I am a bit rusty, but I think you allocate it first (get a SYSn DD
name) before CONCAT with other dataset/s.
On 4 Aug 2014 02:45, MichealButz michealb...@comcast.net wrote:
I keep on getting 0360 In the S99ERROR filed
Invalid text key
I have the following question can I dynamically
John Gilmore observed:
I bought yesterday a roundtrip rail ticket, and in order to do so I
was required to produce picture ID.
Yes, and that's an important facet of price discrimination, a practice most
IBM-MAIN readers' employers employ. It's security, but it's mostly
revenue security for the
Michael,
As far as I know, the answer to your question is, YES.
Your dynamic allocation request to concatenate datasets is the same whether you
dynamically allocated them or if they came pre-allocated at runtime.
You always use DDNames in the concatenation list, never dataset names.
Your
Hi, does this mean If I want to concatenate MYTEST.LOADLIB I first
dynamically allocate it use use the ddname returned to me by SVC 99
Then use text key DCCDNAM ? can I concatenate ISPLLIB and/or STEPLIB or
TASKLIB returned from TSOLIB ?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion
If the dataset is not allocated in your JCL, then yes, you must allocate it and
you will need to use the DALRTDDN to have the SVC 99 processor return to your
program the DDName it generated and then you will need to supply that DDName in
the list of DDNames you want to concatenate.
I believe you can concatenate any two allocations that make sense to
concatenate. All you need is the two DD names.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of MichealButz
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2014 8:45 AM
To:
THANK YOU
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Hardee, Chuck
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2014 8:54 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Dynamic Alocation question
If the dataset is not allocated in your JCL, then yes,
Correct, but there are implications.
It has to do with whether the allocations were dynamically created or not, and
whether you will be de-concatenating them or not. That's why I keep telling the
OP to locate a copy of the MVS Authorized Assembler Services Guide and read
Chapter 26. Requesting
Thanks so much
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Charles Mills
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2014 8:59 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Dynamic Alocation question
I believe you can concatenate any two allocations
I have customized some DFsort defaults. Issued the following:
S ICEOPT,ICEPRM=05
and it works as expected.
Q: what about IPL? Will my options survive IPL or I have to re-issue the
command after IPL?
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
---
Treść tej wiadomości może zawierać informacje
Correct I am writing an authorized TSO command processor and would like to
concatenated it to STEPLIB/TASKLIB TSOLIB
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 4, 2014, at 9:06 AM, Hardee, Chuck chuck.har...@thermofisher.com
wrote:
Correct, but there are implications.
It has to do with whether the
Did you put this start ICEOPT in your COMMNDxx member in sys1.parmlib for
IPL?
If not, I would think they would not survive across an IPL.
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of R.S.
Sent: Monday, August 04,
Hi,
I don't think steplib will work but I will try the TASKLIB from TSOLIB I
think coming from there it is still APF authorized
25.2.2.1 JCL DD statement facilities not supported by dynamic allocation
Table 25-2
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/iea2a8c0/25.2.2.
http://www14.software.ibm.com/support/customercare/sas/f/redAlerts/20140801.html
- TITLE: z/OS 2.1 DFSORT records out of sequence
- URL:
On Mon, 4 Aug 2014 06:06:59 -0700, Hardee, Chuck wrote:
I'm sort of think that the OP is writing something for use under TSO/ISPF
because of his query about STEPLIB, TASKLIB and ISPLLIB, which then implies
that he may need to preserve a concatenation group, like STEPLIB, before he
adds to it
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2014 09:36:49 -0500
From: 000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Dynamic Alocation question
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
...
Can one do *anything* to STEPLIB? I thought it was peculiarly
sacred; immutable. But I've never tried a
On Mon, 4 Aug 2014 11:29:37 -0400, J R wrote:
===
Well, the tasklib, whether it be JOBLIB, STEPLIB or some other,
is opened at step initiation, so even if you can/could dynamically
concatenate something to it, program fetch will continue to use
the DEB constructed by that original OPEN.
I would imagine so, since the same field is used, TCBJLB.
Of course, if authorized one can do what one likes,
which is presumably how dynamic steplib products
juggle program fetch allocations.
===
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2014 11:00:27 -0500
From:
Wait open at step initiation
I am talking about TSOLIB which I
Believe I can load am APF authorized program from
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 4, 2014, at 11:29 AM, J R jayare...@hotmail.com wrote:
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2014 09:36:49 -0500
From: 000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu
Hi Lizette,
All the volumes are displayed in pool.
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 8:25 AM, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com
wrote:
How does the storage group look in ISMF? Are any volumes DISNEW, DISABLE,
QUINEW?
How did you determine the are not in the pool or not being used in the
pool?
So are all volumes ENABLED?
Just because you DISPLAY doesn't tell me their state.
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: Rajesh Janakiraman raj.janaki...@gmail.com
Sent: Aug 4, 2014 10:28 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Initialization problem in Storage Group
Hi Lizette,
All
On Mon, 4 Aug 2014 12:55:10 -0400, Micheal Butz michealb...@comcast.net wrote:
Wait open at step initiation
I am talking about TSOLIB which I
Believe I can load am APF authorized program from
Yes, you can load APF-authorized programs from TSOLIB, _if_ all the data sets
in the TSOLIB
I think you need to supply a bit more information about what exactly you
are doing, and/or expecting to happen. I notice you have a VERIFY(FC1800)
on your INIT. So, the FC1800 volser was originally NONSMS? You then
re-initialise as SMS, with the same volser? You then add it into a Storage
Just curious: I'm accustomed to seeing the message:
GIM41802I INLINE JCLIN PROCESSING WAS SUCCESSFUL FOR SYSMOD sysmod
whenever my SYSMOD contains JCLIN. But for one FMID in particular, I notice
it appears in the APPLY [CHECK] steps, but not in the ACCEPT [CHECK] steps.
What makes the
ACCJCLIN is set in the DLIB zone in question?
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
Just curious: I'm accustomed to seeing the message:
GIM41802I INLINE JCLIN PROCESSING WAS SUCCESSFUL FOR SYSMOD sysmod
whenever my SYSMOD contains JCLIN. But for one FMID in particular, I notice
it appears in the APPLY
The word sophist has a number of conflicting, epoch-dependent
definitions. It can, for example, identify a pre-Socratic
philosopher in an entirely neutral way. Or again it can, as it does
in Plato's eponymous dialogue, describe a rogue philosopher.
Sophistry and its analogues in the other
On Mon, 4 Aug 2014 18:31:37 -0400, John Eells wrote:
ACCJCLIN is set in the DLIB zone in question?
Yup. Thanks. FWIW (rationalization), I was dealing with UCLIN composed by
two different programmers.
Why would anyone ever want not to ACCEPT JCLIN? Well, the RM suggests:
o Downward
The following sequence does what I need. I could not have conjured it up
without this group's assistance. Thank you.
IOF DSN1MSTR RUNNING CLIST
1 BR
SD DSNAME('IBMUSER.DSN1IOF1.TEMP')
SNAP 9 PAGES
END
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Robert A. Rosenberg
At 09:30 -0400 on 08/03/2014, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote about
Re: LE APAR PM99349:
In 2830304844335286.wa.ibmmaintpg.com...@listserv.ua.edu, on
08/03/2014
at 06:52 AM, Shane Ginnane
Hello.
We have a huge table with around 125 million records and we are unloading this
file in a job based on the current date, there are some instances where this
job gets delayed and runs past 12.00 AM and the records fetched is not correct.
Could some one please let me know in the unload
Call the programmer.
Ed
On Aug 4, 2014, at 11:31 PM, Ron Thomas wrote:
Hello.
We have a huge table with around 125 million records and we are
unloading this file in a job based on the current date, there are
some instances where this job gets delayed and runs past 12.00 AM
and the
What do you use for an UNLOAD?
Is this a VSAM, DB2, SAP, etc.. type file?
Do have a program that generates the UNLOAD process?
You have not provided any information that allows the list to understand this
issue. Not all shops use the same process for unload. If you cannot explain
your
We are using DB-2 unload utility as the table size is 125 million, the Unload
data is fed to the downstream programs for further processing.
Thanks
Ron T
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
33 matches
Mail list logo
