Is there IPCS support, e.g. VERBX or toolkit or the like for chasing
and displaying the kind of information that can be obtained on a live
system using either CSVDYNEX REQUEST=LIST or the console D PROG,EXIT
command?
I'm thinking I've seen it in there somewhere, but right now I'm not
finding
Sorry, I didn't properly articulate what I meant to convey.
I was trying to point out that the term "allocation" is used in more than one
context, ie. in the case of datasets, (1) assigning datasets to DD names, and,
specifically in the case of datasets on DASD, (2) their creation and placement
Peter:
I haven’t worked with DMS lately. Having said that I vaguely remember DMS doing
its own thing with DASD (i.e. creating a F4 DSCB and deb etc etc etc).
Ed
> On Oct 20, 2016, at 3:12 PM, Peter Hunkeler wrote:
>
>
>
>
>> That might be a good point: different flows through
David,
Now it's clear for me.
It's matter of language - in Polish there is no such gismo like article
(a, an, the).
Yes, you are right, *assuming proper setiing* it is possiblem to control
other domains from a TKE.
AFAIK, it's not possible to do it from z/OS. However there's a trick:
changing
Peter,
All new allocations are not necessarily seen by ACS routines. It depends on
your authority.
>From DFSMSdss Storage Administration Reference:
http://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.adru000/dgt3u2150.htm
BYPASSACS specifies that Automatic Class
Kees,
Yes, running the same job, but removing the BYPASSACS parm results in the
SMS-managed data set being created, but there is still no IGD101I message.
That's interesting.
Greg
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
>Dynalloc's S99MSGL0 is the equivalent of JCL's MSGLEVEL=0, ie. the allocation
>of datasets to ddnames.
Not equivalent, I would say. MSGLEVEL is for the whole job, S99MSGL0 is for a
single allocation.
--
Peter Hunkeler
>That might be a good point: different flows through the program that set
>different S99MSGLO flags.
and it has nothing to do with "bypassing SMS".
All new allocations are seen by SMS's ACS routines. If they decide to assign a
Storage Class to the data set, then the data set is "SMS
Dynalloc's S99MSGL0 is the equivalent of JCL's MSGLEVEL=0, ie. the allocation
of datasets to ddnames.
Messages describing the details of actually creating new datasets on DASD are
related to DADSM.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 20, 2016, at 15:18, Peter Hunkeler wrote:
>
>
Peter,
That might be a good point: different flows through the program that set
different S99MSGLO flags.
Kees.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Peter Hunkeler
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2016 9:17 PM
To:
Greg,
If you request to bypass SMS, no IGD101I can be expected. Can you create an
example where things are left to SMS when possible?
Kees.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Greg Shirey
Sent: Thursday, October 20,
>"So, it is DMS or FDR which decide whether to place those IGD* messages or
>not."
>
--
Peter Hunkeler
>To be precise:
>It is DMS or FDR which decide to allocate the dataset via SMS or not, thereby
>causing the IGD message to appear or not.
PMFJI, I do not know but I seriously wonder if it
RS,
I should have elaborated more. You need *a* system up and running on the box,
but not *the* system. For example we use TKE, and connect to a TECH system on
the box that is running. That tech system IMAGE profile is setup to be able
to administer all crypto domains. So when we bring
On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 13:17:07 -0400, Rick Troth wrote:
>On 10/14/16 18:50, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>> CMS Pipelines (perhaps other CMS utilities) use 0x25 instead of 0x15.
>> There's some very Bad History behind all this.
>
>So you're saying even Hartmann makes mistakes? Shock! :-)
>
Rather, I'd
I have a question about the first option.
As I recall when you first mentioned this back in 2013 (?), I setup this New
Function subscription.
I believe it was an email every day/week about closed New Functions.
This stopped working around last year september for me and disappointed as I
was, I
I had to sign paperwork to get my copy, back when... I guess it has been
released to general public since then.
Tony Thigpen
Tony Harminc wrote on 10/20/2016 12:48 PM:
On 20 October 2016 at 08:47, Tony Thigpen wrote:
If you are a vendor, you should have access to the LE
On 10/14/16 18:50, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
CMS Pipelines (perhaps other CMS utilities) use 0x25 instead of 0x15.
There's some very Bad History behind all this.
So you're saying even Hartmann makes mistakes? Shock! :-)
0x25 is EBCDIC "linefeed".
Sadly, that's printable if misinterpreted as
On 20 October 2016 at 08:47, Tony Thigpen wrote:
> If you are a vendor, you should have access to the LE vendor manual. Some of
> the pointer locations can be deduced from it. If you are not a vendor, you
> don't have access to the manual.
The LE Vendor Interfaces manual,
Here is a job which produced a new SMS-managed data set without generating an
IGD101I message:
//DPC088X JOB 111,NOTIFY=DPC088,CLASS=A,MSGLEVEL=(1,1)
//STEP01 EXEC PGM=ADRDSSU,REGION=0M
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//DD2 DD
If you have a TKE, then you can load it in advance. If not then your only
option is to use the ISPF based ICSF panels.
_
Dave Jousma
Manager Mainframe Engineering, Assistant Vice President
david.jou...@53.com
1830 East Paris,
Thanks. I'm on board except for this statement. "You can do [the Master Key] in
advance or during DR IPL." What is "in advance"? These systems are IPLed only
in DR (test) mode. Is there any alternative to actual IPL?
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team
Marna,
Turned out to be a firewall issue which has now been resolved.
Thank you for the very useful link.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Marna WALLE
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 12:51 PM
To:
"So, it is DMS or FDR which decide whether to place those IGD* messages or not."
To be precise:
It is DMS or FDR which decide to allocate the dataset via SMS or not, thereby
causing the IGD message to appear or not.
Kees.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Vernooij, Kees (ITOPT1) - KLM wrote:
>We found the answer.
Excellent!
>IGD101I is used by Control-M for the 'disp=catalog' rule of dataset triggering.
>IGD104I is used by Control-M for the 'disp=keep' rule of dataset triggering.
>In the case of the DMS step IGD104I is always produced, so we
Hi all,
We found the answer.
Apparently IGD101I is produced when SMS creates and catalogues a dataset and
Control-M relies on this message to detect dataset creation/cataloguing.
But there appear to be other methods to create and catalog SMS managed datasets.
As we already discovered, a
If you are a vendor, you should have access to the LE vendor manual.
Some of the pointer locations can be deduced from it. If you are not a
vendor, you don't have access to the manual.
Tony Thigpen
Pete Dillon wrote on 10/20/2016 08:36 AM:
Many thanks for that. The documentation for the
Many thanks for that. The documentation for the CEETLOC service* shows
two macros being invoked, CEEXCELV and CEEXCAA - the CAA and the vector
table I alluded to in my original post. But they seem to have gone AWOL
somehow - certainly they are not in the concatenation
SYS1.MACLIB
SYS1.MODGEN
Hello
I am converting from the IBM HTTP Server to the newer Apache Server provided
with z/OS 2.1
We have a customer who makes a lot of use of the CICS Web Interface, DFHWBAPI.
Is this still supported under the Apache Server, and if so are there
instructions somewhere on how to set it up?
I
W dniu 2016-10-19 o 23:22, Jesse 1 Robinson pisze:
Thanks to Stuart for pointing me to his doc. ;-)
Radoslaw, you said in one post that the whole thing can be done ahead of time,
but your latest post mentions only LPAR Image profile setup on HMC. Mike Ward
(and Stuart's doc) refer to ICSF,
29 matches
Mail list logo