:: -Original Message-
:: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
:: Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
:: Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 3:36 PM
:: To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
:: Subject: Re: Another C compiler shift bug?
::
:: On Thu, 8 May 2014 15:16:26 -0700,
Thanks... I've already tested the and got working the email solution using
Sprint...
*George Rodriguez*
*Specialist II - IT Solutions*
*IT Enterprise Applications*
*PX - 47652*
*(561) 357-7652 (office)*
*(561) 707-3496 (mobile)*
*School District of Palm Beach County*
*3348 Forest Hill Blvd.*
I presume from the question that using SLIP's PVTMOD/PVTEP does not work.
CICS must use either load with address or some other process to load your
module.
You must find out from CICS how to determine the address of your module.
And then you would use the normal SLIP processing that lets you
This has been an interesting thread. I rather like the escrow idea. For
smaller ISVs, I wonder if it would be helpful to integrate something like
git or subversion into their processing, with a secure (are there any?)
off site backup master. When a change is pushed to production, it would
update
I thought CICS switched to using standard Program Fetch 25 years ago.
Old V3? Does knowing that change anything?
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter /
I was able to get the Trace to work - after removing the -r TLS, that
generated an error.
*EZA2892I Secure port 21 does not allow the -a or -r start parameter *
And from that trace it appears, to me, that the FTP server is not
responding correctly to the z/OS client handshake.
For smaller ISVs, I wonder if it would be helpful to integrate something like
git or subversion into their processing, with a secure (are there any?)
off site backup master.
Why do you think this is an original idea? All ISVs deal with source code
management. Some use open source
Sorry.. was doing my post via phone..
Here is the short version of GSKSRVR trace
Run a GSKSRVR for SSL trace.. the only gotcha is that it must come up
before the task you want to trace.
- S GSKSRVR
- Restart STC
- Update GSKWTR PROC to add a dataset to hold the trace.
- TRACE CT,WTRSTART=GSKWTR
On Thu, 8 May 2014 12:54:04 -0500, Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.com wrote:
If the IPLable utility tape was created on a labeled tape, then it isn't
going to work
and you have no choice but to IPL the installation media. (A power outage
isn't
going to affect a tape that's not in a
I did a quick search and the error seems like a TLS 1.0 only issue.
As I remember it, the FTP TLS on z/OS is restricted to TLS 1.0 with IBM
stating something like
my impression
please use AT-TLS... we are done putting work into task specific TLS
implementations
/my impression
AT-TLS provides
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ed Jaffe
On 5/8/2014 10:49 AM, Matthew Stitt wrote:
You do not need a remote HMC. You just need to have the local HMC
available through the Internet
with remote access allowed. I do this all the time. Could
W dniu 2014-05-09 13:35, John McKown pisze:
This has been an interesting thread. I rather like the escrow idea.
I consider it as useless.
- Unclear reason to do it. Why source code in escrow would help the
customer?
- No warranty the code is complete, well documented and up to date.
Without
Dears ,
bad luck , seems not working as following JCL RC=8 , with msg of ADR374E
(001)-OPNCL(14), UNABLE TO OPEN DDNAME DASD, 10 .
//DUMP2HFS JOB (LTSAI,81038),CLASS=A,MSGCLASS=A,MSGLEVEL=(1,1),
// NOTIFY=SYSUID
/*
//DUMP EXEC PGM=ADRDSSU,REGION=0M
//DASD DD
Oh well, you will have to try something else...
snip
bad luck , seems not working as following JCL RC=8 , with msg of ADR374E
(001)-OPNCL(14), UNABLE TO OPEN DDNAME DASD, 10 .
//DUMP2HFS JOB (LTSAI,81038),CLASS=A,MSGCLASS=A,MSGLEVEL=(1,1),
// NOTIFY=SYSUID
/*
//DUMP EXEC
W dniu 2014-05-09 16:00, Tsai Laurence pisze:
Dears ,
bad luck , seems not working as following JCL RC=8 , with msg of ADR374E
(001)-OPNCL(14), UNABLE TO OPEN DDNAME DASD, 10 .
//DUMP2HFS JOB (LTSAI,81038),CLASS=A,MSGCLASS=A,MSGLEVEL=(1,1),
// NOTIFY=SYSUID
/*
//DUMP EXEC
Radoslaw Skorupka is right to emphasize that an escrow agreement is
not a panacea.
Such an agreement may be all but useless, but an able lawyer who
understands the software-development process can write one that is
useful in extremis.
Moreover, the availability of such agreements sometimes makes
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 7:54 AM, Bob Shannon bshan...@rocketsoftware.comwrote:
For smaller ISVs, I wonder if it would be helpful to integrate something
like git or subversion into their processing, with a secure (are there
any?) off site backup master.
Why do you think this is an original
John,
I like that idea. I don't know how the ‘business side’ would work. i.e.; the
money …unfortunately we all have to earn a living unless your rich, then I say
god bless you..We use SVN and I can test you for IBM Mainframe source its kinda
ok ..I don't think its SVN.
From:
I first encountered the notion of source-in-escrow in the 80's when
negotiating purchase of a well known product. History sadly saw demise of
the customer while the vendor still thrives. But I'm acutely curious:
after all this discussion over the pros and cons of seeking an escrow
clause, does
All:
I am not trying to pour cold water on any ideas or dis-credit anyone, that's
not me . I have a weird kinda legacy issue I am trying to solve.
Basically, COBOL STC calling Assembler subroutines. The STC(s), are single
threaded or single TCB and the real issue is we need them to run
Thanks, rob -
I am working on this now. One issue, I don't have z/OSMF on my systems.
Guess I'll be stuck with trying to create policies by hand. I seem to
recall there was a stand-alone version of the policy tool, but it appears
that can not be used with a z/OS 2.1 system.
Starting wonder how
Hello everyone, do any of you know of a utility that can compare 2 loadlibs
with supposedly the same members and report if there is a discrepancy in the
modules, I.E. size of module, date of linking, that type of thing?
Thanks
==
This email, and any files transmitted
SUPERC (ISRUPC) will do fine. For the compare. It will easily identify any
member mis-matches as well as missing members.
It won't be very good at telling you what the differences are.
HTH,
Al Staller | Z Systems Programmer | KBM Group | (Tel) 972 664-3565 |
allan.stal...@kbmg.com
Scott,
Is this message table in fact a static one than you change only
infrequently, e.g., when you also make changes in the routines that
use it?
If so, you should consider making it into a load module or,
preferably, a program object.
It can then be brought into storage using a LOAD or LOADX.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Ed Finnell
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 5:39 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: FW: FW: z10 IPL from Utility Tape
The OP was the z/OS Lpar wouldn't activate after
On Fri, 9 May 2014 15:25:18 +, Staller, Allan wrote:
SUPERC (ISRUPC) will do fine. For the compare. It will easily identify any
member mis-matches as well as missing members.
It won't be very good at telling you what the differences are.
Faced with such a problem once, we compared as
I haven't used SSL client verification by certificate, so you are past my
knowledge. As an experiment, can you get a working connection using
userid/password authentication.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
On Behalf Of Mark
A number of the commercial compare utilities can perform that function. I know
for a fact that Compuware's Comparex and Macro4's InSync can do this, and CA
FileMaster may have that capability as well, not sure about that one.
You can also get CBT file 321, COBANALZ, which will analyze a load
In 7981579224536763.wa.alanaltmarkus.ibm@listserv.ua.edu, on
05/08/2014
at 12:54 PM, Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.com said:
If the IPLable utility tape was created on a labeled tape, then it
isn't going to work and you have no choice but to IPL the
installation media.
Why? You used
In 00c101cf6b20$a7f2b3a0$f7d81ae0$@mcn.org, on 05/08/2014
at 05:50 PM, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org said:
Many moons ago I wrote, as a contractor, a product for an
application software company and they ended up losing the source
code for the product (which they were selling as part of a
John,
Yes sir it is static …I like the idea of a load module ..easier for sure..and I
can protect it..
A big thanks..
Hey do you know if a Heap can be passed in a C thread ?
Regards,
Scott
From: John Gilmore
Sent: Friday, May 9, 2014 11:26 AM
To: IBM Mainframe Discussion
On 5/9/2014 5:17 AM, Martin Packer wrote:
I thought CICS switched to using standard Program Fetch 25 years ago.
Old V3? Does knowing that change anything?
CICS uses directed LOADs for modules found in the DFHRPL concatenation.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Parkview
Oh yes. We've been doing it that way for years.
Trying to add the ability to secure the log in process.
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Gibney, Dave gib...@wsu.edu wrote:
I haven't used SSL client verification by certificate, so you are past my
knowledge. As an experiment, can you get a
Thanks to all for their suggestions. I have tried every permutation I can
think of, but to no avail. Yes, I understand some permutations are ignored but
I tried them anywayeven IBM software has been reported to have a bug or two
from time to time.. ;-)) I'm using z/OS 1.12 and ISPF 6.1.
On 2014-05-09, at 08:04, R.S. wrote:
Try the following:
STEP1: ADRDSSU to MVS dataset
STEP2: copy the dataset to hfs file.
This is almost certain to work, but it falls well short of the
OP's desire for directly. PoC JCL appended.
I used IEBCOPY rather than ADRDSSU because of my
Thanks for all of the replies everyone! Yes, there are several reasons that
prohibit accessing the HMC via the internet the biggest being that the z10 is
on a closed network. Having said that, since we do have a link, I might be able
to remote into the HMC from my location. Anyway, I just got
Well, if your are doing the SSL server stuff, then the password is not flowing
in the clear. On the other hand, my interpretation of the vsftp parm I sent a
few days ago is to NOT do certificate based client authentication.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Sorry, confused, again.
We currently do userid/password authentication - without SSL.
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Gibney, Dave gib...@wsu.edu wrote:
Well, if your are doing the SSL server stuff, then the password is not
flowing in the clear. On the other hand, my interpretation of the
Hi all,
I'm doing an assembler program that needs to know actual CPU consumption of
every Lpar in the Sysplex.
To address it my program is calling a Rexx that invokes SDSF environment to get
this information.
It works but the design is poor. Are there any other solution, maybe RMF APIs ?
On 5/9/2014 11:13 AM, ITURIEL DO NASCIMENTO NETO wrote:
I'm doing an assembler program that needs to know actual CPU consumption of
every Lpar in the Sysplex.
To address it my program is calling a Rexx that invokes SDSF environment to get
this information.
It works but the design is poor. Are
BCPII?
snip
On 5/9/2014 11:13 AM, ITURIEL DO NASCIMENTO NETO wrote:
I'm doing an assembler program that needs to know actual CPU consumption of
every Lpar in the Sysplex.
To address it my program is calling a Rexx that invokes SDSF environment to
get this information.
It works but the
Well, for what it is worth, I use the following in my userid.FTP.DATA and
successfully talk to vsftp with SSL Encryption:
TLSRFCLEVEL CCCNONOTIFY ;
EPSV4 TRUE
TLSMECHANISM FTP
SECURE_MECHANISM TLS
SECURE_FTP REQUIRED
SECURE_CTRLCONN CLEAR
We had a somewhat similar problem a few years ago. In our csse it turned
out to be a firewall issue. An internal name server or resolver was
trying to resolve a host name using an outside name server. The internal
system was sending out EDNS queries, but our Cisco firewall/VPN
appliance had an
You could guess, but I'd recommend you don't. I don't believe it to be
true, no matter what they claim.
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 10:09 PM, Mitch mitc...@aol.com wrote:
Mark:
I absolutely agree. And for the likes of the larger ISVs, I would guess
all of their product source code is in escrow
WOAH, WOAH, WOAH, what the hell? I copied and pasted your FTP.DATA file
into my FTP.DATA file and now it works.
Now I just have to determine what was different on yours than every
iteration that I have been through so far.
THANKS, I think. ;)
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Gibney, Dave
On looking at it, I think the
TLSRFCLEVEL CCCNONOTIFY ;
And/or the
EPSV4 TRUE
Are newish (in that they were what I had to put in to make it work the last
time it broke :) It tends to break when maintenance is put on Linux or vsftp :)
-Original Message-
From: IBM
Just to add to Mitch's comments.
I was one of the developers of the said software that was given to our
competitor.
We held the software in Escrow with Iron Mountain, The software was mainly
z/OS assembler source/macros with the SMPE build code, SMPE APAR/PTF code.
We would also package the
One thing I just noticed as I was documenting this.
I had changed my ftp server from using the GoDaddy assigned certificate to
a self-signed certificate. I had send a copy of the .pem file to z/OS and
added it to my keyring as Site certificate. - That is what worked.
So I went back to the
Posted to multiple lists.
The 2014 REXX Symposium, in Memphis TN, has just concluded. While most
were from the U.S.A., some attendees connected remotely from the U.K. and
Australia and others attended in person from as far away as Holland and
Austria. It was a great learning experience for REXX
On Fri, 9 May 2014 18:13:05 +, ITURIEL DO NASCIMENTO NETO
4254.itur...@bradesco.com.br wrote:
I'm doing an assembler program that needs to know actual CPU consumption of
every Lpar in the Sysplex.
To address it my program is calling a Rexx that invokes SDSF environment to
get this
Thank you John
Sent from my iPhone
On May 9, 2014, at 10:15 AM, John Gilmore jwgli...@gmail.com wrote:
Radoslaw Skorupka is right to emphasize that an escrow agreement is
not a panacea.
Such an agreement may be all but useless, but an able lawyer who
understands the software-development
Yes ... but there is a problem of the third kind where having the
source code would have been useful, as follows:
1. An ISV supplies 'calculating' software (running in a separate
address space) to which CICS online 4GL transactions pass
parameters using cross-memory services. The
52 matches
Mail list logo
