John Blythe Reid wrote:
>I'm writing the module in PL/I but I can soon slip an
>assembler sub-routine in !
Is it such a good idea to write an assembler subroutine to encrypt a piece
of data using 3DES specifically? It's generally bad practice to hardcode an
encryption algorithm choice. If (or
In 3.4, seen that the total Tracks allocated for Output Dataset are 170505 and
%Used is 99.
Based on the above values,
1 Track = 56664 bytes
(170505*99%) Tracks = 9564880366.8 bytes = ~8.91 GB
In 3.4 seen that the total Tracks allocated for Input Dataset are 32243 and
%Used
On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 17:22:51 -, bharath wrote:
>In 3.4, seen that the total Tracks allocated for Output Dataset are 170505 and
>%Used is 99.
With BLKSIZE=132, you get 72 blocks per track, or 8504 bytes per track.
8504 * 170505 = 1,444,974,520.
With BLKSIZE=3200, you get 15 blocks per
If the small blksize is an issue try this usermod:
++ USERMOD (LM00062) REWORK(2014001)
/* TRANSMIT OUTDA() FORCES THE BLKSIZE OF THE OUTPUT DATA SET
TO 3120 (X'0C30').
THIS MOD SETS IT TO
REXX output for Input Dataset is
0
Block 1 is 3120 bytes.
Block 2 is 3120 bytes.
Block 3 is 3120 bytes.
Block 4 is 3120 bytes.
Block 5 is 3120 bytes.
Block 6 is 3120 bytes.
Block 7 is 3120 bytes.
Block 8 is 3120 bytes.
Block 9 is 3120
On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 16:38:37 -, bharath wrote:
>REXX output for Input Dataset is
>
>Block 1 is 3120 bytes.
>
>REXX output for Output Dataset is
>
>Block 1 is 124 bytes.
With a 3120 BLKSIZE, you can get 15 records per track,
or 46800 bytes per track.
With a 124 BLKSIZE, you can get 75
The FTP command used to send file from Optim(setup in SQL server VM) to z/OS is,
open -s:%0
IBM.XX.XX.NET
ascii
quote site blksize=3120 recfm=fb lrecl=80 conddisp=delete
binary
quote site blocks PRImary=483640 SECondary=10
put "E:\Data\X\X003_DPEXT.000"
So, size of the Output dataset is getting increased due to the overhead in xmit
format of the Input
dataset??
If yes, anyway to avoid that???
On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 23:14:06 +0530 Tom Marchant wrote
>On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 17:22:51 -, bharath wrote:
>In 3.4, seen that the total
Actually, it looks like that came in with 2.1:
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1OA42406
However, the record type description suggests it's only for tape datasets.
Andy Styles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
This is the subroutine to encrypt and it works like a dream:
*-*
*encrypt string using DES
*-*
encrypt csect ,
The Redbook "Parallel Sysplex Application Considerations" is a good place to
start.
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg246523.html
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
Kees,
This environment also was in a non-SMS environment and the STK silo (SLS8500).
I will check further into the logic. The LIBNAME is correct. I will keep on
digging.
Thanks.
On Wed, 11/11/15, Vernooij, CP (ITOPT1) - KLM
I'd like to point out that 2-key TDES is still the standard for banking
cryptography and that almost nothing in payment card or related security uses
anything else - in fact, some standards (like DUKPT) do not support 3-key TDES
at all.
The confusion is because the best attacks on 2-key TDES
Thanks for that information - we've not yet got to 2.1 (although a couple of
systems have it), so it might be some time before I can use that - but it's
good to know it's coming.
Thanks to everyone else for the suggestions. The only way that I can see we can
do it at present is to create a
There's something from IBM who can discover transaction affinities.
The product is "CICS Interdepency Analyzer" even though it seems you can
use the load scanner "CAULMS" in order to scan load libraries and find out
verbs that can impact CICSPlex.
Of course it's a CICS tool so could catch only
You can put some WRITEs in the ACS routine tot trace where it goes and where it
doesn't.
Kees.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of John Dawes
Sent: 11 November, 2015 14:27
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: JCL
Thanks Dinesh. I followed your suggestion and have my question submitted. I
hope I get a resolution.
Alan Field
Systems Engineer Principal
Blue Cross Blue Shield of MN
651.662.3546
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of
Hi Alan,
I used below options while opening IBM service request for HMC issue
sometime back. Please try with these options and let us know.
Here are the details.
Problem Details
.
I don't think my previous note was having enough information.
In the initial screen for opening service request I selected "Problem with
Appliance" , in the next page searched with keyword as "System z" and got the
option to select for HMC issue.
Product
Usage and Q Support for System z
On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 12:58:15 -0600, Bharath Nunepalli Why is the size of Input Dataset is close to size of the Optim file, but with
>less rows???
Your "input" data set is in XMIT format, or you wouldn't be able to process it
with
RECEIVE. I don't know what you mean by "Less rows". If you mean
On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 13:46:43 -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:01:40 -0800, Lizette Koehler wrote:
>
>>Try the following
>>1). Use BIN and NOT ASCII in your ftp control card
>>
Oops. I meant "binary". (Wrong thread.)
-- gil
1. The size of the file on Optim server (before FTP to z/OS) is ~1.7 GB,
and records count is ~12 million
2. The size of the Input Dataset (into which the Optim file is FTPed) is ~1.7
GB (32243 Tracks*56664 bytes),
and the records count can be ~483,645 (for 3120 blksize, 15
Try the following
1). Use BIN and NOT ASCII in your ftp control card
2). Pre allocate you receiving dataset with lrecl 80 and blksize 3120
Try your ftp job again
A tso xmitted file contains information to receive it. So it uses what it uses.
Lizette
-Original Message-
>From: bharath
On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:01:40 -0800, Lizette Koehler wrote:
>Try the following
>1). Use BIN and NOT ASCII in your ftp control card
>
The OP specified VB in the post that started this thread.
>2). Pre allocate you receiving dataset with lrecl 80 and blksize 3120
>
>Try your ftp job again
>
I see
John, you can very easily extend your code to parameterize the algorithm
choice and key length and to document that parameterization well. I
strongly encourage you to do so. You've written perishable code, probably
already perished code if I'm reading it correctly.
(And that's ignoring the
On 11 November 2015 at 13:58, Bharath Nunepalli wrote:
> 1. The size of the file on Optim server (before FTP to z/OS) is ~1.7 GB,
> and records count is ~12 million
I have no idea what "Optim server" is, but from the context it appears
to generate or at least store a
I was able to use the integrated console maybe once before it all quit again.
I have the JAVA console log but I don't know how to interpret it to decide
what's wrong, or to fix it if I could.
How do I open a IBM service request to the HMC folks to send them the java
console and hopefully have
27 matches
Mail list logo