ax.com, on 12/04/2013
   at 11:16 AM, Clark Morris cfmpub...@ns.sympatico.ca said:

What was the VMS facility like?

Part of the naming syntax was a version number, and there was a
command to control how many versions of a specific file to retain. If
you omitted the version number then you got the most recent version.
 
-- 
 Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
 ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html 
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: 4-Hour Rolling Average in sub capacity reporting

2013-12-05 Thread Joel C. Ewing
Depending, of course, on whether you have cyclic workload peaks and
where during the month they fall.  For example, if all your hottest
4-hour averages are  consistently during the last week of the month,
then typically the effect of changes will only be seen when you
encounter that cyclic peak and it won't really matter when you make the
change during off-peak weeks.
Joel C Ewing

On 12/05/2013 02:09 AM, Vernooij, CP - SPLXM wrote:
 Suresh,
 
 Maybe Mike went home, so I will answer your question:
 IBM will always charge the peak of the month, no matter how you changed
 the MSUs during the month.
 So if you can delay adding MSUs until the second of the next month, they
 will not be charged in the current month.
 Also if you plan to lower the MSUs, do it before the second of the next
 month, then you will be sure to start the new month with the lower
 value.
 
 Kees.
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
 Behalf Of suresh chacko
 Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 08:42
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Subject: Re: 4-Hour Rolling Average in sub capacity reporting
 
 Corrected version...
 
 Mike,
 
 That means if i want add or reduce MSU's of the LPAR it's better to
 perform the change at the beginning hours of  2nd of every month. Kindly
 confirm.
 Also advise how IBM will charge on sub capacity changes if I add MSU's
 on a later day of month.
 
 Thanks,
 Suresh
 
 
 On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Mike Shorkend
 mike.shork...@gmail.comwrote:
 
 And the period is actually the 2nd of each month to the 1st of the 
 following month.
 On Dec 4, 2013 7:00 PM, Richards, Robert B. 
 robert.richa...@opm.gov
 wrote:

 Yes, either 744/4=186 four-hour intervals or 720/4 or 180 four-hour 
 intervals.

 The peak is the highest of those intervals.

 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
 [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Chokalingam 
 Thangavelu
 Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 10:57 AM
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Subject: 4-Hour Rolling Average in sub capacity reporting

 Hi,

 I would like to know how the 4 hour rolling average work in the Sub 
 capacity reporting for a single LPAR.

 Will it take the average of every four hour in a month(1st day to 
 30th
 Day) and produce the peak 4 hour average in a month?

 Please help me to understand this and

 Thanks and Regards,
 Chokalingam


...

-- 
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR   jcew...@acm.org 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: 4-Hour Rolling Average in sub capacity reporting

2013-12-05 Thread Richards, Robert B.
And then, of course, those pesky end-users do billion row queries all at the 
same time and your peaks get set higher than normal.

Suresh, take a look at potentially using group capacity coupled with lpar-level 
defined capacity. See if that combination gives you the level of control you 
are looking to achieve. 

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Joel C. Ewing
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 9:44 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: 4-Hour Rolling Average in sub capacity reporting

Depending, of course, on whether you have cyclic workload peaks and where 
during the month they fall.  For example, if all your hottest 4-hour averages 
are  consistently during the last week of the month, then typically the effect 
of changes will only be seen when you encounter that cyclic peak and it won't 
really matter when you make the change during off-peak weeks.
Joel C Ewing

On 12/05/2013 02:09 AM, Vernooij, CP - SPLXM wrote:
 Suresh,
 
 Maybe Mike went home, so I will answer your question:
 IBM will always charge the peak of the month, no matter how you 
 changed the MSUs during the month.
 So if you can delay adding MSUs until the second of the next month, 
 they will not be charged in the current month.
 Also if you plan to lower the MSUs, do it before the second of the 
 next month, then you will be sure to start the new month with the 
 lower value.
 
 Kees.
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] 
 On Behalf Of suresh chacko
 Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 08:42
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Subject: Re: 4-Hour Rolling Average in sub capacity reporting
 
 Corrected version...
 
 Mike,
 
 That means if i want add or reduce MSU's of the LPAR it's better to 
 perform the change at the beginning hours of  2nd of every month. 
 Kindly confirm.
 Also advise how IBM will charge on sub capacity changes if I add MSU's 
 on a later day of month.
 
 Thanks,
 Suresh
 
 
 On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Mike Shorkend
 mike.shork...@gmail.comwrote:
 
 And the period is actually the 2nd of each month to the 1st of the 
 following month.
 On Dec 4, 2013 7:00 PM, Richards, Robert B. 
 robert.richa...@opm.gov
 wrote:

 Yes, either 744/4=186 four-hour intervals or 720/4 or 180 four-hour 
 intervals.

 The peak is the highest of those intervals.

 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
 [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Chokalingam 
 Thangavelu
 Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 10:57 AM
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Subject: 4-Hour Rolling Average in sub capacity reporting

 Hi,

 I would like to know how the 4 hour rolling average work in the Sub 
 capacity reporting for a single LPAR.

 Will it take the average of every four hour in a month(1st day to 
 30th
 Day) and produce the peak 4 hour average in a month?

 Please help me to understand this and

 Thanks and Regards,
 Chokalingam


...

-- 
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR   jcew...@acm.org 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: 4-Hour Rolling Average in sub capacity reporting

2013-12-05 Thread Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
Suresh said the question was anwered.
I think we are creating complicating situations that ask for even more
complicated solutions.

I thing lowering MSUs on the 1st of the month and raising the MSUs on
the 2nd, simply prevents unintended billing problems, without having to
care about (un)controlled cyclics and definitely uncontrolled users.

Kees.


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Richards, Robert B.
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 16:39
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: 4-Hour Rolling Average in sub capacity reporting

And then, of course, those pesky end-users do billion row queries all at
the same time and your peaks get set higher than normal.

Suresh, take a look at potentially using group capacity coupled with
lpar-level defined capacity. See if that combination gives you the level
of control you are looking to achieve. 

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Joel C. Ewing
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 9:44 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: 4-Hour Rolling Average in sub capacity reporting

Depending, of course, on whether you have cyclic workload peaks and
where during the month they fall.  For example, if all your hottest
4-hour averages are  consistently during the last week of the month,
then typically the effect of changes will only be seen when you
encounter that cyclic peak and it won't really matter when you make the
change during off-peak weeks.
Joel C Ewing

On 12/05/2013 02:09 AM, Vernooij, CP - SPLXM wrote:
 Suresh,
 
 Maybe Mike went home, so I will answer your question:
 IBM will always charge the peak of the month, no matter how you 
 changed the MSUs during the month.
 So if you can delay adding MSUs until the second of the next month, 
 they will not be charged in the current month.
 Also if you plan to lower the MSUs, do it before the second of the 
 next month, then you will be sure to start the new month with the 
 lower value.
 
 Kees.
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] 
 On Behalf Of suresh chacko
 Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 08:42
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Subject: Re: 4-Hour Rolling Average in sub capacity reporting
 
 Corrected version...
 
 Mike,
 
 That means if i want add or reduce MSU's of the LPAR it's better to 
 perform the change at the beginning hours of  2nd of every month.
 Kindly confirm.
 Also advise how IBM will charge on sub capacity changes if I add MSU's

 on a later day of month.
 
 Thanks,
 Suresh
 
 
 On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Mike Shorkend
 mike.shork...@gmail.comwrote:
 
 And the period is actually the 2nd of each month to the 1st of the 
 following month.
 On Dec 4, 2013 7:00 PM, Richards, Robert B. 
 robert.richa...@opm.gov
 wrote:

 Yes, either 744/4=186 four-hour intervals or 720/4 or 180 four-hour 
 intervals.

 The peak is the highest of those intervals.

 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
 [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Chokalingam 
 Thangavelu
 Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 10:57 AM
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Subject: 4-Hour Rolling Average in sub capacity reporting

 Hi,

 I would like to know how the 4 hour rolling average work in the Sub 
 capacity reporting for a single LPAR.

 Will it take the average of every four hour in a month(1st day to 
 30th
 Day) and produce the peak 4 hour average in a month?

 Please help me to understand this and

 Thanks and Regards,
 Chokalingam


...

-- 
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR   jcew...@acm.org 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
Koninklijke Luchtvaart 

Re: 4-Hour Rolling Average in sub capacity reporting

2013-12-05 Thread Richards, Robert B.
Kees,

It prevents nothing if the horses have already left the barn (if he has already 
hit his peak for the month). Now if Suresh can tell us that he is tracking the 
four-hour rolling average and knows that his workload definitely increases on 
the first of the month, then perhaps his idea has merit from a SCRT billing 
perspective. Executives might think otherwise if he caps things that day and 
their pet reports are delayed due to those caps. BTDT...YMMV

Bob

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 10:53 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: 4-Hour Rolling Average in sub capacity reporting

Suresh said the question was anwered.
I think we are creating complicating situations that ask for even more 
complicated solutions.

I thing lowering MSUs on the 1st of the month and raising the MSUs on the 2nd, 
simply prevents unintended billing problems, without having to care about 
(un)controlled cyclics and definitely uncontrolled users.

Kees.


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Richards, Robert B.
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 16:39
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: 4-Hour Rolling Average in sub capacity reporting

And then, of course, those pesky end-users do billion row queries all at the 
same time and your peaks get set higher than normal.

Suresh, take a look at potentially using group capacity coupled with lpar-level 
defined capacity. See if that combination gives you the level of control you 
are looking to achieve. 

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Joel C. Ewing
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 9:44 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: 4-Hour Rolling Average in sub capacity reporting

Depending, of course, on whether you have cyclic workload peaks and where 
during the month they fall.  For example, if all your hottest 4-hour averages 
are  consistently during the last week of the month, then typically the effect 
of changes will only be seen when you encounter that cyclic peak and it won't 
really matter when you make the change during off-peak weeks.
Joel C Ewing

On 12/05/2013 02:09 AM, Vernooij, CP - SPLXM wrote:
 Suresh,
 
 Maybe Mike went home, so I will answer your question:
 IBM will always charge the peak of the month, no matter how you 
 changed the MSUs during the month.
 So if you can delay adding MSUs until the second of the next month, 
 they will not be charged in the current month.
 Also if you plan to lower the MSUs, do it before the second of the 
 next month, then you will be sure to start the new month with the 
 lower value.
 
 Kees.
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] 
 On Behalf Of suresh chacko
 Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 08:42
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Subject: Re: 4-Hour Rolling Average in sub capacity reporting
 
 Corrected version...
 
 Mike,
 
 That means if i want add or reduce MSU's of the LPAR it's better to 
 perform the change at the beginning hours of  2nd of every month.
 Kindly confirm.
 Also advise how IBM will charge on sub capacity changes if I add MSU's

 on a later day of month.
 
 Thanks,
 Suresh
 
 
 On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Mike Shorkend
 mike.shork...@gmail.comwrote:
 
 And the period is actually the 2nd of each month to the 1st of the 
 following month.
 On Dec 4, 2013 7:00 PM, Richards, Robert B. 
 robert.richa...@opm.gov
 wrote:

 Yes, either 744/4=186 four-hour intervals or 720/4 or 180 four-hour 
 intervals.

 The peak is the highest of those intervals.

 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
 [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Chokalingam 
 Thangavelu
 Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 10:57 AM
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Subject: 4-Hour Rolling Average in sub capacity reporting

 Hi,

 I would like to know how the 4 hour rolling average work in the Sub 
 capacity reporting for a single LPAR.

 Will it take the average of every four hour in a month(1st day to 
 30th
 Day) and produce the peak 4 hour average in a month?

 Please help me to understand this and

 Thanks and Regards,
 Chokalingam


...

-- 
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR   jcew...@acm.org 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 

Re: Catalog system for Unix Was: Re: z/OS is antique WAS: Aging Sysprogs = Aging Farmers

2013-12-05 Thread John McKown
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) 
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote:

 In
 caajsdjg7hhfkk5jwq7u9xytddqzfrk9jak2mculh5oogztq...@mail.gmail.com,
 on 12/04/2013
at 11:09 AM, John McKown john.archie.mck...@gmail.com said:

 NVT?

 See TELNET PROTOCOL SPECIFICATION, RFC 854.


Thanks. I am not any kind of expert, but the otelnetd UNIX daemon that I
mentioned in a previous post in this thread _seems to me_ to implement this
fairly well. It works fine with both the Linux and Windows telnet
command. In our shop, this gets the user a z/OS UNIX shell environment
which is similar to a Linux shell prompt or a Windows cmd.exe prompt. In
my case, on the Linux side, before I do the telnet command, I do an export
TERM=xterm. z/OS UNIX does not understand the normal TERM value of
xterm-256color set by the Konsole command shell which I use on Linux.



 --
  Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
  ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html
 We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
 (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN




-- 
This is clearly another case of too many mad scientists, and not enough
hunchbacks.

Maranatha! 
John McKown

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


CoD On/Off (capacity on demand) question

2013-12-05 Thread R.S.

Technical question about CoD:

I have 706 machine with CoD contract.
That means I can temporarily upgrade it do 712 (up to 100% actually, 712 
is 100%, nevermind).

Of course the more CPs activated the more money is to paid.

On resourcelink I generate an Order - electronic record. I specify order 
details - how many MSU I want to add.
I choose one of listed values, minimum is single CP, maximum is last 
value below 100%.

Let's say I've chosen model 710 - 4 cp's more than permanently.

Now the question: is it possible to order 4-CP worth Order and then 
activate it partially?


The following scenarion comes to mind: I ordered 4 CPs due to money 
limits. In case of need I activated one CP of the 4 in the Order. Then - 
if it's still to little - I activate another one, etc.


To be honest I did it once, many years ago, and I added then 18 CPs, 
however I didn't have to pay for it ;-)


--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland






---
Treść tej wiadomości może zawierać informacje prawnie chronione Banku 
przeznaczone wyłącznie do użytku służbowego adresata. Odbiorcą może być jedynie 
jej adresat z wyłączeniem dostępu osób trzecich. Jeżeli nie jesteś adresatem 
niniejszej wiadomości lub pracownikiem upoważnionym do jej przekazania 
adresatowi, informujemy, że jej rozpowszechnianie, kopiowanie, rozprowadzanie 
lub inne działanie o podobnym charakterze jest prawnie zabronione i może być 
karalne. Jeżeli otrzymałeś tę wiadomość omyłkowo, prosimy niezwłocznie 
zawiadomić nadawcę wysyłając odpowiedź oraz trwale usunąć tę wiadomość 
włączając w to wszelkie jej kopie wydrukowane lub zapisane na dysku.

This e-mail may contain legally privileged information of the Bank and is 
intended solely for business use of the addressee. This e-mail may only be 
received by the addressee and may not be disclosed to any third parties. If you 
are not the intended addressee of this e-mail or the employee authorized to 
forward it to the addressee, be advised that any dissemination, copying, 
distribution or any other similar activity is legally prohibited and may be 
punishable. If you received this e-mail by mistake please advise the sender 
immediately by using the reply facility in your e-mail software and delete 
permanently this e-mail including any copies of it either printed or saved to 
hard drive.

mBank S.A. z siedzibą w Warszawie, ul. Senatorska 18, 00-950 Warszawa, www.mBank.pl, e-mail: kont...@mbank.pl 
Sąd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy XII Wydział Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego, nr rejestru przedsiębiorców KRS 025237, NIP: 526-021-50-88. Według stanu na dzień 01.01.2013 r. kapitał zakładowy mBanku S.A. (w całości wpłacony) wynosi 168.555.904 złote.



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: z/OS is antique WAS: Aging Sysprogs = Aging Farmers

2013-12-05 Thread Scott Ford
I always thought VMS was *nix like??? If not what opsys is it similar too or is 
it's own thang

Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
from my IPAD

'Infinite wisdom through infinite means'


 On Dec 4, 2013, at 9:57 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) 
 shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote:
 
 In 1mhu99pv4m3ki96ug6d0g46nb44j1bc...@4ax.com, on 12/04/2013
   at 11:16 AM, Clark Morris cfmpub...@ns.sympatico.ca said:
 
 What was the VMS facility like?
 
 Part of the naming syntax was a version number, and there was a
 command to control how many versions of a specific file to retain. If
 you omitted the version number then you got the most recent version.
 
 -- 
 Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
 ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html 
 We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
 (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
 
 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: z/OS is antique WAS: Aging Sysprogs = Aging Farmers

2013-12-05 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 13:38:46 -0500, Scott Ford wrote:

I always thought VMS was *nix like??? If not what opsys is it similar too or 
is it's own thang
 
What's *nix like?  On a cursory brush, I believe VMS has a hierarchic
filesystem.  That's *nix like.  It doesn't have an ALLOCATE command.
That's *nix like.  Its files can have attributes.  That's MVS-like.

I knew two programmers: one transplanted from a UNIX environment
to VMS who spent much effort customing his VMS profile to make VMS
behave like UNIX; the other transplanted from a UNIX environment
who tried to make VMS behave like UNIX.  Myself?  I spent (wasted)
enormous effort trying to make the uglier parts of XEDIT behave like
their nicer ISPF analogues.

VMS delimits its version numbers with ';'.  Imagine how that must
infuriate anyone accustomed to using ';' as a command separator.

And an alien once asked me, VM is a version of MVS, isn't it?

-- gil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Catalog system for Unix Was: Re: z/OS is antique WAS: Aging Sysprogs = Aging Farmers

2013-12-05 Thread Wayne Bickerdike
Literal translation would be that goes, ca va is a shortened comment ca
va, ie how goes it(that)?. OK would be ca va bien. Without bien it's
meaningless in the context. Bien would be the OK piece, ie fine


On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Hey zMan,

 I entered 'ca va' in French comes bac as 'okay' which is correct, I lived
 in Europe and spoke French. Very impressive converting languages

 Scott ford
 www.identityforge.com
 from my IPAD

 'Infinite wisdom through infinite means'


  On Dec 4, 2013, at 6:09 PM, zMan zedgarhoo...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  Or go to Google Translate (translate.google.com). It even handles
  transliterations quite well: put in spasebo and tell it's Russian; it
  will say:
  Did you mean: спасебо
  and then you can translate *that*. I've even had it guess when the
  transliteration wasn't quite right, and get it right (I concluded, based
 on
  context).
 
  We're getting pretty far OT here, not that that's anything new.
 
 
  On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Mike Schwab mike.a.sch...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
  On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Elardus Engelbrecht
  elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za wrote:
  deleted
  My pet peeve is - when I search a word in a language, not English, then
  Google is useless.
  deleted
  Try using http://www.google.fr for french words?
  (use a country suffix where that lanquage is used).
 
  --
  Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
  Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?
 
  --
  For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
  send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
 
 
 
 
  --
  zMan -- I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it
 
  --
  For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
  send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN




-- 
Wayne V. Bickerdike

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: NSA foils much internet encryption

2013-12-05 Thread Mike Schwab
Why did the NSA even bother to get a internet tap, when they could
have just re-routed packets through their servers?

(Maybe the extra delay is causing our messages to be re-sent creating
duplicate messages?)

http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/12/bgp-hijacking-belarus-iceland/

Earlier this year, researchers say, someone mysteriously hijacked
internet traffic headed to government agencies, corporate offices and
other recipients in the U.S. and elsewhere and redirected it to
Belarus and Iceland, before sending it on its way to its legitimate
destinations. They did so repeatedly over several months. But luckily
someone did notice.

And this may not be the first time it has occurred — just the first
time anyone has noticed.

On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
 On Mon, 7 Oct 2013 16:53:28 -0500, Mike Schwab wrote:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-24429332
NSA using old versions of Firefox to infect PCs in order to identify TOR 
users.

 Will virus scanners detect such infections, or has NSA arranged that the
 scanners themselves have an Acquired Immune Deficiency?

NSA unable to break TOR itself.
GO TOR developer U.S. Navy (who needed a secure way to share messages
with submarines).

 -- gil

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN



-- 
Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Catalog system for Unix Was: Re: z/OS is antique WAS: Aging Sysprogs = Aging Farmers

2013-12-05 Thread Scott Ford
Yep..but on Switzerland French shall we say interesting like the Swiss German

Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
from my IPAD

'Infinite wisdom through infinite means'


 On Dec 5, 2013, at 3:34 PM, Wayne Bickerdike wayn...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Literal translation would be that goes, ca va is a shortened comment ca
 va, ie how goes it(that)?. OK would be ca va bien. Without bien it's
 meaningless in the context. Bien would be the OK piece, ie fine
 
 
 On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com wrote:
 
 Hey zMan,
 
 I entered 'ca va' in French comes bac as 'okay' which is correct, I lived
 in Europe and spoke French. Very impressive converting languages
 
 Scott ford
 www.identityforge.com
 from my IPAD
 
 'Infinite wisdom through infinite means'
 
 
 On Dec 4, 2013, at 6:09 PM, zMan zedgarhoo...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Or go to Google Translate (translate.google.com). It even handles
 transliterations quite well: put in spasebo and tell it's Russian; it
 will say:
 Did you mean: спасебо
 and then you can translate *that*. I've even had it guess when the
 transliteration wasn't quite right, and get it right (I concluded, based
 on
 context).
 
 We're getting pretty far OT here, not that that's anything new.
 
 
 On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Mike Schwab mike.a.sch...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
 On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Elardus Engelbrecht
 elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za wrote:
 deleted
 My pet peeve is - when I search a word in a language, not English, then
 Google is useless.
 deleted
 Try using http://www.google.fr for french words?
 (use a country suffix where that lanquage is used).
 
 --
 Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
 Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?
 
 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
 
 
 
 --
 zMan -- I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it
 
 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
 
 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
 
 
 
 -- 
 Wayne V. Bickerdike
 
 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: NSA foils much internet encryption

2013-12-05 Thread Mike Schwab
Microsoft finally woke up.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2013/12/05/microsoft-u-s-government-is-a-potential-security-threat/

Microsoft is trying to change the terms of the NSA debate — literally.

The company is labeling any government effort to spy on its online
communications as evidence of an advanced persistent threat, a term
that's so far been reserved to describe foreign espionage units such
as the one allegedly operated by the Chinese military.

more at the link

-- 
Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: CoD On/Off (capacity on demand) question

2013-12-05 Thread Alan Field
Yes. When you request to add capacity on the HMC you are presented with a 
list of all increments from your base up to the maximum CoD.

Last year we made our 509 a 510, then a 512 and back to a 511.

Alan Field
Technical Engineer Principal
BCBS Minnesota

Phone: 651.662.3546  Mobile:  651.428.8826





From:   R.S. r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU, 
Date:   12/05/2013 12:17
Subject:CoD On/Off (capacity on demand) question
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU



Technical question about CoD:

I have 706 machine with CoD contract.
That means I can temporarily upgrade it do 712 (up to 100% actually, 712 
is 100%, nevermind).
Of course the more CPs activated the more money is to paid.

On resourcelink I generate an Order - electronic record. I specify order 
details - how many MSU I want to add.
I choose one of listed values, minimum is single CP, maximum is last 
value below 100%.
Let's say I've chosen model 710 - 4 cp's more than permanently.

Now the question: is it possible to order 4-CP worth Order and then 
activate it partially?

The following scenarion comes to mind: I ordered 4 CPs due to money 
limits. In case of need I activated one CP of the 4 in the Order. Then - 
if it's still to little - I activate another one, etc.

To be honest I did it once, many years ago, and I added then 18 CPs, 
however I didn't have to pay for it ;-)

-- 
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland






--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: z/OS is antique WAS: Aging Sysprogs = Aging Farmers

2013-12-05 Thread R.S.

W dniu 2013-12-05 19:38, Scott Ford pisze:

I always thought VMS was *nix like??? If not what opsys is it similar too or is 
it's own thang
In simple words: No. VMS is similar to ...VMS, and maybe older DEC 
systems which I don't know (RSX-11 AFAIR).


Few concepts of VMS:
Unix has single root, VMS has drives similar to DOS/Windows (AFAIR not 
drive LETTER, but drive NAME)

both systems use directory, subdirectory concept to for grouping files
another syntax, square parentheses are used for pathname
interesting thing: [...] means this directory and all subdirectories. 
Can be used for i.e. DEL *.BAK in whole tree.
Filename is file.extension both components up to 40 characters. only two 
components (qualifiers) allowed. Second qualifier plays role similar to 
DOS extension, i.e. LOGIN.COM is king of .profile or AUTOEXEC.BAT and 
it's executable script. Files also have third part: version, usually 
omitted. Full name is FILE.EXTENSION;version (a number).
All file names were uppercase charcters allowed wer similar to MVS. No 
tricky names possible (try to use filename * in Unix and then delete it).
Directories can be nested up to 8 levels. further nesting is allowed, 
but indirectly: you have to create 'symbolic' drive at some directory level.


Most files are plain like in unix or DOS/Windows, but some file can have 
internal structure - like PS, or VSAM.


Commands are much longer than in Unix.
Command syntax is similar to DOS, but command names and parameters tend 
to be longer.


--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland






---
Tre tej wiadomoci moe zawiera informacje prawnie chronione Banku 
przeznaczone wycznie do uytku subowego adresata. Odbiorc moe by jedynie 
jej adresat z wyczeniem dostpu osób trzecich. Jeeli nie jeste adresatem 
niniejszej wiadomoci lub pracownikiem upowanionym do jej przekazania 
adresatowi, informujemy, e jej rozpowszechnianie, kopiowanie, rozprowadzanie 
lub inne dziaanie o podobnym charakterze jest prawnie zabronione i moe by 
karalne. Jeeli otrzymae t wiadomo omykowo, prosimy niezwocznie 
zawiadomi nadawc wysyajc odpowied oraz trwale usun t wiadomo 
wczajc w to wszelkie jej kopie wydrukowane lub zapisane na dysku.

This e-mail may contain legally privileged information of the Bank and is 
intended solely for business use of the addressee. This e-mail may only be 
received by the addressee and may not be disclosed to any third parties. If you 
are not the intended addressee of this e-mail or the employee authorized to 
forward it to the addressee, be advised that any dissemination, copying, 
distribution or any other similar activity is legally prohibited and may be 
punishable. If you received this e-mail by mistake please advise the sender 
immediately by using the reply facility in your e-mail software and delete 
permanently this e-mail including any copies of it either printed or saved to 
hard drive.

mBank S.A. z siedzib w Warszawie, ul. Senatorska 18, 00-950 Warszawa, www.mBank.pl, e-mail: kont...@mbank.pl 
Sd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy XII Wydzia Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sdowego, nr rejestru przedsibiorców KRS 025237, NIP: 526-021-50-88. Wedug stanu na dzie 01.01.2013 r. kapita zakadowy mBanku S.A. (w caoci wpacony) wynosi 168.555.904 zote.



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: z/OS is antique WAS: Aging Sysprogs = Aging Farmers

2013-12-05 Thread Anne Lynn Wheeler
paulgboul...@aim.com (Paul Gilmartin) writes:
 And an alien once asked me, VM is a version of MVS, isn't it?

cms had about 64kbytes of code that was the os simulator that allowed
os compilers and many applications to run unmodified.

the burlington mall vm370 development group was working on a much more
complete coverage of os simulation ... joke about cms 64kbyte os/360
simulation was much more cost effective than mvs 8mbyte os/360
simulation.

this was about the time the FS effort failed, mad rush to get products
back into the 370 pipeline (having been suspended and/or killed off
during the FS period)
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/submain.html#futuresys

head of POK also managed to convince corporate to kill the vm370
product, shutdown burlington mall group, and transfer all the burlington
mall developers to POK or otherwise MVS/XA wouldn't ship on
time. Endicott eventually managed to save the vm370 product mission but
had to reconstitute a development group from scratch.

the shutdown of burlington was going on in extreme secret, not planning
on telling the people until a few weeks before it was effective
... minimizing the number of people that would be able to escape the
move to POK. however, the shutdown managed to leak a few months early
... and numerous people managed to escape ... so many going to work at
DEC on VMS (very early in its development, well before first VMS release
shipped) ... that somebody observed that the head of POK was one of the
biggest contributors to VMS
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VAX

The major expansion of os/360 simulation for cms disappeared in the
shutdown of the burlington mall group ... and the major person
responsible was one of those that went to DEC.

old post with decade of vax/vms numbers sliced and diced by year,
model, US/non-US ... etc:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002f.html#0

vax/vms sold into much the same mid-range market against vm/4300 ... and
in similar numbers ... for small order sizes (one or few machines). A
big difference was large corporations ordering several hundred vm/4300s
at a time for deployment out in departmental areas. A past post
mentioning explosion in vm/4300 departmental machines
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001m.html#15 departmental servers

the explosion of vm/4300 machines inside ibm was one of the
reasons the internal network passed 1000 nodes in 1983
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subnetwork.html#internalnet

-- 
virtualization experience starting Jan1968, online at home since Mar1970

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: z/OS is antique WAS: Aging Sysprogs = Aging Farmers

2013-12-05 Thread Scott Ford
Gil and R.S.,

I was curious about VMS because I haven't worked on that platform. Worked many 
others in a past life supporting LU 6.2 file transfer on 26 platforms. But that 
was like a lifetime ago.
I went from OS/VS2 to VSE to VM/VSE , then MVS so I feel your pain Gil

Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
from my IPAD

'Infinite wisdom through infinite means'


 On Dec 5, 2013, at 3:16 PM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
 
 On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 13:38:46 -0500, Scott Ford wrote:
 
 I always thought VMS was *nix like??? If not what opsys is it similar too or 
 is it's own thang
 What's *nix like?  On a cursory brush, I believe VMS has a hierarchic
 filesystem.  That's *nix like.  It doesn't have an ALLOCATE command.
 That's *nix like.  Its files can have attributes.  That's MVS-like.
 
 I knew two programmers: one transplanted from a UNIX environment
 to VMS who spent much effort customing his VMS profile to make VMS
 behave like UNIX; the other transplanted from a UNIX environment
 who tried to make VMS behave like UNIX.  Myself?  I spent (wasted)
 enormous effort trying to make the uglier parts of XEDIT behave like
 their nicer ISPF analogues.
 
 VMS delimits its version numbers with ';'.  Imagine how that must
 infuriate anyone accustomed to using ';' as a command separator.
 
 And an alien once asked me, VM is a version of MVS, isn't it?
 
 -- gil
 
 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Catalog system for Unix Was: Re: z/OS is antique WAS: Aging Sysprogs = Aging Farmers

2013-12-05 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Fri, 6 Dec 2013 07:34:48 +1100, Wayne Bickerdike wrote:

Literal translation would be that goes, ca va is a shortened comment ca
va, ie how goes it(that)?. OK would be ca va bien. Without bien it's
meaningless in the context. Bien would be the OK piece, ie fine
 
Think idiom.  First relevant Google hit:

http://french.about.com/od/vocabulary/a/cava.htm

(Spelling: ça va.)

-- gil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: NSA foils much internet encryption

2013-12-05 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 15:19:55 -0600, Mike Schwab mike.a.sch...@gmail.com wrote:

Microsoft finally woke up.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2013/12/05/microsoft-u-s-government-is-a-potential-security-threat/

Microsoft is trying to change the terms of the NSA debate � literally.

The company is labeling any government effort to spy on its online
communications as evidence of an advanced persistent threat, a term
that's so far been reserved to describe foreign espionage units such
as the one allegedly operated by the Chinese military.

Related:


http://techcrunch.com/2013/11/05/apple-slips-in-warrant-canary-to-warn-users-of-future-compliance-with-patriot-act-section-215-information-requests/

... and my vocabulary is enlarged.

-- gil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Base-less programming

2013-12-05 Thread zMan
Ouch. SO true.


On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org wrote:

 I've seen a lot of baseless programming in my life. Had no idea you were
 talking about registers in assembler. g

 Charles

 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
 Behalf Of Phil Smith
 Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 3:05 PM
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Subject: Re: Base-less programming

 Apologies for those who saw this post and said WTF? - wrong list. Hey,
 it's Wednesday.

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN




-- 
zMan -- I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Catalog system for Unix Was: Re: z/OS is antique WAS: Aging Sysprogs = Aging Farmers

2013-12-05 Thread Phil Smith
Tony Harminc wrote:
Unfortunately that takes me to https://www.google.ca, which doesn't
seem to have a search tools choice. I can force Google to go to the
.com (i.e. US) site, but it's still HTTPS, and it still has no search
tools that I can see. And merely quoting a phrase doesn't (contrary to
their claim) restrict the search to the exact quoted string.

The Search Tools appear on *results* pages, to refine them. Sorry, I totally 
buggered this up by not mentioning that wee detail!

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Base-less programming

2013-12-05 Thread John McKown
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 6:09 PM, zMan zedgarhoo...@gmail.com wrote:

 Ouch. SO true.


Yes. In this same vein, but a bit more seriously, why don't we start using
RI-programming (for Relative  Immediate) or RelImm-programming. Because
there is _no_ way that I can think of to write _useful_ code which does not
use at least a few base+displacement instructions. At the very least for
the incoming parameter list. Well, maybe a random() type program could be
written without using any base+displacement instructions if it did some
sort of manipulation of the data returned by the STCKE instruction instead
of having a seed and basing the current result on the previous one.





 On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org wrote:

  I've seen a lot of baseless programming in my life. Had no idea you were
  talking about registers in assembler. g
 
  Charles
 
  -Original Message-
  From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
  Behalf Of Phil Smith
  Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 3:05 PM
  To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
  Subject: Re: Base-less programming
 
  Apologies for those who saw this post and said WTF? - wrong list. Hey,
  it's Wednesday.
 
  --
  For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
  send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
 



 --
 zMan -- I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN




-- 
This is clearly another case of too many mad scientists, and not enough
hunchbacks.

Maranatha! 
John McKown

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


U.S. bill patent troll bill passes the House.

2013-12-05 Thread John McKown
http://www.infoworld.com/t/government/patent-troll-bill-clears-house-huge-majority-232218
This _sounds_ good to me. But I ASSuME that they have written something
reasonable. OOPS, my bad.

-- 
This is clearly another case of too many mad scientists, and not enough
hunchbacks.

Maranatha! 
John McKown

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Catalog system for Unix Was: Re: z/OS is antique WAS: Aging Sysprogs = Aging Farmers

2013-12-05 Thread Scott Ford
Gil,

Your correct it's an idiom..slang...more or less...in 3 yrs in Switzerland I 
learned I needed a better accent to speak French and Swiss German and don't ask 
for items in French in a Swiss German canton or State..it ain't pretty

Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
from my IPAD

'Infinite wisdom through infinite means'


 On Dec 5, 2013, at 6:32 PM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
 
 On Fri, 6 Dec 2013 07:34:48 +1100, Wayne Bickerdike wrote:
 
 Literal translation would be that goes, ca va is a shortened comment ca
 va, ie how goes it(that)?. OK would be ca va bien. Without bien it's
 meaningless in the context. Bien would be the OK piece, ie fine
 Think idiom.  First relevant Google hit:
 
http://french.about.com/od/vocabulary/a/cava.htm
 
 (Spelling: ça va.)
 
 -- gil
 
 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Base-less programming

2013-12-05 Thread Scott Ford
Fines are serious pain, worked in banking , every minute the SDLC line was down 
to the Fed. The bank was being fine $$$ ..per min, it gives all new meaning 
to pressure, oh yeah John, I hear you have been there when it's ugly

Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
from my IPAD

'Infinite wisdom through infinite means'


 On Dec 5, 2013, at 8:05 PM, John McKown john.archie.mck...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 6:09 PM, zMan zedgarhoo...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Ouch. SO true.
 
 Yes. In this same vein, but a bit more seriously, why don't we start using
 RI-programming (for Relative  Immediate) or RelImm-programming. Because
 there is _no_ way that I can think of to write _useful_ code which does not
 use at least a few base+displacement instructions. At the very least for
 the incoming parameter list. Well, maybe a random() type program could be
 written without using any base+displacement instructions if it did some
 sort of manipulation of the data returned by the STCKE instruction instead
 of having a seed and basing the current result on the previous one.
 
 
 
 
 
 On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org wrote:
 
 I've seen a lot of baseless programming in my life. Had no idea you were
 talking about registers in assembler. g
 
 Charles
 
 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
 Behalf Of Phil Smith
 Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 3:05 PM
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Subject: Re: Base-less programming
 
 Apologies for those who saw this post and said WTF? - wrong list. Hey,
 it's Wednesday.
 
 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
 
 
 
 --
 zMan -- I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it
 
 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
 
 
 
 -- 
 This is clearly another case of too many mad scientists, and not enough
 hunchbacks.
 
 Maranatha! 
 John McKown
 
 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: z/OS is antique WAS: Aging Sysprogs = Aging Farmers

2013-12-05 Thread Mike Schwab
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenVMS

http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9239984/OpenVMS_R.I.P._1977_2020_



On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com wrote:
 I always thought VMS was *nix like??? If not what opsys is it similar too or 
 is it's own thang

 Scott ford
 www.identityforge.com
 from my IPAD

 'Infinite wisdom through infinite means'



-- 
Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN