Sorry it took me so long to respond. I did not see that this was updated in the
daily updates. I do not think R1 is used in these instructions. Why do you ask?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
se
There are (2) Rexx execs located on file 220 of the CBTtape.org web
site (V492) (http://www.cbttape.org/
They are LISTSVCJ and LISTSVCT. These execs will list the SVC Update
Journal table and the all of the active SVCs respectively.
HTH
Tony
-Original Me
Tom Marchant wrote:
>Tom's rule number 1 about creating PTFs: Don't change the PTF!
>Tom's rule number 2: If you think it is ok to change the PTF this time, refer
>to rule 1.
>Tom's rule number 3: If you do change the PTF, despite the first two rules,
>then RESTORE and REJECT it, then RECEIVE an
On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 12:35:46 -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>o APPLY REDO doesn't always undo the side effects of the prior APPLY.
> I suspect this is particularly true if the SYSMOD contains ++*UPD or
> ++ZAP or if the newer version contains fewer CSECTs than the
> previous and this is what I mi
COBOL has had XML parsing for a while, and has generation. Of late it uses the
z/OS System Service. For JSON parsing (parsing only so far) it also uses the
existing z/OS System Service.
So Enterprise COBOL has native parsing/generation for XML and native parsing
for JSON. It has nothing native
On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 10:46:37 -0500, Kurt Quackenbush wrote:
>> I don't believe PTFS using IEBUPDTE can be RESTORED.
>
>Why do you believe this? Of course PTFs containing ++MACUPD or ++SRCUPD
>can be RESTOREd.
>
I stand corrected. I misled myself by my (mis-)understanding of our own
development
Maybe now we have some sort of confusion on acronyms;
I was talking of XLS = file extension of ExCel files,
not XSL = XML schema language ...
Kind regards
Bernd
Am 17.11.2016 um 19:13 schrieb Allan Staller:
I believe z/OS (as of 2.1? 1.13) has built in XML services.
Try here
http://www-03.
SO is the S0C4 in an application program? If so, then products like Dumpmstr
and Abendaid capture it and format it so the application programmer does not
have to know how to read dumps.
Is there a reason why you are having a concern?
If this includes LE functions, then a CEEDUMP should have be
I believe z/OS (as of 2.1? 1.13) has built in XML services.
Try here
http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/features/xml/
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Bernd Oppolzer
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2016 12:08 PM
To:
BTW:
at the company where I am working at the moment,
we need to build "true" XLS files at the mainframe (no CSVs)
which are then transferred to a Windows network drive, so that
the clients (that is, Accounting people etc.) can fetch them from there.
The problem with mainframe generated CSVs is
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Paul Gilmartin <
000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 09:01:53 -0600, Bill Woodger wrote:
>
> >The only real problem with delimiters is when the delimiter can occur in
> the data. Often a good reason for avoiding commas. Tab
On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 09:01:53 -0600, Bill Woodger wrote:
>The only real problem with delimiters is when the delimiter can occur in the
>data. Often a good reason for avoiding commas. Tab can be good, as long as the
>data cannot contain tab (unlikely for Mainframe data).
>
>Delimiters in the data
IEBUPDTE depends on 'standard' line numbers in columns 73 - 80 to identify
lines for modification, deletion, or insert location. IBM guarantees that
source and macro line numbers remain fixed for the life of an FMID. There are
few if any other elements that have reliable line numbers even for fi
I didn't know about the existence of the RFC.
I think that some things are missing,
for example: in Germany (and German editions of Office packages),
the separation char in CSV is a semicolon, because the comma is used
in numeric values instead of the decimal point
(see COBOL's "DECIMAL POINT IS
I'm still working with this customer to get their FTPS working. It has
taken forever for the networking staff to work on the firewall. I think
they have it fixed.
But when I connect and try to download with the sample JCL., now it says it
cannot find the file. Also when I went to look at the sa
No the actual statement used system MVSA. I incorrectly meant to imply any
valid LPAR name.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Vernooij, Kees (ITOPT1) - KLM
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2016 10:15 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSE
I don't believe PTFS using IEBUPDTE can be RESTORED.
Why do you believe this? Of course PTFs containing ++MACUPD or ++SRCUPD
can be RESTOREd.
Kurt Quackenbush -- IBM, SMP/E Development
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
Answer on my S0c4 question. Given that LE was involved, Dumpmaster's LE exit
module DMBLEATE captured the dump. If Dumpmaster was not there, a dump would
have been produced, most likely to a SYSDUMPn dataset or possibly a SYSOUT
dataset as I understand it.
Thanks everyone for all of your input
CSV has been around a long time (I certainly used them in '91, and perhaps
earlier). It for sure would be good to have native COBOL support, but 25+ years
without it may indicate it is not much of a priority. I'd support an RFE, but
not lose any sleep about it happening any time soon.
I don't t
I have the same problem if I use your statement (JOBPARM i.s.o JOPARM)
/*JOBPARM SYSAFF=MVS*
HASP112 value of SYSAFF= parameter is not valid
Did you by any chance mean to use /*JOBPARM SYSAFF=*?
Kees.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTS
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Bill Woodger
wrote:
> The only real problem with delimiters is when the delimiter can occur in
> the data. Often a good reason for avoiding commas. Tab can be good, as long
> as the data cannot contain tab (unlikely for Mainframe data).
>
> Delimiters in the data
I posted a question about SYSAFF not working and received several resonses
(thanks). Thanks especially to Bill Planer for his suggestions.
Several people asked for specifics about the failure. This ocurrs when using
/*JOPARM SYSAFF=MVS*
The message is out of module HASCSRIP and reads "-- INV
The only real problem with delimiters is when the delimiter can occur in the
data. Often a good reason for avoiding commas. Tab can be good, as long as the
data cannot contain tab (unlikely for Mainframe data).
Delimiters in the data can be "protected" by enclosing the data of that field
in dou
On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 17:29:28 +0530, Peter wrote:
>I have installed a product when I try to start it fails with module not
>being APFed.
>
>There are two datasets in STEPLIB. The Dataset1 which has the failing
>modules is already APFed. Still the STC fails and it was fixed once the
>second dataset
Bill,
Don’t you mix up dumps and abends? Was a system dump produces?
I don't know dumpmaster, but does it handle abends or dumps?
Kees.
-
Yes, a dump was produced, it was picked up by Macro 4's dumpmaster. LE may be
involved here. see message below:
CEE3204S The system detected
On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 14:23:42 +0530, venkat kulkarni
wrote:
>Hello,
>
>Do we have any way to implement LDAP on z/os for authentication purpose.
Your question is unclear.
If you mean "could we run an LDAP server on z/OS so that applications running
elsewhere can authenticate using that z/OS LDA
This is more just a question that emerged from the inky depths of my mind.
The COBOL compiler we have, 3.4.1, has an XML PARSE verb. I looked in the
current, 6.1, COBOL language reference material and notice that there is
now a JSON PARSE verb. Excellent work, COBOL people! But there are a lot of
p
I don't understand: was a dump produced and where did you see it?
Kees.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of william janulin
Sent: 17 November, 2016 14:45
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: S0c4 abend in batch job questi
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 7:45 AM, william janulin <
008d52e04f2e-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> To list;
> Can anyone explain why a dump on a S0c4 abend in a batch job would be
> produced when there is no SYSUDUMP or SYSABEND dd statement in the failing
> job's jcl?
> Thank you in ad
To list;
Can anyone explain why a dump on a S0c4 abend in a batch job would be
produced when there is no SYSUDUMP or SYSABEND dd statement in the failing
job's jcl?
Thank you in advance, Bill J.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / sig
Sam,
It appears as though quotes on the target catalog name will also work.
TSO RCNVTCAT 'catalog.name' TARGET(my.new.catalog.name)
TSO RCNVTCAT 'catalog.name' TARGET('my.new.catalog.name')
Both produced an identical PDS members/contents
Thanks again for adding this.
Bob
-Original Messag
On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 17:29:28 +0530, Peter wrote:
>There are two datasets in STEPLIB. The Dataset1 which has the failing
>modules is already APFed. Still the STC fails and it was fixed once the
>second dataset was APFed.
>
>I am trying to understand why would STC expect the second dataset in
>stepl
You have two issues to consider.
a) what ldap strings the client is "programmed" to be able to send.
check your ITDS log file (or trace) on z/os to see what is being sent
and make adjustments if needed
b) what ldap strings the Tivoli Directory Server will accept.
Only a few filters are allowed
On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 20:16:32 -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>I don't believe PTFS using IEBUPDTE can be RESTORED.
Why not?
--
Tom Marchant
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...
>From the IBM website. I used the search phrase on www.ibm.com
JCL APF STEPLIB
z/OS z/OS 2.2.0 z/OS MVS z/OS MVS Programming: Authorized
Assembler Services Guide Protecting the system Using APF to restrict
access to system functions APF-authorized libraries
If a JC
The rule is that all libraries in the DD statement must be APF authorized for
the DD to be authorized. The authorization indication is stored in the DEB for
the DD statement.
The reason is to prevent spurious subsequent loads.
On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 17:29:28 +0530 Peter wrote:
:>Hi Group
:>
:>I ha
All libraries in STEPLIB must be APF authorized in order for the whole
concatenation to be APF authorized.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Peter
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2016 1:59 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Su
Hello Peter,
For z/OS it doesn't matter in which STEPLIB library the load module is
loaded from. In other words the entire STEPLIB DD is treated as "one
thing", either APF'd (in case ALL libraries are in APF list) or not (in
case one or more libraries are not in APF list).
The situation you have d
Hi Group
I have installed a product when I try to start it fails with module not
being APFed.
There are two datasets in STEPLIB. The Dataset1 which has the failing
modules is already APFed. Still the STC fails and it was fixed once the
second dataset was APFed.
I am trying to understand why woul
MAJOR props to whomever managed to get the delivery method default to be
changed to *Internet*.
It has been a week or two and I still have to resist the urge to move my cursor
to the drop-down box to change it! :)
Many thanks!
Bob
We need LDAP for two user id authentication purpose. Do we have any way to
implement this change
On Nov 17, 2016 12:32, "Elardus Engelbrecht"
wrote:
> venkat kulkarni wrote:
>
> >Thanks for reply. We want to implement LDAP for initial login
> authentication purpose.
>
> That is somewhat another
venkat kulkarni wrote:
>Thanks for reply. We want to implement LDAP for initial login authentication
>purpose.
That is somewhat another story. Here we use the LDAP to reset the ids after
verification. Then thereafter the user logon to the application with the id.
Please tell us for what applic
Hello Elardus,
Thanks for reply. We want to implement LDAP for initial login
authentication purpose.
On Nov 17, 2016 12:21, "Elardus Engelbrecht"
wrote:
> venkat kulkarni wrote:
>
> >Do we have any way to implement LDAP on z/os for authentication purpose.
>
> Yes there is a way to implemenet LDA
venkat kulkarni wrote:
>Do we have any way to implement LDAP on z/os for authentication purpose.
Yes there is a way to implemenet LDAP ('IBM Tivoli Directory Server
Administration') [1]
Could you be kind to tell us for what purpose do you want to have LDAP for
authentication? Or what are you
Hello,
Do we have any way to implement LDAP on z/os for authentication purpose.
Thanks for help.
Regards
Venkat
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the
45 matches
Mail list logo
