Hi
We would like to document the actual maintenance or PTF level or
software level of the compiler, we are using to compile our product.
How can I find this ?
(It is the C/C++ compiler)
--
Kind regards, / Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Miklos Szigetvari
Research Development
ISIS Papyrus
On Mon, 31 Mar 2014 09:31:57 +0200, Miklos Szigetvari wrote:
Hi
We would like to document the actual maintenance or PTF level or
software level of the compiler, we are using to compile our product.
How can I find this ?
(It is the C/C++ compiler)
//S1 EXEC PGM=GIMSMP
I think a useful stretch objective would be to get the information into
the load module in some vaguely architected header.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Closest I can find is this:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/cbclr1b0/19.2
But that doesn't show the PTF level. Perhaps _someone_ (hint, hint) should
put in a request that the C compiler include the PTF level in the compile
listing? HLASM does.
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at
In 533766af.3000...@t-online.de, on 03/30/2014
at 01:34 AM, Bernd Oppolzer bernd.oppol...@t-online.de said:
And my experience is that over 90 percent of them have
no clue what the descriptor logic of PL/1 is all about,
Nor should they. They should, however, understand the DECLARE
statement.
Check out the PHASEID compiler option.
On 31/03/2014 3:31 PM, Miklos Szigetvari wrote:
Hi
We would like to document the actual maintenance or PTF level or
software level of the compiler, we are using to compile our product.
How can I find this ?
(It is the C/C++ compiler)
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/03/29/us-heart-daylightsaving-idUSBREA2S0D420140329
quote
Switching over to daylight saving time, and losing one hour of sleep,
raised the risk of having a heart attack the following Monday by 25
percent, compared to other Mondays during the year, according to a
Of all the languages which I have personally used. I loved Borland's Delphi
(loosely base on Modula II) the best.
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote:
In 533766af.3000...@t-online.de, on 03/30/2014
at 01:34 AM, Bernd Oppolzer
Just use C++ with has references
void func( int ref ) { ref++ }
On 30/03/2014 9:22 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
In 533766af.3000...@t-online.de, on 03/30/2014
at 01:34 AM, Bernd Oppolzer bernd.oppol...@t-online.de said:
And my experience is that over 90 percent of them have
no
David,
Thanks! I added that compile parm to my make file and got messages like:
CCN(I) Product(5694-A01) Phase(CCNEOPTP) Level(UI15229.z1r13)
CCN(I) Product(5694-A01) Phase(CCNDRVR ) Level(UI15229.z1r13)
CCN(I) Product(5694-A01) Phase(CCNEP ) Level(UI15229.z1r13)
CCN(I)
In 5338993d.5020...@bcs.org.uk, on 03/30/2014
at 11:22 PM, CM Poncelet ponce...@bcs.org.uk said:
As in (for REXX):
In what environment?
TSOEXEC LISTA ST
Isn't that only for ISPF?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see
On Mon, 31 Mar 2014 06:58:46 -0500, John McKown wrote:
Of all the languages which I have personally used. I loved Borland's Delphi
(loosely base on Modula II) the best.
I was absolutely blown away when I first saw Delphi - not so much with the
language itself, but that IDE !!! What an eye
On 31/03/2014 8:44 PM, Shane Ginnane wrote:
On Mon, 31 Mar 2014 06:58:46 -0500, John McKown wrote:
Of all the languages which I have personally used. I loved Borland's Delphi
(loosely base on Modula II) the best.
I was absolutely blown away when I first saw Delphi - not so much with the
Thank you for all, we know already the PHASEID,
currently all the phase-id's are the same and it is equal with the
highest PTF level.
What if they would be different ?
On 31.03.2014 14:15, John McKown wrote:
David,
Thanks! I added that compile parm to my make file and got messages like:
In
CAAJSdji4DNweFb2WsM8eqnVh1o+8T_k=f1rL10Vx=ji5jhd...@mail.gmail.com,
on 03/29/2014
at 09:07 PM, John McKown john.archie.mck...@gmail.com said:
http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2014/03/information-overload-i-know-too-much-to-program-quickly-what-can-i-do/
Basically the author is
Hoping someone can help us out with this. Getting a getmain error 878-10 in a
job this is trying to do a tape-to tape copy. In looking up the error code for
878-10 one of the issues is region size is too small. The Job is coded both on
the job card the steps with REGION=0M... Any direction
Post the IEC message describing the error. Better yet, post the job (minus the
dump, if any).
Anything without that information is just guessing
HTH,
snip
Hoping someone can help us out with this. Getting a getmain error 878-10 in a
job this is trying to do a tape-to tape copy. In looking
If it is INHOUSE program, then you have a storage accumulation..
Milad Hashoul
Team Leader
BMC Software
A ship in the harbor is safe, but that is not what ships are built for
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Robert McElroy rmcel...@njtransit.comwrote:
Hoping someone can help us out with
Allan,
IEA995I SYMPTOM DUMP OUTPUT 849
SYSTEM COMPLETION CODE=878 REASON CODE=0010
TIME=08.09.00 SEQ=10871 CPU=0040 ASID=0057
IEA705I ERROR DURING GETMAIN SYS CODE = 878-10 CHRMZCBK STEP1 STEPA 00
IEA705I
R.S. wrote:
snip
BTW2: nowadays you don't need ICKDSF before restore, AFAIK.
That's correct, and it's been true for the last few releases.
Standalone DFSMSdss was changed to no longer require you to use ICKDSF
to label the volume before RESTORE when the volume labels differ. This
change
According to the message posted, the storage request was (unconditionally) for
X'007C7318' bytes of storage in SP00 above the line (via GETMAIN or STORAGE
OBTAIN).
Obviously, this was not available.
What utility are you attempting to use for the copy?
snip
IEA995I SYMPTOM DUMP OUTPUT 849
Clark, Kevin wrote:
4. Hopefully you ordered a z/os System Pac ( in full dump volume format) (
this may come with a SA program ?)
In at least most countries SystemPac is no longer available.
(ServerPac, by contrast, should be available anywhere.) However,
where SystemPac remains
In that case, I suspect there is an installation exit that converts region=0m
requests to something smaller.
Retry with a explicitly coded region of (based on the error message) of 32M or
64M.
Al Staller | Z Systems Programmer | KBM Group | (Tel) 972 664-3565 |
allan.stal...@kbmg.com
Thanks Allan, We will give that shot... appreciate your help...
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Staller, Allan
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 9:43 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Error 878-10
In that case,
Timothy Sipples wrote:
Yes, installation services are available from IBM and service partners.
As John Eells points out, if you prefer to install z/OS from scratch in
house then you'd use the z/OS Customized Offerings Driver, available at no
additional charge with your z/OS license (assuming
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 8:10 AM, David Crayford dcrayf...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31/03/2014 8:44 PM, Shane Ginnane wrote:
On Mon, 31 Mar 2014 06:58:46 -0500, John McKown wrote:
Of all the languages which I have personally used. I loved Borland's
Delphi
(loosely base on Modula II) the best.
On 31/03/2014 10:13 PM, John McKown wrote:
You will pleased to know that Lua on z will be coming this year
(compliments from my employers) with lots of goodies and execution speed
that can show Java a clean pair of heels in 8 out of 10 benchtests that run
sub-second.
I hate to have to ask, but
This thread has drifted horribly -- or wonderfully, if you prefer.
Returning to the original question, everything I know about PL/I could be
engraved on the head of a pin, but the thought occurred to me: why shoehorn
this problem into a language where it does not seem to fit? Why not write a
Many C programmers have the habit of, for clarity, enclosing the
returned expression of a RTETURN statement in parentheses, which C
neither requires no objects to.
In PL/I, however, the parentheses are required (because PL/I has no
reserved words, only keywords in context). Thus
IF ARG = NULL
Two typo corrections, for which I apologize:
o RTETURN == RETURN
o IF ARG = NULL then RETURN(SYSNULL) ELSE RETURN (ARG) ; ==
IF ARG = NULL then RETURN(SYSNULL) ; ELSE RETURN (ARG) ;
John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA
1969 is very important. I was born that year! :-)
From: Timothy Sipples sipp...@sg.ibm.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2014 7:12 PM
Subject: Re: XMLSS performance vs COBOL 4.1 runtime XML
Shane Ginnane write:
I was referring to the
Just a comment: many responders assumed skills from scratch.
It wasn't pointed by the author of the thread.
Maybe the system is to be installed from scratch, but maybe the team
consist of skilled persons.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
W dniu 2014-03-31 15:48, John Eells pisze:
Well, I think I indicated that my PL/I knowledge was minimal. I was trying
to illustrate a concept, not write a tutorial on PL/I syntax. From your
response, I would guess I was eminently successful at my intended task. I
guess it's the nature of IBM-MAIN: the more irrelevant the nit, the greater
On Fri, 2014-03-28 at 18:54 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
The Itel disk drives [] were loathsome.
I believe that the OEM for those (as well as the Telex-branded ones) was
ISS/Sperry.
Potter tape drives
The Mohawk 200 bpi (!) tape drives weren't much of a joy to work with
either.
--
We're using Passport. My last site used Rumba.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of MARTIN, MIKE
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 1:52 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: 3270 Emulators and consoles
All,
We have a z114
Using VistaTN3270 from Tom Brennan. Works great, no complaints.
Brad Wissink
Information Technology Services
Iowa State University
515-294-3088
If it ain't broke, you ain't trying - Red Green
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
Bluezone.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Pommier, Rex
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 1:54 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: 3270 Emulators and consoles
We're using Passport. My last site used Rumba.
Rumba 7.5 (vintage circa 2006). I presume new versions will also work.
YMMV,
snip
We have a z114 and are upgrading to Windows 7. Is anyone using a 3270
emulator other than PCOMM for their OSA-ICC console functions.
/snip
--
Vista from Tom Brennan Software works great!
Tim
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Staller, Allan
Sent: Monday, 31 March, 2014 3:27 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: 3270 Emulators and consoles
Rumba 7.5
We are successfully using QWS3270
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
On Behalf Of MARTIN, MIKE
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 11:52 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: 3270 Emulators and consoles
All,
We have a z114 and
Vista TN3270 from Tom Brennan will be your friend, it's great. I use it for
ages now. Support is perfect, and after all, it is not expensive and does
more, then one would expect. Just try it.
Christian
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
I must agree .. GREAT product
Dr. Rick Williams
---Original Message---
From: Christian Birr
Date: 3/31/2014 3:56:54 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: AW: 3270 Emulators and consoles
Vista TN3270 from Tom Brennan will be your friend, it's great. I use it for
ages now.
On Mar 31, 2014, at 2:53 PM, Gibney, Dave gib...@wsu.edu wrote:
We are successfully using QWS3270
So are we. For non-Windows (although a Windows version is available), but on my
Mac I use x3270 (http://x3270.bgp.nu).
--
Curtis Pew (c@its.utexas.edu)
ITS Systems Core
The University of
We had fun with Memorex Disks. Upgraded walkie talkies for hardware techs
and if they keyed to talk by the Memorex controller it would IML itself.
Also after a couple of furious weekends to meet ESP commitments, went to IPL
XA and it wouldn't. After looking at sense codes PSR said it's the
In
CAAJSdjjtLjqHFZK=H0EKf8kdO=4wzjegwvu-o6hjwnddnho...@mail.gmail.com,
on 03/31/2014
at 06:03 AM, John McKown john.archie.mck...@gmail.com said:
But that doesn't show the PTF level.
There is no such thing; there's only the list of all service
installed.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz,
I recall that the original Telex 2314 clones were terrible performers compared
with the IBM devices, and the Telex folks were really frustrated, because our
measurements proved their device's exactly matched the published IBM specs.
Unfortunately for Telex, the actual performance of those IBM
On Mon, 31 Mar 2014 09:26:46 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
But that doesn't show the PTF level.
There is no such thing; there's only the list of all service
installed.
FSVO there (perhaps John trimmed it). HLASM manages to display PTF level
on the first page of every SYSPRINT. (But
We discussed this further with some co-workers on my customers site.
There are some more aspects of this discussion:
a) the C language manual at one certain point states what are pointers
acceptable
to C and what are not. From the wording there it sounds as if pointers
that come
from
I've allocated a bunch of explicit and automatic DDNAMES.
I concatenate them with BPXWDYN( 'concat ddlist(SYSEXEC,SYS6,
SYS7,SYS8,SYS9,SYS00010,SYS00011)' )
So I see:
listalc status sysnames
...
SYS14090.T135209.RA000.user.R0173005
SYSEXEC DELETE,DELETE
On 3/31/2014 4:02 PM, Bernd Oppolzer wrote:
We discussed this further with some co-workers on my customers site.
There are some more aspects of this discussion:
a) the C language manual at one certain point states what are pointers
acceptable
to C and what are not. From the wording there it
Hi
I took many if your suggestion that in order to get my TSOLIB working have it
sitting a clist
I coded the simplest possible Rexx exec
/* Rexx */
Call CLISTLIB
Address TSO
LISTALC
The CLISTLIB
Proc 0
TSOLIB
The clist fails horribly it is called by the Rexx exec as I turn on tracing
But
It's been a long time since I coded CLIST but I think Proc should be PROC.
Dave Salt
SimpList(tm) - try it; you'll get it!
http://www.mackinney.com/products/program-development/simplist.html
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 18:12:18 -0400
From: michealb...@optonline.net
Subject: Rexx calling
On Mon, 31 Mar 2014 18:12:18 -0400, Micheal Butz wrote:
Call CLISTLIB
Address TSO
LISTALC
And the TSOLIB I get invalid syntax seems it thinks the clist is a Rexx exec
even thought I don't have
Yup. Try:
address TSO '%CLISTLIB'
(If I got the quotes right this time.)
-- gil
On Mon, 31 Mar 2014 18:51:47 +, MARTIN, MIKE wrote:
We have a z114 and are upgrading to Windows 7. Is anyone using a 3270
emulator other than PCOMM for their OSA-ICC console functions.
Hmmm... Having read much of this thread, I surmise the SNR would be higher
if contibutors reported
Am 01.04.2014 00:11, schrieb Steve Comstock:
On 3/31/2014 4:02 PM, Bernd Oppolzer wrote:
We discussed this further with some co-workers on my customers site.
There are some more aspects of this discussion:
a) the C language manual at one certain point states what are pointers
acceptable
to C
That's not it I had it in caps
For some reason it's not recognizing my clist as a clist
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 31, 2014, at 6:18 PM, Dave Salt ds...@hotmail.com wrote:
It's been a long time since I coded CLIST but I think Proc should be PROC.
Dave Salt
SimpList(tm) - try it;
On Mon, 31 Mar 2014 17:33:48 -0500, John Gilmore wrote:
... I do not think your
omisses, a semicolon and some framing parentheses, are mortal (or
indeed even venial) sins. Moreover, what you wrote is substantively
correct.
On the other hand I do think it important to correct code examples
Clist calling Rexx works
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 31, 2014, at 6:53 PM, Steve Comstock st...@trainersfriend.com wrote:
Try EXEC'ing your CLIST, maybe
exec 'library(clistlib)' clist
-Steve Comstock
On 3/31/2014 4:37 PM, Micheal Butz wrote:
That's not it I had it in caps
On 3/31/2014 4:54 PM, Micheal Butz wrote:
Clist calling Rexx works
But isn't your example REXX calling CLIST? That doesn't work.
-Steve
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 31, 2014, at 6:53 PM, Steve Comstock st...@trainersfriend.com wrote:
Try EXEC'ing your CLIST, maybe
exec
On 1/04/2014 9:37, Bernd Oppolzer wrote:
How do you solve the problem that a pointer coming from a PL/1 module
(or ASSEMBLER) and possibly having the high order bit on is not accepted
from the C module as a valid pointer and that the results, if you use
this pointer,
are unpredictable or
Right !!!
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 31, 2014, at 7:03 PM, Steve Comstock st...@trainersfriend.com wrote:
On 3/31/2014 4:54 PM, Micheal Butz wrote:
Clist calling Rexx works
But isn't your example REXX calling CLIST? That doesn't work.
-Steve
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 31,
On 3/31/2014 6:36 PM, Micheal Butz wrote:
Right !!!
So, did you try my suggestion?
-Steve
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 31, 2014, at 7:03 PM, Steve Comstock st...@trainersfriend.com wrote:
On 3/31/2014 4:54 PM, Micheal Butz wrote:
Clist calling Rexx works
But isn't your example REXX
Thank you :)
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 31, 2014, at 9:25 PM, Steve Comstock st...@trainersfriend.com wrote:
On 3/31/2014 6:36 PM, Micheal Butz wrote:
Right !!!
So, did you try my suggestion?
-Steve
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 31, 2014, at 7:03 PM, Steve Comstock
VistaTN3270 from Tom Brennan is a nice low cost product!
I love to work with it on my Hercules - MVS system
Roger
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Wissink, Brad [ITSYS]
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 1:57 PM
To:
I originally sent to wrong forum
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: Micheal Butz michealb...@optonline.net
Date: March 31, 2014 at 11:02:50 PM EDT
To: Assembler Language assembler-l...@listserv.uga.edu
Subject: Rexx substr not retiring string
I have some imbedded JCL in
Just remove CALL because that implies you are calling a REXX function or REXX
exec.
The clist name is unquoted. Since that variable name is not a defined REXX
variable, you won't have a problem but you should get into the habit of
quoting.
Jon Perryman.
Shmuel is correct. Having a PTF level can be misleading. You are only seeing
PTF numbers that IBM has chosen to display. If the C compiler consists of a 100
modules, then there are 100 PTF levels which may or may not be important to you.
UNIX has this concept because the product is replaced as
On 2014-03-31, at 21:06, Micheal Butz wrote:
I originally sent to wrong forum
Well, TSO-REXX would have been the right one.
From: Micheal Butz michealb...@optonline.net
Date: March 31, 2014 at 11:02:50 PM EDT
To: Assembler Language assembler-l...@listserv.uga.edu
Subject: Rexx substr not
On 2014-03-31, at 22:19, Jon Perryman wrote:
Shmuel is correct. Having a PTF level can be misleading. You are only seeing
PTF numbers that IBM has chosen to display. If the C compiler consists of a
100 modules, then there are 100 PTF levels which may or may not be important
to you.
(But
What is the actual error that occurs if you don't use this ISPF panel?
I usually don't have a STEPLIB in my TSO proc and tend to use ISPEXEC LIBDEF if
I need access to load modules. With PARMLIB(IKJTSO##) correctly configured,
I've never needed TSOEXEC for XMIT. I don't know if STEPLIB with an
70 matches
Mail list logo
